A cashless policy is an economy that runs operates on zero cash. Not as if there will be no cash in circulation, but it will be done digitally and can be fully traceable.
Now, with countries experiencing inflation, the best way to curb this inflation is by using this method of going cashless as there will be no much paper money in existence.
 But then, when these government bodies introduce these policies, they carefully scrap out the demerits of these proposals if I may call it that, because why worry about these "little disadvantages" when there is a world of good adopting such a policy could do for a country.
 I took out time to do a little research on this cashless economy plan, and found that though there are positives, there are also  some red flags that are worth pointing out.
 
Pros:
1. Reduces crime rates as there is no tangible money to steal.
2. Decrease in money laundering
3. Less time and costs associated with handling, storing and depositing paper money.
4. Easier currency exchange.

Cons:
1. Banks have full control of every single penny you own .
2. Every transaction you make is recorded.
3. Access to your own money can be blocked at the click of a button.
4. The government will decide what you can and cannot purchase
5. If your transaction are deemed in anyway questionable by those who create the questions, your money will be frozen "for your own good".
6. Potential data breach may expose personal information
7. Temptation to overexpand may increase.
 
If the world must go cashless, Bitcoin should be the better option, but as the government will always want to be in charge of your funds, CBDC is always projected by the government. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.managementstudyguide.com/cashless-economy-pros-and-cons.htm&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjNtYToxIT4AhXMyIUKHdrhC7MQFXoECAUQBg&usg=AOvVaw2132ZR98zH061TKrcKtzvu

It happens multiple times a week.
Pay Drake millions to sponsor but cant even keep the site up for us normal players.
Seriously losing players because this is seriously messed up and not reliable.
Truely a joke.

I usually go yolo in house games where the house edge is minimal like Blackjack, Baccarat, Dice etc. I avoid going all-in in games with high house edge like slots, lotteries etc. This strategy helped me earn decent profits so far which is why it's my favorite strategy currently.

I apply the same strategy in sports betting as well though I avoid going all-in in accumulator bets for obvious reasons.

I do not know how good of a strategy that is going to be. In as much as it sounds like a good idea, living in a third world country is not as easy as you imagine, i live in one by the way; and over here more than 70% of the population, minus the privileged rich people, would 'kill' to move over to a first world country to start a new life there, need i also remind you that the same privileged rich people every now and then travel to first world countries on vacation, to spend their money, etc, the only reason why many of them would not relocate permanently to a first world country is because they make their money back home.

There are many reasons why you would not want to relocate to a third world country, one is electricity, the power supply is so poor, and in the end you will be spending a huge amount of money on fuel or diesel to power your generator for 24 hours a day. Bad roads, noise and air pollution, insecurity, inflation, poor standard of living etc are other reasons. Taxes and bills are higher in first world countries simply because the standard of living is high, and you are paying for a good life, it is not so in third world countries, taxes and bills aren't as high because the standard of living is low, and if you are going to maintain a good standard of living for yourself there you have to pay so much, you have to literally 'buy' it, but not in the form of tax or necessary bills because the goverment provides nearly nothing, example it is better you provide electricity yourself through your generator than pay light bill for an epileptic power suppy.

Seems like he is talking about the platinum 2 rank. Because, the rank up bonus for platinum 1 is $200. Recent gameplay activity can increase the amount a little. Stake gives $400 to it's user for reaching platinum 2 rank. I had received $400 when I reached platinum 2, beside that I got extra $40+ for my recent gameplay activity. I think he reached platinum two rank and received the regular level up bonus amount, plus extra $100 for his recent gameplay activity. The bonus amount could be $500 in that case.

Seems they decided to give out the remaining amount they didn't send out because the stream ended early. Ran out of steam after awhile.
Check to see how much you got cause it depends on your rank from the looks of the comments shown so far:
https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1530018700517965824

From $8mln to start with ran it up to a bit over $19mln in less than 25 minutes in was pretty good.
But like he said: "This was nothing to me to lose!" "Stake won this time but will get them next time!"

Platinum III received 0.00276btc from what I seen of the above giveaway.
Not to shabby for watching a 2 hour stream.

FWIW this is a false statement because you aren't taking the risk into account. In early days people who saw bitcoin were faced with a very experimental currency that might not have lived to see past a birthday or two. So anybody buying it back then would have been taking a much bigger risk that anybody buying it today that bitcoin is 13 years old, has a strong network, is adopted in multiple countries as a legitimate currency and a legal tender in a country or two.
In other words calling bitcoin a "high risk investment" now is silly in my opinion.