• Mr. Versetti has clarified that the Masternode model will be multi-tiered. However, more details concerning this model will not be released until the EDCON conference in Canada around May 5th (https://kryptocal.com/event/18214/token-economics-release). One benefit of this setting is that there will be experienced representatives from the industry present who can give quality feedback when the model is unveiled.

• The newly hired CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) is Mr. Stephen Croncota. Mr. Croncota was previously CMO at Versace. In his talk with the audience Mr. Croncota stressed his desire to make Ambrosus more well-known, and emphasized the importance of transparency and honesty.

• Throughout the talk Dr. Vlad Trifa and Mr. Versetti stressed the power of keeping Ambrosus open source. They discussed how the revolutionary changes Ambrosus will bring to the food and pharmaceutical industries are often times difficult for current companies to accept (i.e. Monsanto), however, especially in terms of demonstrating quality, Ambrosus will be essential for companies wanting to demonstrate their authenticity (the example was given of Asian companies who will have the opportunity to use Ambrosus to demonstrate a European Union level quality of their products).

• Dr. Vlad Trifa also was very keen to emphasize how the Ambrosus NET registers ‘events’. What this ultimately means is that not only food, or medicine can be tracked in the Ambrosus system: but rather, any asset that may require an ‘event’ so as to be assembled (i.e. Car Parts) will also be eligible for Ambrosus tracking.

• Mr. Versetti discussed a couple of real use cases for Ambrosus. Most importantly, he mentioned a company (currently under NDA) but valued at around 22 billion. As well as two other companies: one valued at around 2 billion and the other in-between 2 to 4 billion. His use cases were the Chocolate and Coffee industries.

• A key question asked was about possible expansion and geographical location. Mr. Versetti stressed how Ambrosus already has more than enough opportunity in Europe, however a lot of European countries assemble their products (or get their produce) in Asia. On a different point, Mr. Versetti stressed the importance of engaging with both public (i.e. government) and private actors so as to ensure that certain import-export or tariff barriers are taken into account. Finally, Mr. Versetti discussed the partnership with the UN Sustainable Food Program and put the call out for any company working with the program in developing countries to get in touch if they desire to.

• One final general point is that both Mr. Versetti and Dr. Trifa were very keen to emphasize how Ambrosus will be compatible with many other systems in the blockchain and IoT space. The Ambrosus project is ultimately planning for the long term: smart cities, more complete blockchain adoption and open source participation, etc.

Credits to mondaysblow

There is no need to worry about the long-term development of the AMB coin project. Short wave band traders can consider selling first, and the rebound is almost in place.

The potential of this project is very good, coupled with a team that has great ability (judging by how the team answers all the questions in this forum)

Price predictions are silly.  If you asked me in January where the price would be by April, I certainly wouldn't have said .036.  However, the roadmap is promising and the partnerships are promising.  If they stay on track I think we'll see really nice returns.  Especially if your entry point is here.

We are confident that the day will come true, we know this project is beautiful. Just wait for them to be busy so they can not answer the questions. be patient

It is great to see the constant updates and flow of information from the LaLa team. The product speaks for itself, it will bring many people a chance to a better life. What I am wondering though, how will this reflect for investors? What are possible ways the price might increase based on more usage of the LaLa token? Interested in other peoples opinions on this.

All mentioned still have a long time until their Betas, testnets and mainnets. Time is very important in crypto space, half a year of a difference can mean that the project stalls or fails.

Very true and a very good point. It's possible, but the motivation for what I've seen appears to be designed to create buzz, similar to how the U.S. election was hacked.  Here again, my point is also that anything Russian or related to Russia is tainted due to recent world events in the U.S. in the UK and in Syria.  It puts a bad taste in people's mouths and minds for anything Russian.

If Credits wants to redeem itself, they can start by using more polished English speaking people when using the English language to communicate ANYTHING TO THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD.  Otherwise they look like total idiots in the PR sense.  No one in the West, wants to hear from a Russia ANYTHING right now.  Russia is openly despised right now on the world's stage, so it's stupid to underline that ethnicity in any way, under the present circumstances.

On the positive side, this is actually a good time to buy Credit$, because of the negative news cycle. This is when you want to buy. Also, my suspicion is that Binance doesn't care about anything but profits, generally, and Credits is one of the best sellers on KuCoin, so they must be chomping at the bit to list it. Binance doesn't want to list a true scam, but with their decentralized platform coming out this year anyway, it won't make much difference what they list on their centralized exchange, as it will be the wild West on their decentralized platform, regardless. So why be too picky now?

Everytime Credits$ dips below 0.50 cents, people rush in to buy it, which is not typical of most of the ICO's that we've seen launched during the bear market.

I want to give you some important advice - don't sell your tokens until next year. I think that the maximum price of the token will be when people begin to use the platform.

People are expecting this, a project can only be distinguished on their platform they are handling, in the case of Credits they should guaranty that everything is working perfectly, even now it is behind the scene, they are everywhere that's make them trustworthy only the platform is missing.

People are expecting this, a project can only be distinguished on their platform they are handling, in the case of Credits they should guaranty that everything is working perfectly, even now it is behind the scene, they are everywhere that's make them trustworthy only the platform is missing.

Their mission is honorable. That's why they got my support for sure and I will spread the word about this when possible. So many projects look like money grab, but I have a good feeling about this one.

Always have to do your own due diligence ofcourse, but I do think it's a good buy now. Specially considering that some people paid around $0,45 per LALA I think in the auction?