|
While I know I haven't yet built up a reputation here, I've reviewed the sources for the "dust settler". It's a sound concept, but I'm not happy with his implementation, nor his "forced" donation (which is tucked away in his version of the bitnet client dll). I'm currently developing a similar application which I'll be publishing (with full sources) within the next week.
|
|
|
|
New P2Pool node: 2% fee - http://24.199.222.250:9500/ North America, East Coast Please let me know if there are any issues, I'll address them ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
Just finished setting up another p2pool node:
Fee 2% for now, likely to reduce.
URL: 24.199.222.250:19335
Username: *your LKC address*
|
|
|
|
E1csKCpWXStEmx3J3Z2TvhBtMYqojh6Q1N  |
|
|
|
|
Messing around, tweaking miner settings, I decided to test things with junkcoin. For some reason, the IRC connection is failing and I'm constantly out of sync. Is anyone else having this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Coinchoose is wrong. Check the console (getdifficulty) currently 0.34835140 (roughly 22.8K)
|
|
|
|
|
Despite the shaky launch, I actually really like this coin. Best of luck on Cryptsy!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, all. My setup is far from optimal. I use cgminer with a single 6990, a second rig with a Nvidia GTX560 (cudaminer) and 14 CPU cores mining from different machines.
The cudaminer setup is pointing at my local p2pool litecoin node, though I'm thinking of writing a GPU accelerated sha256 miner in cuda to try to squeeze a bit more out of my TRC mining before all the sha256 coins are eaten by asics.
|
|
|
|
I know most of you won't find this very exciting, but I know I do. After countless days of pooled mining, I finally solo-mined my first TRC block!  What a rush! EDIT: For documentation's sake: Status: 4/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 node(s) Date: 5/20/2013 00:21 Source: Generated Credit: 20.00 TRC (matures in 116 more block(s)) Net amount: 0.00 TRC Transaction ID: f9331a53dbf64e9f838f9851f9a5fa5ab14ac24e10111765e8de67840e61880a Also of note, this just after winning my first ltcpoker.eu tourney! Turning out to be a good evening indeed. |
|
|
|
PM for offers. Will likely use dudeami's escrow/exchange for your peace of mind.  Thanks. I have roughly 94, but will toss in any extra as a tip after sucessful trade. Also selling 71 PWC and ~5000 GMC. |
|
|
|
|
Really hope this works out, OP. We need more exchanges, even in the form of escrow services.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I feel callous. Site looks nice. Interesting style for trades.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. I really wouldn't have the time to do something like this right now, and if I did I would spend quite a bit of time working on it (likely with many other contributers) before launch. My primary interest would be in ease-of-access to the code, even in the precompiled versions to help prevent people having their wallet.dat stolen, system trojaned, etc. Also keeping the number of required external libraries to a minimum to make it "easier to compile" for those who are having trouble compiling their own copies of the coins that are popping up everywhere now.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new here, but expect no quarter from the flames. I enjoy mining the vast number of various altcoins that have been released as of late, but with a few slight exceptions, we really aren't seeing anything new brought to the table. I would love to contribute something altcoin related, but I refuse to tweak a few settings and release a garbage coin in hopes of pump and dump riches. Instead, with this past week's YaCoin FUD debacle, why not reimplement the whole system for a new coin. Create a generalized client codebase in a language such as Java or C# (anything managed, really) such that decompiling the "precompiled binaries" would be easy enough for anyone to do a safety audit.
I'd be extremely interested in creating this codebase, and even including support for different hash algorithms within the client so per "coin" fork selecting either SHA256, scrypt(1024,1,1), scrypt(n,1,1) would be simple. In fact, we could extend this to other hashing algorithms as well. This would give coin-makers incentive to innovate and make a real change within their coin, and it would allow for miners with low-end equipment (CPU-only) to have a fair shot in certain cases.
As I said, I have no plans to actually implement this yet, it is only a suggestion. A rewrite may help ease the hyper-expansion of all the various coins popping up every day, and may give us something beneficial in a cryptocurrency in the end.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Selling 200 ELC for 35LTC. Willing to negotiate. Likely holding the rest of my ELC for a while.
EDIT: Withdrawn. Checkpoints added to manipulate block chain. My coins are apparently worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
1ABMmreAeAEuZoeLXG16vcbd7gmrB6zZFE
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Only have about 60 YAC, though I'd be willing to sell at that price. Willing to send first, just let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Well the good news is, absolutly everything is pointing to FUD right now. I sincerely hope that turns out to be the case.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see why it wouldn't be feasible, given a large enough investment, but at current difficulty rates and widespread ASIC availability looming, I wouldn't take the risk.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
