lolwhut!? For 2600 USD you could build an 8-card Rx 480 rig, get over 500Sol/s, and have money to spare! |
|
|
|
For everybody that keeps repeating the same question over and over again...
HE WON'T BE RELEASING ANY NVIDIA OR LINUX VERSIONS!!!!
Why do you say that ? Because you will loose all supposed advantages of AMD cards if this was the case ? any news about Nvidia support?
I will not release NVidia support. Neither Linux update. Please use mrb's miner for that OS and hardware. |
|
|
|
anyone with nanopool getting error? ZEC: Stratum - socket send failed 10054, disconnect
I had that before when I was running two separate instances, but didn't use the -mport flag. After I set both instances to -mport 0 it worked. |
|
|
|
|
Right? I don't get the lack of interest in this coin. If the tech is open source and is at least as good as any of the other privacy options out there, how does it have such a low mcap? It seems like it should be worth at least as much as SDC. Especially given the recently renewed interest in privacy options a la XMR and ZEC. I remember a time when the DASH (or rather, DARK) community ran a full-on balls-to-the-wall coordinated FUDfest because they were afraid of this coin. I mean, for people who can read the code, what is it about this coin that when they look into it, they go, 'This coin is not worth buying at this price.'?
Maybe it's just because it's not mine-able? I know the mining had to be stopped early because it was in danger of 51% attacks. Is it a problem that it's PoS only and there are a few ppl with over 5%, and several that own over 1%?
Maybe it's just that it seems like it's dead, even if it's not, because there is no activity here (or anywhere else that's easily searchable) from devs/community. As far as I know you can't google the slack logs, so unless you sign up for the slack and log in all the time, there's no way to know what's going on. I don't know what it is, but it could probably use a little bit of marketing, or at the very least a sign of a pulse.
|
|
|
|
GPU returned incorrect data!
how can I deal with it ? Reduce clocks, loosen timings, or reduce undervolt. Works on 21 470/480 cards for me, (and a 7950), all flawless. 8 are bios mod, but not extreme. Each new version is faster, and also puts more load on GPU, so it causes issues for some with more extreme tweaks. all xfx cards are moded for ETH with low voltage mod and none of them had this problem, one card in 120, how can it be ? Not every program is the same. Just because your video card can run League of Legends at 1350MHz, doesn't mean it won't crash if you try to run FurMark using the same settings. For everyone here having problems with crashes, blue screens, incorrect data, etc., TRY REDUCING YOUR OVERCLOCKS. It's not Claymore's job to 'fix his miner' because you refuse to find lower settings that work and tweak upwards from there. Also, every card is different. Just because one guy can copy 1375MHz memory straps and run at 2100MHz mem clock, doesn't mean that your card will be able to do the same. How about you try running 1375MHz straps at 1375MHz clock and see if it works first? If it does, that means THE PROBLEM IS YOUR OC. EDIT: For people that want to mod your BIOS for higher speeds, just be aware that you need to test for stability and tune your speeds for the program you are using. It is a trial and error process and there is no cookie-cutter BIOS or OC settings that will "just work" for every card, in every program. That said, there is a lot of good info here: http://www.overclock.net/f/67/amd-atihttp://www.overclock.net/t/1604567/polaris-bios-editing-rx480-rx470-rx460http://www.overclock.net/t/1561372/hawaii-bios-editing-290-290x-295x2-390-390xhttp://www.overclock.net/t/1561904/mlu-bios-builds-for-290x |
|
|
|
For the first time I am actually getting less than advertised for a stock 390X, though I am using 290(non-X) with 2560 cores, so perhaps the cores are finally starting to get to where they are being fully utilized? That said, I am seeing ~15% increase going from 2.1 to 3.0. Only slightly higher CPU usage. v2.1 (Stable for over 40 hours)  v3.0  CPU Usage before and after  |
|
|
|
v3.0:
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
Noice! I think those haters were mostly ppl who were butthurt that they were the only ones getting good speeds because they were on linux, and you levelled the playing field, so they decided to start some FUD. You punched em right in the profits!  |
|
|
|
Dear folks,
after killing the mobo of my old XW8600 when squeezing to much Sols out of my 2 290x cards I'm in need of a new system.
For the ready made systems there are 2 Options right now to be optained "cheap" (around 600,-- €). Both come with ~1100W PSU.
Dell T7500 - 2x Xeon X5650 SSD 128GB HDD 1TB Ram 48GB - 1100 watt 85PLUS Power Factor Correcting (PFC) power supply
HP Z800 - 2x Xeon L5640 SSD 128GB Ram 24GB - 1110 watts 89% efficient power supply
Any preferences ?
Shall be used for working and mining in the background or when idle.
Thanks
Peter
i don't think this miner kills your motherboard it use less power than other miner how can poeple buy so expensive hardware ? for mining it s already hard to pay back cheap one better buy all the piece separately and build you a cheaper miner computer you can use 2 psu lot cheaper than 1, use a asrock motherboard, 4gig of ram is enough and you probably alredy have a hard drive and using a computer you need for work and mining is not a good idea I second this. Is there a reason you need 2 x slow hexacores from pre sandy bridge days? Why not just replace the motherboard and PSU on your current system? I don't recommend doing any mining at all with dell or hp no-name PSUs. |
|
|
|
I guess for an 8 year old system with 2x 150W TDP CPUs plus 2x 300W TDP GPUs it held up decently well if you got 3 months of mining out of it. You probably weren't seeing any CPU load while ETH mining, but ZEC would have been a different story. Did it have the 800W or the 1050W in it?
1050W and ZEC V2 took about 15% load. Am thinking it's the PCI Slots. Have a small PCI card (wo PSU connection) running there in 1024*768 mode, when I rise the resolutuion I get blackscreen. Any doubts? Congrats Sir! You have smoked your mobo by using the PCI card without perf power from the PSU. No way iot could handle the vid card power draw. Nicely done  Nope my friend, you got me wrong. Had 2 290x running with the PSU connection. After I fired them to hard, something got killed. Did not get them running again. Black screen before or after login. A small old simple PCIe VGA works but only in std. mode. Thats why I think I grilled the PCI. Probably just the mobo. No big deal really. You can get a used one of those for 30 bucks on ebay http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Precision-Workstation-T5400-Dual-Xeon-Socket-LGA771-Motherboard-/322304684309Regardless if you do just replace the mobo, or if you get a newer mobo/cpu/ram combo instead, I would also throw that PSU out and get a good 1200W Seasonic or EVGA or the like. |
|
|
|
Pre-built systems have crap power supplies that are lucky to live through the warranty period without adding any extra hardware. I'm surprised it even had a motherboard that allowed you expand to two cards, or enough 6 and 8-pin connectors on the PSU in the first place. Lesson learned. Hopefully the more expensive components are still good and it's just the board or PSU.
The workstation class systems are usually not that crappy in my experience. Thats why I use them. Of course custom and surpose built is better (did this for a living) but leasing surplus is not a bad option nowadays. I guess for an 8 year old system with 2x 150W TDP CPUs plus 2x 300W TDP GPUs it held up decently well if you got 3 months of mining out of it. You probably weren't seeing any CPU load while ETH mining, but ZEC would have been a different story. Did it have the 800W or the 1050W in it? |
|
|
|
Hi folks, here's my short story ... so far. I came into mining about 6 months ago. Had a HP 8600W Workstation, that was running 24/7 quite underutilized. So I thought why not making some extra money?! To stay easy I went with nicehash. I soon noticed my good old trusted Nvidia Quadro was no more beefy enough for nowadays. So I ended up adding 400,-- € with 2 RX290x cards to my system. Seemed to make them pay themself in 2-3 months at that point, selling hashpower for ether. Let them run with minor tweaking and now, just a few days ago they paid themself (as long as I dont calculate power use). Great so far, profit might be coming. Thats when I learned about Zcash and the Claymore miner. Went fast, quite easy installation and worked fine. Have been running V1, V1.1 and V2 with success, for about a day each . Made about 50% more BTC than on Ether for a Moment. Then I got greedy. Tweaked settings up to 1125/1500 with good result. Ran for hours ... When I stopped the miner for some updates, the system fried. Got a black screen and the system blackscreens again at boot up or after login. Even with different GPUs. I'll go on figuring out tomorrow. Right now, I'd say I killed the board or the PSU or both and a "new" used Workstation might be needed. If that's the case I'll be set another 500,-- € back. At least unpleasurable when you are already set back with a big Vets bill because of some asshole that poisened and killed your dog.  So worth the money? I'd say no. But it's a experience and a gamble. I'll be back soon, maybe... Cheers Peter Pre-built systems have crap power supplies that are lucky to live through the warranty period without adding any extra hardware. I'm surprised it even had a motherboard that allowed you expand to two cards, or enough 6 and 8-pin connectors on the PSU in the first place. Lesson learned. Hopefully the more expensive components are still good and it's just the board or PSU. |
|
|
|
Heheh I was kidding. But good info for any tinfoil hat guys!
I think some may have the full suit, not just the hat Well you have to keep the aliens from controlling your body too, not just your mind! Haven't you seen what they do to the cows? |
|
|
|
How would you know? You only wrote the program It's not so difficult to check - download WireShark and check the data traffic from miner. Logfile from miner + Wireshark to confirm data and time. Heheh I was kidding. But good info for any tinfoil hat guys! |
|
|
|
I'm getting an extra 5% or so going from 2.0 to 2.1 and using -i 2 on Hawaii cards. CPU usage is only slightly higher and still only seeing partial consistent load across 3 cores on a 3.7GHz Thuban. Uses about 6GB of swapfile instead of 3GB on v2.0. v2.0 (Rock-solid stable for over 19hrs)  v2.1  CPU Usage before and after  How would you know? You only wrote the program |
|
|
|
I'm having "GPU returned incorrect data!" on my mixed 290/280 rig. Despite errors galore the rig gives only about 1% of rejected shares on the pool side even though the log is all red at times. None of the cards is overclocked, they are undervolted however with AB. What might be the cause of it? http://image.prntscr.com/image/c8ae8a63174747b7960cd0d0bfb86885.jpgTry either raising the voltage or lowering the clocks. Undervolting causes similar issues to overclocking (just with less heat involved). |
|
|
|
Can confirm ~15% increase going from v1.0 to v2.0. Each of my Hawaii cards went from ~52S/s to ~60S/s 1.0 (Stable for over 48hrs)  2.0  Also CPU usage did increase from ~35% erratic on 1 core, to ~40% consistent usage across 3 cores, + some lower and more erratic usage across 2 other cores. This is on an old Thuban @ 3.7GHz. I am going to guess any old quad core from Core2 days and onwards, or maybe any decent hyper-threaded dual core from Sandy Bridge onwards (core i3+) should be able to handle it.  Looks like this resulted in higher GPU usage though which is a good thing.  Pls remove images if you quote this post. All images can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/7LMhe |
|
|
|
Ubuntu 15.10 Catalyst 15.2 GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290 Command: ./zecminer64 -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal xx.xx -zpsw x -tt 60,90,90,90,90,90 -tstop 96,96,96,96,96,96 -powlim 0,-10,-10,-10,-10,0 -r -1 I'm running the miner (v.1.1) since today and noticed the following. At the start it runs fine, but after an half hour or so the zecminer64 process is taking 99% cpu load. Also, bind errors (notice GPU0 jumping to 0 sometimes btw): ZEC - Total Speed: 141.329 H/s, Total Shares: 200, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09
ZEC: GPU0 28.519 H/s, GPU1 23.528 H/s, GPU2 21.890 H/s, GPU3 23.123 H/s, GPU4 22.991 H/s, GPU5 21.277 H/s
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=29%, GPU3 t=84C fan=58%, GPU4 t=91C fan=59%, GPU5 t=85C fan=26%
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=90C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=31%, GPU3 t=84C fan=56%, GPU4 t=91C fan=61%, GPU5 t=85C fan=25%
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:20 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 112.830 H/s, Total Shares: 105, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s, GPU1 23.295 H/s, GPU2 22.808 H/s, GPU3 21.948 H/s, GPU4 22.337 H/s, GPU5 22.442 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 144.112 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 29.249 H/s, GPU1 24.831 H/s, GPU2 21.970 H/s, GPU3 22.697 H/s, GPU4 23.528 H/s, GPU5 21.839 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
And also GPU incorrect data errors: GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35396c83
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396cb3
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU0 t=51C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=88C fan=25%, GPU3 t=90C fan=64%, GPU4 t=88C fan=25%, GPU5 t=90C fan=25%
GPU returned incorrect data! 35196c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 15396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35316c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c5c
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c0f
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35394c93
Any clues? Probably has something to do with the fact that your fans speeds are locked at 25% and your GPUs are running way too hot. EDIT: Also just wanted to say good job on the miner, Claymore! Been running 1.0 solid for over 30hrs now with <1% rejects (and those are due to high pool pings -- good shares submitted just before new job)  |
|
|
|
Mining long on dev fee... normal? ...
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
...
and still on I have devfee from 7 to 10 minits on all my rig`s!!!!!
...
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:42:58 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 155.570 H/s, Total Shares: 243, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:13
ZEC: GPU0 46.959 H/s, GPU1 53.321 H/s, GPU2 55.290 H/s
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:13 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:15 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=68C fan=68%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:47 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:51 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=68C fan=68%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:43:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:00 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:13 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:15 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=68C fan=68%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:30 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 156.647 H/s, Total Shares: 266, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:14
ZEC: GPU0 51.542 H/s, GPU1 52.519 H/s, GPU2 52.586 H/s
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'us1-zcash.flypool.org' <192.99.33.207> por
t 3333
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333)
ZEC: Authorized
DevFee: Pool sets new share target: 0x0083126e (diff: 500H)
DevFee: start mining
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:36 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 <--------------------
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:36 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.396 H/s, Total Shares: 267, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 51.004 H/s, GPU1 56.835 H/s, GPU2 53.557 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:47 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=68C fan=68%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (63 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:58 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 159.355 H/s, Total Shares: 267, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 55.469 H/s, GPU1 50.046 H/s, GPU2 53.840 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:44:59 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:00 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:16 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:20 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 160.507 H/s, Total Shares: 267, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 51.534 H/s, GPU1 52.941 H/s, GPU2 56.032 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:20 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=67C fan=67%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (62 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:41 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (63 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:44 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:44 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=68%, GPU1 t=64C fan=64%, GPU2 t=67C fan=67%, GPU3 t=31C fan=33%
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:45:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (94 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:46:00 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:46:03 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/04/16-18:46:03 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (63 ms)!
DevFee: stop mining and disconnect
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:46:05 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 <-------------------- 44:36 - 46:05....Works fine for me!
ZEC - Total Speed: 157.094 H/s, Total Shares: 267, Rejected: 3, Time: 00:16
ZEC: GPU0 51.754 H/s, GPU1 55.540 H/s, GPU2 49.799 H/s
ZEC: 11/04/16-18:46:06 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
...
Dev fee seems to work fine for me. |
|
|
|
AFAIK it only works on Windows, hence the title of the thread, but I could be wrong. I think I did hear something about EthOS supporting zcash mining but not sure if they do yet or what miner program it uses.
You are wrong - cintronick got very cool results on ethOS - 6 x 480 - 250 Sol/s With Genoil's miner? If so that's pretty cool and I stand corrected. Sorry Lion! so i can't running genoil linux scrypt at EthOs ?
EDIT: Been looking and I can't find any info about this but maybe psjb can help you. From what I can tell EthOS uses zcash-miner and not Genoil's miner. http://ethosdistro.com/kb/#mining-zcash |
|
|
|
how to instal genoil at EThOS and how to run it?
Step 1: Format drive Step 2: Install windows Step 3: Run Genoil Step 4: ... Step 5: Profit! so i can't running genoil linux scrypt at EthOs ? AFAIK it only works on Windows, hence the title of the thread, but I could be wrong. I think I did hear something about EthOS supporting zcash mining but not sure if they do yet or what miner program it uses. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
