sp_ is master of deception and marketing, that is how he sell his product.... is it insane OC with TDP that would kill any card, or its intensity setting that would produce 5% rejects

any hash that he sell recalculate 5-10% less on TDP, OC and way to high intensity then do whats best for you

More than 50% of the miners use my kernels to mine signatum:

http://yiimp.ccminer.org/site/miners (click on skunk)



here is a screenshot of sp-mod #3 (25 july):

is the krnlx  miner the same as epsylon miner? why you are talking about that sp? he clearly said "and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code"...

what's the best config for
1.gtx 1070 = power / core / mem
2.gtx 1060 = power / core / mem

thanks sp_

I'm getting more shares with tpruvot's 2.2 than I do with your mod 7.  About 14 coins per hour with my 300MH/s rate with mod 7, and i'm getting 18 coins per hour with tpruvot 2.2.  reported hashrate can say whatever, but actual results don't lie.

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

Bugfix:

__host__ void myriadgroestl_cpu_hash(int thr_id, uint32_t threads, uint32_t startNounce, uint32_t *nounce)
{
    const uint32_t threadsperblock = 512;
   const uint32_t threadsperblock2 = 512; //1536;

tested all possible initensities with 1080 and 1080ti, no way to get previous speed, much less than spmod7 for 382.xx drivers but 1060 and 1070 working fine

sp_ , a question for you, i would like to buy your mod-skminer, but before that, i need to know, do i have to download a 19gb file of total blockchain database to my wallet before i can mine from my wallet?
thanks alot

was that a reply to me ?
What I meant was , on skminer people say you need one cpu core per gpu you want to mine with.
I can run 5 gpu's currently with my cpu and I wonder if there is the same odd limit with your miner mod?

Getting 25% less hashrate on the 1080ti after updating to new nexus miner version... same settings.. 1080 ti was 270 mh - now some less than 200
565 mh it's maximum for my 1x1080 and 2x1080 ti rig after some tuning intensities.. was 720
upd: intensity 140 573 mh