The price is growing. Anyone know why?
Website is launching soon with a countdown timer and a new fork is coming up BTM is the blue chip right now It can pump to over 150k if huge whales start getting into this coin Look at the website here www.bitmark.ioI have told my friends about Bitmark and theyre highly interested about the project as well Spread the world fellas  What is special about bitmark compared to other coins? All I remember is scam dev nathan rixham stealing community funds and not paying back his debts. Is he gone? .... Nathan Rixham. He was the WOLFcoin dev. Screwed me out of 9 btc by asking me to wait to dump my WOLF because "big things" were coming Unlike most crypto scammers, nathan rixham is one guy who is trackable irl, so if he ripped you off you can find him. Some are already taking legal action against him |
|
|
|
Alright. Wasserman99 followed my advice to fix the points on the wallet that were pointed out by a user. Then distribution started and according to the last terms I will now release terms. I was asked by a couple of users to not release funds, though the coins I hold in escrow belong to the ico phase 2 investors. I sat up milesteps in order to check out if I need to go into the ultimate phase of an escrow, the refund. The refund was offered and far less investors than I anticipated decided to get a refund. Others even withdrew their refund request. And in order to allow the project to move forward, regardless of what I think of the need of these funds to reach that goal, I needed to make an endtime for the refund. Because the other investors believe in OPAIR and want to go through. I normally go with the will of those who own the coins invested. Which partly was wasserman99 but the investors also. When the refund was initiated the investors wish was more important. And it still is since they decided to stay in opair. In any case, I will not override the wishes of those who expressed their will to stay in. I will release the coins and hope the hopes for prosperity of investors will be fulfilled. My personal opinion on that is only an opinion. Good luck with this ICO for everyone who could not get the chance on a refund and for those who decided to invest and to stay in. Except for magum every investor on phase 2, who asked for a refund in the refund phase, will have received his refund when I released the coins to wasserman99. The same goes for the signature campaign and their participants. I'm quite well aware that it is impossible to meet the wishes of everyone to it's fullest but I did my best to find a solution to meet the interest of everyone.  Hi, We already receive the funds. Thanks again for your help. We are doing our best with Opair. Regards OpairClassic, launching any day now by wasserman sock account, I'm sure of it. |
|
|
|
To participate on distribution we'll need to send btc to an address? Why do not just sign a message from the wallet?
How else can they pull off what might end up the biggest BTC heist in bitcoins history. They are going to steal your BTC. How could they do this? Just send the coins then move your stash asap |
|
|
|
|
Is the biggest risk to xmr a community launched zcash clone without the premine and founder tax, like how xmr began?
|
|
|
|
|
Most fair distribution is inverse penis size method (stake gets larger as penis size gets smaller), obviously scope for gaming penis selfie photo applications for genesis block, but internet is not swamped with guys instagramming their micro penis images, so gamers must pay small penis guys for their photos, so redistribution from well hung to less well so must necessarily occur, so overall 'fairness' in the universe must therefore go up. Just start at 6 " as median stake, 1mm smaller penis gets slightly more, 1mm larger gets slightly less, and so on.
Guy with micro penis is a crypto whale, well hung guys need to earn coins from sig campaign ... it's fair, but might be considered ridiculous, so second best method probable just use bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
IS CYAM still involved with qora and burst?
(it's CIYAM btw.) Let me put it this way... CIYAM is still around, and I am in communication with him almost daily. He is not directly working with QORA or BURST, however he is there for consultation and assistance when we need it, and to help out with certain things. He's a good friend and only wants to see our dreams become a reality. I don't want to say much more than this, as he's tired of the trolling on the forums, and isn't around anymore on bitcointalk. I'm honored to work with him, and I'm pleased that he's helping in the capacity that he is. Thanks! Ok, that sounds encouraging. It's understandable that serious developers in crypto must get tired of the many toxic aspects around the cryptospere, so I wish CIYAM well |
|
|
|
The price is growing. Anyone know why?
Website is launching soon with a countdown timer and a new fork is coming up BTM is the blue chip right now It can pump to over 150k if huge whales start getting into this coin Look at the website here www.bitmark.ioI have told my friends about Bitmark and theyre highly interested about the project as well Spread the world fellas What is special about bitmark compared to other coins? All I remember is scam dev nathan rixham stealing community funds and not paying back his debts. Is he gone? |
|
|
|
|
IS CYAM still involved with qora and burst?
|
|
|
|
You guys still can't connect the dots.  Enlighten us all, please |
|
|
|
the developers do not communicate, so market volume diminishes...
is there any development going on in aeon?  I'm part of the Monero core team as well as the lead developer for AEON. The current AEON roadmap involves rebasing on Monero's upcoming release. I'm currently working with the rest of the Monero team to finalize the new release. After that, work will commence on the AEON rebase. This is not very far in the future, although I certainly understand that people would prefer that everything be done yesterday. huh, thats exactly what I'm doing on boolberry cool, we'll get all cryptonotes updated together at this rate! Do you need help getting on Poloniex? You guys gonna consider reviving fantom & quazar too? |
|
|
|
Is the older pre 2fa version still usable?
You could probably get a an old link to it and still use it, but why do you want to use it? It's really, really slow when it comes to verifying the historic chain. There is also a recommendation to update and there will be a hard fork due in a few months. Thanks, just wondering when the hard fork happens. I have a couple of months to catch up and wonder if it's best to sync then upgrade, or upgrade then sync. Want to avoid having to sync the whole chain if I can |
|
|
|
|
Is the older pre 2fa version still usable?
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to have VTR work through I2P ?
Everything is possible, but it will probably take 10-20 years to finish it..  20 years ... by then I expect we'll download movies and porn direct to virtual reality upgrades in our brains , paying for viagra shots with iota directly from wifi cock wallet implants. This project doesn't have that long to deliver the goods |
|
|
|
|
When does live network launch?
|
|
|
|
I know jl777 is a famous developer. But can someone summarize how many ICOs he launched and how many he delivered? I read somewhere that he likes to abandon projects.
Please don't fall for the usual fud, there is expecially one notorious troll Icebreaker that continues making stuff up. He sounds retarded if you know the facts. The only past Ico was Supernet and the first release of its core component Iguana is around the corner. No project has been abandoned, James is working very hard but the to-do list is long. By January with both Iguana and Komodo released the future will look pretty good. A year ago, I predicted BTCD would be abandoned before being completed, and that's exactly what happened. My fears were well-founded. My uncertainty based on the fact ICOscam777 has left dozens of unfinished project in his wake. My doubt turned out to be the correct assumption. I'm not the only one who says this; many victims of these ICO scams have spoken out. EG:
Many of those assets were dividends, however the case of cryptocard is very disappointing. Jl777 launched that fundraiser on the btcd thread, collected 10k btcd from memory when it was worth a lot more, but now he says that was coinomat project. Jl777 converted all his cryptocard assets into WAVES, then sasha mentions after the waves ico ends that coinomat business will likely be sold (who would buy coinomat?), and definitely not part of WAVES.
The cryptocard asset was a fail, and jl777 raised considerable funds, and dumped his own assets, probably knowing sasha's intentions to abandon it.
Jl777 started cryptocard, raised the funds, subcontracted sasha and coinomat, then adandoned the project and bailed to waves, probably with insider knowledge, leaving bagholders still thinking an anon debit card is still being worked on.
No project has been abandoned?  can't find the server at www.jl777hodl.comhttps://isitup.org/www.jl777hodl.com----> Oh no! www.jl777hodl.com seems to be down! #REKTJl777 addressed my concerns about cryptocard up thread. I believe him when he says he didn't convert all his cryptocard assets based on insider information that sasha from WAVES plans to abandon cryptocard anon debit card project. If jl777 still intends to argue on behalf of cryptocard investors to sasha that crytocard and other coinomat assets be incorporated into WAVES and not abandoned, then my complaint has been addressed, and I withdraw my earlier statement that iCEBREAKER quoted. Jl777 can still advocate for cryptocard even if he converted his own into WAVES. I believe he will do this. |
|
|
|
Question in regards it to a cold wallet, moneroaddress.
When depositing coins to your cold wallet, you can check to see if you received them. You just have to enter the view key, public address, and tx id on xmr.llcoins.
Now, how can I check if there have been any transactions since you've initially deposited them? Verifying that there hasn't been a hack on your wallet>
I have same question too |
|
|
|
Many of those assets were dividends, however the case of cryptocard is very disappointing. Jl777 launched that fundraiser on the btcd thread, collected 10k btcd from memory when it was worth a lot more, but now he says that was coinomat project. Jl777 converted all his cryptocard assets into WAVES, then sasha mentions after the waves ico ends that coinomat business will likely be sold (who would buy coinomat?), and definitely not part of WAVES. The cryptocard asset was a fail, and jl777 raised considerable funds, and dumped his own assets, probably knowing sasha's intentions to abandon it. Please correct if that is wrong, but either way, I can understand and accept much of jl777's past record, but cryptocard is a black mark imo. Jl777 started cryptocard, raised the funds, subcontracted sasha and coinomat, then adandoned the project and bailed to waves, probably with insider knowledge, leaving bagholders still thinking an anon debit card is still being worked on. Much is forgivable with jl777, but the cryptocard affair reflects poorly on jl777 and sasha.
The cryptocard has been completed for over a year as much as it ever would and even paid out a few dividends. while it is true is has been a disappointment, everybody had the chance to convert cryptocard into WAVES. That was public knowledge and available for all. I had no insider knowledge of the status of coinomat and in fact I still hold millions of coinomat assets. My understanding is that coinomat business is being converted into a WAVES oriented one, which makes sense to me and why I continue to hold millions of coinomat assets. This is not any bailout behavior. I think it is quite unfair that you accuse me of wrongdoing for swapping a disappointing asset using the same method available to everyone. Was I supposed to not do the swap? If so, then other people would accuse me of not doing what I should have. I believe all the amounts raised would have been recouped via the WAVES swap, at least very close to it, so a disappointment, but not a disaster. If you didn't have insider knowledge on sasha's plan for the cryptocard, then I accept that. It was a failed project so far, and I think you have to accept it was one of yours, so when I learnt you had swapped it didn't look good to me, and the other day you said it was a 'coinomat' project, and I don't think the investors ever thought that. It looked like you were subcontracting coinomat to do the card that would then be plugged into the btcd ecosystem by you. I apologise if I offended, but for smaller investors like myself there's always the fear that 'insiders' are working things out behind the scenes to their own benefit at the expense of regular investors. If you and sasha never discussed his likely abandoning of it, then I believe you, but imo it was your project, and maybe you could argue in favor of him incorporating cryptocard into waves in some form. I am not aware of any plans to cancel the crypto card. and certainly if he is planning this I would be against that. I did coordinate this, so in that sense I was involved, but the banking environment changed from bad to horrible during the project and the best could be done was done. As I am not expert in fiat banking, I need to rely on others for such things thank you for your understanding. If you're still advocating on behalf of cryptocard asset holders that sasha not abandon it, and that he incorporate the asset into waves in some way, then I think most people will accept that. You obviously have much more ability to persuade and influence him than most other crypto people, so if you give that undertaking to argue in favor of the asset living on I am feeling much better. I do respect you for addressing people's concerns james, thank you! I do thank you for addressing my concerns james |
|
|
|
Many of those assets were dividends, however the case of cryptocard is very disappointing. Jl777 launched that fundraiser on the btcd thread, collected 10k btcd from memory when it was worth a lot more, but now he says that was coinomat project. Jl777 converted all his cryptocard assets into WAVES, then sasha mentions after the waves ico ends that coinomat business will likely be sold (who would buy coinomat?), and definitely not part of WAVES. The cryptocard asset was a fail, and jl777 raised considerable funds, and dumped his own assets, probably knowing sasha's intentions to abandon it. Please correct if that is wrong, but either way, I can understand and accept much of jl777's past record, but cryptocard is a black mark imo. Jl777 started cryptocard, raised the funds, subcontracted sasha and coinomat, then adandoned the project and bailed to waves, probably with insider knowledge, leaving bagholders still thinking an anon debit card is still being worked on. Much is forgivable with jl777, but the cryptocard affair reflects poorly on jl777 and sasha.
The cryptocard has been completed for over a year as much as it ever would and even paid out a few dividends. while it is true is has been a disappointment, everybody had the chance to convert cryptocard into WAVES. That was public knowledge and available for all. I had no insider knowledge of the status of coinomat and in fact I still hold millions of coinomat assets. My understanding is that coinomat business is being converted into a WAVES oriented one, which makes sense to me and why I continue to hold millions of coinomat assets. This is not any bailout behavior. I think it is quite unfair that you accuse me of wrongdoing for swapping a disappointing asset using the same method available to everyone. Was I supposed to not do the swap? If so, then other people would accuse me of not doing what I should have. I believe all the amounts raised would have been recouped via the WAVES swap, at least very close to it, so a disappointment, but not a disaster. If you didn't have insider knowledge on sasha's plan for the cryptocard, then I accept that. It was a failed project so far, and I think you have to accept it was one of yours, so when I learnt you had swapped it didn't look good to me, and the other day you said it was a 'coinomat' project, and I don't think the investors ever thought that. It looked like you were subcontracting coinomat to do the card that would then be plugged into the btcd ecosystem by you. I apologise if I offended, but for smaller investors like myself there's always the fear that 'insiders' are working things out behind the scenes to their own benefit at the expense of regular investors. If you and sasha never discussed his likely abandoning of it, then I believe you, but imo it was your project, and maybe you could argue in favor of him incorporating cryptocard into waves in some form. |
|
|
|
What is the situation for BTCD holders? How is this not abandonment?
I was wondering the same thing, is this essentially replacing it? Plus, out of interest how many ICOs has jl777 launched over the years? Here's a (partial) list of ICOscam777 projects: After spending hundreds of hours roaming this forum I must tell you I feel JL777 is the biggest scammer around.
The amount of BTC gathered for BTCD/superNET/NXT-assets issued by his gang is just horrendous.
And the feeling is like everybody is waiting for the miracle tech to come out if not today, tomorrow for sure.
Just scan the thread for BTCD, its almost, almost, almost there. It's finally coming together ... stuff like this on whatever page you chose.
But for BTCD in particular, I see the same wallet used for many months now. I know there is beta around, but it's almost 2 years since BTCD was born. 2 years.
From NXTforum:
(16) jl777's Group of Assets
Type: Dividend Paying
TOKEN (Unity) | ID: 15641806960898178066 | More Info | ACTIVE
sharkfund0 | ID: 3006420581923704757 | More Info | ACTIVE
SuperNET | ID: 12071612744977229797 | Forum | ACTIVE
NXTventure | ID: 16212446818542881180 | More Info | More info 2 | ACTIVE
InstantDEX | ID: 15344649963748848799 | More Info | Status
Privatebet | ID: 17083334802666450484 | More Info | Status
NXTprivacy | ID: 17911762572811467637 | More Info | Status
jl777hodl | ID: 6932037131189568014 | More Info | ACTIVE
Atomic | ID: 11694807213441909013 | More Info | Status
NeoDICE | ID: 18184274154437352348 | More Info | ACTIVE
NXTcoinsco (Tradebots) | ID: 17571711292785902558 | More Info | Status
cryptocard | ID: 7110939398145553585 | More Info | Status
Boost | ID: 9719950459730291994 | More Info | ACTIVE
SNN | ID: 15113552914305929842 | More Info | Status
SuperHODL | ID: 13120737659249432970 | More Info | Status
NXTforex | NA | NA | NA
(5) Joint Venture - Supernet, NXTventure
FreeMarket | ID: 134138275353332190 | More Info | ACTIVE
Omnigames | ID: 7441230892853180965 | More Info | Status
Pangea | ID: 6883271355794806507 | More Info | ACTIVE
Jay | ID: 8688289798928624137 | More Info | Status
Skynet | ID: 6854596569382794790 | More Info | Active
OpalToken | ID: 5326942574002986149 | More Info | Active
(9) Multigateways
MGW | ID: 10524562908394749924 | More Info | ACTIVE
mgwBTC (Bitcoin) | ID: 4551058913252105307 | More Info | PHASING OUT
mgwBTC (Bitcoin) | ID: 17554243582654188572 | More Info | ACTIVE
mgwBTCD (Bitcoindark) | ID: 11060861818140490423 | More Info | UNDER MAINTENANCE
mgwLTC (Litecoin) | ID: 2881764795164526882 | More Info | UNDER MAINTENANCE
mgwBC (Blackcoin) | ID: 7117580438310874759 | More Info | ACTIVE
mgwVIA (Viacoin) | ID: 275548135983837356 | More Info | UNDER MAINTENANCE
mgwDOGE (Dogecoin) | ID: 2303962892272487643 | More Info | ACTIVE
mgwDRK (Darkcoin) | ID: 17353118525598940144 | More Info | UNDER MAINTENANCE
Multiple coins are participating in SN, bought up by LJ (on investor's behalf of cause)
Aaaand there is new project born every day. And new ones after that. And some ideas for a brand few new ones in the middle.
Two years almost passed. InstantDEX is almost ready?
BTCD, after doing nothing for two years, is being abandoned. Turns out BTCD was just a research project, not a serious effort with long-term committed devs. SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS Now shut up and buy into Kodomo, the replacement scam. These gullible bagholding chumps love to throw their money away into every new ICO scam jl777 hypes. I warned them jl777 never finishes anything he starts. I even predicted this exact thing would happen; it's obvious when you see his pattern of ICO-hype-abandon-repeat. Nobody should have the slightest bit of sympathy for fools who keep the faith in their Dear Leader, after having been burned so many times. NEW FLASH: SUPERNET is being abandoned in favor of jl777's new project SUPER-DUPER-ULTRANET!!!!  Many of those assets were dividends, however the case of cryptocard is very disappointing. Jl777 launched that fundraiser on the btcd thread, collected 10k btcd from memory when it was worth a lot more, but now he says that was coinomat project. Jl777 converted all his cryptocard assets into WAVES, then sasha mentions after the waves ico ends that coinomat business will likely be sold (who would buy coinomat?), and definitely not part of WAVES. The cryptocard asset was a fail, and jl777 raised considerable funds, and dumped his own assets, probably knowing sasha's intentions to abandon it. Please correct if that is wrong, but either way, I can understand and accept much of jl777's past record, but cryptocard is a black mark imo. Jl777 started cryptocard, raised the funds, subcontracted sasha and coinomat, then adandoned the project and bailed to waves, probably with insider knowledge, leaving bagholders still thinking an anon debit card is still being worked on. Much is forgivable with jl777, but the cryptocard affair reflects poorly on jl777 and sasha. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
