Current number of posts: 477
Rank: Senior Member
Bech32 address: bc1qrgp3ljsv9cm9cskwhp06xpzjphk6562404rt0n
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 100+

Like I said earlier, I've seen beautiful articles about Alice and Bob including the Wikipedia page, but I didn't scroll down to where you found this funny characters. Just read them now and they's another Merlin and Author Character below the characters you shared.

As for Craig, his 1 million BTC ownership claims is near to the above roll, he must have timelessly tried to crack into Satoshi's wallet.  

Hello Loyce V they's a user that got a proxyban and needs to be whitelisted. Please help.

Username: Pillsike

OP is making actual sense as it's indeed difficult to win with the free spins offered. It seems like normal bets waggerd with funds, if you get the right prediction then you win unless that the instincts tells players that they are not winning because it's a free spin.

I tend to use an all black or red technique on roulette games, it works fine for me but the payout is definitely not as big as selecting the actual number that the ball rolls to and stops. Though, it depends on the wagered amount and how correct you predict the color that is next. Even 1-9 kind of prediction is also a good strategy with nice rewards. They are multiple techniques on Roulette game, knowing the right prediction is difficult, one thing is sure that the risk of losing is low when you follow the mass selection techniques compared to choosing just one number.

I have seen Alice and Bob on several cryptographic codes, even on physics problems and they've not be a time that I've seen a different function or name used to replace Alice and Bob. Read further about them and an article said that they are cryptographic couple. Did they exist? how did they come into the cryptographic world and don't forget my question is it a constant? Thanks.

Instead of out ruling computational operations why not, like actual Proof of luck, initiate the usage of a spec of computer like Intel SGX that allows Trusted execution environment. That'll prevent attackers from controlling the blockchain within the Trusted execution environment threshold. Also to ease energy and CPU cycle, the TEE (Trusted execution environment) allows a participant to wait for the expected time to pass during transaction verification without doing any work unlike in proof of work where the participant is expected to do work while waiting for an enforced sufficient amount of time to pass. This will also keep your consensus secured and different from POS.

Re-applying

One cannot do without an exchange if they are traders but, another can stay without exchange and use them any time he wants to change a certain currency, he owns, to bitcoin or Altcoin. I think Op made a good point for newbies to adhere to and learn. To me exchanges remains a hub for swapping currencies and after every transaction I leave some fragment of the coins which I won't, in anyways, be bothered to lose.

AFAIK the Nft market flopped and it'll also affect the ongoing CR7 project though his fans will blow the Nft up but sooner, I predict, the NFT will drop too like bored Ape when the hype is gone.

Well, anything is possible, but I'm curious about who will transfer the domain name server and hosting server to him. Is it Satoshi or Theymos? If it's Satoshi then that's not impossible by anymeans because he cannot be contacted.

Username: Accardo
Post count: 467
Segwit address: bc1qrgp3ljsv9cm9cskwhp06xpzjphk6562404rt0n

Earlier during the trend of cryptocurrency regulations some U.S Senators and Congressmen like Patrick Toomey didn't want crypto to be regulated, but they all want it now! These Senators are shooting from the hip, as they is nothing to think about. FTX did something bad. Below are some of their quick reactions;



Senator Cynthia Lumiss: A strong proposer of the cryptocurrency regulation is still standing on her initial suggestion of regulating cryptocurrency. She went on to tweet that the FTX bankcruptcy wouldn't have happened if the Lummis-Gillibrand bill was passed. Here are the key points in the bill she mentioned.

• Clear property right (not your keys, not your coin)
• Strong protection and separation of customer assets on an exchange
• Tight limits on digital asset leverage and lending
• Bankruptcy protection for all customers
• Transparency into affiliates and connected organization of an exchange.

On her Interview with a Yahoo reporter named Jenniffer she called FTX a Ponzi scheme and reassured the reporter that her bill with Grillibrand will be reviewed immediately. “We’ll definitely review the bill under this to see that we have adequately protected consumers assets during a bankruptcy, protecting consumer assets from being co-mingled and making sure that our definitions are sufficiently tight,” said Lummis.

On another interview with SquawkCNBC she was asked an important question that goes; how will you regulate a company based in Bahamas and other Offshore exchanges? "We need to make sure we're balancing innovation with consumer protections," says @SenLummis
 "Buyer beware, these foreign based companies are operating under different country's laws because they're more advantageous to those companies."

My view, I think the regulation is only for US based cryptocurrency firms and that doesn't make enough sense, though Bahamas is working on her laws to tackle the FTX collapse. Therefore, it'll be difficult to regulate these exchanges, because it won't get to or affect every country. 

Second on my list is Senator Patrick Toomey

Senator Patrick is blaming the congress for not having passed a regulatory bill on cryptocurrency trading. And such negligence has led cryptocurrency developments to foreign jurisdictions that have little or insufficient regulations. Also, he said that the regulation should start with Stablecoins.





Generally, It seems they are more focused on regulating exchanges than cryptocurrency.



The last lawmaker on my list is Rep Warren Davidson who claims to have been in the digital currency space since 2000s
His Opinion, self custody, seems to be the best, and he seeks that his bill "Keep your coin" be passed, and anyone that attacks self custody opposes individual freedom. He added that people are lured to hand-over their funds to someone else(exchanges), believing that their funds are safer on exchanges.

Adding to his reactions, he quoted a tweet from 2019 where he interviewed SecEnfDirector on "Selective Enforcement", and said that the SEC has proven not to be capable of regulating cryptocurrency.


In a nutshell, from what Rep Warren Davidson had to say about the Self custody and people getting deceived to save funds on exchanges, more works needs to be done. Because, these victims enter the market blindly and they can't see what's going on, even. Regulating Exchanges seem to be more achievable in the US than any other country. What do you think?


SOURCE:

https://twitter.com/SenLummis
https://twitter.com/SenToomey
https://twitter.com/WarrenDavidson

N/B: Pictures are their respective profile pictures.

Current number of post: 464
Rank: Senior Member
Bech32 address: bc1qrgp3ljsv9cm9cskwhp06xpzjphk6562404rt0n

Merit earned in last 120 days: 100+

You can check some cryptocurrency job sites for any opening. Like the link below, the company is looking for a miner though it's been over 30days since the listing date, you can look for other openings too. Remember you need a resume.

Miner needed

Life is a stage and it's not easy to climb down these staged after climbing to it's top. That's why it's difficult for cooperate workers to quit their jobs and Chase a dream. They are now capable of certain bills and those bills will keep coming whether they're at the top or downsized. I think your friend thought about this, and chose to go back. Although his business would have made him more money if he stuck to it, But in the process of waiting for the business to Excel, he must have become a debtor. So decisions vary, and Life has more than one category none which is easier to handle than the other.

Indeed, we are still early. Mr President of El Salvador is not concerned about the dollar value of bitcoin he just wants to accumulate bitcoin. Despite losing $70million, according to the article, he didn't relelent. He is a true bit coiner, he doesn't need to buy bitcoin only for profits but buying bitcoin for owning more bitcoin is his goal, I assume.

Such could happen as a result of privacy negligence; downloading untrusted programs, visiting unsecured sites and apps etc. And the outcome won't be extremely bad like a collapsed exchange. It's a number game and the lesser the affected people the better. Exchanges have a wide variety of loopholes from third parties like staffs who have access to secret files that can lead hackers to the exchange. Ideally, it's just one address that store the whole money deposited by millions of people. Unlike the self custody that the virus will have to work on one victim per time. Unless, it permeates a viral software used by multiple people.

I don't understand the context of this paragraph. Normally, crypto provides jobs for people, if a beginner have got skills like; data analysis, programming, content creation etc, that fits in a cryptocurrency firm looking for his potentials, then its not a wrong move if he applies and gets employed. And he/she doesn't need cash to get employed. The only investment required here is time which matters in every field.

It would be better if you specified what part of cryptocurrency a beginner shouldn't take as a job opportunity. Like I did above.

Things should be balanced at some point in the cooperate world or the internet, I know it's a shady place, but not to this point, selling fake reviews and claiming to Target only genuine companies sounds really unique. Genuine companies need genuine reviews that will stick. Does your service stick on Trustpilot? Dont think so, because your site doesn't have a single review on there. However, probably, the scam and fraudulent people are your target audience and you can't resist it, because how on Earth will you detect them since you want sales too.

And the only way a genuine company will need a fake review is for black hat purposes, to hunt their competitors down. Good you outruled such a service, but it's all about offers here and rules can change.

On the whole, I think your site needs some Trustpilot reviews too. It's too obvious not to have a single fake review for yourself. Thank you.