It is because Bitcoin has a huge community compared to Altcoins and of course the adoption around the world. It is also the most popular cryptocurrency to date and crypto is nothing without Bitcoin. Some country even accepted Bitcoin as a valuable asset and can be traded locally.

I am pretty sure that bitcoin would have been great with or without altcoins, I am also sure that altcoins (the good ones) helped bitcoin grow bigger as well. These two things are not mutually exclusive, you could be great all by yourself, and still get help from other coins as well.

I do believe that bitcoin was already on a good path without all these altcoins came along, there were a few during the early days, like the first 5 years between 2009 to 2014 there were a few, but none of them really picked up this much and bitcoin was still doing awesome. At the end of the day altcoins became big and that certainly increased the love for crypto for sure.

This could be seen as a bad thing. After all why would we want people like Mexican cartels to use crypto, right? But if you decide to find a way to block them from using crypto, then how long until we could block you from using as well? Either you are fully decentralized, or you are not at all.

This is why I believe that we should not be focusing our resources into finding a way for bad people to stop using crypto. ISIS uses crypto as well to launder their money, which is a terrible thing when you consider it but that is still a reality. Ignore the bad ways that cyrpto is used and just try to focus on the amazing great things that it helps get achieved like donations to Ukraine.

Pa nisam ti rekao da ga odes testirat s ETH, to nije ni uvijet za kampanju. Samo sam rekao da mislim da mixa ETH. Onaj kome obično treba mixer obično ima i malo veću toleranciju na rizik. Testiras s BTC i ostane ti 19$ na kraju sigurno. Nije da me interesira ali je ipak račuica koja će nekome odgovarati.

Evo ga sad na 281.8% u zadnjih 7 dana (bar po CG izvestaju). Sad je na $0.17. U nekom momentu sam bas bio besan na sebe sto ga ne prodadoh kad je bio 0.2+.
Nego imate li neku svoju prognozu na kojoj vrednosti bi ZIL trebao da se ustali?

Nije to tako lako za napraviti ako nemaš neki social media account sa hrpom followera. Onda ovisiš puno o drugima i moraš nekako doći do nekog influencera da počne širiti vjest za tebe.

Sada kada sam to napisao zapravo bi se vjerojatno dalo bez previše muke platiti nekom od njih da obavi posao za tebe ali opet taj mora biti dovoljno stručan za basic fact check prije objave. Možda je taj proces upravo potrajao par dana.

Pa šta nije ovaj novi mixer koji daje 20$ za testiranje mixer za jedno 4 coina među kojima i ETH? Možda sam nešto krivo shvatio jer sam gledao dok sam bio na semaforu u autu samo letimično kada me manager kontaktirao da li sam zainteresiran to testirati.

That means you enjoyed ATH 2017 right? You're lucky because I'm a user who can't enjoy ATH 2017 even though when I signed up for an account the bitcoin price was still quite expensive for me to have.

I read newspapers and some other online media and I found bitcoin being talked about even though some of my friends have been here for bitcoin since mid 2015. I really didn't realize that until one day they admitted they had been here for a long time and even had hundreds of bitcoin. This is my 4th year on the forum, I'm really enjoying it now and I'm lucky during that time I'm enjoying some ATH.

ovaj sto je prijavio nestanak sredstava, on nije haker, on je pomislio da Axie tim radi rug pull, pa ih je ucenio da mu daju 10 miliona dolara da cuti
ako sam dobro shvatio, nije u pitanju hack, nego dogovor izmedju 5 saradnika u multi-potpisu (ukupno je 5/9 novcanik), ili su nekima od njih nestali kljucevi

po meni, to nije hack, nego kradja, nemam pojma, tako mi se cini

Tornado.cash je mislim najbolji mixer za ethereum ali nisam siguran koliko se isplati koristiti ga kad su velike naknade za transakcije na eth mreži.
Sigurno ima još nekih mixera (možda onaj novi koji sad rekalmira Royse) ali su mnogi sumnjivi ili scam, a možeš koristiti i neki centralizirani exchange bez kyc verifikacije koji ima sličnu funkciju.

uz naknadu za transakciju na Ethereum-u, Uniswap takodje ima i svoj fee (nekad to izgleda beznacajno u odnosu na fee za transakciju, ali svakako postoji)
ranije je bio 0,3% za sve (ide ka LP-ovima), sad zavisi od para, i ide od 0,05% za neke stablecoine, do cak 1% ako menjas manje poznate i manje likvidne tokene

privatnost ima svoju cenu, i uvek se na kraju plati vise, meni je veci problem transparentnost, ako bilo gde posaljes sa te adrese novac, za neki proizvod ili slicno, svi mogu da izanaliziraju tvoje transakcije od "kulina-bana"

nisam cuo za to
ono sto je ocigledno istina je da je neko prijavio odliv sredstava jos 26.3., ali su mu rekli da ide kod psihijatra (ta prepiska postoji i sa Jihoz-om iz Axie-a, i sa Discord-a), jedino sto je on promasio za decimalu, pa napisao da je nestalo 1,7 miliona ETH (ipak je 170 hiljada ETH odliv)

tako da se za hack saznalo tek posle 6 dana, a u medjuvremenu AXS jeste rastao

Ma lako se to ograniči. KYC na adrese preko 50k$ mjesečnog prometa i bok. Ako netko ima 425 povezanih adresa već će se skužiti.

Definitivno se ne smijemo pomiriti s time da netko ima pravo uvida u našu financijsku situaciju zato što postoje generalna AML pravila. Većina njih ni ne funkcionira jer banke uredno daju račune kriminalcima koji kroz njih peru lovu (pa i dokazano je već puno puta) - a najebemo mi s nekom sićom koja se onda analizira u cent.

The real problem is your inability to comprehend these words of mine: "... There are also no combinations of ones and zeros that would form digital products called bitcoins because no address holder is capable to show such products. All they are able to show are digital numbers...."

As you can see, I am not talking about metal in this part of my response. I am not sure whether this is your inability to comprehend or you are deliberately twisting my words.

Like I have said. You have a very twisted way of thinking. This response proved that also. Ones and zeros in a specific combination form computer programs. The same as ones and zeros attached to the addresses in the Satoshi's system form digital numbers. But there are no combinations of ones and zeros that would form a coin called bitcoin because coins are made of metal. There are also no combinations of ones and zeros that would form digital products called bitcoins because no address holder is capable to show such products. All they are able to show are digital numbers. So, your interpretation of my words is a twisted way of thinking.

Ok, this discussion is getting nowhere. For that reason I decided to make a video for you guys. I will call it: "Bitcoin is a myth and not real." I will explain everything there. The video I attached in the OP is somehow misleading. When I created it I was thinking that bitcoin is a some kind of message. But throughout  the discussion in this topic I realized that bitcoin actually doesn't exist. We can say that I was also the victim of this widespread false narrative on bitcoin's existence. So I will delete that video and make a new one. Probably over the weekend. Stay tuned.

You have found a gap in the market but do you think this gap is creating enough space to enter into this market? I guess no! There are several other factors that are considered by the traders before they jump into an exchange. With the rise of kyc/aml monitoring among the centralized exchanges, defi non custodial exchanges are becoming a predominant player in the crypto market and I foresee this practice will slowly take over the entire crypto market where you do not have send money to exchange accounts before start trading.

So a solution is already here. But why Coinbase or Binance still managing to churn out volumes? It's called endowment effect. Go ahead and  search google for a little business lesson.

Like I have said. You have a very twisted way of thinking. This response proved that also. Ones and zeros in a specific combination form computer programs. The same as ones and zeros attached to the addresses in the Satoshi's system form digital numbers. But there are no combinations of ones and zeros that would form a coin called bitcoin because coins are made of metal. There are also no combinations of ones and zeros that would form digital products called bitcoins because no address holder is capable to show such products. All they are able to show are digital numbers. So, your interpretation of my words is a twisted way of thinking.

Ova tema nam je preozbiljna pa stavljam link od tweeta koji sam upravo vidio. Ne znam da li je istina ali ako je čovjek zaslužuje spomenik. Da nas je više takvih FIFO evidencija bi brzo bila izbacena iz zahtjeva porezne.

Ukratko čovjek namjerno trejda putem bota i gubi lovu samo da im moze poslati punu paletu papira na pregled. Uz par maštovitih dodataka.

https://twitter.com/UceDuce4/status/1508234182517944321?t=kkY6tYZPzog6rMNImMDUJw&s=19