You chose to live in squalor. As I said before, you were wearing a hair shirt. Big difference.
You did it that one day you might be able to impress impressionable minds with your tales of triumph in the face of adversity.
In the UK we call it "slumming" it. Its a common practice among young students from privileged backgrounds, that, like yourself, can't quite come to terms with their own privilege.
Leftists are good at making excuses. Another example of their duplicity and disingenuous evil. And you avoided answering the question. How rough was your suffering specifically? I didn't exactly choose. I did it because of love. And because the girl got pregnant and I had to honor my obligation and not abandon the girl as most foreigners do. And I didn't choose to have a father that abandoned my mother when I was 5 to go live in the Belize leaving us in relative poverty in Louisiana. |
|
|
|
TLDR, I am in poor health. Black kids used to touch my hair when I was small - and my neighbour 3 doors down once had worms.
I lived in absolute squalor in the Philippines. And had not enough food to eat. I had at one point, not even $1 to travel or do anything about my situation. Like all the leftists, you can only lie to justify your evil. You would not likely survive what I endured. If you think you are man enough, come here now and we will go live in squalor together and let's see which of us dies first. You are all talk. No walk. Now me, I did have it rough
How rough? Did you eat only once a day? Did you get eaten by mosquitoes constantly? Did you every week have severe bouts of diarrhea and gastroenteritis due to unsanitary conditions? (note I am not saying that others didn't have worse suffering than me, yet my suffering was severe) |
|
|
|
I have suffered extreme poverty at a level that you could probably not survive.
No - you haven't. That is bullshit, and you know it. It is fact. Those who know my life, know I have suffered extreme poverty. And they know I am suffering extremely bad health now. And I don't avail of health insurance nor socialized health care. You leftists are corrupt and evil. You are the scum of the earth. You will destroy yourselves. You don't embody the American Dream - the boy from the streets made good through drive, determination and raw talent.
I am precisely that. I was moved to 12 schools before I even graduated high school. I lived in inner city Baton Rouge where my sister and I were the only white kids in the entire school. My neighbors had ringworm. But that wasn't the worst poverty I endured. The worst was living in squalor in the Philippines without even food. And from that squalor I programmed Art-O-Matic and CoolPage and then rose from poverty to earn as much as $350,000 in a single year (inflation adjusted that is $millions). But now I am back to poverty again (because I am too generous, because I chose to live with the poor, and because I lost my health making it difficult to work!). I lost an eye because of living in such poverty. And I have lost my digestive health from all the gastro infections and mosquito born illnesses. STFU. (luckily I have never lived in a war zone) You need to do some more reading on political economy and sociology.
Corrupt armchair bigot. You've never experienced reality. Reading that indoctrination propaganda won't teach you about life. We can't change the fact that politics is a power vacuum. All you leftists accomplish is feeding more power to that corruption. You don't accomplish redistribution of wealth. Subtract the debt levels and you can see this is true even in the Western world today. You delude yourselves. |
|
|
|
Not to mention the ridiculous double standard where the conservatives and hardline libertarians believe they have the right to live and work anywhere in the world because capitalism. But as soon as anyone foreign wants to move there, it's all "filthy immigrants" and "dey took er jerbs", where suddenly the open market doesn't apply to the labour force. They claim they want small government, but still want someone to "defend" the borders (preferably for free because they're too greedy and self absorbed to pay tax). They want all the benefits of living in a society but none of the responsibility of maintaining it. Hate-filled leeches.
there is a difference between advanced westerners with money or skills going to other countries and helping generate wealth for those countries and muds coming here to leech welfare or work minimum wage and put our own menial workers on the dole Well anyone can go buy land and own a business in the USA, but I can't buy land nor 100% own a business in many countries in Asia such as the Philippines where I am now. Leftists will find any excuse to defend their corrupt, horrific, megadeath directed ideology. They are retards. We conservatives should congregate in our own regions and kick out the leftists. And let them go congregate in their regions where they are most populous. And then let's watch them crash and burn economically. But they will never allow that without war, because all they know how to do is steal. This process is underway. The USA will break up into regions in the coming decades as Martin Armstrong's computer predicted many years ago. The leftists are not going to tolerate us. So we have nothing to gain by being nice to them. It is time to divorce from them. There is no way to reason with a leftist, because if they had critical thinking skills, they wouldn't be leftists in the first place. Just accept that they are scum of the earth and there is nothing we can do to help them. Let them destroy themselves and prepare for our self-defense because they will make war against us when we refuse to pay for their stealing. We conservatives who are productive must let all those leftists go congregate with their other unproductive ilk and let them steal and ass fuck each other into oblivion. |
|
|
|
...but what you have written here is absolute drivel that could only ever have come from the keyboard of a privileged knob who has never had to struggle.
I have suffered extreme poverty at a level that you could probably not survive. It was not pleasant. I am daily suffering the after effects of those experiences due to destroyed health from it. You are going to have a very difficult time defending your jealous, selfish, corruptness against someone like myself who has at times walked with (nearly) nothing as Jesus said to do. Leftists are religious bigots. A gay lawyer, Dan Goldstein from Brooklyn, who had a child in his arms, outright abused everyone and Ivanka Trump with her husband and children when they were flying in coach on JetBlue from JFK. However one hour before that INCIDENT, Matthew Lasner, Goldstein’s gay wife, wrote on Twitter: “Ivanka and Jared at JFK T5, flying commercial. My husband chasing them down to harass them.”
Dan Goldstein and his wife Matthew Lasner, who were married in September 2012, were thrown off of the JetBlue flight from New York to San Francisco. Goldstein began yelling: “Why is she on our flight. She should be flying private.” Another passenger reported he said “They ruin the country now they ruin our flight!” They also posted that Trump is not my President. Such people should just leave and go to Middle East and get a dose of reality.
This is a prime example of why I would send my children out of the country to be educated for American universities are becoming insane Petri dishes of extreme leftist intolerance where professors, who teach because they cannot do what they teach, think it is their right to express their personal political views to indoctrinate students. Any school that allows such professors should be denied student loans be they left or right. This is not teaching skills but propaganda for either side.
Ivanka Trump is the leftist in the Trump family and then her own ilk attack her. Lol. Retards. |
|
|
|
CoinCube, this is the way I felt about when you quoted me out-of-context and tried to "prod" me into a more moralistic perspective: Dear OP, with such a prescient mind and foresight aplenty, surely your net worth must be vast !
Does that have any relevance to whether all of my published predictions except one were correct? And the one that was incorrect, I stated upfront that it was only a theory and might not be correct. Does your comment have some relevance to the size of your penis and your ego? (How dare anyone claim to be correct most of the time, when in fact they are) If not, what is the relevance? I think you lack the mental acuity to entertain all the factors that go between correct predictions and choosing to be a speculator. I choose to be a programmer and developer (and to have the life experiences of roaming the world including a long stint in the backwater country of the Philippines). A man can be a jack of all trades and expert of none, or can choose to prioritize what he thinks is the most important focus of his time and expertise. Attacking someone for their choices or priorities as a means of belittling their successes, so as to further your own ego, is not very respectful. If you don't respect others, how can you expect them to respect you.Leftists already disrespect me, because I refuse their bankrupt, corrupt, retarded, violent, horrific ideology. Thus respecting them won't gain any of us anything. As Armstrong predicted long ago, the USA will breakup along religious values demarcation. The leftists are one religion and the free market conservatives will unify around christian-like religions. Religious wars will be very prominent over the next two decades. I don't know where those of us anarchists who are more conservative about not moralizing, will fit in to this. We are like the Jews, but even more so. We choose to defect entirely, not just from nation-states. As Jesus said, walk with nothing and from town to town with nothing. CoinCube wants to build society. That is why he favors strong moral discipline. Groupwise organization requires some top-down control. I don't entirely disagree. I see the point of it. |
|
|
|
Dear OP, with such a prescient mind and foresight aplenty, surely your net worth must be vast !
Does that have any relevance to whether all of my published predictions except one were correct? And the one that was incorrect, I stated upfront that it was only a theory and might not be correct. Does your comment have some relevance to the size of your penis and your ego? (How dare anyone claim to be correct most of the time, when in fact they are) If not, what is the relevance? I think you lack the mental acuity to entertain all the factors that go between correct predictions and choosing to be a speculator. I choose to be a programmer and developer (and to have the life experiences of roaming the world including a long stint in the backwater country of the Philippines). A man can be a jack of all trades and expert of none, or can choose to prioritize what he thinks is the most important focus of his time and expertise. Attacking someone for their choices or priorities as a means of belittling their successes, so as to further your own ego, is not very respectful. If you don't respect others, how can you expect them to respect you. |
|
|
|
Hi Marc, I have limited time to post because family obligations during these holidays, so I may not be able to reply to all of your post until next days, but here is a quick reply to a portion: Hey iamnotback, honor having u here  Truthfully, much of what you say is above my level of understanding. I appreciate very much you validate certain points, and debunk others. I really want to understand why POS is not good, but it's hard. The article you linked is way too complex for me. If you are able to explain it in simpler terms I would value that highly. How can POS be more expensive than POW? Nxt has zero inflation, only pays validators with the low transaction fees and network is securely running for 3 years now. Are they using tricks or cheats that fool only non technical people but not cryptographic experts? I am not going to try to explain the nothing-at-stake issue in this response. Maybe later. It is also covered in detail in the whitepaper for the altcoin project I am working on. I will respond quickly to the point about PoS not being cheaper than PoW. We pay for the security no matter how we organize who gets paid. In PoW, much of the payment goes to the production of electricity. In PoS, the payment goes to the whales. In PoS, we must bribe the whales with enough income that they have less incentive to attack the coin. So for example with DPOS in Steem, we pay the whales witness fees and let them dominate the curation rewards. In return, they don't attack the coin. In Nxt, we paid that dictator who recently took over the coin (I don't know all the details, but you can see the value was extracted out of Nxt by the whales at the expense of the smaller holders). There is a more analytical and economically complete way of explaining this, but I don't have time to do it now. Maybe later. What I have tried to do in the design of my upcoming altcoin is reduce the level of harm that control over the resources in the system can do. In this way, I lower the cost of security because the smaller holders are NOT disadvantaged as they otherwise are in both PoW and PoS. In PoW, the smaller hashrate is always losing income relative to the ROI of larger hashrate due to for example propagation. This is complex to explain, but it is in my whitepaper. In PoS, the whales are always profiting at a higher rate than the smaller holder. Thus those systems are a winner-take-all power vacuum over the long-term. I will publish a design that proposes to solve this problem. |
|
|
|
Do not Libertarians, or right wing free market advocates have a set of values ? Of course they do.
Why are they, then, left off the hook when it comes to imposing these values on those that don't share them, over the "leftists" ?
The salient distinction is that the free market by definition means no top-down edicts are directing the outcome, rather the Invisible Hand of opportunity costs are. Free markets anneal to the NATURAL LAW economics of nature. Whereas, top-down edicts do not anneal and become megadeath because of non-intended outcomes. For example, the 57 million who starved in Communist China, because of the top-down management of agriculture. The AGW proponents are trying to achieve a similar megadeath through corrupt top-down governance. If an ideology is an idea system used to maintain an exploitative domination, then from where I'm sat, the free market ideology has by far created the greatest amount of inequality and stifled life chances on the world as a whole .
Top-down governance is corrupted also. The leftist's preferred system is just as exploitative as any natural power-law or exponential distribution of wealth. Because giving power to representatives is a power vacuum and thus will always be victors to the most corruptible. The 160 IQ Eric Raymond explained this well: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984 (Some Iron Laws of Political Economics) 1% own half this world.
The unequal distribution of wealth is a fact of nature. There is nothing you can anyone can do about this, other than improving technology so that everyone's standard of living is lifted. The following references are taken from my whitepaper for a new altcoin project I am working on: J. Doyne Farmer, John Geanakoplos. Power laws in economics and elsewhere. Chapter from a preliminary draft of a book called “Beyond equilibrium and efficiency”, §4.1 Summary of empirical evidence for power laws, p. 15, May 14, 2008. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299, pp. 213–221, proceedings of NATO workshop Applications of Physics in Economic Modeling, Prague, Feb 2001. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth: A Short Survey. Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings 661, pp. 180-183, Sep 2, 2002. Victor M. Yakovenko, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.. Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(4), 1703, Dec 2, 2009. Jean-Philippe Bouchard. Power-laws and Scaling in Finance: Empirical Evidence and Simple Models. Conference on Fractals 2002, Emergent Nature: Patterns, Growth and Scaling in the Sciences, pp. 157–171, Mar 17, 2002. Xavier Gabaix. Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(1) pp. 185–206, §What Causes Power Laws?, Winter 2016. Thomas Lux. Financial Power Laws: Empirical Evidence, Models, and Mechanism. Power Laws in the Social Sciences: Discovering Complexity and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in the Social Universe, §IV. Multi-Agent Models in Behavioral Finance, 2006. Also the extreme excesses in concentration of wealth are not due to the free market, but are due to the top-down political corruption that the leftists advocate. The solution the leftists advocate is the poison that gives them the reason to advocate their "solution". It is a vicious cycle of ignorance, akin to a dog chasing his tail. It is quite sad to see such retarded humans destroy themselves and civilization along with it. Repeatedly. But the ideas that legitimate this gross inequality are somehow OK because ......  ?? Or are their ideas somehow exempt from tyrannical abuse purely because they are the ones writing the rule books and history ? Doesn't make any sense. You retards never learn to stop chasing your tail. It is sad. I see you leftists as a cancer and a virus, that I need to inoculate from my life. CoinCube won't approve of my language, but I use this language because you leftists are evil and violent and the "soft glove" approach doesn't register in your corrupt minds. You need to be told what you really are bluntly and frankly. And moreover, because you always talking so highly of your ethics and you belittle (very condescending tone!) the ethics of the free market proponents, so I just want to put the mirror in your face. |
|
|
|
Do not Libertarians, or right wing free market advocates have a set of values ? Of course they do.
Why are they, then, left off the hook when it comes to imposing these values on those that don't share them, over the "leftists" ?
The salient distinction is that the free market by definition means no top-down edicts are directing the outcome, rather the Invisible Hand of opportunity costs are. Free markets anneal to the NATURAL LAW economics of nature. Whereas, top-down edicts do not anneal and become megadeath because of non-intended outcomes. For example, the 57 million who starved in Communist China, because of the top-down management of agriculture. The AGW proponents are trying to achieve a similar megadeath through corrupt top-down governance. If an ideology is an idea system used to maintain an exploitative domination, then from where I'm sat, the free market ideology has by far created the greatest amount of inequality and stifled life chances on the world as a whole .
Top-down governance is corrupted also. The leftist's preferred system is just as exploitative as any natural power-law or exponential distribution of wealth. Because giving power to representatives is a power vacuum and thus will always be victors to the most corruptible. The 160 IQ Eric Raymond explained this well: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984 (Some Iron Laws of Political Economics) 1% own half this world.
The unequal distribution of wealth is a fact of nature. There is nothing you can anyone can do about this, other than improving technology so that everyone's standard of living is lifted. The following references are taken from my whitepaper for a new altcoin project I am working on: J. Doyne Farmer, John Geanakoplos. Power laws in economics and elsewhere. Chapter from a preliminary draft of a book called “Beyond equilibrium and efficiency”, §4.1 Summary of empirical evidence for power laws, p. 15, May 14, 2008. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299, pp. 213–221, proceedings of NATO workshop Applications of Physics in Economic Modeling, Prague, Feb 2001. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth: A Short Survey. Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings 661, pp. 180-183, Sep 2, 2002. Victor M. Yakovenko, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.. Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(4), 1703, Dec 2, 2009. Jean-Philippe Bouchard. Power-laws and Scaling in Finance: Empirical Evidence and Simple Models. Conference on Fractals 2002, Emergent Nature: Patterns, Growth and Scaling in the Sciences, pp. 157–171, Mar 17, 2002. Xavier Gabaix. Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(1) pp. 185–206, §What Causes Power Laws?, Winter 2016. Thomas Lux. Financial Power Laws: Empirical Evidence, Models, and Mechanism. Power Laws in the Social Sciences: Discovering Complexity and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in the Social Universe, §IV. Multi-Agent Models in Behavioral Finance, 2006. Also the extreme excesses in concentration of wealth are not due to the free market, but are due to the top-down political corruption that the leftists advocate. The solution the leftists advocate is the poison that gives them the reason to advocate their "solution". It is a vicious cycle of ignorance, akin to a dog chasing his tail. It is quite sad to see such retarded humans destroy themselves and civilization along with it. Repeatedly. But the ideas that legitimate this gross inequality are somehow OK because ...... ?? Or are their ideas somehow exempt from tyrannical abuse purely because they are the ones writing the rule books and history ? Doesn't make any sense. You retards never learn to stop chasing your tail. It is sad. I see you leftists as a cancer and a virus, that I need to inoculate from my life. CoinCube won't approve of my language, but I use this language because you leftists are evil and violent and the "soft glove" approach doesn't register in your corrupt minds. You need to be told what you really are bluntly and frankly. And moreover, because you always talking so highly of your ethics and you belittle (very condescending tone!) the ethics of the free market proponents, so I just want to put the mirror in your face. |
|
|
|
Do not Libertarians, or right wing free market advocates have a set of values ? Of course they do.
Why are they, then, left off the hook when it comes to imposing these values on those that don't share them, over the "leftists" ?
The salient distinction is that the free market by definition means no top-down edicts are directing the outcome, rather the Invisible Hand of opportunity costs are. Free markets anneal to the NATURAL LAW economics of nature. Whereas, top-down edicts do not anneal and become megadeath because of non-intended outcomes. For example, the 57 million who starved in Communist China, because of the top-down management of agriculture. The AGW proponents are trying to achieve a similar megadeath through corrupt top-down governance. If an ideology is an idea system used to maintain an exploitative domination, then from where I'm sat, the free market ideology has by far created the greatest amount of inequality and stifled life chances on the world as a whole .
Top-down governance is corrupted also. The leftist's preferred system is just as exploitative as any natural power-law or exponential distribution of wealth. Because giving power to representatives is a power vacuum and thus will always be victors to the most corruptible. The 160 IQ Eric Raymond explained this well: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984 (Some Iron Laws of Political Economics) 1% own half this world.
The unequal distribution of wealth is a fact of nature. There is nothing you can anyone can do about this, other than improving technology so that everyone's standard of living is lifted. The following references are taken from my whitepaper for a new altcoin project I am working on: J. Doyne Farmer, John Geanakoplos. Power laws in economics and elsewhere. Chapter from a preliminary draft of a book called “Beyond equilibrium and efficiency”, §4.1 Summary of empirical evidence for power laws, p. 15, May 14, 2008. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299, pp. 213–221, proceedings of NATO workshop Applications of Physics in Economic Modeling, Prague, Feb 2001. Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth: A Short Survey. Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings 661, pp. 180-183, Sep 2, 2002. Victor M. Yakovenko, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.. Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(4), 1703, Dec 2, 2009. Jean-Philippe Bouchard. Power-laws and Scaling in Finance: Empirical Evidence and Simple Models. Conference on Fractals 2002, Emergent Nature: Patterns, Growth and Scaling in the Sciences, pp. 157–171, Mar 17, 2002. Xavier Gabaix. Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(1) pp. 185–206, §What Causes Power Laws?, Winter 2016. Thomas Lux. Financial Power Laws: Empirical Evidence, Models, and Mechanism. Power Laws in the Social Sciences: Discovering Complexity and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in the Social Universe, §IV. Multi-Agent Models in Behavioral Finance, 2006. Also the extreme excesses in concentration of wealth are not due to the free market, but are due to the top-down political corruption that the leftists advocate. The solution the leftists advocate is the poison that gives them the reason to advocate their "solution". It is a vicious cycle of ignorance, akin to a dog chasing his tail. It is quite sad to see such retarded humans destroy themselves and civilization along with it. Repeatedly. But the ideas that legitimate this gross inequality are somehow OK because ...... ?? Or are their ideas somehow exempt from tyrannical abuse purely because they are the ones writing the rule books and history ? Doesn't make any sense. You retards never learn to stop chasing your tail. It is sad. I see you leftists as a cancer and a virus, that I need to inoculate from my life. CoinCube won't approve of my language, but I use this language because you leftists are evil and violent and the "soft glove" approach doesn't register in your corrupt minds. You need to be told what you really are bluntly and frankly. And moreover, because you always talking so highly of your ethics and you belittle (very condescending tone!) the ethics of the free market proponents, so I just want to put the mirror in your face. |
|
|
|
Let's not even get into the Bitcoin and metals stuff... This bear trap is why gold and crypto-currencies have not likely seen their lows yet and I am still expecting a selloff in gold to $850 or below and Bitcoin to below $150.
You are doing a good "pull the wool over the eyes" of deflecting everyone's attention away for your absolute stupidity to sell BTC recently in the $600s and buy silver at inflated prices that have now crashed, even I was imploring you to not do so and you were so boastfully being the condescending r0ach that you are. The prediction in gold is coming true. The $150 in Bitcoin did happen. And that has already been explained numerous times, yet you refuse to acknowledge it. It was a theory that BTC might track gold down, and I did state that it was theory of correlation that might not be true. ...
I have also stated that I thought that when gold crashes below $1000 (and likely below $850) this year, then Bitcoin would also likely get caught up in the contagion and sell off to below $150 perhaps back to double-digits.
...
It is not certain that gold will elect the March 13/14 turning point to begin its collapse to the final bottom of the correction that began 2011. And it is not certain that crypto-currencies will follow.
...
|
|
|
|
Let's not even get into the Bitcoin and metals stuff... This bear trap is why gold and crypto-currencies have not likely seen their lows yet and I am still expecting a selloff in gold to $850 or below and Bitcoin to below $150.
You are doing a good "pull the wool over the eyes" of deflecting everyone's attention away for your absolute stupidity to sell BTC recently in the $600s and buy silver at inflated prices that have now crashed, even I was imploring you to not do so and you were so boastfully being the condescending r0ach that you are. The prediction in gold is coming true. The $150 in Bitcoin did happen. And that has already been explained numerous times, yet you refuse to acknowledge it. It was a theory that BTC might track gold down, and I did state that it was theory of correlation that might not be true. ...
I have also stated that I thought that when gold crashes below $1000 (and likely below $850) this year, then Bitcoin would also likely get caught up in the contagion and sell off to below $150 perhaps back to double-digits.
...
It is not certain that gold will elect the March 13/14 turning point to begin its collapse to the final bottom of the correction that began 2011. And it is not certain that crypto-currencies will follow.
...
|
|
|
|
Probably the name. But kind of want to put odds on it--though then it becomes another "gambling" coin.
I've always thought that Monero has the best name of any cryptocurrency. Better than Bitcoin. Bitcoin sounds like some nerd thing. Monero just makes me think money. I always thought it sounded like Monopoly play money, not real money. And given all the trolling the Monerotards did on the forums, it became synonymous in my mind to Moaneuro = Moaning + failed eurozone. Or Moanuro, sounded like cow manure with mooing (moaning) cows. The pompous, holier than thou attitude of the community was basically a major turnoff and always will be. Also basically just thieves, trying to rip off technology from others and "open source" it. They haven't had one unique idea/technology of their own of any significance. Even Shen-noether's (and that dude is a pompous asshurl) RingCT is an obvious extention of Maxwell's CT (and even I had figured out how to combine CCT with CN rings before or about the same time that Shen et all did, so whoopie-doo because I am not even a cryptographer not even have sufficient math background in algebraic geometry, elliptic curves, etc). fluffypony seems like a nice guy though. Any way, whatever. Let's see what happens... |
|
|
|
You're kinda trying to rewrite history here. You went through a i hate everyone in Monero and hope you die stage and then claim you told people to buy it, so it's more like you posted completely contradictory information on Monero.
It is a fact that I said to buy Monero before the blast off. My other criticisms of Monero were orthogonal to any analysis of the chart pattern. Please don't blame your conflation on me. That is your lack of mental acuity. Btw, I also advised buying Monero earlier this year, before it had its massive rise. There were numerous other posts of mine where I made the same recommendation about Monero at around that time. |
|
|
|
You're kinda trying to rewrite history here. You went through a i hate everyone in Monero and hope you die stage and then claim you told people to buy it, so it's more like you posted completely contradictory information on Monero.
It is a fact that I said to buy Monero before the blast off. My other criticisms of Monero were orthogonal to any analysis of the chart pattern. Please don't blame your conflation on me. That is your lack of mental acuity. Btw, I also advised buying Monero earlier this year, before it had its massive rise. There were numerous other posts of mine where I made the same recommendation about Monero at around that time. |
|
|
|
You're kinda trying to rewrite history here. You went through a i hate everyone in Monero and hope you die stage and then claim you told people to buy it, so it's more like you posted completely contradictory information on Monero.
It is a fact that I said to buy Monero before the blast off. My other criticisms of Monero were orthogonal to any analysis of the chart pattern. Please don't blame your conflation on me. That is your lack of mental acuity. Btw, I also advised buying Monero earlier this year, before it had its massive rise. There were numerous other posts of mine where I made the same recommendation about Monero at around that time. |
|
|
|
1. Don't you think it's bearish to think for only $1.5K for 2017, unless you meant only the summer of 2017 ?
2. Where do you think we will top at 31.Dec ?
See also the sentence I added to my prior post. 1. Yes. That was only for a minimum objective before summer (perhaps much sooner). 2. Depends if we meander now or not. I will not attempt to make such short-term calls, because the shorter the term, less likely one can do better than flipping the dice. |
|
|
|
$1300 in 2017, probably within 6 months or less. We've broken out above $788 Bitfinex-hack high, accelerating, opening wedge, and two flag patterns. This is uber bullish.  It is not possible to give a precise price point and timing. But we need to hit the extension of that upper green line at some point. So before summer 2017, it projects $1400 - $1500 (on a non-logarithmic chart or higher on a log chart). We could head there very quickly or we could meander. My gut says we are headed there ($1300ish) very quickly to a new ATH, then after that we will perhaps meander before going much higher. But it could be the other way, we meander, then later in Spring blast through $1300 to much higher prices. The reason to favor not meandering now, is look at that chart. There is no overhead resistance until we get in the region of the former ATH ~$1200 - $1300. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
