|
Let me say this now and here: if suchmoon agrees on locking the account, I will remove my red tag on him. lets be honest suchmoon has tried to help Gleb.
But she/he could've helped him simply by lending him the money, what suchmoon did was accepting a DT2 account as a sort of collateral, clearly suchmoon didn't trust Gleb enough. is that what suchmoon good for? to blatantly accept an account(DT2) as a collateral?
Lock the account and I will change my tag in to neutral because of whatever good suchmoon has done for the community. fair enough?
|
|
|
|
|
Vod should've tagged DarkStar_ for misusing the trust system but instead he decided to tag Anduck(a non-DT member) to bully him and say that whatever Vod decides should be the end of story and nobody else should counter his feedbacks.
So what do we have here?
We have Vod tagging Anduck for something that Anduck is no longer doing, actmyname comes here and counters Vod's feedback without providing any reason other than what Vod has done was a childish act. Vod then leaves a positive trust for actmyname.
DarkStar_ sees this opportunity and thinks to himself: why don't I go and tag Anduck with some green and maybe Vod tags me with some green too? however what happens next? Vod tags Anduck to counter DarkStar_'s positive feedback, meaning Vod is trying to directly moderate the trust system with his DT power and is not even fair with his moderation. these people are on this business for years and nobody is competent enough to put an end to their misuse of trust system and abuse of other forum members.
I will be tagging Vod for this obvious case of trust abuse, further I will be tagging DarkStar_ for not using his DT2 power properly and for giving out positive trust for absolutely no reason.
EDIT: tagged both Vod and DarkStar_ for making a personal tool out of the trust system.
|
|
|
|
I did not know about it, although I knew that this functionality existed in such forums. Is it possible for him to use this function when he receives a request to rescue hacked or blocked accounts?
Is there any record of when the PM was viewed by a third account? Only admin has access to PMs without anybody reporting them, global mods could only see a PM if you report the PM and select global mod as the viewer. Please refrain from this kind of question asking on such topics. |
|
|
|
I want to know something here: is it true that Quickseller controls the Tomatocage account? because of this now I have my doubts about Tomatocage and him being on DT1, because Quickseller tried to exonerate Gleb multiple times and even asked for the topic to be closed. Could we say that doing this kind of shady garbage is a common practice among DT members? I would like to request for immediate exclusion of Tomatocage from DT1 unless he excludes Gleb as soon as possible. note again that Tomatocage has an alt account on DT2. Gleb lied multiple times and he is still protecting the first buyer, not to mention that suchmoon who has a habit of obstructing justice for years now has the control of Gleb's account, as a result I'd like our DT2 members to also tag suchmoon because she bought an account while the case was and is still open. |
|
|
|
If I lose my account I'll just start over. You'd start over perhaps you'd also ask Blazed and dooglus to include your new account on DT2 as well so that you could roam the forum and tag whomever you want, buy any account and expect us to trust you on your words. |
|
|
|
|
It appears that suchmoon has bought the account from Gleb, suchmoon blatantly bought a DT account. if other DT members refuse to tag suchmoon for doing this, it means that DT members would only tag whomever they want, that is a clear sign of favoritism and this habit should be frowned upon by all the people.
|
|
|
|
Quoting for future reference. so you bought an account and now expecting the red tags to be removed just because you bought the account?
Tagged.
I don't particularly care either way. You missed the part where I said I'm not going to use the account and Bruno may get it back at some point so it doesn't make any difference to me though it probably does for Bruno. But if you want to keep lying and creating your own reality - be my guest  Nothing is lost yet, if you admit what you did was wrong, I will give you another chance and would remove my tag. you could've paid him from your pocket without taking control of the account. it also seems that Bruno has been on account sale business for years. why did you take the account if you trusted him and even asked for his red tags to be removed? you didn't trust him enough that's why you tried to buy the account and make it look like you are helping him. Therefore I'd like to ask Tomatocage to exclude Gleb from DT2 before we see suchmoon to start tagging people with it.  I would also like to ask Blazed and dooglus to exclude suchmoon from DT2, she is a blatant account buyer. unless Blazed and dooglus agree with suchmoon's actions? if they agree with such a blatant case of account trading maybe we need to ask theymos to exclude them from DT1? |
|
|
|
I know I brought up the QS conspiracy theory but I think the probability of that one is quite low.
I have no reason to believe QS does have it, but somebody does (or did). That somebody right now is me and I'm quite confident I was dealing with Bruno: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg40211259#msg40211259So from my point of view the timeline is this: 1) Bruno needs money, makes the ill-conceived decision to sell the Gleb Gamow account. 2) Some sales action takes place, including PMs, but I don't believe the account changes hands. 2a) I can't explain the changes in posting style though Bruno is known for elaborate trollery so... 3) Unable to sell the account Bruno enrolls in a sig campaign to make money. 4) PMs get published, Bruno gets red-tagged and loses campaign revenue. 5) I make an offer to prevent the account from falling into malicious hands should Bruno decide to sell it again. 6) Bruno takes me up on my offer and now I temporarily control the account. When/if Bruno gets it back I will state so publicly. Even if I'm wrong about some part of this, the fact is the account is in my hands. I'm fully aware of the irony given my stance against account sales and sockpuppetry and the aforementioned impossibility of proving account ownership but I've already stated I won't be using it for anything so it will be really easy to see if I'm telling the truth or not. Hopefully this puts an end to the drama. Given the circumstances it seemed to me like the best way out. I would appreciate if you could remove neg trust as I don't believe Bruno deserves it but that's really up to you. Quoting for future reference. so you bought an account and now expecting the red tags to be removed just because you bought the account? Tagged. |
|
|
|
Are we done here yet kicking a dude - ME - to the curb whose been instrumental throughout the years in saving the asses from being financially harmed by rogue crypto entities that stole literally hundreds of millions of dollars or do we need to play some more?
You could keep doing what you were doing as usual, learn it from me, I got more motivated after I got tagged left and right. I just don't like those people who are in ICO business, I'm trying to make a way out for you here but there is no cooperation from you. I want to let it slide but when I see that you are in bed with our new staff and you both are invested in your ICO, I can't simply let this one slide, my gut tells me that somebody got rejected in a signature campaign and they asked for your account in exchange for the support on your ICO and some cash/coins and they used your account to enroll in the said campaign but then people called you out and you decided to take control of your account back. You made a mistake by starting to cover for that certain somebody, don't cover for him/her because clearly they were playing you all this time and now it's your account on the line plus years of hard earned trust and reputation. |
|
|
|
|
@Gleb, please don't kill yourself man, world doesn't end here and now, I'm sure that we all could find a way to forgive you if you just honestly tell us the truth about the actual buyer. just tell us please and I will do whatever in my power to help you out.
|
|
|
|
❤️
Happy birthday. come down sometimes to the slums of reputation and bring us poor beggars some joy. also I'm sorry if I have mentioned <you know who> a lot. you might have a girlfriend/wife and I never considered this fact that she might not like it. |
|
|
|
Let me go on the record to say that if Gleb ever needs $600 again I call dibs on his account just to prevent it from falling into wrong hands and to preserve its post history.
Let's watch digaran's head explode now.
I see that you are trying to legitimately purchase a DT account. this was the thing I needed to tag you with. You want to preserve his post history? go ahead and archive them. I think this is enough to ask Tomatocage to exclude Gleb as Gleb doesn't even need a DT account due to the fact that he has never left anybody with any feedback. so excluding him wont hurt the "community". Now that I have people's attentions here, I would like to point to the fact that Tomatocage has an alt account on DT2 with the name "Tomatocage1". as always be vigilant guys and girls. |
|
|
|
|
@xSplit, we're not in a family picnic here, this forum is also not a place where people should be worried about their kids, we're adults here and we are trying to revolutionize the economic section. what I am trying to do here is to establish a fair system for everybody and not just myself.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
|
|
|
|
Hey Quicksy, read here first. we could say that Bruno still has a phone and they could post the image with this account, the fact remains that he tried to sell his account as the evidence is convincing in the above link I have provided. My theory is that after FHF got rejected from chipmixer campaign because of being not trustworthy enough according to DarkStar_(who also still doesn't know how to properly use his newly given DT position) he=FHF got a hold of a somewhat trustworthy account and tried to enroll in the sig campaign. if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck then it is a duck. it wouldn't surprise me because FHF has a prior relationship with Gleb though on Gleb's alt account and their ICO. Conspiracy? some truth in my theory? I can't be sure 100% therefore I'd call it a theory. |
|
|
|
This can be or not can be for example if someone else has the access of account/mail/pc. Somebody else then also has access to camera and his face? though I never got the "I'm not gleb" in the image. @Gleb, can I ask you what is your relation with Flying Hellfish (currently a staff member)? you mentioned in your pre-ICO thread something about FHF being #1 shill, could you elaborate more on the case on this topic? |
|
|
|
Speaking of giving trust ratings, did anybody notice that I've never participated in said practice? What is confusing for me is the fact that you never claimed your account to be compromised, you said that you changed email address and password for security reasons, hence no valid excuse to say that a hacker sent a PM to bigmelons25 just to destroy your reputation. I was going to consider you as a victim of a malicious attack on your account, but you said that you are still in control of your account that means you sent PM to sell your account. Yes I have noticed that you have never left any feedback for anybody, that could be the reason for staying low profile just to sell the account somewhere in time without getting caught. |
|
|
|
What the fuck is a DT member? Is this the new owner or what? how come you don't know what a default trust member is after being here for years? it means that your feedback would be visible in trust scores of people if you leave them either positive or negative trust. |
|
|
|
I would like to suggest that we should also consider tagging other alt accounts of this sinner, not to mention the utucoin and their pre ICO, ROI. tag them all guys. we do not tolerate DT members with this kind of shady activities. now you should change your avatar and replace it with a street beggar, because you are no more a god around these woods. |
|
|
|
|
Now the question here is: what should we do with the OP for coming forward with this case? is a simple thank you enough? because doing what he did is the right thing to do and people should do this without wanting anything in return other than a thank you.
However, I still have my doubts, do you think OP was the first buyer who got screwed over by the seller and he posted this proof to get back at the seller?
I'd let DT members to decide that and if they think OP is the real man/woman here then maybe DT members could show some gratitude by the means of a green trust?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
