I agree, health and safety guaranteed indeed.

If you can't stop yourself to gamble, the best option is to stay at home and just gamble with those crypto casinos that you know and you're good doing it while at home.

The covid virus is still there and unlikely to be eradicated and will be with us until it becomes a normal flu and there's already a vast number of medicine that can easily cure it.

I see two things here. The first is that I am surprised that there are a lot of states in the USA where gambling is not legalised. Gambling has its bad things, like alcohol for example, but it is more than proven that by prohibiting it you don't eliminate it, you leave it in the hands of mafias and you stop collecting taxes. And this brings me to the second part, that part of the taxes will be used to help the homeless seems to me to be a poor argument. What we have to do is to attack the root of the problem and try to avoid, or at least reduce the percentage of homeless people.

Then, as for the clothes that people may be wearing, I consider that a secondary issue.

Though localcryptos didn't require KYC(did they?), I'm sure most of the users had no problem going through KYC. There are a very small amount of people who care about privacy and don't want to hand out their data to other people.

Why am I bringing this here?
Well, we all know Binance had introduced P2P transactions followed by Kucoin and so many other exchanges which allow people to easily buy/sell crypto to fiat without waiting more than a few minutes. It's almost instant, very rarely face any issue.

What would be the benefit of the certificates? Bitcoin knowledge is not particularly a CV worthy addition at this time.

You can of course learn about Bitcoin and use that for your personal use; invest or trade (or mine if you have the capital). I personally don't see the purpose of a Bitcoin certificate or the desire by some to have Bitcoin taught to kids or college students. Niche assets can be learnt under financial education, which I believe should be an integral part of school's curriculum, but teaching each separately doesn't seem practical.

There are bunch of gambling tokens https://coinmarketcap.com/view/gambling/

https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/gambling

Can you add some which have enough-good daily trade volume? Mostly of gambling tokens in the market already dead. People rarely mentioning fun token which has become the most used gambling token in the crypto community. The volume looks so good at this moment compared with another gambling token.

I am bullish on the future of Bitcoin as a technology.

We all know that China has a total ban on cryptocurrencies, including but not limited to no mining, no circulation, no trading, no banking services, no listing on exchanges.

What do you think countries have to lose by making this choice?

They have their own reasons for it. The government is just being a government, they are doing what it can to protect its people. That's why there are a lot of people who are against them, especially on some of their decision, let's take for example some regulations about Bitcoin which are not really useful.
They hate decentralization because they can't control it.

The Circa opened at a time when online sports betting, which is now legal in more than twenty states and the District of Columbia, was in full march across the United States. This meant that the Circa not only faced stiff competition from well-funded competitors such as DraftKings, FanDuel and Caesars but it also was trying to sell an in-person experience that might very well be woefully out of date. For four of my friends and me, renting one of Circa’s “Millionaire’s Row” football-watching booths on an N.F.L. Sunday required a twenty-five-hundred-dollar drink-and-food minimum, with a mandatory five-hundred-dollar tip. Instead of just firing off bets on our phones in front of our own televisions, on our own couches, we had to stand in line to place bets at a window. Some of the modern innovations in sports gambling, which include live betting, where you can wager in the middle of a game, and elaborate parlays, where you can string together multiple exotic bets for one giant payday, are harder to find at a brick-and-mortar casino like the Circa. On an app, you can also bet on everything from South American soccer leagues and global cricket matches to political races, most of which were not offered at the brick-and-mortar Circa sportsbook and likely not at the smaller sportsbooks in Las Vegas.

In interviews and in the press, Derek Stevens, the owner of the Circa, has seemed a bit coy about why he built this place. But here’s my theory: Stevens intuits, perhaps correctly, that widespread sports-gambling legalization will bring what once was a barely clandestine culture fully out into the open. Betting apps, then, aren’t really his competition but, rather, client-outreach vehicles that could help lure people into his casinos, especially for big events like March Madness and the Super Bowl. He has created, in essence, the Disney World of sports gambling—a place where large groups of people go a few times in a lifetime, and splurge on everything from bets to cabanas and spa packages. All he needs for the vision to work is a nation of sports bettors ready to open their wallets.

Creating a nation of sports bettors would presumably require the participation of the nation’s most populous state. (Thirty per cent of visitors to Las Vegas last year came from California.) The state has two sports-betting-legalization measures on this November’s ballot. Proposition 26 would allow sports gambling, but only at brick-and-mortar tribal casinos and racetracks. Proposition 27 would legalize online sports betting, and passing it might result in something like the app-based, heavily marketed gambling blitzes we’ve seen in New York and New Jersey.

The supporters and opponents of both proposals have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to saturate Californians with ads; this has led to a great deal of confusion among voters. Nobody seems to know which proposal does what, which ones are supported by the tribes—an important political concern, especially within the progressive nonprofit space—or even what the bills will actually do. The Web site for YESon27, for example, mentions very little about sports gambling at all. Instead, it focusses almost exclusively on the money the bill would raise to ease homelessness through a monthly ten-per-cent state tax on sports betting: the funds would first be used to cover regulatory costs, but, after that, eighty-five per cent of that money would go toward addressing homelessness, and the remaining fifteen per cent would be distributed to Native American tribes that are not involved in sports betting.

Most of the money to stop Prop 27 has been raised by gaming tribes that operate casinos that, along with a broad coalition that includes the California Democratic and Republican parties, have brought up everything from the addictive properties of gambling on your phone to tribal-sovereignty issues. Their argument relies on the premise that online gambling is much worse than going to a casino in person, which, of course, is totally fine. In fact, the big gaming tribes seem to be saying that in-person betting is so fine that everyone should support Prop 26 instead and allow sports gambling—but only in racetracks and, of course, their casinos.

It’s all a bit silly and disingenuous. One side uses the homelessness crisis as a cover for legalizing sports-betting apps; the other pretends that they alone can provide a safe gambling experience. Neither proposition is polling well—a recent U.C. Berkeley poll showed that a mere twenty-seven per cent of voters support Prop 27, a response that is doing only slightly worse than that for Prop 26, which is seeing support from just thirty-one per cent of likely voters. The marked lack of support has pushed the proponents of Prop 27, which include the big app companies like FanDuel and DraftKings, to mostly give up and wait until 2024 to try again.

None of this means online sports betting is dead in California; in fact, all it really highlights is that many powerful interests appear to be cornering what they think will be a lucrative market. The amount of money at stake and the other states that have already bought in may actually broker some sort of compromise between the tribes and the app-based gaming companies. The tribes could also spend the next few years trying to build their own apps, and trying to control the market themselves.

Online sports betting, as I wrote last year, seems to fit in with Robinhood, stock-trading apps, and cryptocurrency trading in getting users—usually young, impressionable men—hooked on losing their money. It took New York State about a month after legalization to become, for a while, the largest sports-betting market in the country; thanks to aggressive customer-acquisition campaigns that included incessant ads and free bonuses and bets, gamblers in the state wagered $2.8 billion in the first seven weeks. Some studies have shown that sports betting is five times more likely to lead to problematic play than other types of gambling. Other studies say that online gambling is more addictive than analogue casino betting. (Though it should be pointed out that, at least in California, the casinos are helping to push that narrative.) Because the big online-gambling companies can roll out their services almost immediately after legalization, and have a seemingly unlimited amount of money for promotions, they will likely outpace whatever support infrastructure that can get built to help addicted bettors.

I’ve spent way too much of my adult life in casinos and cardrooms and sportsbooks, where I’ve met more than my fair share of problem gamblers. I’m still not sure if app-based sports betting is much worse than betting in the Circa sportsbook, where a few steps in any direction run you directly into a slot machine. The idea that it’s somehow healthier to place your bets at a racetrack than on your phone doesn’t really pass muster. Gambling addiction is, in many ways, built on sensory compulsions: the smell of the grass at the track, the sound of a roulette ball bouncing across the face of the wheel, the sharp edges of the dice digging into your fingers. It’s still an open question as to whether the apps can match up to the sensations of physical spaces that have been designed to suck the cash out of your pockets.

There’s a well-worn maxim in gambling that says you should assume everyone is lying to you at all times. This rule also seems to have carried over to the debates about online sports betting, where the only thing you can really trust is that every press release and every commercial is specifically aimed at cutting someone into the action or cutting someone else out. Instead of trying to cloak the issue in more palatable talking points such as tax revenue and homelessness funding, politicians, lobbyists, and the corporations who want FanDuel and DraftKings in their state might do better to just ask the question in a more up-front way. Because Americans, on the whole, do seem to want to become a nation of sports bettors—this year, Maine, Kansas, Minnesota, and Massachusetts passed sports-betting legislation. The will of the dudes in Instagram shorts with a few expendable dollars to put on a game will be served.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/what-would-a-nation-of-sports-gamblers-look-like

Just noticed your username OP 
Hopefully you hang around longer than her if you understand me.

Shitcoins & memecoins can make you money but most are a sure fire way to lose money. It’s a big risk to invest in memecoins but if you do, don’t risk too much because most of them don’t have longevity imo.

Exactly! There are several good matches to put on your money on but not this match. Except for the reason that we don't know whether or not this match is rigged, this match is very unpredictable as well considering that the one is a washed fighter and the other is a YouTuber.
I also recommend to just bet on a professional match with the REAL boxers to it.
https://www.espn.ph/boxing/story/_/id/12508267/boxing-schedule
A lot of good matches about to go down late in October and early November, that includes Loma, Fury, and Bivol are some of the notable names. 

It is an unfortunate situation for Beneil Dariush who is on a 8 fight winning streak and he is the one that has to get the title opportunity and was the back up fighter for the main event if something falls apart but then Alexander Volkanovski wanted to be the back up fighter and Dana and team approved that and Alexander Volkanovski was the back up fighter for the main event which means he gets the next title shot in Perth UFC 284 and Khabib and Islam Makhachev even called him out as the next challenger.

It will be a great fight as Alexander Volkanovski is on a 22 fight winning streak, he will be tricky for Islam Makhachev because of his small stature and his strong frame and as a fight fan i would love to see these fights.


Khamzat Chimaev is crazy and he threw the first punch and he was invited to the event by Abu Dhabi and now with this situation against Abubakar Nurmagomedov who is in Khabib's team, Khamzat will loose many endorsements and opportunities he should have got because Khabib is a really influential individual in GCC especially in the Emirates.

T.J. Dillashaw is a pussy and a coward, in the post fight interview in the cage he claimed that he popped his shoulder 20 times and still he wanted to fight so that he could get into the cage and pop his shoulder once again . He never mentioned his shoulder issue to the commission nor informed the UFC but he informed just before the referee briefing minutes before he walks out to fight that he is having issue with his shoulder and might pop out during the fight.

You should not only read the text, but also understand it before you answer. I was never part of this group. But after a pump, prices fall below pre-pump levels, and you, the obvious layman, should understand that. Furthermore, it doesn't say that I've made a personal loss (I haven't either.), but that I'm organizing the lawsuit. I also wonder how you know how much I work. But to reassure you, I don't have to work anymore thanks to cryptocurrencies.

I am always wondering how everyone is getting to that big level? I have seen people hitting bigger and bigger multipliers in the Games and Round section.  Whether it is roobet, Duelbit or some other casino, people will just throw themselves into various slots and play multipliers likes 777, or even 1000 plus many times. I have rarely hit anything above 100x multiplier and I find myself badly unlucky when it comes to playing slots. All I have hit is around 30-50x max and nothing above that. I always play very cautiously and do not put anything above 10 cents per bet including combination of lines and coins too.

Congrats on your win. I hope you had maximum profit in that since before that there would have been huge slides for you. :-D

Completing tasks in the test network sometimes brings a good profit. One of the last such examples was the airdrop from Aptos, in which for mint free NFT in the test network, its participants received 150 APT, which is approximately equal to $1200. By the way, the activity in this test network has not ended yet, since only 3% of the 51% allocated to the community has been spent.