Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 07:40:58 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 198 »
2741  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** on: February 04, 2014, 02:51:59 PM
If you are having data corruption woes, you can also try the old sync; sync; halt method.  Shutdown is supposed to run the sync on it's own after killing the non-essential processes.  But, you can evoke it at any point.

If I can get into a terminal, I typically run:
sudo sync
sudo sync
sudo shutdown -h now

I was told back in the day, the second sync was there to trigger a head park on old mechanical hard drives.  But, as far as I can tell, it just makes "double sure" that the cache is flushed to disk.  So far I have not had any trashed SD cards and have rebooted the rig about 2 dozen times, primarily for tuning.

Over the weekend, there was about an hour of power outtage - when it returned all 7 antminers returned to hashing normally but the bitfury did not due to another TOTALLY corrupt SD card (wont format and image - throws 'semaphore timeout 121' errors like the last sd card that became bricked.

off to buy a pair of class 8 cards now see if they handle better.
2742  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Tiger Direct CENSORING Butterfly Labs reviews on: February 01, 2014, 02:51:30 PM
^this. also, TD knows that this is a new, sensitive category. They do not want 'the internet trolls' to come through and leave a ton of shitty reviews on a product they do not purchase
2743  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: February 01, 2014, 02:40:05 PM


~1190GH/s for the stack, and more hidden behind it
2744  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: TheShowOff-all ANTMINER mining rigs! on: February 01, 2014, 02:38:52 PM
^sha-256 besides bitcoin are all basically worthless and impractical to mine. Personally, I am planning to mine with my antminers until the bitmain price is in the 1BTC range, then trying to sell them around 1.3-1.5BTC since that seems to be the appropriate markup

here is my rig - 2 antminers and required PSU(s) per crate, plus another antminer on the table behind it.

2745  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [In Talks] Klondike Mining Collective - Toronto, Ontario Mining Facility on: February 01, 2014, 04:45:55 AM
How goes the development?

I am still looking for a suitable location without having to jump right into an empty 1000sqft space right away - Ive had some pretty mixed results on trying to get a good price and the power availability required without  having to go outside the GTA.

Also, I have been trying to wrap my head around starting this as a business, and it looks like there are two obvious options for a canadian small business: sole-proprietorship or as a few shared owners. From my stand-point, sole-proprietorship seems like the straight-forward option with all funds travelling through MY company's account - but If there are some serious individuals who would like to meet in person and share some of the effort and costs of starting this up I am totally open to the idea.

The tax law regarding bitcoin, espescially equipment depreciation, is quite open-ended. My next step is to speak with an accountant or two and see what sort of basic business plan can be drafted up to keep track of equipment costs/profits and make sure capital gains are properly taxed and any small-business benefits are sought out (such as tax-deductions for mining equipment and salaries).

I am still quite certain that there will have to be two seperate approaches made:
1) for investors to back equipment purchases to be hosted on their behalf, and
2) for miners looking for a place to operate existing hardware.

for right now, I am in talks with a small company that might be able to share some room in its back warehouse area which is mostly assigned to storage space at the moment. The location has a 600V 3-phase mains so adding power should not be an issue if there is enough space. I promise to have an update on this option eatrly next week, but it would only act as a small/medium hosting farm, possibly opened up to the 'investors' category. The long-term goal continues to be a larger space that can house tens to hundreds of terrahashes, but would require a large initial investment (hosted antminer group buy?) or a short-term small farm to test the waters for interest and as a business.
2746  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** on: February 01, 2014, 01:09:36 AM
however, the difference in user experience is vast. the antminers dont destroy SD cards. My bitfury has been stable for almost 2 weeks, but I am terrified to change it over to a less-noisy PSU for fear that the SD card will need to be formatted and imaged all over again just to get it running, not to mention re-doing all the autotune

Can't you copy the autotune file to a USB stick? "sudo shutdown -h now" has been sparing me reimaging.

on at least 3 occasions 'sudo shutdown -h now' has messed up the SD card image. in contrast when i first had the system i must have safely turned off and on the PSU to do tweaks and pencil mods a dozen times before the first issue with an SD card. At this point i just avoid touching it for fear of it losing my settings.

How long are you waiting after issuing the shutdown command before you actually shut down the miner?  The idiot lights on the RPi continue blinking for a few seconds before just the red LED stays on by itself.  Once it's just the red LED, you can shut it off.  I've never had a corrupted SD card.

On another note, more H-boards arrived today, two days after they were ordered.  Cool Heatsinks still haven't arrived, but my first boards ran OK without heatsinks for a couple of weeks or so with no ill effect (and with less-optimal airflow over them), so I suspect I'll plug 'em in now and add the heatsinks whenever they arrive.

I am sure I waited long enough. One occasion i waited about 3 minutes first
2747  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** on: January 31, 2014, 10:08:52 PM
My current limit for profitability is ~ US$5.10 per Ghps.

Any more than this and you're unlikely to make a complete ROI in the first 3 months - and if you have to bank on mining more than 3 months to make a complete ROI then you can't make any good (reliable) estimates anyway.

That's a pretty reasonable number. Bitmain comes close. Bitfury is double that. Disappointingly overpriced.

I think bitmain is right on the nose with thier pricing 90% of the time. the current 1.45BTC batch and the 2.65BTC batch they had 2 weeks ago both fall a little norht of what i consider 'reasonable'. 0.0065BTC/GH seems like a fair number to me for an antminer (2w/GH) and maybe 0.0075BTC/GH for a bitfury due to the slightly better efficiency.

however, the difference in user experience is vast. the antminers dont destroy SD cards. My bitfury has been stable for almost 2 weeks, but I am terrified to change it over to a less-noisy PSU for fear that the SD card will need to be formatted and imaged all over again just to get it running, not to mention re-doing all the autotune

Can't you copy the autotune file to a USB stick? "sudo shutdown -h now" has been sparing me reimaging.

on at least 3 occasions 'sudo shutdown -h now' has messed up the SD card image. in contrast when i first had the system i must have safely turned off and on the PSU to do tweaks and pencil mods a dozen times before the first issue with an SD card. At this point i just avoid touching it for fear of it losing my settings.

how could i copy the settings (or better yet, the full image) over the network or onto a usb stick to make backup SD cards?
2748  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTB] Casascius Gold/Silver 1BTC FUNDED Coin on: January 31, 2014, 05:13:20 PM
I have a couple of these as well as te silver ones in absolute mint condition. They have been sitting in the safe for a couple years in air tight sealed bags.

You have 2013 coins sittings in a safe for a couple years? Wait...

hahah - maybe meant there were other 2011 or 2012 coins in the safe as well?
2749  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: January 31, 2014, 05:12:06 PM
A mining flower and a couple of Casascius coins. With a USB fan that is quite effective without making much noise.



is that a *gasp* - REDEEMED - casacius coin!?
2750  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: January 31, 2014, 05:09:54 PM
defcon, check the cooling - does it have 4 screws and is it screwed down tight?  If not, the chip will overheat and cut out.
cooling ok , ' the unit dont come hot, it stay really cold, cause she run only 30 sec ... and shut down... Cry
the i push one of the two buttons in the left of the board, then she start again , and shutdown again 30 sec later .... it's looks like a psu issue.... not sure

sounds like a powewr supply issue. some supplies dont handle the rated power and if thats the case can cause themselves or the machine to switch off or even power cycle
2751  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Antminer v1.6 fans not rotating on: January 31, 2014, 05:03:36 PM
Hello all,

I'm wondering if others have this problem also.
I received last week 3 antminers S1 v1.6 and they all seem to have the same problem.

When we connect them with our PSU via 2 PCI connectors the fans don't start rotating. It looks like they want to start, but they don't.

For the moment we connected the fans directly to the PSU and now they are rotating in full force, which makes a lot of noise off course.

We didn't have these problems with the v1.4 which we have also currently running.

Kr,
D

They are later versions of the fans, they do not start turning until the miner starts hashing and the chips warm up.

this. It seems like the new fans have a different starting voltage then before, so wont trrigger until the PWM feeds a certain amount of power to it.
2752  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** on: January 31, 2014, 04:58:09 PM
My current limit for profitability is ~ US$5.10 per Ghps.

Any more than this and you're unlikely to make a complete ROI in the first 3 months - and if you have to bank on mining more than 3 months to make a complete ROI then you can't make any good (reliable) estimates anyway.

That's a pretty reasonable number. Bitmain comes close. Bitfury is double that. Disappointingly overpriced.

I think bitmain is right on the nose with thier pricing 90% of the time. the current 1.45BTC batch and the 2.65BTC batch they had 2 weeks ago both fall a little norht of what i consider 'reasonable'. 0.0065BTC/GH seems like a fair number to me for an antminer (2w/GH) and maybe 0.0075BTC/GH for a bitfury due to the slightly better efficiency.

however, the difference in user experience is vast. the antminers dont destroy SD cards. My bitfury has been stable for almost 2 weeks, but I am terrified to change it over to a less-noisy PSU for fear that the SD card will need to be formatted and imaged all over again just to get it running, not to mention re-doing all the autotune
2753  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 31, 2014, 08:15:18 AM
Update on trading and wafers:

It is going to be a few more days before, I can get the verifying program uploaded to the server.

I have been busy getting on the February UMC production run for our 55nm chip.

We are going to get 6 Wafer in the middle of April with about 1 week to package the chips.  Based on our estimated yield of 6,800 chips per wafer this give us 40,800 chips for a total hash rate of  77.52 TH/s.  Next we are going to receive 19 wafers by the end of April for a total of 245.48 TH/s, giving us 323 TH/s.  In May we will be able to get all of the wafers we want to run.

so ~320TH deploying late may on 55nm -> good news but hardly amazing. If difficulty climbs 75% a month till then, difficulty will be slightly less than 10x what it is now.

For reference I am running 1.63TH of equipment NOW -> rough equivalent of 16TH by the time actm can deploy 20x that (if they meet schedule)
The network won't be 10x what it is now in May. It will be somewhere between 40-100 PH.

we are seeing roughly 20% jump every 10 days. If ACTM has wafers by late april it will probably take until the END of may to get them packages, mounted, and through certification/testing if there are no holdups. That is roughly 120 days from now = 1.20^12=8.916 times larger than the current network. Depending who you ask, 20% per jump may be a conservative number, hence my rounding to 10x the current network size.
2754  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Announcement: Bitmain launches AntMiner solution, 0.68 J/GH on chip on: January 31, 2014, 07:48:54 AM
I just went through all my miners and calculated the error rates - most are between 0.15%-0.9% and running in the 375/387.5/400 range. I tuned one down that was making 2.6% errors and tuned two up that were less than 0.1% errors - presumably that should afford me an extra 10GH or so in total
2755  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Setup & Troubleshoot] Bitmain AntMiner S1 180GH/S miner on: January 31, 2014, 04:39:12 AM
1st thing in my mind.... PSU  

Please make sure you are using a PSU with 2 +12v rails and each PCI-E cable is coming from it's own rail.  (Not 2 PCI-E connectors from 1 cable)

If the above is not the case, if you feel confortable unscrewing the hashing PCB on the network port side and other hashing pcb and swap it.  Then turn on the antminer with 1 blade only.  If it still shows many XXXXX then, it's time for the RMA to get a replacement Hashing PCB




Just got an S1 in today and hooked up. I have a section of ASIC status all xxxxxxxx and only running 156 Gh/s(avg).  I switched the PCI-e cables around and still the same. Upon further inspection I noted that the RF led is not a steady flashing rate on one of the blades.  Only flashes a couple times every other second or so. Definitely not behaving like the RF led on the other blade. Anything I can take a look at?

easiest way to check is to measure the voltage with a multimeter across the two legs of the inductor (grey cube above the faulting 8 chips). You should pick up a voltage of 1.1V - If this voltage is not present it means those chips have no power. I had a similar issue with my second batch antminer but it was the first 'segment' on the board that had no voltage, thus none of the 32 chips on the side worked. Bitmain was very good at shipping me a replacement PCB

Thank you for the tip. I measured voltages at various points and these are my findings:

Red: 11.56V so juice is definitely getting into the board.
Yellow: 1.1V is present here
Green: this capacitor is supposed to be around 12V, right? Yet it measures much lower and the voltage is dropping as I measure it.



Can you recommend if this can be fixed by me: a have a mobile phone repair guy, who is very good at soldering, so if I can replace something then I'd rather fix it myself.
Or if it is not easily replaceable then I would rather have a small refund as only 50GH/s are not working, which is 28% of the miner.

My immediate impression is that your 12V DC power is far too low. Equipment will not handle well outside of a 11.7-12.4V range and it is almost certainly your PSU being a bit too weak for the job, or running long 18AWG cables that are losing voltage across the distance (partially as the cables getting warm).

I *imagine* that the all 3 capacitors should act the same way when tested - its possible that one might be poor quality and shorting/draining when tested with the meter.

2ND THOUGHT: I am not sure how the power is given from the 12V in to the 4 'segments', but if it is a chain across the the 3 capacitors in a rightward direction the capacitor could be broken and the multimeter is causing the connection to complete, but designed not to carry the required amperage through its probes -> hence voltage drops without a valid circuit. I am not an electrical engineer though, so a 2nd opinion would be a good idea before you take the soldering iron to it. If it is the capacitor, it would be a very easy fix if your friend has the tools for fire-point soldering and some experience with phones. (I personally have only a larger iron so I would not attempt a smaller component like that without buying a new tool or two)

By the way, which section is the one showing all x's? The second one I imagine?
2756  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 31, 2014, 04:27:32 AM
Update on trading and wafers:

It is going to be a few more days before, I can get the verifying program uploaded to the server.

I have been busy getting on the February UMC production run for our 55nm chip.

We are going to get 6 Wafer in the middle of April with about 1 week to package the chips.  Based on our estimated yield of 6,800 chips per wafer this give us 40,800 chips for a total hash rate of  77.52 TH/s.  Next we are going to receive 19 wafers by the end of April for a total of 245.48 TH/s, giving us 323 TH/s.  In May we will be able to get all of the wafers we want to run.

so ~320TH deploying late may on 55nm -> good news but hardly amazing. If difficulty climbs 75% a month till then, difficulty will be slightly less than 10x what it is now.

For reference I am running 1.63TH of equipment NOW -> rough equivalent of 16TH by the time actm can deploy 20x that (if they meet schedule)

Don't discount to possibility of this being retrospectively 'amazing' news.  We start at the beginning and build from there.  This is the first time we've been given figures that can be used to quantify our position and for anyone to FUD post about the incessant rise in difficulty factor, which has the same proportional effect on all miners, it is suggestive of ulterior motives. EDIT : .., or evidence that they do not see the bigger picture. But hey, what would I know?


I am given the impression that they may be a bit late joining the party, especially if there are any unforsen delays or problems in the chip. Hashfast already demonstrated how long it can take from the photo of a dorky CEO holding a sealed box of wafers to actually putting equipment in the hands of miners. (Without checking, I think it was close to 5-6 weeks). By that time there will be a lot more 28nm options available (probably including bitfury if they are working on something in the background) and big promises on a 40nm by asicminer (ie: very cost-effective) - and the cost of hardware could begin to drop faster as buyers simply can't operate any larger a cluster at home
2757  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Server Power Supply Interface Board - for standalone miners and GPU rigs on: January 31, 2014, 03:06:06 AM
I haven't poked around on the DPS-800 yet (been busy scaling up manufacture on the Z750P boards) but I believe they should be able to load-balance. Just a matter of finding the current-share pin. The Z750P boards break it out so tying the SHR pins together on several boards, and tying the rails together, will load-balance. The DPS-800 board should operate the same way, just gotta find out how.

okay - I have access to a box of ~20 of them at $5 each but seeing as how 2 failed on me (one mightve been bad from the start and i didnt test right before modding, the other after ~24 hours of operation) I am slightly skeptical. I have a few more to wire up and try with but they seem like great candidates for solid power, with enough for 2 antminers at 375MHz it seems
2758  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 31, 2014, 02:59:09 AM
Update on trading and wafers:

It is going to be a few more days before, I can get the verifying program uploaded to the server.

I have been busy getting on the February UMC production run for our 55nm chip.

We are going to get 6 Wafer in the middle of April with about 1 week to package the chips.  Based on our estimated yield of 6,800 chips per wafer this give us 40,800 chips for a total hash rate of  77.52 TH/s.  Next we are going to receive 19 wafers by the end of April for a total of 245.48 TH/s, giving us 323 TH/s.  In May we will be able to get all of the wafers we want to run.

so ~320TH deploying late may on 55nm -> good news but hardly amazing. If difficulty climbs 75% a month till then, difficulty will be slightly less than 10x what it is now.

For reference I am running 1.63TH of equipment NOW -> rough equivalent of 16TH by the time actm can deploy 20x that (if they meet schedule)
2759  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Server Power Supply Interface Board - for standalone miners and GPU rigs on: January 31, 2014, 02:46:51 AM
One of the benefits here is, if the supply fails you're only out the $12 for a new supply, don't need to do anything with the wires either or rebuild another supply. Also if you want more than 750W without worrying about overload, these load-balance and tie together for redundancy.
That $50 supply, will that run all 750W on the 12V or how is it split up? How long will it run on heavy load? Does it run 90% efficient? Also would you have to paperclip-trick it, or does it have a real switch? Or the ability to auto-on from an external signal? Also does it have all the cables you'd need, or will you have to splice? And what about all the cables it has that you don't need?


At $25 each, we'd be taking a loss on parts and labor. That's the cost of quality components and domestic manufacture - if we used garbage parts and outsourced to China it could be cheaper, but I would have no part in it. They're as cheap as they're gonna get unless somehow we get free parts or decide to stop paying employees.

Right now only the Z750P boards exist. I'll have some DPS-2000 boards in the next few weeks hopefully, which will be more expensive - integrated fan controller, and all the copper and terminals required to distribute 160A. I'll have DPS-800 boards soon also, which will probably be cheaper than the Z750 boards since those supplies handle fan and low-volt internally. As far as I can tell though, the Z750P is still the cheapest supply to acquire (can be found in large quantities for below $10 per) which should help offset the total cost.

how do you load-balance server PSUs, specifically ones like the DPS-800GB? Can I simply tie all the positive leads to one terminal block and all the negatives to another and get n*800W (n being the number of parallel supplies) of available power, or is there another step? Also, I imagine you couldn't balance a 600W and an 800W together because the 600w will fry, or will it work for ~1400W output?
2760  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Announcement: Bitmain launches AntMiner solution, 0.68 J/GH on chip on: January 30, 2014, 10:32:45 PM
i have a problem, and i wonder if anyone got the same issue
after 2 days of mining i start to get errors on both miners 2 antiminers s1:
ooxxxooo oxoxoxxo oooxoooo oxxooooo


On BTC Guild, i have the same hash rate.


After a reboot, the errors goes away, and i can mine again for 2 days or so...



Ignore them it is just a display bug.

I agree. If your hashrates are fine the X does not mean anything.
However if you keep getting that error check your PSU.
That error is listed in the antiminer setup and troubleshoot guide: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344970.0




i don't think is the soruce, cause i use corsair 750w, for every miner.

I heard some corsairs have problems.
Anyways, I am not an expert just giving my 2c

some power supplies dont provide the full 12V at over 70% rated capacity for prolonged time. I had a 670W server PSU that was switching off and on for 5/10 min cylces at 375MHz. Its fine to power only 1 blade with the other supported by an ATX with 750W on 12V that is also running another 387.5MHz. (an ULTRA X3)
Pages: « 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 198 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!