You just spun this article What On-Chain Analytics Tell Us About Bitcoin Transactions in 2020Don't try to look like someone smart if you don't know how to behave. Great way to start on Bitcointalk  I believe we don't need parrots, we have enough already. What metrics would we say that we are looking into?
An extraordinary beginning stage is all the factors legitimately connected to the blockchain. At first, we are investigating the four generally fundamental, yet vital, on-chain measurements accessible: What metrics are we looking into?
A great starting point is all the variables directly linked to the blockchain. Initially, we are looking into the four most basic, yet crucial, on-chain metrics available: The very first on-chain data points we'll be examining identify with transaction data. Our center will be transaction check and volume, and how these measurements identify with Bitcoin price appreciation. Some significant takeaways are: Bitcoin transaction data
The very first on-chain data points we’ll be analyzing relate to transaction data. Our core focus will be transaction count and volume, and how these metrics relate to Bitcoin price appreciation. Bitcoin address data
Bitcoin addresses show the behavior of BTC holders. The fundamental data we'll be investigating is the number of dynamic addresses and how much everyone holds. Such metrics may assist us with seeing how individuals carry on during bullish and bearish seasons. Bitcoin address data
Bitcoin addresses show the behavior of BTC holders. The main data we’ll be looking into is the number of active addresses and how much each one holds. Such metrics may help us understand how people behave during bullish and bearish seasons For one thing, let me characterize what we mean by "on-chain analytics." Rather than concentrating on cost and traditional technical analysis procedures, we'll analyze all information that is locally put away on the blockchain.
This information incorporates (but is not limited to):
Subtleties of each block (timestamp, expenses, digger rewards, block weight, addresses, clients, and so forth.)
Subtleties of each transaction (sending and accepting locations, the sum moved in every transaction, the rest of the addresses, block time, and so forth.)
Smart contract invocation and usage (for the most part for Ethereum and Ethereum-based tokens). First off, let me define what we mean by “on-chain analytics.” Instead of focusing on price and traditional technical analysis techniques, we’ll look into all data that is natively stored on the blockchain.
This data includes (but is not limited to):
Details of every block (timestamp, fees, miner rewards, block weight, addresses, users, etc.)
Details of every transaction (sending and receiving addresses, the amount transferred in each transaction, the remaining addresses, block time, etc.)
Smart contract invocation and usage (mostly for Ethereum and Ethereum-based tokens). Conclusion:
Seeing some key metrics identifying with Bitcoin transactions, addresses, UTXO, and blocks, we infer that we're in for an energizing couple of years.
Ostensibly, the most recent value drop that took Bitcoin underneath $5,000 on CoinMarketCap gave our last chance to buy BTC beneath $10,000. Particularly since the dividing is practically coming. Thus, let me sum up this present article's discoveries:
Transactions are expanding, however, but the amounts being transferred are as well. The effect on value thankfulness has been very positive during the previous 10 years.
The number of total addresses is growing as well as the amounts held by both dumb and smart money. Hence, there has been a positive impact on price.
A great deal of Bitcoin is locked away by holders who only sell near peaks, meaning there’s little room for further falls until a new high is reached.
Blocks are getting full and new techniques are allowing for more transactions to be added per block. Looking at some key metrics relating to Bitcoin transactions, addresses, UTXO and blocks, we conclude that we’re in for an exciting couple of years.
Arguably, the latest price drop that took Bitcoin below $5,000 on CoinMarketCap provided our last opportunity to purchase BTC below $10,000. Especially since the halving is almost coming. Hence, let me summarize this article’s findings:
Transactions are not only increasing, but the amounts being transferred are as well. The impact on price appreciation has been quite positive during the past 10 years.
The number of total addresses is growing as well as the amounts held by both dumb and smart money. Hence, there has been a positive impact on price.
A great deal of Bitcoin is locked away by holders who only sell near peaks, meaning there’s little room for further falls until a new high is reached.
Blocks are getting full and new techniques are allowing for more transactions to be added per block.
Safe trades! |
|
|
|
If you want, i can help you arrange all possible links for the table later tomorrow, let me know. I like doing a little quest for links.
Thanks. That will be useful if you can  And if someone could give me a table template according to the characteristics above, because honestly, I'm bad with it |
|
|
|
|
Ben la question s'était plutôt sur les moyens mis en oeuvre pour récolter des informations et détecter d'éventuel fraudeurs. Après ce qu'il en résulte c'est autre chose.
Je ne pense pas non plus que par exemple dès qu'ils vont trouver un compte non déclaré ils vont infliger l'amende de 750€ directement. C'est un peu comme ceux qui ne déclare pas leur télévision ou leur abri de jardin. C'est de la fraude mais les personnes ne sont pas pénalisés sur çà avec une amende (généralement), ils sont juste régularisés sur ce qu'ils auraient du payer
Mais il y a toujours des exceptions suivant la tete du client.
|
|
|
|
|
Le big data simplement, et c'est quelque chose de plus en plus utilisé par le Trésor public. Et vu à la vitesse que la technologie avance avec l' intelligence artificielle et tout, on ne sait pas du tout de quoi ils seront capable d'ici 5 ans.
En tout cas même dans l'état actuel des choses, une fois qu ils seront bien en place ca ne sera pas trop difficile pour eux de faire des liens. Il suffira d'analyser le cashflow avec les cash in et cash out. A grande échelle ce ne sera qu'une histoire de déductions logique.
Les plateformes peuvent te chanter n'importe quelle chanson, tu n'es pas à l'abri d'entendre une autre musique plus tard. Si une nouvelle loi les force à le faire, ils n'auront pas trop le choix d'obéir, peu importe qu'elles s'appellent Binance ou Coinbase (Coinbase est aux US, pas en Lettonie)
Ca peut etre aussi un changement de business strategy, tout simplement.
Tu n'as pas fait de cash out mais peut être as tu fais du cash in? Peut être as tu utilisé un service avec? Et un jour faudra bien que tu le transformes en cash, tu ne pourras peut être pas le vendre en F2F... il y a plein de chose à prendre en compte et il faut penser sur le long terme avec ces choses là. Pas juste les 5 prochaines années.
|
|
|
|
Have you given more thought on open-sourcing the code? Even if not yet, this is still the best mixer, but I'm curious about your plans.
None will do that. It's like giving your experience and knowledge to potential competitors and then reducing the market share once there are thousands of forks that cloned your code. Better to give them money directly it will be faster It's like asking Microsoft its source code or Nutella to release the recipe so everyone can copy. |
|
|
|
Hi LeGaulois et al. Can I request the minimum amounts to be added to the excellent list you have of reputable bitcoinmixers? For small fry like myself it's real useful information.
...
Hi . Thanks for the suggestion and your wish is granted  However, I didn't add the value in dollars since I can't imagine me updating the original post everyday. Regarding MyCryptomixer you can figure what the minimum is only when you start to mix, it's then displayed on the page (Send between 0.003 and 0.xx) I feel like there's a potential market for something with real low minimums. You know, so your kids can mess with their pocket money. I don't think so, I believe it can be a waste of time and resources. It's like paying your $1 loaf of bread with a debit card while merchants have a minimum of $10 (because of bank & Visa fees). |
|
|
|
I have tried bisq before but it was too difficult for me. In all that list from OP, what does OP himself use and which has the best prices and good dispute in case I get conned?
Bisq mainly but since you find it too difficult... It may be confusing for some people but once you understand it's easy and their 'anti-scam' system is quite efficient. (Why not using their topic here to ask your questions? Or better with their forum/chat/subreddit) Localcyptos & Hodlhodl are good alternatives, I believe a lot of people who left LocalBitcoin switched there. However, I can't comment on their dispute system. Bitcointalk can also be a good place too, I do a lot of deals here regularly |
|
|
|
|
Bounties rewards died 2-3 years back I believe.
MaxBounty is a CPA network dude, nothing related to the bounties as you know it in the crypto sphere. And I doubt you will be able to post any affiliate link during discussions here since it will be reported as SPAM, like many others when they post their referral links.
If you want to make money using CPA, start your own blog and write quality content, a bit of SEO & SMM but better I tell you the cash doesn't come immediately.
Otherwise, there are a dozen topics here on how to earn bitcoins during your spare time. You'll find them using the search tab.
|
|
|
|
During most hack, cryptocurrencies were stolen while few stole users login details. If the users' login details were used to stole coins then it's not the platform that has been hacked it's just the user account (and his/her coins) and that makes a big difference. Hackers don't use users' accounts to then hack the platform's system. This makes exchanges even more vulnerable to hackers as they are now the primary aims of hackers It has always been, nothing changed... There are many exchanges that has been hacked in the past It happens every six month period, we're used to it... So, I come to the conclusion that it is better to store cryptocurrencies on hardware wallets, and that exchanges are only for trading, not for long holding of cryptocurrencies.
Congratz for your conclusion but it's something we repeat over and over in discussions here, you only figured it now? |
|
|
|
Decentralized currencies but centralized trading, that's the reality. And a study that shows that once again, according to this report, 4 exchange platforms share 90% of the Bitcoin's trading volume (Coinbase, Bitstamp, Bitfinex et Kraken). (It also reminded me of an old article showing that 2/3 of the transactions were related only to trading activities by the way.) What's the point of using a decentralized currency if next to it people use a centralized platform for trading? Oh I know, follow the money... This shows that people are not really interested in decentralization and that the P2P trade/trading/payment methods cannot develop properly. If there is no demand there will be no supply and the ecosystem cannot evolve correctly. (I'm not even talking about the fact that the majority is only interested to speculate) The question also arises as to the future of these platforms which are acquiring more and more influence over the years, such as Binance or Coinbase for example, which are buying up companies or introducing much broader products than a simple trading platform. Doesn't that remind you GAFA? (to compare) We are no longer in 2013 where users had little choice. We have everything we need, more or less, to do without them. Keep using centralized exchanges and complete the KYC, in less than 10 years they all will be hated.  |
|
|
|
Mouais...je vois pas trop l'avantage d'une blockchain. Tickets restau et chèques vacances fonctionnent très bien sans blockchain... Le problème avec chèques vacances par exemple, ce sont les péremptions (environ 30% des montants) Avec une blockchain, tu peux tracer les dépenses et ne faire payer que les sommes réellement dépensées Il suffirait pas de prolonger la date tout simplement? Quand au tracage de paiement, tu parles du côté utilisateur ou entreprise? Parce que c'est tout à fait possible et même peut etre deja en place (plus ou moins), c'est juste que l'utilisateur n'y a pas accès car pas d'utilité, sans doute même pour l'entreprise dans 99.9% des cas (mais ca reste juste une base de données). Quand aux sommes réellement dépensées, c'est pareil, il suffirait juste de changer la règle et de permettre de rendre la monnaie. Moi non plus je ne saisi pas bien l'utilité d'une blockchain dans ce système en fait. J'ai l'impression que c'est chercher à faire compliquer quand on peut faire très simple. |
|
|
|
11.21 btc sent on May 22 still doesn't come back
I think smartmixer.io is a scam.
I don't want others to feel like me.
It is wise not to use smartmixer.io.
I find it crazy to spend ~$100k to someone when there are several red flags that can be found easily using a search engine. I'm so puzzled that I even wonder if it's true  Sorry for you but it's a good reminder to make due diligence before using a mixer (even if we already used it, many services come and go) Just some examples: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227899.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227498 |
|
|
|
Je pense qu'ils utilisent juste des "Bitcoin transaction accelerator" qui sont en fait rien de plus que des demandes 'off-chain' aux mining pools pour inclure la transaction dans le(s) prochains bloc(s). Il y en a des gratuits et des payants, par exemple celui ci. Mais je suppose que certains font payer les gens pour accélérer leur transaction mais utilisent des services gratuit derrière Sinon tu peux le faire toi même si tu es à l'origine de la transaction et que tu peux utiliser RBF (replace-by-free) ou CPFP (child-pays-for-parent) |
|
|
|
...
51% of equity? Why such an odd number?...
When you have (a) business partner(s) you usually share 50/50 but sometimes it's different because a person doesn't contribute at the same level (whatever it's about the hours spent, the capital, etc)... The 1% makes a big difference legally. The partner becomes the majority owner and manager of the company with all the responsibilities that come with it. Or it's a joke with a 51% attack |
|
|
|
Prenons 2 cas : -1 cession fiscale de 500 000 euros par an (occasionnel ? même si grosse bénéfice ? )
-12 cessions de 50 000 euros par an ( habituelle ? avec beaucoup de cessions ? ) Oui dans les 2 cas. Surtout si c'est fait de manière régulière, par exemple 12 cessions en l'espace de 2 mois ,ne sera pas vu de la même façon que 1 cession par mois à chaque mois de l'année. Un peu logique en même temps, il suffit de se mettre à leur place et de se demander si telle ou telle façon fait plutôt sembler à une activité régulière. Si situation habituelle de trading : peut-on créer une micro-BIC ? L’activité d’achat et de revente de cryptoactifs est-elle une activité de vente de marchandise soumis au chiffre d'affaire 170 000 euros (abattement de 71%) ?
Si c'est caractérisé en tant qu'activité habituelle non, c'est du BNC il me semble |
|
|
|
Que personne n'utilise ici. Le but étant quand même de lister les plateformes que les francophonnes utilisent et/ou qui reviennent souvent dans nos discussions. Parce qu'autrement si on commence à lister tout les échanges, on ne va pas s'en sortir et on pourrait lister une centaine de plateformes. Et à part toi qui a créé un compte juste pour faire ta pub ici, je ne vois aucun interet dans la partie francaise |
|
|
|
Nop, I don't sell a service, I sell a script code. for MODERATORS, do CHECK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5232917.msg54031091#msg54031091(I wonder why they didn't link this in the 1st place.) It's not even a hyip script, rather a hyip listing monitor which can also be used for ad networks etc. edit - I see they linked but they state it as a "service", perhaps they are track minded. edit2 - You forgot to add the topic link on op Everything helping scammers isn't very appreciated in the forum. While HYIPs are scams, most HYIPs monitors are too. It's like if you say "Hey I sell guns, yes people die but I'm not responsible at any level!" @marlboroza https://i.imgur.com/lOmWAxB.pngI'm sure not the only one unable to read the original post. It's blocked by UBlock Origin but I don't know exactly why Edit: I removed sites, do you see it now?
Nope sorry |
|
|
|
I did not test any of this features so far, but it is possible I may do it in future It was one of the most important things to check and to show us as it is the main feature of the product. Especially before you really use it. - Waterproof: not just 5 minutes in your bath but several days to accelerate a potential reaction and with the water from the rain if possible not a faucet (the Ph isn't the same). - Shockproof; not just throw off the roof - Fireproof: not just in the oven some minutes with your pizza, you need a high temperature, you can try with a chalumeau, it can reach 3000°C which is enough to compare it to a house fire. - Acid: 304 stainless steel isn't the most resistant At least I'd do it with each I receive. You're not immune to a manufacturing defect, and that's the kind of thing you need to know right away and not on the day you need it. |
|
|
|
The picture is taken from J.Huseman from ProPublica in Austin. The person is just a random rioter trying to create the buzz. And since sometimes you can see such a person in every protestation worldwide. Like during the yellow vest movements , the covid19 lockdown or behind Janet Yellen as you mention. I've seen plenty of them and honestly nothing special. Yes it's free advertisement for the community but the persons try to hit the medias the same ways the Merits Prostitutes here suck for peanuts |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
