Sorry, just a wrong expression, miner says compiling code and initializing GPUs etc.. Then it shows speeds of 0kH\s for every card and I just see in monitoring that they have no load at all.

Tried to run this miner to mine x16r with my Furies, but it will just generate hash file forever. So does it support them or not? Drivers are 18.6.1, win10.

There tons cmd-files in the directory - use them as an example, just replace server and your wallet addresses

Yeah, I've got pretty much the same h\rs with my 1080\Ti's, 1070's have ~16mh\s

Does this miner support Fiji?

Hi there! Does -asm 1 work with Fury(X) for anyone using 4.0b to mine lyra2z? When I try it miner simply wont run whining "-a" parameter is wrong. Or asm simply isn't meant to work with Fury?

Not only cards with gddr5x, GTX1070 seem to behave the same way: I clocked down mem. to 3500Mhz and nothing changed in performance. Also tried lyra2-z\rev2 using Cryptodredge - same thing.

It is, but p-state only affects memory clock and since x16r is irresponsive to it I doubt running P2 will make a difference even at -500MHz in AB which will make it 4000Mhz or so. At least I tried running 5500Mhz with GTX1080 and results were the same as with 4500Mhz.

Just updated drivers from 399xx to 411.70 on my home pc (win7) and noticed perfomance drop in x16r on my 1080. On my rigs I use win10 though, but still unsure whether update drivers or not. Probably gonna have to wait for miner update that improves perfomance with cuda 10.0 drivers

Does anyone try v11.9 with new nvidia drivers(415+), will it work?

What I'd love to see is T-rex catching up with Cryptodredge in Lyra2z perfomance!

You ask for a prof though at the same time you present none either. But no, I didn't make any screenshots to prove it - I was making those test for myself. Just keep in mind -i 20 is not maximum in z-enemy, I was using 21. Also I noticed that on faster sequences t-rex is faster, but on slower - zealot is. So in the end I choose to stick with t-rex anyway.

Cryptodredge as well

Cool, now z-enemy 1.21a is faster than t-rex 0.6.10 in x16r.. though by less than 1%)

I use curve OC, though for each card curve is a bit different cos cards have different OC potential, but not by much. Memory is  set to 5003(-502mhz). And then I adjust power consumption using PL, e.g. for Stris OC's 72%, for Gigabyte OC's its 79%. So you gotta tune your cards individually, my settings might not work for you. If you are mining only lyra2z  algorithm you dont need to limit PL at all, just find proper vcore\clock combination that will make ur card's draw below 200wt. It's just I mine on Nicehash, so I had to make curves for 3 algos for my cards: x16r, lyra2z\rev2, and I also got to use PL hence in lyra2z I'll get more powerdraw (though also higher h\r) if I allow 1080ti's to mine at max clock my curve has. With PL they usually stick to 825-831mV and their respective clocks.

ps Here is example of a curve of 1 of my strix's card:



I get a bit higher h\r - 76-77Mh\s with power draw around 195Wt.

I get ~5.9MH\s @ 197Wt

No point in this conversation indeed since u obviously can't read or don't understand what's written.

Like I've said I've been testing z-enemy and t-rex at the same time on different rigs, so sequences were the same... So, no,  I didn't have to test it for 24hours, even 5 minutes would have been enough.

For now T-rex is obviously faster, so I'm not using Z-enemy to mine x16r anymore. But once new version arrives I'll test it using this command, thank you!

I get on avg. 5800mhs@197wt with 1080Ti's and 4520mhs@152wt with 1080's in lyra2z and 77.5mhs@195wt with 1080Ti's and 58.5@148wt with 1080's in lyra2rev2.