Since the site has decided to not promote on the forum any longer does this mean withdrawals are not being honored? Very interesting indeed how this has all played out. I see a big red wave incomming.

It would be much easier for the Bitlucy team to fix the issues and continue to try and be present here on the forum vs acting like hotheads and running away from the forum blaming the users here for their faults.

Is something new happening with Betnomi or you just bumping to get visibility to the topic?

How often are new slots added? I don't think they are updated weekly on Betnomi.

The expression "the house always wins" comes to mind when seeing this topic. The only way someone is ever gonna be a winner at gambling is if they gamble 1 time, win, and never gamble again.

Anyone that gambles should be doing so with a budget knowing they likely will lose. You cannot or should not think you can make a living from gambling. You should just have a little fun and if you win you win, if you lose you lose. Don't get mad just go on living a happy life.

If a family member has a problem, you should have them call the gambling hotline or look for a support group.

Happy Birthday!!! 

The casino is to blame for not thinking of every way a bonus can be abused before releasing the bonus to their potential and current clients, but they do not make players try to cheat them.

A player decides whether he wants to be a scumbag or not. Their sole purpose shouldn't be to look for exploits at casinos but unfortunately that's exactly what they do.

I wouldn't put it out of the realm of possibility that Curry cannot or will not score 43 again vs Boston. Yes he got double teamed but as you see that just made other players step up. Boston will make changes which will likely include not double teaming Curry in game 6 as well as there is no way Curry goes 0 for 9 on three point shots. I think Curry has a monster game 6.

As you can see from the replies in this thread, many are removing their avatars and personal text. It's nothing personal against royse777, they're all doing what they feel is right. The website isn't working properly, users may or may not be at risk of losing funds, delays are a definite at this time, and it just looks like a mess.

Any actions like a negative can be edited or removed once issues are corrected and the website is working properly.

I would be ok with it , but I'm not sure you would be setting the right precedent by tagging the user in question. I think a logical solution might be to make a rule in campaigns(this would depend on if the manager wanted extra work) no edited posts are eligible for pay.

That rule IMO fixes the problem.

Boston is gonna have to win game 6 at home, but I also feel like the Warriors won the series with the win last night. The Celtics held Curry to 0/9 on three pointers and only 16 points. If they ever needed a win, last night was it for Boston.

If you do it once in a while maybe because you're out with your family and had a few minutes to browse the forum and you see something you want to comment on when you get back home might be ok. Doing it all the time kinda makes me feel like it would be due to the owner being a part of a large farm. They go 1 word comment on a bunch of posts and fill in the blanks later.

Good catch here OP. I would like to hear a response from Andyst

Warriors won the game last night without Curry having a monster game. 0/9 on shooting 3 pointers and only 16 points. Now they lead 3-2 and will likely close out the series in game 6. Boston played well through 4 games but they just don't have what it takes.

Your whole Promoted campaigns section might be a little misleading. I know that these are campaigns that you were selected to wear their signature, but a company looking for a manager might think you managed these campaigns.

My personal opinion, you need to be clear that you have not managed a campaign.

Honestly it doesn't matter if the rank rule is applied or not. Merit can be bought. So, managers apply the jr member rule and then there will be 500 new jr members the next week. Even if they don't buy the merit, users can start meriting their alts. They may even make a post that gets them 1 merit.

A solution has to go further then rank.

The trend will likely be broken by 1 of the 2 teams. I stand by my thoughts that the Warriors will win the series due to more experience. Boston has 0 Finals experience and a rookie coach, it seems silly but it matters.

Totally agree. I have a bet on the game and actually gave 5.5 points instead of the normal spread being offered. This could be over in 6 with Curry starting to take over.

LOL so far that is how it has went but the Warriors are the more experienced team with an experienced coach. Boston has put up a good fight so far but they will face the reality of this isn't their year soon enough.

Are you saying Royse777 is a part owner of BitLucy? I thought he was only a campaign manager for them, but I do find it odd that they do not have an official account that i'm aware of.

Also odd that royse hasn't been online for a week. Maybe he is on vacation? Send him a pm regarding this thread. He may pop online and try to answer some of your concerns.

Finally the Warriors get home court advantage back. When it was announced who the 2 teams were, I thought Golden State was gonna sweep Boston, but damn Boston has played well. It's a dogfight but Golden State is in the drivers seat.

The decision on how much to pay is up to the company, but most let the manager make the rates according to the weekly budget. It also depends on how many users the company wants to hire. 1 company may be ok with 20 users and a $2000 weekly budget whereas another company wants more exposure on the forum and they want 50 users with a $2000 weekly budget. That's why you see a difference in pay per rank.


The company and manager discuss the advantages of which ranks to hire. I like to let companies get a few extra users for cheap even though they cannot wear an avatar. At the same time it makes users not feel like its gonna be 100 years before they reach full member rank.

Since the introduction of the merit system, users feel like it takes forever to earn enough merits for the full member rank(which is not true if you're a decent poster).

Think about it man.

The definition of "shit post" varies from manager to manager. Even users in chipmixer are shitposters at times.(yea I said that) Some people believe that the more a companies name is seen, the better it is for the company. Some believe the more well known names a company hires the better it is for said company. Some just want their name to be seen some on the forum but cannot afford thousands per week for months.

I personally feel like asking for 80-90 posts per week is a bit much. Even 50 is a bit much. Companies should be happy with 20-25. Allowing more then that just invites users to post spam to get more pay. Seems like when a company wants a large quota, people suddenly have an opinion about everything. Lower the quota they're allowed and magically most who had opinions on everything chill out.

It's also worth it to mention that these companies that allow a user to post a large amount of posts weekly, do not force a user to max out. They hope that users post like normal and offer quality, but cannot do anything but remove a spammer if they deem a user is spamming for pay.


Getting merit IMO means nothing. You can buy that shit if you look hard enough.(I have never bought a merit for the record) Some managers like to use it  as a requirement to stay in the campaign, maybe they feel it makes them look better or users are good posters. I think NOT.

You pm me asking for a slot and i'll use that as my reason to not hire you, unless you are someone well known on the forum. You apply like everyone else and wait to see if you got in.

Managers all have a different opinion on this.

Burstposting!!!!!!  If you are a user that makes 3 posts a day for 7 days and make those 3 posts in 1 minute per day, depending on the content i'll likely allow it. You might be a user in a shit area with spotty internet or some other restriction, so I try to sympathize. Now, if you are a fucking shithead who makes their quota in 2 days spamming the discussion boards 5 minutes a day with 25 posts, i'll remove you from a campaign in a heartbeat and pay you 0.

It's obvious who burstposts trying to get paid, or has multiple accounts with quotas to meet each week. I'm sorry if you have shitty life circumstances, but this forum is not your bank where you need 20 accounts in a sig campaign each week.

There is no written rule, but most managers like to see a gap in posting. (This ties in with burstposting as well) If you are in a campaign and you make all your posts in 1 day(lets say everyone made all their posts in the 1st day of the week), what happens to the advertisement you are wearing? The answer is IT DISAPPEARS TO PAGE 5 IN 1 DAY, because all these other companies have users replying in the same threads you posted in and noone will see that ad til the next week. Basically the company just wasted their money for 1 day of advertising and 6 days of dead time.

This is solely at the managers discretion. Companies make some rules and some companies just trust the manager. I should probably remove the beginners and help restriction because that board is bitcoiners helping other bitcoiners. I have seriously considered banning the trading discussion board, bitcoin discussion board, gambling discussion board, and altcoin boards as I fell that's where most of your spammers are located, but I will not be that strict.


Hopefully this answers most of your questions. If my responses pissed anyone off, shit happens. I gave what I think are honest answers.

That's not exactly true. Yes more red trust is something he probably will not care about, but when you tag someone you leave a reason as to why they were tagged. Someone who is looking to deal with him may be willing to deal with him if he's red trusted for something small, but a certain offense may hinder them from dealing with him in certain areas.

Dice was the big thing forever. Seems every new site the popped up had dice. Now days what you see is slots. All the casinos offer basically the same slots. It's really quite boring.