That could also be taken as you never earn money no? The effect is simply breaking even in most, if not all scenarios. Never losing money doesn't mean it's a guaranteed profit after all. Might just be OP using different words, but it can be used as a play on words tbh, to make users misunderstand the terms of what OP is providing. Honestly, I'd follow bttzed's recommendation about an escrow if you really are willing to do the 100% refund. Otherwise, I highly doubt people would be willing to risk their money.

Hmm, interesting, site UI looks pretty old style, nonetheless rather clean though and uniform all throughout (from what I can see). Still, if you were trying to advertise the site as a business then I doubt it could get much traction, but if it was solely for people who want to play and stuff like that (kind of like god field if you know about it) then yea, it could work as one, especially with the timeout feature which looks rather interesting imo. Could be, or that it didn't necessarily took a year but rather just spread out the work in that year.

It's kind of unclear what overtake what you mean OP. If it was something along the lines of the general idea of Bitcoin standing above USD, then no, it won't. I've always believed in Bitcoin being an additional option/asset like the USD that people are able to use as a currency. Neither would dominate over the other nor would they actually kill each other. People would be able to pretty much use whatever currency they deem to be much comfortable. Even if Bitcoin adoption were to soar, and it was used as a currency instead of an investment (compared to now that is), it still won't make fiat disappear.

Always has been. If you were talking about short term investments, then I'd choose some other small-time coins that you think would be hyped up since the returns would be far greater than shorting Bitcoin (or any other top coins most of the time), but if we were talking about long term investments, I'd always prefer to choose Bitcoin. Still, it would always be better to spread your portfolio as much as possible, and not on just one coin or asset. Bitcoin may be the best investment (imo), but it isn't a guaranteed investment that you'd profit in, just like any other investment there is.

It's not odd, I mean if you were to look at what the past looked like, there have been many instances of traps in the market that happened. I mean it wouldn't be that odd for another dump to happen, and by then people would really be fearful and probably sell. I'd honestly just take it as a good sign that the market is slowly recovering, I just hope no big pumps happen since that again might cause the market to crash down to even lower levels than what we have right now.

I'm mostly on Bitcoin back then, I did try to do some other coins back in the past but I limited myself to trading coins that are in the top 50 coins, just to make sure that I won't lose much if I do actually lose. The longest altcoin I've traded were XRP, ETH and Doge, though I've stopped trading them now (and Bitcoin) and just started DCA strats onto the coins that I'd think would perform well in the long run, which includes Bitcoin on the list naturally.

It's only to a certain extent, but it is possible. Plus, Bitcoin never did aim to completely replace the government, it was solely an alternative imo. I was never of the opinion that Bitcoin would, or should even try to replace the government, centralization was made in the first place because people wanted it after all. No matter how many Bitcoin enthusiasts want to replace Bitcoin, it'd never happen since in the first place, Bitcoin is a medium, it could never lead itself to replace the government(fiat).

Simply saying gambling is reliant on luck and trading is reliant on educated guesses would be more than enough imo. It's like a well-prepared hiker vs a person who just decided to hike all of a sudden. Traders are people who risk their money while having the confidence that their risk would bring about some form of success, while gamblers are people who solely risk money. I'd probably not agree with the emotion part though, traders still sometimes get greedy and let their emotions get to them after all.

Ig it was a mistake on their side, or the system rather? It should be rather obvious that sending advertisements to unsubscribed users shouldn't be done. Especially since they're running a gambling casino, which could make a lot of issues depending on how the status is reported. I don't think it's something new, but it is something I don't often see since most casinos tend to actually take this issue with quite the careful stance afaik.

That, I don't think would actually happen. I guess there'd be more strict regulations for casinos to comply, but complete ban? Nope.

It's not that it's impossible, it's that they don't, and for good reasons. Completely stopping inflation would hurt the economy, and a balance must be maintained for it to actually benefit the economy. Now, what damages the current state right now is that inflation is rising at high levels. Levels that are not beneficial for the economy of the country. It's to the point that people are losing their purchasing power when they aren't even doing anything with it.

Rather than stopping inflation, a more apt term would probably be controlling it?

It's 1xbit though.... I mean, idk even why people still actually use their site, especially if you were to DYOR a bit, you'd find a lot of negative reviews and reactions with how they're running their site. It's to the point that cases like yours, are well, nothing really new at this point, since it has happened in the past and could possibly continue to do so if people don't do their own research about the casinos they're actually trying to enter. Unfortunate for you OP, you don't even need to wait till feb 22, I hardly doubt you'd get an answer honestly. But if you do, well glad for you.

No, it won't. That's a pretty dumb mindset to have ngl, Yes, it might remove him from his addiction from gambling, but it doesn't really solve the root problem since drugs would simply replace the void that was opened up due to forgetting about gambling. I honestly would recommend getting another hobby instead, maybe Gundam building, jogging, biking, idk. it may seem more expensive than gambling, but I'd honestly say it's a lot better since it wouldn't turn into an addiction, unlik gambling.

Make it an option instead of a guarantee. There might be employees who would not prefer using crypto over fiat, after all, that is their paycheck, they probably use more than 50% for stuff that they need to pay. As for asking for a method, well, it shouldn't be that hard, if they wanted crypto in the first place they should already have their own wallets. If they don't I reckon you can prepare some paper wallets, no need to complicate it as much. It is going to be a temporary storage after all, until they can create their own which shouldn't take long imo.

I don't think so no. I don't know how it works specifically, but it's pretty much like allowing transactions between two points/networks when you connect metamask to opensea. It's like opening up a channel, BUT you still have the last word on whether a transaction would go through to the said channel (via metamask). You'd probably only get hacked really if the site you visited was a phishing site or you got human-engineered or something. So yea, just make sure you're visiting the correct site and are approving transactions you know you should approve.

True, but we shouldn't blame them really. It was hard to believe on something that popped out suddenly as a form of currency, with what all the jargon that Wikipedia people probably didn't even know or understand about. Plus, well, they weren't alone. A lot of groups and companies probably believed it to be the same. We should be glad instead that they changed, after all, if they still refused to acknowledge Bitcoin even after all this time, then something is indeed wrong.

I'm dropping some of the ones I've personally used. I've tried Roobet, Wolfbet, Rollbit and FortuneJack. They're pretty solid casinos with pretty good customer support (as far as I experienced anyway), and have a pretty solid list of games. There's also others I've heard of such as stake (don't mind the accusations, they're just that, accusations) and Duelbits. There's probably a bunch more out there but those are the most notable ones I've heard and experienced. Do note that most of what I've said requires basic KYC though, so if you don't want those then probably better to find another.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384564.0 Here's an entire thread that has some tidbits about why. tldr is basically it is a business requirement. Crypto may not require KYC, but gambling does.

I expect it isn't random, they should have their own stuff that they're trying to judge whether they should ask for KYC or not, judging probably from the amount they bet (or are trying to withdraw) plus any suspicious activities, like maybe sudden deposits of big amounts when the user used to do small amounts and stuff like that. Any small things could turn suspicious if the user rarely do it, so they can probably do it like that. Honestly, it's understandable really. I may hate KYC but I know why they need to do it, but that doesn't still let me like it.

It isn't that surprising really, some articles maybe just a form of misunderstandings (or really, not understanding the topic itself) but it still does give traction to the site by the people who read the said topic. As long as the article seems pretty good, and all details intended were as is and the other misinformation or misunderstanding is solely the opinion of the journalist, it'd probably be allowed. Quality checks don't deign on stuff like that after all.

Plus, negative articles sounds more enticing to read for most people anw, at least it is for me when I know completely nothing of the topic.

It'd probably be that I'd recommend books in the first place to people who actually like to read, and honestly, they're rather rare. Most people nowadays have quite short attention spans, especially on a completely new topic, and a rather complicated one (from the outside) like Bitcoin (or crypto in general). I had a few experiences with my friend first but that was because they were rather interested in it, they were asking stuff about what it is, how it works, and mainly how to earn money from it (which is their main motivation I think).

Simple, legality issues. It's mostly due to their provider, or the country they are licensed in, which requires them to do KYC on certain situations (or maybe, on all occasions really) so that they can comply with the laws and whatnot that the country has. Honestly, I think most casinos wouldn't even bother KYC requirements if it weren't for those, it is additional work and I highly doubt they'd lose money if they didn't implement it, they might even earn more.

Plus, if they didn't, they'd be well something of a "banned, illegal site", which would turn away most players. With the label of a "legal casino", they can invite new players.