Updated chart from the buggy BU; ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fi4bypyv.png&t=663&c=CPOa05URhdLz2w)
|
|
|
BU is bugged again it's dropping like a rock ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fi4bypyv.png&t=663&c=CPOa05URhdLz2w)
|
|
|
Roger is messing up with the whales, this idiot is digging his own grave.
|
|
|
BU acts buggy...AGAIN lol ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FLhYUhJo.png&t=663&c=f88d1bTC9v4axg)
|
|
|
Nice to see $1100 again Money from the Dash bubble will move into Bitcoin, i'm not suprised to see $1200 before the weekend (dump).
|
|
|
Segwitt is the way to go, Core's roadmap is increasing Bitcoins performances which is the best possible solution.
We will have a 2-3MB increase with Segwit with another 30-40% on the horizon with integrated Schnorr signatures.
Flexcap is a clever algorithm instead of fixed blocklimit. Core's 0.14 adds more nice features.
|
|
|
Sounds great, but the problem is those poor people from North-Korea will never getting there hands on Bitcoin untill that fat pig Kim getting removed from power.
|
|
|
Even if he manages to block segwit, those 2nd layer solutions are still going to happen. LN and other 2nd layer solutions do not actually require segwit.
They're beeing build around Segwit, they work so much better combined. Finally, you make one out of three points that makes some sense.
1mb blocksize limits is the current state of bitcoin.. that is correct, and bitcoin was not meant to be easily changed. Therefore, 1mb blocksize limits seem to be the status quo going forward until there is some kind of convincing evidence and/or argument(s) that allows for it to be adapted in some kind of way, whether that is through seg wit or blocksize increases or any other "scaling" way forward.
I expect a 2-3MB increase with Segwit with another 30-40% on the horizon with integrated Schnorr signatures. Flexcap is a clever algorithm instead of fixed blocklimit constant. Core's roadmap is the way to go imo.
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60gem4/jihan_wus_latest_weibo_post_looks_like_an_offer/Jihan willing to talk is a GREAT sign! I really believe once he folds the scaling debate will start coming to a conclusion. The fact that he admits that he finds 2nd layer solutions a threat is telling, but he will realize that he cannot force the rest of the community to hold back on achievements to benefit the miners. A prosperous $2K+ bitcoin is much better for him than half a bitcoin with less users Thx for sharing Dafar! Jihan is finished, this is his only solution to compromise. Bugs, BU=ALT-coin, no propper support and his raging from past weekend made him realize that his whole PR battle is ruined ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Jihad Jihan Wu is going down this week!
Well, that escalated fast... ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Bigger blocks are nice but it wont make Bitcoin mainstream, 1Gig+ blocks are needed unfortunately i dont wanna wait atleast 10 years before the sheeps can start using Bitcoin. In the end we need side-chains, each chain with there own specialization. The network will cripple when we have a few more waves of new users, it doesn't matter if we have 2mb ore 32mb blocks. I'm very certain Segwit is the best possible update Bitcoin can have.
|
|
|
Jihad Jihan Wu is going down this week!
|
|
|
Jihad Jihan wu is an central Chinese miner who lost his ALT-coin PR battle. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQJBAhAC.png&t=663&c=C1buASI5TAzTbg)
|
|
|
Jihad Jihan Wu lost his PR ALT-coin battle. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQJBAhAC.png&t=663&c=C1buASI5TAzTbg)
|
|
|
Yeah - if this your point - I also don't care too much, but rather the conflict of interests they have.
And where did I point to BU here ? -
I mostly try to show that you cannot sell : (limit on-chain scaling + unlimited off-chain scaling) in one go.
Miners will reject this - crystal clear ?
Segwitt is onchain scaling that opens the doors for sidechains projects, having the opportunity to scale beyond youre wildest dreams. You dont understand how it works, miners will follow the users not vice-versa. BU can fork if they have enough hash power but when there are none ore enough transactions to verify they will go down after 10 min.
|
|
|
A. A. is working for ETH book (and about 'good' safe hard forks ?).
Blockstream is working for AXA, Banks - Blockchains....
G.Max is working for Blocksteem
C Banks is working as GMax fan boy.
Bitcoins needs to fall behind ETH market cap than these fan boys will understand this clusterfuck done by GMax brain washing.
Its dangerous working as a brain washed fan boy.
Sigh
Nobody cares how Blockstream has been funded, even the most bankster haters they also just dont care. Amazing that this argument is only comming from BU shills from the past 2-4 weeks ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) If Segwit is the best solution to the ongoing problems in bitcoin then I will support segwit. But my concern is to have an immediate solution to the bitcoins problem. If things go worse we will see bitcoin replaced by other alternative coins. As of this moment there was some issues that the reason why the ETF was disapproved due to the on going block problems in bitcoin. Aside from that many are transferring to dash and ethereum and has contributed to the decrease in bitcoin price this few days.
Segwit is the best possible update Bitcoin can have and it will not be replaced with another alt-coin. ETF has been rejected due investors protection which i can understand. Yesterday was crazy, you could see the capital fleeing away from bitcoin to Ethereum, as bitcoin's market cap was decreasing Ethereum's was increasing, amazing stuff.
People are starting to vote with their money on the development team's choices, Segregated Witness and Lightning Networks have been controversial since the beginning and eventually it will reflect on the price.
Bitcoin's market cap and trade volume dominance have never been lower, and they will go lower.
Why dont you spread youre ETH FUD pump talk in the Alt-section?
|
|
|
$1130 is cheapest price possible, nice buying opportunity ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
A dynamic limit at least allows for the possibility of a balanced fee market. A Fixed limit is sure to produce an unbalanced fee market.
I am onboard with segwit, but I REALLY like a dynamic limit. I REALLY want to do both, who wouldn't?
I wish for less ways to wish for and more ways to work toward it
Dynamic Block size increase is the only things that sounds interesting about BU, in the end we will need sidechains to make it mainstream. Innovation will flourish, each sidechain with there own specialization. LN, Mimblewimble, Rootstock and TumbleBit are just the beginning. Sidechains will offer many useful features to institutions that want to build applications based on blockchain technology. Basically, sidechains should allow businesses to better implement peer-to-peer applications while cutting out the middleman. Certain startups will be able to utilize sidechains to disrupt many Wall Street processes. Segwit will deliver all oure needs and shoud be rolled out asap. LN is already on the testnet so adoption can move fast. Jihan from Bitmain (with to many mining power) + Roger Ver are the only idiots who's blocking this cool stuff.
|
|
|
^ 3 posts from Chopstick, i got this one on ignored. This person must be talking bullshit, i'm sure this troll is frustrated that BU is in deep shit ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
I rather see China losing control from the minig industry, a few miners got way to much power and they also wanna control the protocol.
|
|
|
|