|
+1 I for one am appreciative of the Dev's initiative and commitment to make sure the relaunch went right. Out of the ~100 launches i've been a part of, the Dev's UNC relaunch ranks at top and is a great foundation for the coin to grow upon.
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to say I am really impressed with the Dev's activeness!  +1 The way the relaunch was handled has been a 110% success and set an example that hopefully more Dev's will follow if they want to see their coin succeed. From the measures he took to ensure a fair start for everyone with the wallets available prior to launch, the increasing block reward to ensure no insta-mining and prompt responses to every question and suggestion. Even going out of his way to reimburse those that had rented rigs for the prior launch. If you rent rigs for a coin launch, you do so at your own risk, IMO. From start to finish the Dev should be commended for his efforts!  |
|
|
|
|
Never invest in a coin with an IPO. Successful coins don't need an IPO. They rely on what they bring to the table to ensure investor demand. Only Pump and Dump shitcoin scams need an IPO.
|
|
|
|
|
At which block does the PoW stage end? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Never invest in a coin with an IPO. Successful coins don't need an IPO. They rely on what they bring to the table to ensure investor demand. Only Pump and Dump shitcoin scams need an IPO.
|
|
|
|
I'm not investing in anything called hack coin, and I'm sure no one else will either.
You clearly overestimate the capacity people here have to use their head for anything other than visualizing BTC signs! |
|
|
|
I have faith in the dev. Not worried at all.
“People have the mistaken impression that virtual currency means
you can trust a random person over the Internet,” says Jeff Garzik, a member of bitcoin’s core developer group." http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/1 |
|
|
|
AC market removed from Mintpal. Damnit, I knew I should have put it all into Cinni. They are the only legit PoS next to BC with no premine/ipo. Even rat4 the dev of BC assisted with Cinni's code...
Check out MINT. It was the first PoW/PoW coin to use a limited PoW stage before switching to pure PoS. Similar to BC. |
|
|
|
|
Never invest in a coin with an IPO. Successful coins don't need an IPO. They rely on what they bring to the table to ensure investor demand. Only Pump and Dump shitcoin scams need an IPO.
|
|
|
|
How efficient is minerd vs sph-sgminer ? Does the gpu miner blow it out of the water ? I've been looking for a good cpu miner to squeeze a little bit more out of my mining rigs.
Look into Groestl. The GPU to CPU ratio is about 5-10x, much better than x11. GPU mining with Groestl is also way more efficient. |
|
|
|
Which Algo do you think is the best/holds the most interest with the public atm?
Scrypt-n pretty much had the market for a while, but with x11 and groestl (However you're supposed to say that!) coming up, which will become the new standard?
I heard x11 is not fpga and asic resistance. So scrypt-n pretty much... I vote for Groestl to replace scrypt since it's far more efficient than Nscrypt mining and even give CPU's a chance at lower diff. |
|
|
|
You should have multiplied IPO coins x5 than too
Successful coins don't need an IPO, they rely on what they bring to the table to ensure demand. Only shitcoin Pump and Dump scams like this one need an IPO. |
|
|
|
Why do people keep dumping their coins the first chance they get? If they held onto them for a little while and gave this coin a chance they may actually earn themselves some decent profit?? I just don't get it?
Not just miners. As posted a few pages back, multipools are targeting this coin since it became one of the most profitable coins and they simply mine to dump the coins for BTC. You can tell it's multipools mining because the diff will suddenly double and then drop in half a short while later as they come in and out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=590681.msg6501547#msg6501547 |
|
|
|
|
The spotlight is on the original multi-algo mining coin MyriadCoin. This coin is just an amateur attempt to copy and cash in on their success without even bring anything new. The fast block times with a lack of a working diff retarget make it obvious it's an insta-mine scam.
|
|
|
|
What's the pw for the Windows-qt? It's not in the OP.
It should be WknYbiAWZ4EA66ggUhSaj3HE7cee But you can get unpassworded wallets from github (linked in the OP) Thanks that worked. They should update the OP. |
|
|
|
|
What's the pw for the Windows-qt? It's not in the OP.
|
|
|
|
THE FACTS ABOUT DARK COIN
1. released without windows QT so that only dev and pals could mine it.
2. Instamined harder than any other coin out there 12.5% of the current minting was mined in the first day
3. Later they decided to cut the minting by 75% to turn their 12.5% instamine with no windows QT into 50% instamine in 24hours - nice hey
yes that is correct they mined 50% of all the coins available at this time by themselves in the first 24 hours whilst windows users could not mine.
That is the facts.... doesn't matter what else they say... nothing can change what they have done.
Once zero coin, or bytecoin with a decent wallet it released or another darkcoin clone is released.... dark coin will sink like a stone.
LC definitely got them beat on that point. 500,000 or 50% of the 1M total was insta-mined in 30 minutes! They even try to cover up their insta-mine scam by calling it 'fast distribution' of the coin. I'll say, fast distribution into the wallets of those 'early adopters' in the first 30 minutes  http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#limecoin |
|
|
|
THE FACTS ABOUT DARK COIN
1. released without windows QT so that only dev and pals could mine it.
2. Instamined harder than any other coin out there 12.5% of the current minting was mined in the first day
3. Later they decided to cut the minting by 75% to turn their 12.5% instamine with no windows QT into 50% instamine in 24hours - nice hey
yes that is correct they mined 50% of all the coins available at this time by themselves in the first 24 hours whilst windows users could not mine.
That is the facts.... doesn't matter what else they say... nothing can change what they have done.
Once zero coin, or bytecoin with a decent wallet it released or another darkcoin clone is released.... dark coin will sink like a stone.
LC definitely got them beat on that point. 500,000 or 50% of the 1M total was insta-mined in 30 minutes! They even try to cover up their insta-mine scam by calling it 'fast distribution' of the coin. I'll say, fast distribution into the wallets of those 'early adopters' in the first 30 minutes http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#limecoin |
|
|
|
I like Dedicated Pools but think the way their PPLNS payouts is configured disadvantages small miners with less hash. The way it's setup when mining on their pool you only get paid a share of the block if you submit shares towards the block found. Since their vardiff will keep you from submitting shares too quickly, if their pool hash is very high you wind up only getting credit for the blocks found at a higher hight and not the easy blocks found by large hash miners. Other PPLNS pools give you a payout for all blocks found by the pool, even when no shares were submitted.
We are using prop so I'm not sure what you're talking about ?  I will leave this here though.  I was mining on your pool at launch and saw you posted a notice about limiting the vardiff to 128 in order to allow shares to be submitted more quickly before the next round. The problem is my miner can still go 1.5 minutes+ before submitting shares and with the very high pool hash, I don't get credit for many of the easy blocks found at a lower height. Most of your pools have PPLNS payouts and I have noticed the same issue I mentioned on those pools as well. When I registered for the UNV pool I could of sworn it was PPLNS payouts too. |
|
|
|
|
I like Dedicated Pools but think the way their PPLNS payouts is configured disadvantages small miners with less hash. The way it's setup when mining on their pool you only get paid a share of the block if you submit shares towards the block found. Since their vardiff will keep you from submitting shares too quickly, if their pool hash is very high you wind up only getting credit for the blocks found at a higher hight and not the easy blocks found by large hash miners. Other PPLNS pools give you a payout for all blocks found by the pool, even when no shares were submitted.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
