Tagged, please read the reference.
|
|
|
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
Why is it wrong? From theymos himself ( who you believed should have 100% control the trust network): It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)
Well my don DarkStar_, theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time, but if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust. Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce a previously left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback and also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.
|
|
|
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.
"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck" "After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum." "Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum." Let's start with those. Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback? I would change my negative trust on matlboroza because I have to admit that I was too harsh on him, yes I am willing to change my tag on him to neutral just in case if he ever reset his password, we could have a reference as to when he has changed his email address. regarding Vod's feedback: I am willing to give him a chance if I see that he is willing to admit that tagging actmyname with some green was a misuse of the trust this community has given him. I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong. I am constantly changing my methods and I am trying to improve myself based on the reactions from the community members. some DT members are not like that unfortunately, they would tag somebody and would leave them for dead.
|
|
|
I left some feedback...
Were you ever involved in any Ponzi scheme yourself before? if yes then your feedback means jack, if people see that you have had some shady activity regarding similar Ponzi-like schemes, they wont trust your feedback. However I haven't seen you endorsing any project other than a few which I would like to assume that they were successful at the end and nobody lost any money just because you were endorsing the projects. All in all, thank you for your vigilance.
|
|
|
We need to reward good and long term reporters with something, there needs to be some sort of incentive for people to report, I'd say that we should also increase the numbers of moderators, without them there is no use for reporting.
Personally I am not interested in garbage coins and their scam ICOs, therefore I wont visit that section at all, I think altcoin section should be removed entirely, there is nothing there other than scam.
|
|
|
Thanks, now every street beggar could become a signature designer to spam the forum with their garbage posts about garbage coins, tokens.
|
|
|
Blah blah blah I'm not a DT member, my feedback is untrusted and you could read the references yourself. About 90 day tag, if those people stay after getting tagged, maybe we should give them another chance, 90 days is enough time to test them, don't you think?
|
|
|
Tagged, let us wait for trust system moderators (DT members) to see this thread and tag these cheaters accordingly.
|
|
|
whom I tag is none of Vod's business Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it. Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not. DT members are not going to remove their false negative feedback. that's all I want, I want them to forgive people, I want them to remove their false tags on me and on anybody else.
|
|
|
Vod is not fit to be on DT he is consistently abusing other people with his red tags. in this case Vod is trying to moderate the trust system directly. I'm a non-DT member, what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.
|
|
|
Tagged part one accounts, lets hope that trust system moderators and my stalkers see this.
|
|
|
Further more Vod tagged me in retaliation of my tag on him. Vod is incompetent individual and is also trying to moderate the trust system. if you read his tag on me, you'll understand.
How many times DT members could toy with other people's reputation until they get kicked out from DT?
|
|
|
The only thing US government has is an arsenal of nuclear bombs and they stole the technology from Germans. however they have that arsenal only by the grace of God, without God's wills nothing ever happens. whatever good happens comes from God, whatever bad happens comes from ourselves.
HAARP. what a joke.
|
|
|
Lauda and Ognasty are two DT members with some balls, I haven't seen anybody else so far.
But what if Lauda is female? That would be awkward. Like you are a female? if you are then it explains your desire to fuck with me with every chance you could find. Disclaimer: I don't do married women, I haven't done any women in my life so far.
|
|
|
~ be about ethics~ Coming from a known racist and somebody who has nothing else in his/her life other than tagging low rank accounts. be the man and tag anybody on DT if you see they are doing something wrong. don't be a puss and say whatever DT members are doing is their own business and people should only suck to them in order to remove their tags. what good could come out from you if you were only tagging non-DT members? I like how some of the DT members are with some big balls to tag other DT members for their shady activities. unfortunately we have only a few of such great people in this community, the rest are just some pussies scared of losing their pay per post campaigns. Lauda and Ognasty are two DT members with some balls, I haven't seen anybody else so far.
|
|
|
Because people lack faith in God, they are afraid of poverty and they simply don't believe that God is the only one who'd provide for them, therefore they would go into prostitution. just a bunch of lost sheeps if you ask me.
|
|
|
NK leader is a pussy, coward. Iran on the other hand will stay firm and will stand up against the tyrants. "Trump will make America great again. <sarcasm tag>"
|
|
|
Since I wasn't paying attention to that loan I've "bailed" on a few years ago (even tho I've had a collateral), will I have negative trust removed if the loan is repaid?
This is mainly for hilariousandco and marlboroza.
Did they tag you for the loan alone or did they tag you for being an alt account? let us wait for trust system moderators to see what is their opinion on this.
|
|
|
one has to wonder, are these people really idiots if they think that I care for some red numbers and words on my profile or what?
You care enough to make a complaint thread in Reputation....
|
|
|
at this point being tagged by several DT members is enough to silence a member I would like to invite you taking a look at every single tag on my profile from DT members. you'll see my point. this is your mindset which is wrong, DT members are just people, their tag is not definitive indication of somebody being a scammer/untrustworthy.
|
|
|
|