Na them them . The people wey dey launder money na which people my brother? Abi no be them ? Na them them. If them catch them now, wetin dem go do? Nothing. Highest dem go do plea bargain and collect their own from the money. Leave Nigerian government.


Sometimes you go just see say Nigerian government dey far from the people. Dem forget say social media no be every person wey get bank account dey social media. Wetin happen to phone numbers? I think say na the same reason wey carry BVN and NIN come, dem don leave those ones come enter Facebook, WhatsApp, tweeter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit etc

Them never tell us where dem dey pursue us go.

All those talk na bobo talk. An innocent person fears no accusation. Him sabi say him no win the election by no means, na him and INEC follow run wetin him do on to say some people feel say dem go do as them like. Because no be him win be the reason wey make all him line for speech dey enter on the votes,on who vote for him or not. Make him make speech wey make sense, abi we hear anything wey him to for france for the summit, if no be so so greet him dey greet people. E easy to run the government but the thing be say dem dey carry d thing do business. Na ball dem dey play that's why they are not sincere. When they enter the place na the money dem spend for election dem dey arrange to collect by every corrupt way and before you say jack another election time don appear.

No I think na until government begin provide better enabling environment for the people and youths of the country to help themselves at least get job or other engagements and dem stop the high level of corruption, nepotism and who you know for the country then tins go still dey as e dey and youths go still dey ball with btc.

I know say some people no dey make profit for the bitcoin trading but dem still dey manage like that because at all at all na dat one bad.

I don see some religious people wey dey gamble oo. Hunger dey the land.

Thank you but it is just an open discussion that ensued from the financial summit in paris and nothing more attached to it. It is a topic that is based on economy of the world after they discussed climate change financing. So it is just a thread to talk on the issues arising from the New Global Finantial Pact Summit.

It is not intentional but a feature that is now introduce in betting depending on the company, they call it different name in the options, it is either in-game betting, in-play or something else but what I know and have heard bettors discuss on it is that the odds are reduced that it will not be encouraging to bet on.

 
Can you bet on a game once it starts?



Yes it is the practice that when you bet games ahead of time, the odds is higher than when the game come closer, if the game approaches then the odd is reduced. This is because when the time approach, more publications and revelations would have been made about the team regarding the features, the players fitness, injury, bench and reserve against the strength of the opponent.

I think betting when the game is already up is another features in football gambling that some pundits like now because it provides an opportunity to be able to decide where the pendulum will swing to. By that, the bettor can access the options he is considering like how many corner kicks the second half could produce, throw-in etc


It is more like you can't eat your cake and have it. If you want to take the full risk of the game then you will be rewarded more but if you choose the lesser risk then your reward will be reduced. I think it is well understood that way. I know many bettors are caught between this web but it is really a new innovation that many have taken advantage of.

I think the first thread is still fresh and running with contributions already, although you have added the voting side to it but from the first thread we are already seeing that Mark Zuckerberg is topping the list of probable winner majorly because of his younger age and strength which is assumed to be an advantage. Also he is a white belt in jiu jitsu, so enough has been deliberated to the advantage of mark.

So at the New Global Financing Pact in French, president William Ruto of Kenya was afterwards hosted by Macron (France president), Ruto was asking and suggesting for a global financial transaction regime where the procede would be in the care of a new financial organisation different from IMF, World Bank or any other financial institution but a brand new financial architecture of equals where power and governance is not in the hands of few people. I have miss the video but I'm sure the outcome of the submit is in the public space likewise the videos of them.

My question therefore is, with the call of Ruto, do you think IMF and World Bank as the global financial institutions have not performed very well in Africa economy to support in different ways or why do you think he is making that call ?

This is exactly the point because I have seen people who do giveaway to some people without asking for anything in return or creating a group online for the purpose of making additional gains for that which they are claiming to have been successful of, that is simply a means of exploitation. And really if someone is selling a signal, he is not making enough from that which he is claiming to be master of. Moreover there are several prediction sites online and they don't charge users but only makes there gains from the traffic they generate from visiting there site and adverts on the site which is better of than outright selling of signal on group.

When it comes to soccer as regards to such legit groups, they hardly give out three correct winning games constant and daily. So most times they can share one winning game and it is not out daily. Therefore, rate of there winning is not constant and not anywhere near 85%. Moreover, giving out just one game is not enough because majority of bettors are those who don't have huge pocket to take big financial risk to stake on just 1.30 odd (on A level teams like Madrid, Barcelona or PSG, Manchester city) for example because some of those "sure" games that those groups share out are already predicted winning games around the betting space, so a bettor need at least reasonable winning games like 3 different games to play for a reasonable potential winning. So you see it will become a thing of running around the circle

Of course eSports is also part of the gambling Al that has been encrypted in video games for more relaxed games and for bettors pleasure.



Usually, I think programmers have found love in horses and from inception have made races for horse competition but I know dog race also exist. And maybe I have not seen other animals like cheater etc, maybe they exist.



How does it feel when horse racing is also encrypted video on eSports. I think with the different options including horse racing, eSports is growing daily and creating gambling experience.

On another hand some other pundits use them to compare others. Like they join different of such group but they belong to the free signal section to see what is being predicted there and they use them alongside with what they see from some other groups, they compare and contrast before staking their bet. These are the class of people who do betting for a living, they have the time to research on all that they want to bet. They sometimes compare idea with other bettors and doing such has higher chances of success sometimes but if you rely on just what was predicted without your personal effort then you may likely just be paying call fees with no benefit.

That is simple logic to prove to you that is fallacy. If you have a winning strategy in gambling, you don't want to bring it out publicly. For example when you get to offline gambling house you see bettors who win at least average of 50% but such people don't give out same games that will win but they can give out less probable winning games and conceal their real winning games. You hear such people cashing out the next day while your game given to you by them will fail. That is the reality of life.



Your getting to a telegram group may be good for you to have an experience that will help you understand what is happening there. Example if you don't pay you are not given certain games, you just get average games like free prediction but both paid games and free games have no guarantee.



Not really winning games because nobody is certainly giving you such. They research them from other prediction sites and compare with their knowledge of the games and collect fees from you as you register. They have different levels of registration up to VIP and VVIP   

This decisive step na on masses while dem dey pack the money go abroad. All these people just dey scam the people with impunity. Abi you never hear the scam involving CBN wey dem carry Emefiele? Little did you know about all these online transfer charges, stamp duties, you no hear say na private pocket dem dey enter? CBN go carry government money still borrow government. My brother forget oo, them just dey use people catch cruise and I know go surprise if dem still leave Emefiele because if dem keep holding him then heads go roll.

This is the reason many casinos are rich today because there is a trend consistent gambling even when people lose, they believe trying the next game will be the winning key and they keep playing chasing losses because of their greed. It takes a highly discipline gambler to stop playing while he still has money to continue. This is a real life experience in the daily life of a gambler.


Not really the fact now because even when people say it but deep down their heart they expect huge profit from the bet

My answer to this is yes, it built the economy of those enslaving others because if you buy someone over you are definitely going to use them for among other things labour. They will add to your labour force and your production and manufacturing level will increase like you made the example of the cotton industry that increased to commercial quantity and that led to export which in return increased the GDP and revenue of the developed countries at that time.

So to answer your question, yes it helps to increase the economic growth because it is additional labour. But at present time, I can't say if there is still the kind of slave trade that existed in the past around 1800, that involved capturing people by force or selling of human beings to another country. However, I believe there is a new kind of slavery which is modern way where people exit their country to another country because of bad governance and that causes brain drain to the home country while the migrants contribute immensely to the economy of the recipient country.

I think another reason that the gambling stocks are having that level of high attention is that people who play most times don't make profit and so they feel it will be a wasted investment just like they have been recording losses. It takes a knowledgeable bettor to have a different view from what I have said because by the time you play repeatedly without no success, you also get discouraged from further investment, at least this is the way the larger population of losers will think.

How it started . I think this may just be another social media stunt that we are going to see unfold something as days go by. After three days that this story took over the air and musk mum tweeting on not going to see that come through, we are yet to get updated on the next move if these two rich dude are going to give the public something to talk about anytime soon but if that is going to happen, I believe crypto is going to rally so hard.

No I don't think it is because of trust that people won't stay with only bitcoin but however, there is a saying that a wise man doesn't rely on only one source of income to be financially stable and satisfied to take care of the family. Diversification is economically wise. Agreed that bitcoin has a level of guarantee but some other coins have survived through time so to also keep some reserve with etheruem is quite reasonable. Apart from bitcoin and etheruem, some other altcoins have also fluctuated and survived like bitcoin, variety is the spice of life as it is said.

If this fight were to be real I don't think your analysis regards to height would be an advantage in this because your have to consider age which is important to movement and speed. Looking at Mick Tyson in his prime, he was able to defeat most bigger fighters because of his age that was advantage for him and then his punch. So if musk had the combination of age and height then I would agree with you but now he only has height slightly higher than Zuckerberg and that may not matter