Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 02:01:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 [140] 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 ... 330 »
2781  Other / Meta / Re: Selling of merits and btctalk accounts on: October 17, 2018, 03:05:46 AM
Some people buy these accounts to not scam other people but to use features on this forum which they can't use with young accounts they may own.
What features do people buy accounts for?

We have copper membership. What else do you need? Don't try to tell me that people are buying accounts just so they can have an avatar Roll Eyes
2782  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Auction] Papersafe Wallet CoD Dallas SuperConfernece Ed, Loaded, 1000 bits on: October 16, 2018, 01:38:12 PM
.003
2783  Economy / Services / Re: [FULL] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | 0.00075 BTC/post on: October 15, 2018, 12:40:41 PM
Hi, I noticed there's a user with low quality posts on your spreadsheet. Maybe you'd want a replacement. I can write high quality posts.

Username: KingZee
Post Count: 437
BTC Address : 1KingZeeW97uLvngcUA3R6QJx18Fn78ddb
Ignoring the fact that your address isn't a SegWit address (thanks for removing that part), the campaign is still full.

Read this:

Nope, I'm "burning" it. Basically what ends up happening is I struggle deciding between people so I usually pick two even when there's one slot open. I currently don't want to bring the campaign to 60 members (technically there's supposed to be 55, we're now at 58)
2784  Other / Meta / Re: What is my fault? on: October 15, 2018, 08:34:17 AM
You just answered the questions your self by telling the audience that you violated the forum rules by post low quality comments. The only thing I think you should do now is to find a way of creating an appeal post or message if the forum moderator can released your account for you.
No, you weren't reading.
OP claimed that their post was not spam. The only time you would conclude that they weren't contributing was when they were justifying their post with "I found many comments of other members almost similar to my comment" as it would have someone conclude that comments of such a nature were acceptable.
Like I said previously, it is possible that the thread suffered a mass exodus and that OP was looped in with the rest of the spammers.
2785  Other / Meta / Re: Help! The first ban and for life ??? on: October 15, 2018, 08:28:33 AM
I did all this for one fucking Merit, which I did not need!
If you didn't need it, why did you do it?

What made you think that plagiarizing content was ever acceptable?
2786  Other / Meta / Re: Help! The first ban and for life ??? on: October 15, 2018, 08:24:04 AM
~ even if I create a new profile? Sad Sad Sad
You (as a person) are banned. Posting anywhere else than in this thread is ban evasion and means you'll be banned again.
Very sorry! But as they say, hope dies last. I hope for the prosperity of Madera. Once again, without warning, ban for life, it's inhuman! You leave me without bread ... no idea how offended I am to tears! Because of this nonsense I lost my job in the forum! I sincerely confess their mistakes! I have nothing to say ...
Shame on you for expecting that you can have "job security" from an online forum, in which you abuse it by putting in zero effort while you copy and paste.

No amount of apologizing is going to unban your account. /thread
2787  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuse of another DT user. @actmyname on: October 14, 2018, 10:55:03 PM
The point of red trust should be given for trading or ammount of possible risked money. I have never scammed anyone in my whole life, and right.
Wrong.

I received a red trust for having "garbage posts".
Wrong.

Where is the problem of me posting in the thread of games and rounds. If that's my purpose on this forum, where is the problem?
There is no problem.

Second i got now a red trust for asking for a loan without collateral. Where is the problem?
Consider the facts. You had red trust. Therefore you had little to no chance of garnering a loan. Then the red trust disappeared. And coincidentally, you decided to apply for a loan. It seems suspect.

I message him on telegram and instead of replying to my messages he blocked me.
You acknowledge my rule and still violate it: "Ok, 72 hours, I won't wait 72 hours [...]"

I am a nice person and I always respect users arround, i help many projects that are young and myself i was scammed hundreds of times from my bad investment decisions, but i don't believe it is ok that the forum system is acting like this.


Respect, huh?
2788  Economy / Lending / Re: [Loan Request]: 0.25 BTC on: October 14, 2018, 08:53:40 AM
Repayment confirmed, thanks!
Perfect. Thanks for the quick reply!
2789  Economy / Lending / Re: [Loan Request]: 0.25 BTC on: October 14, 2018, 08:49:59 AM
Payment sent.
0e3fd24ccae5243cae50ef994e5c1bedad88c6da2289f6184720fab9c3aeec97

Once praine confirms, I'll lock the thread.
2790  Economy / Reputation / Re: 10 Alts waiting red trust from DT on: October 14, 2018, 02:41:51 AM
Tagged. Thanks.
2791  Other / Meta / Re: What is my fault? on: October 13, 2018, 10:17:52 PM
The posting time of those guidelines was just a few hours back. Where as I commented atleast 6 hours prior.
Not sure if it's some miswording, but the guidelines were posted a year ago.
It's possible that OP actually did want to post that they were following the project (genuinely, as people did before the bounty spam-craze) and was banned because the bounty incited bumps on the thread.

(where OP got looped into a mass-ban)
2792  Economy / Gambling / Re: BetKing.io Is it a blatant scam? on: October 13, 2018, 10:11:43 PM
Why is this scam artist allowed to open a second thread even though forum rules say only one thread per site?

BetKing.io Crash Game Seeding Event
Because you don't know how the rules work. Did you read the thread that expanded on it?

Unless your thread is for a new site or is newsworthy (such as a you are hosting a whole new type of game on a site

See also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2807542
2793  Economy / Reputation / Re: rezwalker probably bought merit from Embroiderymate on: October 13, 2018, 06:17:02 PM
Without conclusive evidence I believe it's critical to give the benefit of the doubt to rezwalker to prevent abuse down the line due to any loosely-given negatives for an A->B transaction to the receiving end. If we start tagging users who receive merit from an untrusted source then it arms negatively-trusted users with the power to ruin some accounts. If then, there are exceptions, then those same users will now be able to obfuscate and dilute their actual merit abuse.
TL;DR: don't create an abusable precedent, no tag.
2794  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Auction] Papersafe Wallet CoD Dallas SuperConfernece Ed, Loaded, 1000 bits on: October 13, 2018, 06:14:03 PM
0.0025
2795  Other / Meta / Re: The unluckiest person in bitcointalk on: October 13, 2018, 05:41:09 PM
I think it's much easier: rule 14 activity for 14 days only works to get a new activity, not to restore the old activity. If it worked differently, he wouldn't be able to get 620 activity in 200 days.
I'm fairly sure that's not the case here. If you were right, then there would need to be data stored for activity periods in which a user has posted for each account rather than a check for posts in a given time-frame.

If I were to delete my first 200 posts, I would see a decrease in activity. This is because I have to have at least one post in any given activity period to qualify for the potential activity.
2796  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM ALERT!! LUCKYGAMES - 50 Billion Bets Placed Myth Exposed on: October 13, 2018, 02:55:54 PM
In defense of the claim for bets, I just ran with a test account on the site (betting their "lucky" token with the lowest possible wager for 49.5% win rate) and the auto-betting at max acceleration was roughly 5 bets per second.

That's about equivalent to about 155 users running on auto. It's certainly not what I would expect in terms of traffic for the site but not outrageously far-fetched.

Add in. too, the surge in traffic that comes whenever they run their giveaways.
2797  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Auction] Satori Chips, 2 Sets, Both Flavours, Ends October 17 on: October 12, 2018, 10:52:37 PM
Thanks for ending on Canada weed day.

Both @ 0.002
2798  Economy / Lending / Re: Loan request of 0.05 TBP within 48hrs on: October 12, 2018, 10:48:01 PM
You can think what you want, I know myself, and sure, there are no guarantees with anything but I ran that bot for over a month and more than doubled what I put in. You could try it if you like  Wink
No bot or script or automated bullshit program will ever guarantee profit.

What's your income source? Don't you have a more secure way of earning money than a bot or asking people for a loan on BCT? Surely, since you used some amount for your bot, then you must have earned that amount somehow.

Fair enough but I've seen BTC loans doled out for less.
Anecdotal data has nothing to do with your case.
Facts are:
1) your most recent post from before the loan was over a year ago
2) if you're the same person then you must have one of those GPU rigs you were posting about
3) prior to the period of absence, your account was selling a huge amount of dietary supplements, and an xbox 360.
Where do you live that you can't make $370 in a pretty short amount of time? (a week, maybe)
2799  Economy / Lending / Re: Loan request of 0.05 TBP within 48hrs on: October 12, 2018, 05:02:59 AM
And... what exactly do you need this loan for? Sure, you might have lost money on a doubler, but why is it that you need a loan right now?
2800  Other / Meta / Re: [Beta] @mention notification bot open for testing - now with Telegram on: October 11, 2018, 07:32:59 PM
So there will be more privacy, now everyone can put my thread in the watchlist and see when somebody quotes me, not that I really care about it but...
Functionality is still there if someone wants to check up on your mentions (for whatever reason) if they simply search your name in the built-in search function. This is what I've been doing to check my mentions (until I found this thread).
Pages: « 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 [140] 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 ... 330 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!