Transgender, was born a man, americans dig this stuff so he is getting loads of followers
to bad the doctors couldnt do better with his face, he still looks like a man
You're nothing but hormones, chemicals, tissue, water, gases, and a few organs. There is nothing metaphysical about you, so yea Transgender-ism is as normal as anything else. Thinking you're anything different/"superior" from any other human being of any genetic makeup or identity is foolish, because you're not. And she looks just like a stereotypical "woman". How could you say such things? did you even see his face? where in my post did i say i was "superior" to him? By you referring to her as "him" and "man", it was and is only rational for me to infer that you think of her as some sort of "freak" or has a "disorder", since you refuse to use the correct pronouns, and that's why I said you are nothing but flesh, and are equal in every way to her. Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you have to be condescending. It would do you well to know that Gender and Sex are not synonymous, with the latter being a social construct, and the former being biological. Gender is the term most used in public and thus can be changed at any time(Biological man can identify as a woman, and vice versa). Even the sexual organs can be changed in sex reassignment surgery. "See his her face"? You made a remark on her face, to which I made a counter-remark that's equally as valid. He still born as a man. You can't change what you TRULY are. It doesn't matter to me if you inserted your penis inside yourself to look it like a vagina, you still are a man. And yeah, his/her face is totally manly, I would never get on that trap. |
|
|
|
|
Canada
It may have some problems, but seens to be one of the best countries around the world.
You barely don't hear about problems on it.
|
|
|
|
Ué, não vejo muito problema, o satoshi "em pessoa" tá segurando um 1 milhão de BTC também e ele não aparece faz anos.  |
|
|
|
If we're talking about a blockchain fork, in simpler terms it would mean that the blockchain 'splits'.
I see a lot of thread on bitcoin fork all of sudden, just wondering what will be the affects of this split in blockchain and does a normal user who doesn't mines really need to know about what a fork really is? Someone care to explain it in simpler terms. A fork is when there are 2 blockchains running, because the difference of adoption of an update in the bitcoin core. A very idiot is that let's say that in the Bitcoin core version 11, every transaction must be sent with a red loop on it. Miners that don't like the idea of the red loop won't use it, so every transaction sent from a bitcoin v11 will be rejected, but miners who use the bitcoin core v11 will accept, and them a fork happens where 2 blockchains are splitten in the network. |
|
|
|
|
Primeira correção, sua carteira/wallet pode e vai conter várias e várias address/endereços. Uma carteira é um aquivo no seu computador que todas essas informações.
Abrindo o bitcoin qt, tudo que estiver na aba receber são os endereços que você pode usar.
(Por favor, note que isso não quer dizer que sejam todos os endereços dentro da sua carteira, existem outros ocultos, mas que estão na carteira).
|
|
|
|
|
And how he found that this address is yours?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably something that will be expensive and will mine 1 satoshi per hour.
Another waste of energy.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, to all people that didn't know about it they don't like the idea of a money that is "internet based" and without regulation.
There is also some people that read by themselves and even this way they don't like, and some other people that liked the idea made some questions since I use BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like to ask twice, I know that its annoying, but I still didn't got the payment from yesterday.
Checked trough my bit-x account.
|
|
|
|
|
Well my stats got reseted aswell and no payment was sent.
|
|
|
|
i was thinking, what happen if a long thread where everyone with the signature, posted there is moved in a section where the signature is not payed, but only after we all got our payment?
it's fine for the campaign anyway i guess...
You get payed and the system doesn't "callback" the money, since when you get payed the cost pount is updated and it doesn't trackback. |
|
|
|
|
The forum(Staff and Moderators) can't handle this.
Of course, if someone suspects that it maybe dangerous, so him shouldn't click on the supposed link.
If someone PROVES it's malicious software, then he should notify/report.
And forum rank doesn't mean nothing, it's just how long he has been here, nothing else.
|
|
|
|
Com 2 desses tu vai gerar incríveis 1 centavo por dia. https://alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculatorAcho que isso já responde por si só que tu só vai ter prejuízo. É muito provável que os miners vão quebrar antes mesmo de se pagarem. |
|
|
|
I should stress this is just purely me but I have the skills now to get everything done, it's just a question of putting the time and effort into it now, I'm using the game engine Unity which has totally won me over partly because it's so damn easy to publish games on it, I'm not surprised tons of indie developers have picked it up.
I think at the very least I will make sure my platformer has no bugs and the like in it the code is pretty basic it's just if I spend forever making lots and lots of levels which I have no with but if I spend forever on it I won't make any money which is why I thought I'd want to do content updates so that I have time to polish everything, we'll see how much progress I make though.
Well, you can send the concept of the game to GreenLight if your account has any game that isn't free, so players can make some avail to you, and other small devs aswell. To send a complete game you will need to pay the 100$ Fee, but you can save it until ou complete your game. Sending a concept will make a bit depressive, since most players only because they don't want the game they vote NO, but that doesn't really means that the art/concept of gameplay is bad. Anyway, good luck, since I'm also trying to finish my very first 2D game made with AS3 and Adobe AIR and instead of selling the game on FGL, I'll try it the DIY way and put it on GreenLight. |
|
|
|
|
Depends if the developer is already known.
We all know many cases where we all dumped our precious money goes to the developers and the game never gets good.
(bugs, not the 100% of the promised content)
One example of Early Access that i'm not satisfied is Starbound, which I personally prefer to call Starbutt, since the devs went from new content every month to new content every year. That's really disapointing support a project to see it going to nowhere, the game will never be finished this way.
On the other side, I supported a indie game, that is about a sci-fi FPS that I don't recall it's name, that although far from the end, the devs are doing a good job and I loved the game even it's far from finished.
EDIT: Found it the name, Interstellar Marines.
|
|
|
|
So what is the point of trustlessness if we are trusting developers? Bitcoin had grown in size to the scope that the current core update procedures are antiquated and simply ... dangerous. I think having some type of voting system in place might be a solution. Make it so only changes receiving 80% of the vote are implemented. But who would vote? There a tons of people that know little to nothing that if given the choice to vote could vote on the stupid suggestion/BIP. All ends in trust, there's no way to avoid that. |
|
|
|
Mining has to become unprofitable for big business so they can die off and let mining return to the users.
This is a nice and utopic view, but I think that this is not possible with current terms (algo not changing). Let's say that the businesses shut down and the home miner will continue mining (for fun, for believing in Bitcoin etc.) What stops one of the big miners in, let's say, 3 months after shutdown to fire up all the miners and do a 51% attack? Even thinking on that is scary. It would be the end of bitcoin reign, really. If all the miners will be "home miners", the someone with a few ASICs can turn on and profit. Then another guy with a few ASICs left on dust will see that the hashrate increased and that there's a chance to profit, and turn his rig on. And another guy, and another guy, and there goes on. No network will die, no utopic "everyone mining" will be true(not everyone want a computer destroyed trying to get BTC), things will only need another "balance". Also remember that most miners sell their coins to pay their rigs, so less coins means less miners selling amount that leads to a small rise in the price. |
|
|
|
|
To meio atrasado no tópico, mas não foi mencionado o Fiverr, ele aceita saques e retiradas em Bitcoins se me lembro bem.
|
|
|
|
-It's a trap meme-
I think that's pretty straight forward, or should I say "gay forward"? |
|
|
|
I also saw a recent episode of one of the Pawn Shop reality shows, where a guy came in to sell his "Money maker" - A home built rig, with a combo of about 5 GPU cards, and he claims it mines Bitcoins. I could not help to laugh, he asked $4000 for it, and told the guy, he wanted to sell it, because he wanted to upgrade to something bigger. They brought in a expert, and he knew even less about Bitcoin. The general notion about Bitcoin is... "It's something, where a lot of people lost BIG money" This was not a good reflection on what Bitcoin should be and where it's going... Most of these movies and series only concentrate on the negative side.  You can't blame people, since the MT GOX incident. Bitcoin most of the time is used as a joke, there a tons of references out there, but the most important that is being accept more and more everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
