Meh, a "mentor" story. I was hoping for a "brother" or maybe a salacious "ex-girlfriend" drama. You should have asked nutildah to write you a better one, he has a way with words.
OK here's the story: They don't actually just know each other. They're brothers. But they're not actually just brothers. They're twins. But they're not actually just twins. They're siamese twins. But they're not actually just siamese twins, they share all of the same body and brain. That's pretty good, right? I don't doubt that the address in question (366PvEGTjf1UKWCjZGiPHPyqpFUuNJp9to) belongs to someone other than colires/vereole.
I do. Everything this colires guy says is a lie. This is like the 7th time he's been accused of scamming somebody on the forum under that account. Why wouldn't his new story also be a lie? Regardless, there's little doubt that colires poses a trading risk by this point. Here's the exact same scenario back in April.  This address also made deposits to the "exchanger" address. So regardless of whether or not colires and vareole are the same person, they engage in the same scams and send dirty money to the same idiot exchanger. Case closed. |
|
|
|
 Is this a first for a user who can sign a message? Or does it happen more often?
Theoretically, he can, but never did nor did we feel the need to ask for one as it wouldn't have meant much since the private keys seem to have been kept on a possibly compromised email address. There were a lot of question marks that wouldn't have been answered even with the help of a signed message in this case. That's understandable but it would have evidenced the possibility that Legendster was telling the truth. Without it, there's no reason to believe whoever has the account is currently capable of doing it, and it could have just been part of a story. I would have signed the message first and then disclosed that its possible the hacker had the private key. It's a weird statement to make without backing up but not completely relevant to what's at stake. In any case, its a moot point now. |
|
|
|
Lol. Blast from the past. Here's the update on my post from 6 years ago: Until someone registers YouVPorn.com, and then it will all be free. The way it should be.
Somebody registered that domain but its in Chinese and there's no porn on it, at least not that I immediately saw. Not that I know what porn is. Recently i saw some porn based crypto project grab the trending search list. Though all are shit project but they grab the trending position.
Yeah see that's the thing: they are shit projects with little-to-no experience in anything other than getting people to give them money. What would make infinitely more sense is if somebody like Brazzers came out with their own token that people could use to buy exclusive content. The token creation part is the easy part, making porn that people are actually willing to shell out money for is quite a demanding task. |
|
|
|
...
Pay me for 2.. 1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
... 26.22 x 2 = 52.44 I owe you. Will send on Weds. . Thanks Eddie. I'll keep you updated on how the NFT thing goes. Price of XCP held up pretty decently during this latest downturn, carried by healthy demand. There's a lot of potential here because its a proven, rather-fairly distributed protocol that works. Bitcoin-backed NFTs should be the gold standard. |
|
|
|
The technical problem of Solana network is that it is very difficult to operate a node, people need equipment with powerful configuration. I saw the problem before looking at the 'Proof of history' consensus method. It is really recursive and makes the blockchain more and more heavy.
This is probably the best explanation for what happened I read here. It just goes to show how if a coin has an inherently centralizing design (however by accident), it can lead to long-term problems for the success of the coin. As I was just mentioning in another thread, a pretty bigtime blockchain game has adopted Solana for their game NFTs. Imagine if you wanted to play the game and couldn't because its host blockchain was "down." That would be quite unacceptable. Hope they get it together. |
|
|
|
|
Right now, some of the biggest blockchain games are on Polygon, next to Ethereum of course (and Ronin for Axie Infinity). Solana is also destined to become a blockchain game platform as well. There's a game which has received several million in funding, Star Atlas, already selling NFTs for gameplay on the Solana blockchain -- even though the game hasn't been launched yet.
|
|
|
|
Boooo this man!! Boooooo  I have some good go-to gifs for shitposting intruders, just waiting for an excuse to use them. This week I like KC to cover -6.5 or -7 and Las Vegas to cover -4.. I'll personally be rooting for the Rams to take out Brady, Mr. Perfect over there, but won't be betting money on it. Can't believe the line for that one is only -1 TB. The late Sunday game, SF vs. GB should be pretty entertaining as well. |
|
|
|
Its good to see that nutildah finally understood how stupid he sounds and put me on ignore.
_______________________________________
This wallet belongs to exchanger. If two people are using same exchanger then they are alts, because they both sent funds to exchanger wallet?
Seriously?
What do you mean by "put you on ignore", exactly? That's correct. The wallet belongs to Kraken. It's a deposit address that is assigned to one account holder and periodically emptied, along with other Kraken deposit addresses. Your address, on the other hand, thus far has no indication of not being controlled by you. |
|
|
|
You have to be stupid if you think that this wallet belongs to vareole.
It's a curious address to be sure. If its not owned by vareole, its owned by a network of scammers of which you and him are a part. I have no idea what you would be doing sharing the same Kraken deposit address, but seeing as how you're both involved in a lot of the same types of scam accusations, there's a high chance you're the same person. This is the address you provided in the non-disputed PM: 1JVHCH6r7gjHf8Bk17bLQWmCn84vzTYGXt This is Vareole's staked address: 1JtnLnMfDio59QRvTgiUG1Ck5nDgukWLqw This is the Kraken deposit address shared by you and Vareole: 366PvEGTjf1UKWCjZGiPHPyqpFUuNJp9to You've also received funds from scams using other accounts at that address. Good show for getting this far, got a lot of merits this time. Keep it up the good reports. |
|
|
|
Its pretty much pointless to say anything here since DT members will believe a newbie and rely on his screenshots after he admitted that he faked some of them..
But you already said this: I am not denying those PM-s.
And in those PMs was this:  The address you posted sent the scammed BTC to a Kraken deposit address used by Vareole, as I proved in the post above.  "So how do you account for that?" he asked, not sure how the cookie jar-handed, red-faced scammer would react next. Would he respond with some creative bullshittery? Try to dance his way through hoops of plausible deniability, like some sort of douchelord acrobat? Whatever it was, it would probably be entertaining, and perhaps even good for a laugh. |
|
|
|
I fake that screenshot only for self defense, not for scamming or what.
I didn't fake anything in this accusation.
Of course you can have your opinion, I respect that.
@Pbacala didn't online for some days, that already means something.
Your methods are a little on the entrappy side but the end result is the same. He didn't return because the flag is a death sentence for a scammer account -- well most of the time. What's funny is hours after I posted this trust to Pbacala ArcusIsidar (alt account of scammer Rambotnic) bumped his thread where he accuses me and a lot of other accounts of all being the same person. Bump
Of course its a locked thread so nobody can respond. Somewhat ironically, the first account to claim Pbacala might be a scammer was colires, who was recently just outed as an alt of Vareole, Rambotnic's competition. Tangled web of backstabbing scammer treachery. |
|
|
|
Part II of II of a Pretty Big Bounty Farm This is a lot bigger farm than I thought it'd be. Had to take an intermission and split it into two parts. Looking at another transaction made by Rihat7/alex juhir on the same day, we find more alts depositing to a different collection address: Proof of authentication - ETH: 0x03474955BbaD1a4AE3E4981cA2F904515088144C - Email: crsohag0@gmail.com- Campaigns applied for: Twitter, Facebook & Telegram Again labeling them in Etherscan make the deposit address activity look like this:  This person has been caught cheating bounties before, but let me guess, this is simply one of these Bounty School operations we keep hearing about. Any reason why these accounts shouldn't be tagged as bounty cheaters? |
|
|
|
Part I of II of a Pretty Big Bounty Farm - Truncated for Length Issues Some of these alts have been established as such already, some have negative trust, pretty sure at least a couple are banned. Alts signing up for same bounty, note the order of posting: Proof of authentication - EP20 (BSC) address : 0xe1Af165aA6D72d156d0093F49fe8bd4612D3FcB1 - Email : hmsalman8205@gmail.com- Campaigns applied for : Twitter, Facebook, telegram, Instagram Proof of authentication - EP20 (BSC) address : 0xe1Af165aA6D72d156d0093F49fe8bd4612D3FcB1 - Email : hmsalmankhan1@gmail.com- Campaigns applied for : Twitter, Facebook I just say that because there's no way Salman8205 can say this other account just copied their ETH address. In March that address sent BASE tokens to an address that has collected tokens from some other accounts, including: (this one's a double) Proof of authentication - EP20 (BSC) address :0xC960e9C8C7982a5F99019A6F6Eef001F9f3352aD - Email : rahmanrana3479@gmail.com- Campaigns applied for : Twitter.facebook When you plug the names in as addresses, the evidence is clear:  (thus concludes Part I) |
|
|
|
The members here said that only Coinbase employees can access these Coins with private keys.
The Coinbase support insists that they cannot be recovered.
You were complaining about this 2.5 years ago, and somebody answered you back then. You sent your BCH to your BTC address instead of the BCH address assigned to your account. It appears Coinbase did manage to move it, and that was after you contacted them. You might want to try again. |
|
|
|
If I remember correctly theymos said a while back that coding badges in such a way so that people could have the option to display or not display the badge would be difficult.
I don't believe that for a minute--even though I'm not a coder. If those gold coins can be put under every member's rank, I seriously doubt Theymos (who is very intelligent and has a lot of resources) wouldn't be able to give members some sort of badge. Plus he did exactly that for the forum anniversary art contest winner if I'm not mistaken. Its different because the art contest winner badge displays whether the user wanted it to or not. There was an art contest for reporter badge design 2.5 years ago, so that part has already been taken care of at least. Here's what I was talking about: still waiting for it  Sorry for the wait, when I went to implement this it ended up being quite a bit more of a can of worms than I originally thought because of opting out, preventing certain report-count-padding strategies, etc. It's still on my to-do list, but there are several things above it. |
|
|
|
Even though you don't have any recourse legally-speaking, you could complain to Kraken that there is a scammer using them to cash out bitcoin through their exchange. This is the scammer's Kraken deposit address: 366PvEGTjf1UKWCjZGiPHPyqpFUuNJp9to Found him. He's vareole. Busted AF. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi, I am vareole from bitcointalk.org and today is 20/07/2020
I want to stake my btc wallet address here 1JtnLnMfDio59QRvTgiUG1Ck5nDgukWLqw
This is my AUTHENTIC ADDRESS and the FIRST ADDRESS I HAVE SIGNED IN THIS FORUM AND IN MY LIFE!
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JtnLnMfDio59QRvTgiUG1Ck5nDgukWLqw
IC+EDbNrD+oY5COJZpPPY640yV0pB06Vtgtl30DW/Pi/TKrrnpbqEshflo60BR5zxPiH3NyNbBPbtDka3XjGyO0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- address: 1JtnLnMfDio59QRvTgiUG1Ck5nDgukWLqwThat address is part of this wallet and was used to send BTC to the same Kraken deposit address:  I had kind of suspected they were the same person for a while now, but he's getting better at covering his tracks. Unfortunately for him the blockchain is non-coverable. Somebody should really report him to Kraken, though. If I was one of his victims, I definitely would.
My point is that being the member with the 37th most good reports doesn't mean a goddamn thing in general and it certainly doesn't have anything to do with this scam accusation.
Perhaps not but since vareole is also on the top reporter list with 569 good reports, so he actually has 1004 good reports total. He's been a very busy beaver, and a very naughty boy. |
|
|
|
I can't fake forum PM, anyone with permission could check them.
This might be the best option. You would have to let a trusted member of the forum have temporary access to your account. I would trust Jawhead999 to check your PMs, or I would volunteer to do it. It is up to you if you want to do it at all, it would provide absolute proof, which all other accusers have lacked. On a related note I saw this today: These are the people who have the most good reports over the last year: +-------------------------+--------------+
| User | Good reports |
+-------------------------+--------------+
...
| colires | 435 |
...
+-------------------------+--------------+ Colires has the 37th most good reports in the entire forum, over the last year. I didn't even make the list, its pretty competitive. PS: While I'm glad you could help nail two long-time scammers, getting scammed twice in 2 days isn't a good start and I recommend taking a bit of time off before your next trade. |
|
|
|
Namecoin itself is a nebulous project with great goals but no practical use, and not even an example of a practical use.
So the whole ".bit" extension thing is dead in the water then? Or is it simply not practical at the present time? Why do these bags of shit delete posts that are not their own.
Because somebody reported your posts as off-topic (indeed the post in itself has nothing to do with Namecoin, so there you go). The post I quoted above will probably be deleted as well. |
|
|
|
These are the people who have the most good reports over the last year: +-------------------------+--------------+
| User | Good reports |
+-------------------------+--------------+
| vareole | 569 |
+-------------------------+--------------+ Damn, an actual scammer has been cleaning up the forum undercover! Its kind of a Batman-type situation, except instead of being a billionaire playboy he's a scammer. The reports are probably for excessive bumps and whatever posted by the competition. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
