|
Gov is inflating the bond bubble and bond prices, we all know this, but since they're the largest holder, will maturation yields just go back to paying the debt to their bond purchases?
|
|
|
|
|
$25m may seem like a lot, but is vitally important in securing marketshare
|
|
|
|
Trying for a breakout as we speak.
triangle closing finally? |
|
|
|
There is one sticking point, though: bitcoins are fungible. Thus, you could always claim to have sold at least some of the "old" coins, as long as you've been trading for over a year.
^ exactly  |
|
|
|
|
that's my home state heyy-ooooo. glad the press got it right
|
|
|
|
So basically there is ZERO CORRELATION between difficulty and price. Quite at odds with the exclamations to the contrary.
zero correlation is simply incorrect. sample size is simply too small for it to match up on the last leg from april onward, give it time |
|
|
|
honestly it looks more like this  |
|
|
|
I think we are just at the beginning of 'Sell!'. I'm not seeing market capitulation here, there is still hope. For what reason would we capitulate, give that we already have before (twice, more perhaps?) it's not like there's no light at the end of the tunnel, the fact that we've survived the last ones has conditioned us. We know there's light at the end of the tunnel, contrast this to the first time we had to deal with this, from 32->2. Capitulation will be briefer and briefer until this market matures. we're focusing too hard on the bubble of 2011 and forgetting the other capitulations we had before, such as in August of 2012. |
|
|
|
We are definitely in a capitulation cycle. It won't last long because Bitcoin is getting strong and will not be ignored. Bitcoin needs to ROAR!!!
I see either hope (meaning capitulation has already happened) or fear, I don't see real capitulation right now... what leads you to think so? I don't see many dumping their BTC any more |
|
|
|
|
Did he ever get behind Linux?
|
|
|
|
Stop spreading this crap. Its not realistic, you fuggin troll.
it is if we choose not to use fiat-based currency any longer |
|
|
|
Can't superimpose it in a scaled format, too lazy, but here's this   |
|
|
|
Now if only Bitcoin itself can get this kind of marketing |
|
|
|
figured I'd repost here for relevance Well said. Perhaps Bitcoin holders will see free zones spring up that encourage crypto use and effect better exchange value.
http://www.nhforliberty.com/ron-helwig-discusses-shire-silver-and-bitcoin-at-2013-nh-liberty-forum/This guy, Ron Helwig, really gets it. I'm glad he's a part of the Free State Project, something I am seriously considering in the future, maybe even as just as a first home. "And of course, we do accept bitcoins for the Shire Silver, and we've gotten several orders for that. So people who are a little unsure about bitcoins can easily convert them to sound money by buying some Shire Silver!"
"So how do you answer the question that Bitcoin is sound money?"
"Actually, if you think about it, it probably is, to extent that, getting into the whole semantic argument, 'let's be a pure Austrian', all that stuff. Bitcoin either proves via Mises's regression theorem by having an actual value in its utility as a means of exchange, or it disproves Mises' theorem, in which case, is to me, a moot point. But the fact that it's mathematically limited to the 21 million bitcoins, means its essentially sound by mathematics, as opposed to silver and gold, it's sound by physics. Physics limits the amount of gold and silver available, mathematics limits the amount of bitcoins available." |
|
|
|
Well said. Perhaps Bitcoin holders will see free zones spring up that encourage crypto use and effect better exchange value.
http://www.nhforliberty.com/ron-helwig-discusses-shire-silver-and-bitcoin-at-2013-nh-liberty-forum/This guy, Ron Helwig, really gets it. I'm glad he's a part of the Free State Project, something I am seriously considering in the future, maybe even as just as a first home. "And of course, we do accept bitcoins for the Shire Silver, and we've gotten several orders for that. So people who are a little unsure about bitcoins can easily convert them to sound money by buying some Shire Silver!"
"So how do you answer the question that Bitcoin is sound money?"
"Actually, if you think about it, it probably is, to extent that, getting into the whole semantic argument, 'let's be a pure Austrian', all that stuff. Bitcoin either proves via Mises's regression theorem by having an actual value in its utility as a means of exchange, or it disproves Mises' theorem, in which case, is to me, a moot point. But the fact that it's mathematically limited to the 21 million bitcoins, means its essentially sound by mathematics, as opposed to silver and gold, it's sound by physics. Physics limits the amount of gold and silver available, mathematics limits the amount of bitcoins available." |
|
|
|
how do I get the full text? is it possible without subscribing?
3rd post |
|
|
|
Either way, it's a hard statistic to perfectly quantify. I think we can agree on that |
|
|
|
OK. So every transaction is recorded and regulated. Bad news for a lot of big traders  like it hasn't been already? There's a log for every single transaction you conduct in every single exchange, in addition to the blockchain |
|
|
|
|
I can't believe you would close wire deposits without warning. There is no liquidity whatsoever here without that. Massively irresponsible to your customer base to abruptly pull deposits. How are we supposed to know whether or not you're insider squeezing?
|
|
|
|
DElfation? Hrmm am I missing somethng. You meant inflation right?
The concepts are easily confused. The dollar is definitely inflating, as in the supply of dollars is increasing, but the demand of dollars relative to it is increasing even more. Something about higher inflation rates in other countries creating demand for a relatively less inflating currency, pyramid of fiat, etc Bitcoins man, bitcoins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
