I am for free carrying of weapons. It's a paradox, but in countries where it is permitted freely carry weapons much lower crime rate. It is no secret that illegal weapons are many. And me with a weapon would have been calmer conductive yourself and loved ones
If the people stood up and used their guns to remove taxes, there would be even less crime.  The people don't need guns for that, that is an unfeasible goal. Be realistic, guns are only for self protection, hunting and fun. The US is one of the biggest military powers in the world. You cannot take down the biggest military power with a few toy guns. The American civil war pretty much showed that. That is me in those taxes. I put my labor, even myself, into earning that money. Then they stole it. They stole me. And they won't stop. I need more and bigger guns. |
|
|
|
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
All you need to do is go to the cemeteries and take a look. God is stopping evil, but He is giving people a chance to stop it first. They don't, however. What a sweet God. Giving us all the chance to stop being evil before He stops it. |
|
|
|
Yep. A mountain is proof the earth is not flat. How? The mountain, which is part of earth, rises up above the flatness of the earth. |
|
|
|
Come on people, god doesn't exists! Stop dreaming about the afterlife and face the truth! You've got only one life, live it and have fun!  Come on people. Science proves God exists, nature shows God exists, and in the Bible God tells us He exists. God rules all. |
|
|
|
Look at all the lenticular galaxies in the universe. They wanted to be flat. But they just couldn't. Same as the earth. The proof is the pancakes that rise with big bubbles in them. |
|
|
|
... [clip]...
The numerous experiments that refute flat earth include:
1) Measuring The Coriolis force
2) The Cavendish Experiment
3) Eratosthenes' Calculation at various altitudes
4) The Michaelson Gale experiment
... [clip]...
1) The Coriolis effect has a cycle of 23 hours 56 minutes, the claim is that the Earth rotates every 24 hours. Clearly the motion of the stars circling above is responsible for this effect as the cycle matches sidereal time. 2) Two led balls hanging in some dudes garage is not proof we're on a sphere. The experiment is total garbage that nobody can replicate. 3) Nice that you added "at various altitudes" but the experiment still works if the Sun is a 32 mile wide disk orbiting 3k miles above a flat Earth. 4) The Michaelson Gale experiment corroborates the Sagnac effect in proving the existence of the aether. This leaves the only possible interpretation of the Michaelson Morley experiment as being a motionless Earth. We're not on a spinning ball, the Earth is a flat motionless plane! However, round earth has way more to it than flat earth, even if it's notbatearth. |
|
|
|
While the first verse in the Bible covers a period that is unknown, because things like the electromagnetic spectrum had not been settled into place before there was light, the KEY biblical understanding of this is that "the earth was formless and void." In other words, there is no knowledge of what went before the day that light was made. Some of it might correspond to billions of years, or trillions. Other of it would correspond to only an instant, like a nano-second or less. And some might correspond to any amount of time in between. And you've just shot down your own belief that the bible proves the Earth's age is 6000 years by saying that any time period between Earth's creation and there being an electromagnetic spectrum could have been billions or trillions of years, or a nano-second or less. Nice work!!!  Quite the contrary. The time before time was not time. It wasn't even before time. So, using time, the thing that the year is made up of, the earth is a little over 6,000 years old. Just because it has some other things that look a little like time but aren't time, doesn't change the time. |
|
|
|
yes being muslim i fully believe on Allah, He is the creator of all the world and every one has to return to him after death and after that every one has to answer to Him about all of his dead and Allah will reward them for their good deeds or will punish them for their wrong deeds.
The funny thing about Muslims is, if they translate the Koran into English, they don't translate the word "Allah." If they did, you would never see "Allah." You would only see "God." |
|
|
|
I agree, it's time to ban. But a lot of people will lose the meaning of life. A man accustomed to someone to serve. Even if now prohibit religion, it will be many generations before people learn to be free
If people want to enforce bans on religion, the only way they will be able to accomplish it is if they do it religiously. |
|
|
|
I am for free carrying of weapons. It's a paradox, but in countries where it is permitted freely carry weapons much lower crime rate. It is no secret that illegal weapons are many. And me with a weapon would have been calmer conductive yourself and loved ones
If the people stood up and used their guns to remove taxes, there would be even less crime. |
|
|
|
If you educate people well and distribute the wealth equal, there won't be any need of a gun. Capitalism made rich, richer and poor poorer. So while the poor fucks killing each other for their security they make those rich people even richer by buying their guns.
Oh, drat. I liked football games. But distributing the wealth equally took away the chance everybody had to excel. Now nobody wants to fight for anything 'cause there's no money in it. They don't even want to play football anymore. |
|
|
|
Look at this^^^! Start talking about getting into their money, and they start with subtle (or not so subtle) threats! Are all flat earth people like this?
|
|
|
|
It's interesting how Christians are the only group of people who object to the age of the Earth...
No they are not. Muslims are similar "fundamentalists" and believe the same crock of shit. I have to date not met a single Muslim fundamentalist who believes that the Earth is 6,000 years old. If it was 6000 years old, methinks it would be one pretty hot rock. Because we could figure the numbers on all that inbound gravitational energy turned into compression and heat, and then look at outbound radiant energy, which is essentially a 2d outflow, 3d inflow problem. So the rock would stay hot a long time, which it has indeed, still having a molten core and such. Since things like heat and energy in the form of the electromagnetic spectrum were not settled before the first day, when light was made, there is no way to understand how hot or cold anything was. Scientific understandings of how the earth came about are as much guesswork as anything else. |
|
|
|
You are talking about the Adam era i.e the time man came into the picture. It is true that man is 6000+ years old on this planet and the "new earth" was created about 6000+ years ago to accommodate life as we know it.
I am talking of the pre-Adam era, before God created man.
Lucifer traded and walked in the garden of Eden. There was an old garden of Eden... there must have been an old Earth. I think God has destroyed and created Earth more often than we thought... I know the hidden things belong to God.
This has got nothing to do with evolution, man didn't evolve from apes and no animal evolved from another animal. But really, how old are the angels... do you know?
In the book of revelations, Lucifer is called the ancient serpent. How old is he?
Scientists say the universe is billions of years old, I can't argue with that.
You and I both know Lucifer existed long before Adam was created..
I do not know how old he is...
The bible is silent on life before the creation of man... things happened before Adam was created. Things we were not told.
While the first verse in the Bible covers a period that is unknown, because things like the electromagnetic spectrum had not been settled into place before there was light, the KEY biblical understanding of this is that "the earth was formless and void." In other words, there is no knowledge of what went before the day that light was made. Some of it might correspond to billions of years, or trillions. Other of it would correspond to only an instant, like a nano-second or less. And some might correspond to any amount of time in between. |
|
|
|
A few other options I've seen pop up:
Kerry: whatever.
Michelle Obama: That's an interesting one! That could work, and it could explain the attention paid to her speech at the convention. It would get the X chromosome count where it needs to be to adhere to 'the plan.' It would also mitigate Obama's 'black deficit' conferred on the guy by his mother. Certainly this is responsible for the appalling results that the black community has realized under the guy you know. Beyond that, if the rumor than Michelle is tranny turns out to be true, it will put a checkmark by the third box in the 'black -> woman -> gay(ish)' plan cooked up at the DNC.
Michelle Obama Is A MAN!!(PROOF) PT.2/2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B418vtkQsY |
|
|
|
God uses all things for Himself. The greatest thing is God. All things were made by Him and for Him. The closest He comes to doing something different than this is, He has allowed people who believe in Him to join with Him so that they can experience Godness. |
|
|
|
Your Money or Your Life:
What's Behind the Latest Government Scam to Rob You Blind? "The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: Your money, or your life. And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat. The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the road side, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful."—Lysander Spooner, American abolitionist and legal theorist
If a cop wrongfully attacks you, you cannot fight back.
If a SWAT team wrongfully raids your home, you cannot defend yourself.
If a highway patrol officer wrongfully takes your money or your valuable possessions, you cannot get them back without a lengthy, costly legal battle.
It used to be that the Constitution served as a bulwark against government abuses, excesses and wrongdoing.
That is no longer the case.
Having been reduced to little more than a historic document, the Constitution now provides scant protection against government abuses, misconduct and corruption.
Not only are "we the people" painfully vulnerable to the whims of any militarized cop on the beat, but we are also sitting targets for every government huckster out to fleece the taxpayer of their hard-earned dollars.
We get taxed on how much we earn, taxed on what we eat, taxed on what we buy, taxed on where we go, taxed on what we drive, and taxed on how much is left of our assets when we die.
Because the government's voracious appetite for money, power and control has grown out of control, its agents have devised other means of funding its excesses and adding to its largesse through taxes disguised as fines, taxes disguised as fees, and taxes disguised as tolls, tickets and penalties. For example, red light cameras, which were sold to the public as safety measures, have in practice become backdoor taxes aimed at swelling government bank accounts.
The government's schemes to swindle, cheat, scam, and generally defraud Americans have run the gamut from wasteful pork barrel legislation, cronyism and graft to asset forfeiture schemes, the modern-day equivalent of highway robbery, astronomical health care "reform," and costly stimulus packages.
Americans have also been made to pay through the nose for the government's endless wars, subsidization of foreign nations, military empire, welfare state, roads to nowhere, bloated workforce, secret agencies, fusion centers, private prisons, biometric databases, invasive technologies, arsenal of weapons, and every other budgetary line item that is contributing to the fast-growing wealth of the corporate elite at the expense of those who are barely making ends meet—that is, we the taxpayers.
Those football stadiums that charge exorbitant sums for nosebleed seats? Our taxpayer dollars subsidize them. Those blockbuster war films? Yep, we were the silent investors on those, too. Same goes for the military equipment being peddled to local police agencies and the surveillance cameras being "donated" to local governments.
Now the government and its corporate partners in crime have come up with a new scheme to not only scam taxpayers out of what's left of their paychecks but also make us foot the bill, and it's coming at us in the form of a war on cash.
What is this war on cash?
It's a concerted campaign to do away with large bills such as $20s, $50s, $100s and shift consumers towards a digital mode of commerce that can easily be monitored, tracked, tabulated, mined for data, hacked, hijacked and confiscated when convenient.
According to economist Steve Forbes, "The real reason for this war on cash—start with the big bills and then work your way down—is an ugly power grab by Big Government. People will have less privacy: Electronic commerce makes it easier for Big Brother to see what we're doing, thereby making it simpler to bar activities it doesn't like, such as purchasing salt, sugar, big bottles of soda and Big Macs."
Much like the war on drugs and the war on terror, this so-called "war on cash" is being sold to the public as a means of fighting terrorists, drug dealers and tax evaders. Just the mere possession of cash is enough to implicate you in suspicious activity and have you investigated. In other words, cash has become another way for the government to profile Americans and render them criminals.
The rationale is that cash is the currency for illegal transactions given that it's harder to track, can be used to pay illegal immigrants, and denies the government its share of the "take," so doing away with paper money will help law enforcement fight crime and help the government realize more revenue. Read more at https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/your_money_or_your_life_whats_behind_the_latest_government_scam_to_rob.
|
|
|
|
I checked just now. Forex Paradise is still there. I'm past the halfway mark for getting my payout. Only 28 days left. Will it last that long? Could be gone in a minute. But has been around for over 950 days. |
|
|
|
These flat earth jokers are dangerous! For sure by now they have applied for Federal and State grants to continue their mission of stupidity. And all of us are required to support them by our taxes. Just think! Your Welfare and Social Security checks could be higher if we didn't have jokers like this stealing our tax money.  |
|
|
|
Fired for not shooting, West Virginia cop breaks silence A Marine veteran says he was fired from the Weirton, West Virginia Police Department because he did not shoot an armed black man who was looking for "suicide by cop." Two other officers arrived and killed the man, whose gun was not loaded.
Stephen Mader, 25, answered a call on May 6 from a distraught woman who said her boyfriend was trying to commit suicide. He tried to de-escalate the situation using his Marine Corps and police academy training, he told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Weirton is a city of about 20,000 in the West Virginia panhandle, 36 miles west of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
"I saw then he had a gun, but it was not pointed at me," Mader said, describing a silver handgun that Ronald Williams of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania held in his right hand, pointed at the ground. Williams, 23 and known as "RJ," told the officer to "just shoot me."
"And I told him, 'I'm not going to shoot you brother'," Mader told the Post-Gazette. "I thought I was going to be able to talk to him and de-escalate it. I knew it was a suicide-by-cop."
At that point, two other officers arrived. Williams walked towards them, waving the gun, and they shot him. Police later established that the gun had not been loaded. Mader and the two other officers are white; Williams was black.
When Mader tried to return to work on May 17, he was told to report to Police Chief Rob Alexander.
"We're putting you on administrative leave and we're going to do an investigation to see if you are going to be an officer here. You put two other officers in danger," Mader recalled the chief saying. On June 7, he was given a termination notice that said he "failed to eliminate a threat" by not shooting Williams.
The following day, Hancock County Prosecutor Jim Davis announced the shooting had been justified, and Chief Alexander told reporters that "all three officers" were back at work and doing well. Read more at https://www.rt.com/usa/359218-cop-fired-not-shooting/.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
