Hi, now i have RIG  3x ASUS R9 270x apprx. 44MH/s BUt lots of ppl has 20MH/s for each GPU. I think i make a mistake. I dont know what. My setup is, Windows 8.1 Lastest version of etherium Using Cointron and Dwarfpool. Lastest GPU driver which is, version 15.20 ( https://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/R9270XDC2T2GD5/HelpDesk_Download/) Any idea why my result is low? Where do people get 20 MH per GPU? |
|
|
|
gcc-4.8: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory cc1plus is not in the repository. Even tried installing gcc-4.7. Same error. Also looked up the error message. Found some really old posts about adding build-essential and/or just g++. Both are installed. It seems you have two choices. Change cuda to match th OS or change the OS to match cuda. The latter seems preferable to me. If the xubuntu repo has cuda you can be pretty sure it works. |
|
|
|
|
Hi Crackfoo,
Since you have been so active adding new algos and coins I'm surprised cryptonight hasn't hit your radar. Any particular
reason? I've got a shiny new cpu miner I'd like to put to work.
|
|
|
|
they were talking about primecoin wich is only gpu since more than a year ago, riecoin is still only cpu for now. also the miner I posted before, from gatra, is not the most new or optimized but since it was a fork from cpuminer I thought it would be easier to add it to this miner, just like copy pasting  the latest miner for riecoin is here https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie , one of the pool owners optimized this miner for the intel cpus but he have it closed source for now. I can't do much if it's closed source. What about the original? Why don't you use it? |
|
|
|
Forgive me for barging in to Epsylon3's thread, but can you tell me more about his algo? What coins use it and are they in any pools? I might have a look at it. Hi joblo, this algorithm is only used on riecoin, this is the official thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446703.4380 its a good coin for cpu mining, and there are currently 2 pools, you can check them in the official thread. A recent post would suggest the CPU mining days are over. Could just be FUD. I'll look into merging it with cpuminer-opt. Edit: follow me here... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.msg13542056#msg13542056 |
|
|
|
which time the ccminer 1.7.1 will be compiled ?
thanks.
at 2:34 and 23 second (it will be available for 5 min ) don't miss it LOL! That's some funny stuff right there.  I just successfully compiled 1.7.2 on a Xubuntu 14.04 miner with CUDA 7.5 on it and it runs beautifully! I mine the Quark algo. Period. Save the comments. Whereas sp_mod was running about 11% higher hashrate on my GTX 750 Ti's, it was only getting ~70% acceptance when I mined solo. tpruvot, while 11% lower hashrate, kicks ass at 100% acceptance! ~20% ahead of the game mining solo. Question: I can't seem to compile on a Xubuntu 15.10 box with CUDA 7.5. Getting the "can't deal with >gcc4.9" error. I do seem to have gcc-4.8 installed but it's not being seen when I compile. How do I force it? Did you install cuda from the distro repo or from nvidia? The distro is more likely to be compatible. |
|
|
|
Forgive me for barging in to Epsylon3's thread, but can you tell me more about his algo? What coins use it and are they in any pools? I might have a look at it. |
|
|
|
Hi, can someone help me how to configure this cpuminer-multi to use multiple pools? I mean in case when the first one will be down. If yes, could the second pool use different algo? Thank you Gee I usually use a script for that., whether windows or linux. There are even some GUI managers that can be a front end for profit switching and failover. |
|
|
|
|
Have a nice weekend.
I am considering dropping suport for scrypt as a standalone algo. It's integration
with algo_gate didn't go so well, and there's allways Pooler.
However Pooler claims to have a very optimized scrypt and may be better than the
current one in cpuminer-opt and its ancestor cpuminer-multi.
I will investigate further as it may speed up some other algos.
|
|
|
|
sorry sir:
./algo/groestl/sse2/groestl.c:37:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
[.....]
algo/qubit/qubit.c: In function ‘qubithash’:
algo/qubit/qubit.c:89:23: error: ‘ctx_echo’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
Are you sure you did "make clean" before compiling it?
Are you compiling for SSE2? That doesn't work. uh... yes... sorry :-/ I working on fixing sse2 for release. I don't think the break is due to algo-gate but the file tree reorg and consolodation. Prior to that the quark sse2 code was in a seperate file. Now it shares code with AES_NI and I need to rwview all the hooks to keep them seperate. This may turn out to be a good thing because it gave me an idea about the problems I've been having with the sse2 groestl macros. The macros are defined in a file with regular functions and I think I need to split them up so i can configure each one differently in Makefile, #include, etc. Could be a boost for x* sse2. Might get it done before 3.1 release. This was a good thing. I have now solved the GRS macro problem. It was a metter of seperating the macros and real functions into seperate files, and not adding the macro file to Makefile. V3.1 will have significant improvements in SSE2 performance. Edit: X algo sse2 performance will have an additional 10% increase on top of the 4% already in v3.1-beta. v3.1 will be released later today. Thanks to Pallas for freaking me out into solving a long nagging issue with the GRS macros. |
|
|
|
sorry sir:
./algo/groestl/sse2/groestl.c:37:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
[.....]
algo/qubit/qubit.c: In function ‘qubithash’:
algo/qubit/qubit.c:89:23: error: ‘ctx_echo’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
Are you sure you did "make clean" before compiling it?
Are you compiling for SSE2? That doesn't work. uh... yes... sorry :-/ I working on fixing sse2 for release. I don't think the break is due to algo-gate but the file tree reorg and consolodation. Prior to that the quark sse2 code was in a seperate file. Now it shares code with AES_NI and I need to rwview all the hooks to keep them seperate. This may turn out to be a good thing because it gave me an idea about the problems I've been having with the sse2 groestl macros. The macros are defined in a file with regular functions and I think I need to split them up so i can configure each one differently in Makefile, #include, etc. Could be a boost for x* sse2. Might get it done before 3.1 release. |
|
|
|
sorry sir:
./algo/groestl/sse2/groestl.c:37:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
[.....]
algo/qubit/qubit.c: In function ‘qubithash’:
algo/qubit/qubit.c:89:23: error: ‘ctx_echo’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
Are you sure you did "make clean" before compiling it?
Are you compiling for SSE2? That doesn't work. uh... yes... sorry :-/ I working on fixing sse2 for release. I don't think the break is due to algo-gate but the file tree reorg and consolodation. Prior to that the quark sse2 code was in a seperate file. Now it shares code with AES_NI and I need to rwview all the hooks to keep them seperate. |
|
|
|
sorry sir:
./algo/groestl/sse2/groestl.c:37:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
[.....]
algo/qubit/qubit.c: In function ‘qubithash’:
algo/qubit/qubit.c:89:23: error: ‘ctx_echo’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
Are you sure you did "make clean" before compiling it?
Are you compiling for SSE2? That doesn't work. I have confirmed that error only occurs when compiling for SSE2. |
|
|
|
sorry sir:
./algo/groestl/sse2/groestl.c:37:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
[.....]
algo/qubit/qubit.c: In function ‘qubithash’:
algo/qubit/qubit.c:89:23: error: ‘ctx_echo’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo, (const void*) hash, 64);
Are you sure you did "make clean" before compiling it?
Are you compiling for SSE2? That doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, add #include "algo-gate-api.h" also.
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: In function ‘register_lyra2’: algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:227:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->scahhash = &LYRA2; ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:228:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->init_ctx = &initState; ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:229:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->set_target = &lyra2_set_target; This is deja vu. I've seen each of those errors before. The starting point had no algo-gate code in lyra2.c No gate functions, no registration function and no includes changes. That os what I intended to deliver. My apologies for messing up so bad. I'll get a new build out soon. Beta2: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZbElvRWdJWFBKV2s/view?usp=sharing |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, add #include "algo-gate-api.h" also.
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: In function ‘register_lyra2’: algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:227:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->scahhash = &LYRA2; ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:228:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->init_ctx = &initState; ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:229:7: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘algo_gate_t {aka struct <anonymous>}’) gate->set_target = &lyra2_set_target; This is deja vu. I've seen each of those errors before. The starting point had no algo-gate code in lyra2.c No gate functions, no registration function and no includes changes. That os what I intended to deliver. My apologies for messing up so bad. I'll get a new build out soon. |
|
|
|
latest dev beta has some issues on lyra2:
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:217:46: warning: ‘struct work’ declared inside parameter list
double factor )
^
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:217:46: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: In function ‘lyra2_set_target’:
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:219:2: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘work_set_target’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
work_set_target( work, job_diff / (65536.0 * factor) );
^
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: At top level:
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:223:1: error: unknown type name ‘bool’
bool register_lyra2( algo_gate_t gate )
^
algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:223:22: error: unknown type name ‘algo_gate_t’
bool register_lyra2( algo_gate_t gate )
HMMM, I thought I fixed that already, need to add #include <stdbool.h> to lyra2.c. Those last minute changes are a killer. Good thing it's only beta. Note that lyra2 in the code is not the same as -a lyra2 on the command line and is not on the supported algo list. But a compile error, that's bad. thanks, but not enough: algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:218:46: warning: ‘struct work’ declared inside parameter list double factor ) ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:218:46: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: In function ‘lyra2_set_target’: algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:220:2: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘work_set_target’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] work_set_target( work, job_diff / (65536.0 * factor) ); ^ algo/lyra2/lyra2.c: At top level: algo/lyra2/lyra2.c:224:22: error: unknown type name ‘algo_gate_t’ bool register_lyra2( algo_gate_t gate ) Oh yeah, add #include "algo-gate-api.h" also. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
