Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 11:31:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 »
2681  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BUg Unlimited - newb here on: March 22, 2017, 02:31:58 AM
Updated chart from the buggy BU;

2682  Economy / Speculation / Re: SegWit losing Bitcoin Unlimited winning -> Moon soon on: March 22, 2017, 02:30:55 AM
BU is bugged again it's dropping like a rock  Cheesy

2683  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. on: March 22, 2017, 02:00:07 AM
Roger is messing up with the whales, this idiot is digging his own grave.
2684  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 22, 2017, 01:53:39 AM
BU acts buggy...AGAIN lol

2685  Economy / Speculation / Re: Almost 1,100 on: March 21, 2017, 05:26:40 PM
Nice to see $1100 again Smiley

Money from the Dash bubble will move into Bitcoin, i'm not suprised to see $1200 before the weekend (dump).
2686  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] SegWit (BTC) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (BTU): Which Would You Choose? on: March 21, 2017, 03:01:19 AM
Segwitt is the way to go, Core's roadmap is increasing Bitcoins performances which is the best possible solution.

We will have a 2-3MB increase with Segwit with another 30-40% on the horizon with integrated Schnorr signatures.

Flexcap is a clever algorithm instead of fixed blocklimit. Core's 0.14 adds more nice features.

2687  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: North Korea Launch Missiles = SWIFT shutdown 3 banks (Welcome to Bitcoin ?) on: March 20, 2017, 06:13:52 PM
Sounds great, but the problem is those poor people from North-Korea will never getting there hands on Bitcoin untill that fat pig Kim getting removed from power.
2688  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 20, 2017, 06:03:37 PM
Even if he manages to block segwit, those 2nd layer solutions are still going to happen.  LN and other 2nd layer solutions do not actually require segwit.

They're beeing build around Segwit, they work so much better combined.

Finally, you make one out of three points that makes some sense.  

1mb blocksize limits is the current state of bitcoin.. that is correct, and bitcoin was not meant to be easily changed.  Therefore, 1mb blocksize limits seem to be the status quo going forward until there is some kind of convincing evidence and/or argument(s) that allows for it to be adapted in some kind of way, whether that is through seg wit or blocksize increases or any other "scaling" way forward.

I expect a 2-3MB increase with Segwit with another 30-40% on the horizon with integrated Schnorr signatures.

Flexcap is a clever algorithm instead of fixed blocklimit constant.

Core's roadmap is the way to go imo.
2689  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 20, 2017, 03:30:09 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60gem4/jihan_wus_latest_weibo_post_looks_like_an_offer/

Jihan willing to talk is a GREAT sign! I really believe once he folds the scaling debate will start coming to a conclusion. The fact that he admits that he finds 2nd layer solutions a threat is telling, but he will realize that he cannot force the rest of the community to hold back on achievements to benefit the miners. A prosperous $2K+ bitcoin is much better for him than half a bitcoin with less users

Thx for sharing Dafar!

Jihan is finished, this is his only solution to compromise. Bugs, BU=ALT-coin, no propper support and his raging from past weekend made him realize that his whole PR battle is ruined  Smiley


Jihad Jihan Wu is going down this week!

Well, that escalated fast... Cheesy
2690  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If you want bigger blocks but hate BU... on: March 20, 2017, 02:47:19 PM
Bigger blocks are nice but it wont make Bitcoin mainstream, 1Gig+ blocks are needed unfortunately i dont wanna wait atleast 10 years before the sheeps can start using Bitcoin. In the end we need side-chains, each chain with there own specialization. The network will cripple when we have a few more waves of new users, it doesn't matter if we have 2mb ore 32mb blocks. I'm very certain Segwit is the best possible update Bitcoin can have.
2691  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 20, 2017, 03:30:09 AM
Jihad Jihan Wu is going down this week!
2692  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Unlimited 40.3 % segwit=>deadwit :D :D on: March 20, 2017, 03:27:10 AM
Jihad Jihan wu is an central Chinese miner who lost his ALT-coin PR battle.

2693  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 19, 2017, 07:06:46 PM
Jihad Jihan Wu lost his PR ALT-coin battle.

2694  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Andreas Antonopoulos: "Segwit is enough, gets us 2MB+, is ready, and is safer" on: March 17, 2017, 01:08:26 PM
Yeah - if this your point - I also don't care too much, but rather the conflict of interests they have.

And where did I point to BU here ? -

I mostly try to show that you cannot sell : (limit on-chain scaling   + unlimited off-chain scaling) in one go.

Miners will reject this - crystal clear ?

Segwitt is onchain scaling that opens the doors for sidechains projects, having the opportunity to scale beyond youre wildest dreams.

You dont understand how it works, miners will follow the users not vice-versa. BU can fork if they have enough hash power but when there are none ore enough transactions to verify they will go down after 10 min.
2695  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Andreas Antonopoulos: "Segwit is enough, gets us 2MB+, is ready, and is safer" on: March 17, 2017, 12:39:59 PM
A. A. is working for ETH book (and about  'good' safe hard forks ?).

Blockstream is working for AXA, Banks - Blockchains....

G.Max is working for Blocksteem

C Banks is working as GMax fan boy.

Bitcoins needs to fall behind ETH market cap than these fan boys will understand this clusterfuck done by GMax brain washing.


Its dangerous working as a brain washed fan boy.


Sigh


Nobody cares how Blockstream has been funded, even the most bankster haters they also just dont care. Amazing that this argument is only comming from BU shills from the past 2-4 weeks  Undecided

If Segwit is the best solution to the ongoing problems in bitcoin then I will support segwit. But my concern is to have an immediate solution to the bitcoins problem. If things go worse we will see bitcoin replaced by other alternative coins. As of this moment there was some issues that the reason why the ETF was disapproved due to the on going block problems in bitcoin. Aside from that many are transferring to dash and ethereum and has contributed to the decrease in bitcoin price this few days.

Segwit is the best possible update Bitcoin can have and it will not be replaced with another alt-coin. ETF has been rejected due investors protection which i can understand.

Yesterday was crazy, you could see the capital fleeing away from bitcoin to Ethereum, as bitcoin's market cap was decreasing Ethereum's was increasing, amazing stuff.

People are starting to vote with their money on the development team's choices, Segregated Witness and Lightning Networks have been controversial since the beginning and eventually it will reflect on the price.

Bitcoin's market cap and trade volume dominance have never been lower, and they will go lower.

Why dont you spread youre ETH FUD pump talk in the Alt-section?

2696  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 17, 2017, 03:24:45 AM
$1130 is cheapest price possible, nice buying opportunity Smiley
2697  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Andreas Antonopoulos: "Segwit is enough, gets us 2MB+, is ready, and is safer" on: March 17, 2017, 02:58:26 AM

A dynamic limit at least allows for the possibility of a balanced fee market.
A Fixed limit is sure to produce an unbalanced fee market.

I am  onboard with segwit, but I REALLY like a dynamic limit.
I REALLY want to do both, who wouldn't?

I wish for less ways to wish for and more ways to work toward it

Dynamic Block size increase is the only things that sounds interesting about BU, in the end we will need sidechains to make it mainstream. Innovation will flourish, each sidechain with there own specialization. LN, Mimblewimble, Rootstock and TumbleBit are just the beginning. Sidechains will offer many useful features to institutions that want to build applications based on blockchain technology. Basically, sidechains should allow businesses to better implement peer-to-peer applications while cutting out the middleman. Certain startups will be able to utilize sidechains to disrupt many Wall Street processes.

Segwit will deliver all oure needs and shoud be rolled out asap. LN is already on the testnet so adoption can move fast.

Jihan from Bitmain (with to many mining power) + Roger Ver are the only idiots who's blocking this cool stuff.
2698  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 16, 2017, 02:44:12 PM
^ 3 posts from Chopstick, i got this one on ignored. This person must be talking bullshit, i'm sure this troll is frustrated that BU is in deep shit  Cheesy
2699  Economy / Economics / Re: china will no longer able to control bitcoin market??? on: March 16, 2017, 02:38:42 PM
I rather see China losing control from the minig industry, a few miners got way to much power and they also wanna control the protocol.
2700  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: March 16, 2017, 02:26:02 PM


https://medium.com/@Coinosphere/why-bitcoin-unlimited-should-be-correctly-classified-as-an-attempted-robbery-of-bitcoin-not-a-9355d075763c#.5waefc4fg
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!