Confirming that I already received my 1mbtc freebet on blackjack and manage to cashout with 1.275mbtc in total. Livecasino giveaway is the real definition of giveaway due to there straightforward easy requirements and no bullshit requirements to withdraw your winnings. I can't count how many times I participated on their giveaways and manage to take a profit from the rewards. I hope @livecasino will continue to do this for many rounds! 1.275mbtc from 1mbtc in free chips it's a very good result, because if it's the same for me, they were available on an Evolution Bombay Club Blackjack table with a minimum bet of 0.25 mbtc, that is to say a maximum of 4 hands. Personally I have been lucky too this time, since I manage to win 1.5mbtc thanks to one double down. |
|
|
|
On which driver have you finally bet swogerino? Because you were right, anything can happen at Monaco, and anything has happened this time again since Sergio Perez has won! Congratulations to the (few) 584 winners! I'm sad to have been so shy with him because I only placed 0.5 mbtc on him while betting 1.2mbtc on Leclerc and Verstappen.
Oh yes, it was a surprise (finally!). Me personally I placed a small bet on Sainz, so it was close! Congratulations to all who bet on Perez. He does not win very often, but when he does, it is in a great style. Russell makes a very good results recently, seems to be a rally promising driver. Yes Carlos Sainz has made a very good result too, he ended at the 2nd place, 1.15s behind Sergio Perez, he was my 4th choice for this race actually. Anyway I've received my winnings this morning and they confirm it was a good idea to bet on him since I've won almost 0.01BTC with this bet.  |
|
|
|
In my neighbourhood, I have seen a guy selling his parent's house and gambling away all the funds gathered and obviously lost them all. Even worst his parents were struggling with some health issues and when they came to know about it, their son had suicided already in guilt and pressure from his friends for the payment of the remaining amount. Somehow everyone in the society came forward and helped but I can't even share the kind of emotions everyone went through, even though most of us didn't even know what exactly happened.
Gambling addiction sucks. Period. But, gambling itself isn't the problem it's the excessive gambling and the mentality that sucks and makes gambling look like such a bad thing. It's the same with alcohol and tobacco, you consume once in a while and you're fine (most likely) but if you repeat and make it your addiction, you will be in trouble tomorrow if not today.
I'm not sure gambling is the main culprit in your story and in the story of OP. The main culprit here, is dishonesty IMO, gambling had only been a trigger that could have been something else either. Not everyone is able to start to lie, to rob or to kill to satisfy a gambling addiction. |
|
|
|
And that's what I said many believe for something like this especially on a country which is so rich on many traditions. So don't get surprised for people to believe on something what we see weird to us since for sure all of this has relation with their own beliefs. If we look at it deeply for there's totally no relation to anything because we know most of the games in casino is base on RNG so all of it is just pure luck nothing else nothing more.
Less and less games are based on RNG because more and more people like to play to real games at live casinos since it's more social and more trustworthy than digital games. There rituals can influence games because it can change the way the dealer is dealing. I don't think it will bring you more success but at least you can impact the game you are playing at. |
|
|
|
The big advantage is of course that it is relatively anonymous, apart from the KYC. You can deposit as much money as you want, there is no one to check or view a transaction and possibly put it on pause as banks often like to do. And it also goes very fast, you can gamble fairly quickly on the site after an upgrade. And for a payout it is of course exactly the same story. Anonymity could also be a disadvantage if you have problems with a casino.
If there is a KYC, it's not anymore anonymous but what do you mean precisely by saying it could also be a disadvantage if you have problems with a casino? All cryptocasinos are offshore casinos, even russian ones like the one you are promoting, then I don't really understand what giving your identity will change if there is a concern. It usually only depends on the good will of the casino, they only care of their reputation and their need to keep or attract good customers. You will never been able to bring them to justice. |
|
|
|
Charles Leclerc completely dominated the free practices in F1 at Monaco today both FP1 and FP2 and with a big difference to Redbull,his closest was his team mate at just 0.04 slower but the odd of his team mate are near 14 to win the race.I think the odd is inviting as the odd for the other drivers like Leclerc and Verstappen are less than 2,also Sergio Perez is at 14.With the race expected to be run in the rain anything can happen,we can make a lot of money or lose it all,it depends on how bold we are.Betting on George Russell is even better at a near 30 odd,in Monaco nothing is excluded so why not experimenting a bit. On which driver have you finally bet swogerino? Because you were right, anything can happen at Monaco, and anything has happened this time again since Sergio Perez has won! Congratulations to the (few) 584 winners! I'm sad to have been so shy with him because I only placed 0.5 mbtc on him while betting 1.2mbtc on Leclerc and Verstappen. Anyway winnings should be good, as usual on Freebitcoin  |
|
|
|
First time Ive seen anything, the site is there and its almost doing something but comes back with invalid time state or some error I dont recognize. I was only going to check an old bet slip but no doubt a pain for those wanting to do something.
About to cash out and take my money elsewhere. Like the site but this is bull. Cool having Drake but fix the website with all that money coming in.
This site is pure Thrash.
Millions of dollars but cant keep site online…
Embarrasing.
Yes it is really unfortunate while there are so many online players on the site. I was trying to check my bets on UCL final game, in case there is something good to be cashed out but my bets are gone. As well as I want to make a live bet if there is a good opportunity to bet. So many users also complaining in the chat room, hope it will be fixed soon. It happens multiple times a week.
Pay Drake millions to sponsor but cant even keep the site up for us normal players.
Seriously losing players because this is seriously messed up and not reliable.
Truely a joke.
Yeah not first time, again main event and broke website. No one can cashout bets on sports, they should compensate our losses. Same for me, I had a bet on the Champion League final but I haven't been able to cashout it before its loss like many other customers. I've asked the support if they plan to give something to compensate but they haven't been able to reply. Last time there had been several drops for everybody, I think it would be fair to drop something this time too, at least to customers who had losing bets on the matches played during the shutdown. It's sad there has been no communication on the incident. |
|
|
|
|
Nottingham - 0:1, 13'
username: SaintLoup
|
|
|
|
Yes that's right it is Stake, Spb.io and FJ all sites from this forum each site has its own advantages depending on which one we choose
In this match Stake offers higher odds sometimes in other matches FJ or Spb.io is higher which I think is normal in competing
I would have bet on Fortune Jack but I wasn't sure since its graphical interface is pretty common among sportsbooks. But if it's true that each one has its own advantages, you can't compare it to Stake and Sportsbet IMO, FJ is way smaller than them and can't compete against them. So it would be surprising to frequently find better odds and promotions there, moreover the reliability is also not the same. You can't say every sportsbook are equal actually, some are more interesting and profitable for players than others, they offer better odds, better promotions, better bonuses and/or a better support than others. |
|
|
|
|
a) 9 b) 1:52
a) 14 b) 2:02
|
|
|
|
Si on m'obliger à parier sur l cours du BTC.
Je ne serai short sans doutes possible. Le 15.000$ est possible .
Ah ouais quand même. 50% de baisse alors qu'il a déjà perdu 40% en 2 mois (il était à $48k le 29 mars dernier), ça ne s'appelle plus une correction à ce niveau, ça s'appelle une purge. J'espère pour nous que tu te trompes parce que ça entacherait durablement l'image de Bitcoin et des cryptos je pense et annoncerait certainement un (vrai) crypto winter, l'ATH (68k) datant d'à peine 6 mois le traumatisme et les pertes seraient lourds pour beaucoup de monde ama.
Sinon, bonne ou mauvaise nouvelle pour le marché, la Russie réfléchit à autoriser officiellement les cryptos pour les transactions internationales afin de contourner les sanctions imposées. Russia is considering allowing cryptocurrency to be used for international payments, Interfax news agency quoted a government official saying on Friday.
"The idea of using digital currencies in transactions for international settlements is being actively discussed," Ivan Chebeskov, head of the finance ministry's financial policy department, was quoted as saying.
Allowing crypto as a means of settlement for international trade would help counter the impact of Western sanctions, which has seen Russia's access to traditional cross-border payment mechanisms "limited," Chebeskov said. https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/05/27/russia-considers-allowing-cryptocurrency-for-international-payments-as-sanctions-over-ukra |
|
|
|
Stake has been a place that wagering and the odds have been a bit of a problem even without the parlay and the independent situation. It always has a bit worse odds and I never liked that odd situation. Look, I do gamble here on dice and that is why I gamble here on some sports as well because it's the same bankroll and I am fine with it.
But, I have to be honest and say that I am also gambling some other place as well because the odds are better there. Like in a bet that offers 1.70 here, I could find as high as 1.80 or more in another place, that may sound like a small thing but when you combine that from 10k+ players here, I am pretty sure that difference is millions.
Which sportsbooks are you referring to please? Are they crypto or fiat sportsbooks? On which markets are they clearly above Stake? If you check on odds comparator, you will certainly find sportbooks with better odds for many markets but they are usually fiat sportsbooks not available for everybody (like Pinnacle for example) and not offering the same amount of promotions and bonuses as Stake. It should be taken into account because if you don't mainly bet on parlays and if you are not a small bettor Stake remains certainly one of the most interesting sportsbook, on the whole IMO. We heard this one since a few years ago but not in all gambling markets right? I mean sometimes stake.com offer higher odds for example in the match Liverpool vs Madrid tomorrow I took screenshots of 3 sports betting markets including stake.com But I still admit that overall stake offer lower odds.    I recognized Stake and Sportsbet on your pictures but which is the third one please? |
|
|
|
Tu parles de ta main ou de celle du croupier? la mienne Ca c'est pour impressionner la galerie quand tu fais ça avec une grosse mise, ça laisse tout le monde bouche bée y compris le croupier qui s'est moqué de toi. Le problème c'est que ça foire plus souvent que ça ne marche  Les jours qu je suis zen ça réussi plus souvent Tiens ben moi "j'ai essayé" 2 fois tout à l'heure involontairement parce que j'ai pas eu le temps de choisir, et les 2 fois je me suis fais battre à la régulière par la croupière qui a été plus dédaigneuse qu'impressionnée. Je dois pas avoir assez la zen attitude je crois  |
|
|
|
Mais normalement, le BTC devrait connaitre lui aussi un rebond technique, aprés 8 ou 9 semaines de baisse consécutives (un record). D'ailleurs, j'estime qu'il n'est pas idiot de jouer ce rebond à condition de ne pas croire qu'il s'agit d'une inversion de tendance. La baisse devrait reprendre ensuite. Vincent Ganne pense que le btc n 'ira pas sous les 20000$ parce qu'il n'y a jamais eu de retracement jusqu'à l'ath précédente (en 2017) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPPvxx5_U5wMais on pourrait lui objecter que les phases bear vont souvent jusqu'à 80% de baisse. Notons qu'il y a actuellement une surenchère baissière sur le btc. Certains annoncent 20000$, 14000$, 10000$, 8000$, voire 3000$ !  Ah ouais il est à fond dans l'AT, ca va faire plaisir à certains... BTC tres stable ce week-end, je pense que si il devait y avoir un dip avant la fin du mois il se serait produit maintenant. On devrait donc cloturer le mois au-dessus des 25k, aux environs des 30k maintenant. |
|
|
|
Le Nasdac a pumpé cette semaine, pas le btc qui semble incapable de rebondir. Cela signifie-t-il que la tech n'investit plus dans le BTC ? Peut-être à cause de l'effondrement de Terra ? Inquiétant en tous les cas. A moins que le btc remonte ce week-end. Mais je n'y crois pas trop. Alors direction les 25K ? De plus en plus probable.  Ce n'est peut-être pas la stagnation de BTC qui est injustifiée mais au contraire le pump du nasdaq qui l'est. Parce qu'avec l'inflation généralisée des matières premières et des produits de consommation in fine qui est en train de stopper le regain de croissance post-covid, il n'y a pas vraiment de raison de retrouver de l'optimisme vis-à-vis du nasdaq amha. Les bits ne nourrissent pas si j'ose dire, alors quand Mme Michu doit arbitrer entre payer la cantine de ses enfants ou son abonnement Spotify, "la question elle est vite répondue" je pense, meme si c'est une jeune entrepreneuse... |
|
|
|
Cette semaine, la correlation entre le btc et le Nasdac semble moins claire.  Effectivement il semble en hausse quasi-continue depuis le début de la semaine, contrairement à Bitcoin qui est toujours plat comme une crêpe (ou plutôt comme une pizza devrais-je dire) pour ne pas dire en léger faux plat descendant. Espérons qu'il soit juste en retard et que la reprise du nasdaq soit un signal prodromique d'un effet patrickus... |
|
|
|
|
a) 14 b) 2:07
a) 8 b) 1:38
|
|
|
|
Tu parles de ta main ou de celle du croupier? la mienne Ca c'est pour impressionner la galerie quand tu fais ça avec une grosse mise, ça laisse tout le monde bouche bée y compris le croupier qui s'est moqué de toi. Le problème c'est que ça foire plus souvent que ça ne marche |
|
|
|
Moi j'aime bien quand mon instinct ne me fait pas faux bond quand je sit avec une main à 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.. et je laisse le croupier burn ses fesses Tu parles de ta main ou de celle du croupier? Si c'est celle du croupier, il a effectivement plus de 40% de chances de sauter au final lorsque sa première carte est un 4, un 5 ou un 6. (Par contre pour 7 ça tombe à 26% et 8 à 24%) https://www.guide-blackjack.com/statistiques-probabiltes-blackjack.htmlC'est vrai que les stratégies de base ne définissent pas une mauvaise main d'une bonne, et ils ont peut-être pas tort
Une main ou tu stand sans reflechir quelque soit la carte du croupier en face on peut considérer que c'est une bonne main. Les soft 19+ et les hard 17+ sont des mains plutôt tranquilles. |
|
|
|
Dis-moi @perl ou quelqu'un d'autre, est-ce que tu sais ce qu'il faut faire pour la stratégie de base, lorsque la table permet de "surrender"?
C'est-à-dire que lorsque le dealer a un as, il propose l'assurance ou d'abandonner en ne perdant que la moitié de la mise(surrender).
C'est pas la même que pour quand le dealer a un as ? Oui lorsqu'il y a un as, c'est bien ça mais la plupart des casinos ne proposent que l'assurance d'après ce que j'ai vu et la stratégie de base "standard" est pour ceux-là. Mais à celui où je joue actuellement ils proposent aussi de surrender, ce qui n'est pas la même chose que l'assurance. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
