That's right, people do make mistakes themselves and then hope for the place to fix it. I have seen this in exchanges a lot, people end up sending stuff on the wrong chain, and hope that they could get it back. Technically speaking if the exchange (or casinos) check it, they could find the money, but it's not their job to hop on network to network to find your money and credit you, check to see if it's spent and 99% of the time it's not even touched.

So long story short, it is your responsibility and you should be aware of what you are doing. Been in crypto for many years, and I have never sent a single transaction to anywhere wrong before in my entire life.

Milan Atalanta will definitely be a good deal, I am not saying that it is the only game that matters this week but that is the biggest teams that will play each other. Most other games are like Roma vs Cremonese or Juventus against Sampdoria or Inter against Speiza.

I really do not think that there would be any surprises in these two games. Which begs the question, should I go with parlay of these three sure things, which could be wrong and I could fail because of one them could lose as it is football and anything could happen but risk it for a low odds, or should I add in a Milan win to make sure that I could get a high risk and high reward type of deal.

We have 2 games that I can't wait to watch. Newcastle is not "there" yet but the reality is that they have the richest owner of any club in the world. That guy could spend 1 billion dollars RIGHT NOW, they have that much money.

Of course, they didn't spent that much, they are gradually making the team better and in a few seasons they will be much better. They are slowly putting in money because they can't just put billions in it for fair play reasons, but could put in more and more constantly over course of many years. They will play City, another rich owner club and already established good club. Let's see what's going to happen. Liverpool United is on this week too, both teams had a terrible start, let's see what will happen.

Problem Lakers have is that they can't really sent Westbrook away for anything, they would have to literally pay to get rid of him and that’s the problem. Any team that has any cap to get Westbrook for cheap (as in Lakers won't get same salary back) would have to own a big chunk of salary space and they would require a lot of money.

So all in all, I have to say that Westbrook will stay, even Irving trade can't happen that way, Lakers could give ALL picks they can, and it would still not work. How could it work? If Lakers had any players, they could tradeaway for picks, they could ask Nets which picks they want, then trade the Lakers player for those picks and add their own picks and add westbrook and MAYBE that could work.

That’s the point of fun token and why it wouldn't go down in value a lot. It’s good to buy as many as possible because you get premium benefits from it, you could have more WoF that could get you money, and all of that combined means that it has a good value and could be bought to make you money.

When you consider that, you are realizing that it is in fact utility token that you could buy and that results with price not going down too much. Sure it went down a bit, but that’s mainly because the whole market did, nothing about fun token itself because Bitcoin isn't 68k neither, which shows that fun token is quite good, has a good reason to have it, and people wouldn't sell it too much.

Only if some project will be big enough to include everyone and actually have some utility. Facebook may or may not try that, but the reality is that we are not going to see anything "big" for a long time because the tech is not there yet and development takes years. So, anything that is like movies would only happen after many years of working on it. Remember the fact that cyberpunk was just a game and it had so many problems, and that’s just one simple game.

This is entirely a universe basically that happens online, can you imagine how hard it could be? If developers fail to make a simple game without bugs even when they worked on it for many many years, how could we expect them to give us something amazing in a few years at most with no problem?

I have literally seen a casino that managed to get as many people as possible involved to just take the money and leave, that’s it, they stopped the domain and the website as well and not like they just secretly scammed, they just up and left and even closed the website.

Many sell data of the players to others for income as well, affiliate marketers pay a huge sum for people who wager money and if you have the data, that worths a lot. Imagine you are a big casino, you have their email address, maybe their kyc, their name, their wagering amount, how much they bet, when do they bet and many other data, that could be sold and turned into a huge profit as well. So, finding a decent place that is honest just like Duelbits is important.

The amount of people who win or lose huge amounts are rare which is why it's normal we do not see a lot of them here. I mean think about it, people who wager 100k are already very low, not many around, and people who may end up winning that bet is even rarer, and the amount of people on bitcointalk checking roobet topic is not a huge amount neither.

So, when you combine these two, not many could overlap. That’s why it's normal that winners or losers, people who ager a lot are rare and we may not see them here. It doesn't mean they do not exist; we will never know if they exist or not, we are agnostic about the existence of people who wager a lot basically .

It's not "just" development neither, they talk with people here and make decisions based on what people say. That's the main difference. I have seen plenty of places that did what you say, developing more and more but they just do whatever they think would make them the most money.

On the other hand, what I am suggesting here is that we have a situation where it's not just making profit for them, but whatever we suggest as well, and that's very precious. Not a lot of places would add something that won't make them profit right away, hence why would they add it? It's not a profitable thing. So, we should be supportive of them doing it anyway.

I still think that he was overpaid for his talents but underpaid for what he brings to the table. I mean he is a financial profit machine for any team that has him. Meaning, even if he doesn't play amazingly then I would guess that you could make that money back from the seats he helps getting sold, and secondly the jersey sales that he could help them. He doesn't have to play amazingly to be a player you could pay 50 million, because team would make more than that.

Same goes with Christiano Ronaldo for example, he doesn't need to play well, because he makes 2x more than what you pay him with just jersey sales that he gets which is the point of teams wanting these players.

There are people who think that Luna case is not really related to bitcoin directly, it just shows that market could be crashing down because of other coins, that’s the point. If Luna crashed the market, then next time it could be solana, then avax, then dot, who knows when and which one will crash? This is the point why there are some people who are afraid.

I am not afraid of the market at all, but I do understand others. When all looks good and maybe we could have been higher already if Luna deal didn't happen, out of nowhere something happened and the whole market crashed. People are worried about those type of things and I can understand it, that’s a fine logic.

As long as you do not stop looking into bitcointalk and what could be done here, that’s fine. I mean it is clear that not everyone could have the same type of marketing, sometimes you do one thing and you do not get the same results, and you stop.

Whereas someone else may do the same thing but can get a good result. Not all signature campaigns get a good result though, I mean it is obvious that we are going to end up with something that is decent, it is going to be a bit of a trouble and the best thing to do here would be making sure that it is going to be a good signature campaign that gets you a lot of customers when you comeback, and that will mean that you need to get ready for it a lot, prepare some good materials.

I did something similar and still sucked, I mean sometimes weeks are just weird and you do not get what you think you will get, it's normal and I am fine with it. I am not saying that every week will be like htis, I am sure there will be at least one week where I will do 5/7 minimum, but the fact is that no matter how carefully I pick, the majority of the results are me losing and not getting anything .

I think this is the third season right? I only saw like 2 winners in all 3 seasons, that is like realizing how hard it is. The reward is that huge accordingly though, 10k dollars is not a small reward, it's huge and that is why it's normal for that few winners as well.

I do agree that it is not going to be easy, many people think that pump equals bull run starting, and it might be or maybe it is not, but I wouldn't advise anyone for the time being. I personally do hold mine and keep on buying more, but I am weird in that regard, I would buy more if it was 100k right now too, I just like getting more.

I aim at having 1 full bitcoin eventually, and to do that the price of bitcoin going up doesn't help me . and that is why I keep on buying. But to people who are only interested in making quick decisions, I can't say if right now is great or not, I wouldn't know, doesn't look like there is a clue somewhere that can show us what's the reality.

Honestly, USA and the world has been going through some of the worst times in the recent few decades, which means that changing hands wouldn't be a shock. I remember how clearly that after Bush, people flocked to voting for Obama, both because he was the first person with a different race then just white, but also because people hated Republicans for putting them into so many trouble.

This year, we have seen Republicans gain a lot of confidence and votes, all because stuff that democrats didn't do, but because world in trouble. But that's life, it goes both ways, if this happened during tenure of a republican senate and president, democrats would have won as well. I guess it is going to be republican win for sure.

Lack of budget? I would like you to meet one of the biggest, if not the biggest websites in all of bitcoin world, lol, they can't lack funds at any time because they earn way more than you imagine. They get visitors more than any other crypto related website outside of maybe a handful of them. So, they definitely do have enough funds for it, but the scary part is that when you are THIS big, how could you just change everything all at once.

Thequin once said that they are looking into UI for sure, and I do believe that they are looking into it for sure. But you can't just close the website down, do a whole new design, and expected everything to go 100% correctly.

It is definitely a big hurdle to go over what happened in the past, but if efialtis is saying that they fixed it, then I might have to give it a test run as well. I do not go into casinos right away unless I see reputable people say it's okay. I mean not just efialtis of course, there are many, usually common legendary accounts that we all know. In that case I would just go in and test with small amounts.

At first, I was refraining from playing here, but I guess they turned things around and could be something valuable here eventually, that will benefit all of us and I guess it’s going to make a good change for sure. That’s my guess though, maybe I am wrong, will have to try and see if it’s all fixed.

I never meant to say they said all games are provably fair, I just meant that they are not, and that's fine. I like playing blackjack anyway so I am fine, and there is nothing to worry about. I didn't mean to like attack or anything here, I love it here, and I love playing here. I just saw a discussion and I just throw my 2 cents in there and that's about it.

If I made anyone doubt about this place, or if anyone thought that I disliked this place, I am sorry. I didn't mean anything like that, I would never want to be seen like that. I just wanted to say what I think it is about, and that's it. I think this place is one of the best at what they do for sure.

If they could have done it, they would have done it already. It's clear that there is a talent to be a strategist, a race engineer, and team boss none of which Ferrari has, even if they want to, they will always fail because they are not good at it. Give the whole team outside of car and driver to Red Bull and red bull would have been bad this year, same car, same drivers, too would have taken them to top.

So, it's all about the staff part and they can't get better, only if they somehow hire new people all around. Red Bull will be good enough, Mercedes will become second team and Ferrari will drop to third, and that's how we are going to finish off the season.

That's usually just a situation where people would get their money back if they only wager a certain amount. I still think that it's quite fun, because UFC doesn't go to decision that commonly, it's a bit more harsh and it's not as soft gloves like boxing, which we all know doesn't go to distance all the time neither, but UFC doesn't a lot quicker, we have like 3-5 minute rounds because of this based on how terrible it could get, people literally get knocked out and stay in hospital for so long there.

Hence, this type of stuff is a promotion that they will not have to pay a lot, and it's not too grand, if it was they would have made a big deal out of it.