The OP inherited the house from his father before he died, so his father might have lived in it for 50+ years. For all we know the house might be 100+ years old. When a house gets beyond a certain age it's often cheaper to knock it down and build a new one than fixing it.

If the OP had kept the house for another decade it might have only been fit for the wrecking ball.

I truly believe in the teachings of Ghandi.  So many times you are what you say you are.  Its funny how life works and how powerful the mind can actually be.  I am not saying you are going to start moving things with your mind, but I will say the people who are "lucky" turn out to think they are going to win going into something.

What investments do YOU have that could make you a millionaire?

It might happen this droop will have mythical dimensions.

It's interesting to see analyses more bearish than mine.
https://www.tradingview.com/v/MW7ZZW0C/
https://www.tradingview.com/v/DMMyayp9/

If the driver is bad, sane people opt for a better driver. 

Bitcoiners want to replace the driver with a windup toy

I only wish someone could've talked him into renting the house out or something of the likes, and investing % of the rent money into the btc oh well internet randoms for financial advice is pin the tail on the donkey esque.

In fact we know that there is a china teapot in an elliptical orbit about the Sun.
But perhaps that was your point.

How do we know Warren Buffett isn't investing in BTC?

Can't happen

Won't happen

Absolutely.
Now imagine yourself strapped into the driver's seat, your hands tied behind your back & a comforting "YOU'LL BE JUST FINE, BRAH" flashing sign where the steering column used to be, as it accelerates towards a [newly built] brick wall.  You know exactly what's going to happen, in macabrely minute detail, because laws of motion.

If man doesn't even know how to drive a car, today, hardwiring how cars will be driven in the future is just...

That's Bitcoin's biggest problem--it's algorithmically predetermined, it is preprogrammed.  The local paranoid fringe would have you believe that it's a good thing, but it ain't.

Think of it as a clockwork guidance system:  instead of reacting to the terrain like an IRL driver, it only reads instructions from a piano roll: forward two feet, turn 12 degrees left, halve block reward, and so on.  If something gets in its path, there is no way to avoid it, no way alter the course.
Theoretically, it is possible:  If the entire bitcoin network comes to a consensus.  That's like driving a car by consensus--by the time consensus is reached, you're already flying through the windshield.

In short, Bitcoin's a throwback to the days of gold and cowrie shells--when money supply was inelastic & controlled by scarcity.

Modern money is more complex.  It depends on elasticity of supply, which, in turn, depends of having IRL people at the helm.
The Luddite need to undo centuries of innovation to return to cowrie shells seems attractive--everyone understands how cowrie shells work, and simple must be good, amirite?  Why spend years studying economics when a bit of horse sense is enough?  The problem's it ain't

People just wanted to believe that price was going to follow y = x^xxx

If the pattern of price deflation will be similar to the one of June - October, then I guesstimated a bottom of about 180$ in January - February.
But it's better to wait and see how this unfolds, and make shorter term predictions. If not too many bagholders will panic sell, then the market
might even bounce off 275$ (further down truncated, and then slow and steady up). If many will panic sell, then the shit will hit the fan.

Should be the last obstacle to get the price going back up again, unless another Mt.Gox-style episode happens with something else like Coinbase or another exchange where the coins get hacked.

Some common symptoms of depression include:  loss of energy, oversleeping or insomnia, loss of appetite, decreased libido, social isolation and withdrawal,  lack of motivation and/or enjoyment going about your daily routine, increased uncontrolled substance abuse, etc.

When your body is sick with a cold or flu, it provides an immune response.  If you have a fever, it's because your body is attempting to fight the illness.  Consequently, you feel like crap, which is actually a pretty good thing at least in the sense that it makes you want to lay in bed all day, which conserves energy and allows your immune system to do its thing as efficiently as possible.

When you have a mental illness (e.g. depression), there is a different type of immune response which may be described by some of the symptoms of depression I mentioned earlier.  However, they also have the effect of making you feel like crap, which is actually a good thing because, in an ideal world where we can freely choose when and how we address our problems, we most likely should be taking time to focus on ourselves in order to raise our awareness of the decisions we make which may cause or exacerbate mental illness so that we can likewise raise our awareness of ways we can better care for our mental state.  To this extent, Dank is generally correct.

However, we don't live in an ideal world, and we often don't get the chance to take as much time as we want when we want it to address anxiety and depression, or at least not without severe consequences.  We usually have so many other responsibilities that we simply don't have the luxury of dropping everything to take care of ourselves.  Additionally, when people do get time to themselves, most people do the wrong kinds of things.  I would define the 'wrong' kinds of things as passive/escapist activities like watching television, sleeping excessively, using drugs, etc.  Instead, active activities such as exercise, meditation or other relaxation techniques or therapeutic exercises, hobbies, reading, learning, etc. are what help us to grow and progress towards self-actualization.

But, if you have a depressed person who already feels run down and worn out, and who does not have the luxury of dropping all of their other responsibilities, the problem is that it isn't very likely that after attending to all of their other responsibilities they're already struggling to manage that they are going to be motivated to consistently do these "active" activities.  Instead, people usually resort to the passive activities I mentioned because they constantly feel like they need a break from everything.

So, for those people who don't have the discipline or capacity in their current mental state to both adequately fulfill their typical responsibilities and also adequately take care of themselves, antidepressants can help elevate a person's mood throughout the day so that they feel motivated and energized.  

In many cases where antidepressants fail and you see people struggling to ever ween off of them, the problem often isn't the antidepressant itself, but rather that people don't often take advantage of the increased motivation, energy, and optimism and apply it towards engaging in those more beneficial, active activities.  Contrarily, those who do are usually the ones you see who are successfully weened off their medications and continue to maintain a positive mental state by abiding by new, better habits instead of the older habits.

Note*: I'm generalizing throughout.