Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 10:24:05 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 317 »
2681  Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname! on: June 18, 2018, 02:57:33 PM
I'm here to let you know that actmyname as it appears has a habit of giving a free pass to allegedly scammers according to some other DT2 members. for example actmyname countered Vod's feedback to give a free pass to somebody Vod considers to be a scammer. so as I can see the post of cjmoles, it is clear as day that actmyname has been on this business for a long time and I'd like to blame this on Blazed. note that Blazed is only active and posts on such topics when his own ass is on the line, well I have a bad news for Blazed: this is on you and I will PM him to let him know about this.

If I PM him and he keeps actmyname on DT2 after seeing all the shit actmyname has done so far, I will tag Blazed this time.
Please note that actmyname is also tagging other campaign managers for something from the past, red tagging the competition by a DT2 member while we're supposed to trust DT2 members with their judgements. tell me if you can't see the conflict of interest here?

Are we going to allow a DT2 campaign manager tagging other campaign managers and say nothing here? get your house in order @Blazed, exclude this trust abuser and be free of whatever he/she is doing in your name, yes whatever actmyname does is on you, because you have given him/her the trust.

EDIT: just sent the PM, let us wait and hope this one is reasonable enough to see the evidence and act on them.
2682  Economy / Reputation / Re: Merit buyer, abusing merit system on: June 18, 2018, 02:30:18 PM
These messages show that this is the same person.

Is that all? I can see that one member "Ristic" got a tag from Vod, is there any other account related to goalbonanza that we need to get them a tag as well? I hope that justice is now served for you guys, sorry that you got scammed and never got paid by these people.

Note that Ristic just edited his post today to avoid getting caught, I bet that they have changed their telegram link in the edited post. it means they are guilty and their tag is legit.
2683  Economy / Services / Re: Campaign manager digaran at your service! on: June 18, 2018, 01:20:36 PM
With all those Red Tags, are you really gonna fit and can be trusted to be a Campaign Manager? Although it has nothing to do with a Campaign Manager, "Trust" still has a big role when it comes to Managing Campaigns.
I'm not saying that you don't have the right to be a Manager but it will be hard for you to find a client in this kind of situation of yours.
You're indeed promising but it's not enough to attract clients.

By the way, keep it up. You might hook up customers soon but don't get scammed Smiley

Sorry to tell you that trust system of this forum is moderated by only a few selected people and what they decide would show on our profiles as default, if you take a look at my red tags you'll know what I'm talking about. I'd also invite you to check the negative tags I have left for some people lately.

What you need to do is to decide for yourself, green or red colors are not any indication of being trustworthy/untrustworthy, people with green trust here are usually the real scammers, note on hundreds of positive feedbacks left on people with no reference, those people want us to trust their words, then take a look at negative feedbacks left on people by the same forum members, you'll see that they are also expecting us to trust their judgements.

Let me explain to you what trust system is in this forum:

Trust system means that when a normal member leaves either +/- on other people, their feedback is worthless by default(untrusted). there are only a few people with trusted feedback, they(80% of them) are corrupt and deceitful, they want to decide whether somebody is trustworthy or not. the moment you start trusting these people and their words, is the moment you'd become their minion, do not let them to dictate who is trustworthy and who is a scammer, do your research and read untrusted feedback first.

After reading my tags it's up to you whether I'm a scammer or not.
2684  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q2) on: June 18, 2018, 12:44:46 PM

I see obvious misuse of trust system and merit exchange between alt accounts. they should get tagged unless they are owned by some trusted members?
2685  Other / Meta / Re: This is why merit sources shouldn't be known publicly. on: June 18, 2018, 11:32:09 AM
I think the system would work best with a diverse and active merit source pool. Right now the total merit spending is less than half of ideal, so there is room for improvement.

What a shame really, I got tagged by you when I was in the process of reapplying, really such a waste of talent and time, I should be out there meriting people instead I got tagged and forced to focus on DT members and their tagging habits, it's not too late you know? please un-tag me and let me to bump my application, maybe theymos changes his mind and accept me just to stop me from poking my nose in his little cute trust system.

Though if I become a source again, I'd have no other choice other than starting to poke my nose into other sources businesses like before, guys whatever you do I am not going to stop. you'll have to deal with me one way or another. Wink
2686  Other / Meta / Re: SCAM TOPICS AND PAID SHILLS. on: June 18, 2018, 10:58:44 AM
I would like to add something: since from every 1000 ICOs 999 are scams, I'd suggest you and every investor to ignore any advertisements on signatures related to bounty section. they should only care about Bitcoin signature ads because scammers don't like to spend anything. so when you see a ad which has a token, garbage coin payment, stay away from them.
We also need some active DT2 members in local boards to tag these scums.
2687  Other / Meta / Re: This is why merit sources shouldn't be known publicly. on: June 18, 2018, 10:47:38 AM
accountable for what?
may i remind you many of us (them?) never asked to be a source, and have no interest in participating in the drama/shitposters lives nor circle jerks here


Are you an alt account of a merit source? what suchmoon said was that if people know who are all the merit sources then people would ask them why are you inactive and not distributing your source merits? that is the accountability she was talking about.

Funny when I was a merit source and I even made it public, I never got any PMs from people asking for merits, I only made it public for people to point my mistakes to me so that I could improve my meriting methods, instead people attacked my character without having anything to say about my merit transactions.

Fun fact: Jet Cash made it public himself that he is a source and now is bitching about it. lol.
2688  Economy / Reputation / Re: Merit buyer, abusing merit system on: June 18, 2018, 10:28:05 AM
However, asking someone to admit a fault worthy of punishment wouldn't be easy. Would a criminal admit his crimes? No. I think not.

Then how'd you suggest we could link that telegram account to a Bitcointalk account? we can't just tag somebody based on similarities between telegram username and forum username.

Update: these numbers would mean I gave away approximately $10k worth of Merit Cheesy

That means theymos created millions of dollars out of nothing, sound familiar? Cheesy

2689  Economy / Services / Re: Campaign manager digaran at your service! on: June 18, 2018, 08:30:40 AM
I wouldn't care about their tags.

Are you talking about the participants or the DT members that have tagged you?
Just to clarify, you are saying that you wouldn't accept members with negative trust, but it is going to be based upon the trust list that makes you no longer have negative trust?

It might be helpful for your future clients to post your trust-list, publicly, so they can make an informed decision about whether or not they agree with your stance, and to avoid future confusion about participants they see as negative trust that you do not.

I would check every single participant's trust page before enrolling them. of course if I see that somebody was tagged for scamming/cheating, I wont enrol them. however if I see that somebody got tagged for something other than scam/cheating, I will let them in.

Consider this a bump. I'm here guys don't forget about me.
2690  Other / Meta / Re: Banned From the Forum. Why is it so? (Hero Member) on: June 18, 2018, 07:33:27 AM
Thank you rickbig41 our dear global moderator, let this be a warning for every single forum member regardless of rank and position, you'll get banned forever if you are found plagiarizing. don't do it guys.
2691  Economy / Reputation / Re: Merit buyer, abusing merit system on: June 18, 2018, 07:03:34 AM
I also saw in the telegram that one of the ICO projects asks to list the merit to their manager.




https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1139852

It can be seen how the manager fixed this post in the telegram.


Could you provide a link where the account owner admits to own that telegram account? because somebody else could easily set them up and buy them a negative trust.
2692  Other / Meta / Re: This is why merit sources shouldn't be known publicly. on: June 18, 2018, 02:40:26 AM
I receive PMs like this once or twice a week.  I just leave them negative trust and move on.

What do we have here? yes ladies and gentlemen, we have Vod tagging forum members just because they asked him to have a look at their post histories and merit them if he finds their posts meritable. Vod is a lost cause and should be stopped.
He doesn't realize that we have a limited numbers of merit sources and people don't have a place or a section to check and ask for some merits if they haven't received any merits even if they are posting good content and Vod who is also a merit source simply uses DT2 negative trust just to get rid of the people, what an irresponsible individual and such an abuser.
2693  Economy / Reputation / Re: Gleb Gamow account was sold Proof on: June 18, 2018, 01:37:22 AM
No problem, that's what I figured. Gleb Gamow account is still in my control until I say otherwise Smiley

Good luck with getting your money back and good luck with having Gleb's negative trusts to be removed.  Wink
BTW, I got tagged by don hilary's alt after I followed his example, I got triggered by his thread about Gleb changing email and pass so I posted a thread about marlboroza changing email, and don hilary tagged me. thanks don, remember you inspired me to go down that path. Sad
2694  Other / Meta / Re: Trust system abuse on: June 18, 2018, 01:13:22 AM
Let me make a new point here.
According to Vod, Anduck is a scammer, correct? OK.
Actmyname counters Vod's feedback to give a free pass to a scammer, actmyname literally said: here scammer Anduck, receive this positive trust and go on scamming people with ease, don't worry about Vod's negative feedback because I just countered it so that you could keep scamming people.

Now what is the reaction of Vod? yes he goes and leaves a positive trust for actmyname, Vod literally said: here actmyname have this positive trust because you just gave a free pass to somebody I consider as scammer. then DarkStar_ comes here and is not even countering any body's feedback, he just hands out a positive feedback for somebody Vod considers as scammer. what is Vod's reaction here? yes he goes and counters DarkStar_'s feedback just to say that Anduck is still a scammer.

They are misusing the trust system left and right and they will continue to do so unless they are kicked out from DT2.
2695  Economy / Reputation / Re: Gleb Gamow account sold or hacked? on: June 17, 2018, 08:27:20 AM
Simply put, suchmoon was open and transparent with the reasoning behind why Gleb's account was "bought". Red tags are given to account sellers/buyers that have the purpose of trying to game the forums and/or bounties/campaigns here. Because that issue was addressed and full disclosure provided by suchmoon that the account won't be used for any of the purposes mentioned above, I personally find it to be trustworthy.

IF, however, the Gleb account is used for any other purpose than what suchmoon has stated, then yes, it should be tagged to death by DT members.

Red tags for account sales are at the discretion of the DT member tagging it, so in a nutshell, I agree with your statement that they only tag whomever they want. Because at the end of the day, it's their prerogative and not a requirement, especially because full disclosure was provided in why the account changed hands.

Suchmoon tried to "help" a good member but suchmoon didn't trust this good and trustworthy member enough to lend him the money, instead she tried to accept the account as a collateral, in a nutshell I'd call that account trading in disguise. the story of a goddess ends where suchmoon doubted Gleb and took the account, it means that suchmoon was afraid that Gleb could sell the account once more after getting the money, therefore Gleb was no longer a good member in the eyes of forum goddess "suchmoon".

Gleb has an alt account "AGLD" which I got The Pharmacist successfully tag him by getting involved as a red tagged garbage poster(sting operation) but I have been extremely transparent and he caught me with my bluff, however a good forum member "bigmelons25" came forward with the evidence and now we have this case here because of that.

Please note that Gleb was trying to sell multiple accounts and as I have heard he is in this business for years, there is something fishy about this case, Gleb resets password and changes email multiple times and the account tries to apply for a signature campaign, even when he was in control of the account he lied multiple times and claimed that he has never tried to sell the account, he was in control of the account and was enrolled in a sig campaign while lying to our faces. suchmoon considered this person trustworthy and tried to help him out. suchmoon has tried to help a liar and account seller.

I am willing to forgive him at the age of 58, I am willing to provide a way out for him if only he tells us who bought the account and how many times he sold the account? he could keep busting scams with a newbie account if he really wants to help. did he only busted scams because of some green numbers and words on his profile?

Gleb is so naive that he thinks either theymos or some other high profile authority around these woods is going to exonerate him from all the crimes he has committed. @Gleb, what you have done is worse than killing a man according to some forum members.
I suspect that Quickseller is the person who included Gleb on DT2, if you pay a closer attention you'll see that some DT1 members are always present on topics where their DT2 members are involved but they always use alt accounts. note that DT1 members are not getting involved directly for some time now unless they are afraid to lose their positions. my guess is that theymos is trying to give them the benefit of the doubt far too many times and I would like to ask him please stop letting people to do more damage than this, when you see some evidence of shady activity from DT1 members, be a man and put a stop to their misuse of trust system. they all are linked to you, whatever they do people would blame it on you.
2696  Other / Meta / Re: Inaccessible Bounty Threads on: June 17, 2018, 06:24:26 AM
Lol, theymos's alt just merited LoyceV's alt. the questions are now answered, no more garbage bounty threads, currently bounty section is a total garbage section and it needs more moderation than this. note that I also have a thread in bounty board. a total joke and it should be deleted as well. Wink
2697  Other / Meta / Re: Inaccessible Bounty Threads on: June 17, 2018, 05:48:29 AM
Do you actually see the thread in the bounty board and when you are trying to click on it you'd get that error? if yes then I'd like to think this is a new forum policy? either a staff or admin could clarify on this please? thank you guys.
2698  Other / Meta / Re: [Suggestions] of The Others a.k.a digaran on: June 17, 2018, 05:24:07 AM
Not to mention that you're suggesting to watch merit sources but there is no public list of them so whom are we supposed to watch?

Why I said moderators because they have the list of all the merit sources and I said vigilant forum members because we already know a few merit sources.
2699  Other / Meta / Re: [Suggestions] of The Others a.k.a digaran on: June 17, 2018, 03:00:39 AM
I would like to suggest that moderators and vigilant forum members to closely watch every single merit source and their profiles for any email and password changes, it has been proven that people are indeed in business of trading high profile accounts and what is better to sell than a merit source account? do not show any mercy to a merit source if they changed their email and password. if they did then we should keep them under a closer watch and monitor their every merit transaction.

Remember that I'm delusional right? recent events would suggest otherwise.
2700  Other / Meta / Re: Trust system abuse on: June 17, 2018, 01:01:34 AM
I will be tagging Vod for this obvious case of trust abuse, further I will be tagging DarkStar_ for not using his DT2 power properly and for giving out positive trust for absolutely no reason.

EDIT: tagged both Vod and DarkStar_ for making a personal tool out of the trust system.

Once again:

It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)

Stop quoting theymos, he is no god, just a man. you didn't counter Vod's feedback my don DarkStar_, no you handed out a positive trust to Anduck for no valid reason, actmyname already countered Vod's feedback which was also a mistake, because actmyname has no right to tag people with red and green wherever he/she wants to.
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!