good volume but at the cost of the price.
Also known as a dump. With no volume being traded and price remaining about 18 cents, I don't think this was a dump  |
|
|
|
good volume but at the cost of the price.
Also known as a dump. Look at bottom edge of chart, I think the chart shows more green volume than red... two nice runs before the downfall in ION price... |
|
|
|
It has been a few days since the ionomy live update and the impact on the market has cause a good volume but at the cost of the price. Maybe generating answers to some of the ION questions being asked  Is ionomy chat room a beehive of activity with release of this update  ... Then all you Say can be taken with salt. If want to discuss, come and we discuss. But you only run away from discuss or make so many twisting around off point.
I think the more interesting news is the developing conversation between Korvas128 and Trollymctrollface... lol  |
|
|
|
Can I get someone from Ionomy management to post the ICO addresses so that I may gain trust for my user?  Promoting a known scam coin...  Suchmoon has crossed path with them  I am very impressed with Suchmoon trust history. I couldn't find my user in the long long long list |
|
|
|
New Life for Ionomy Atoms with ION Improvement Proposal White Paper Posted 8 months ago: "There's many new changes to how Atoms function in the Ionomy Vision. New details are coming in two weeks in the ION Improvement Proposal created by the ION Foundation Group.. An updated White Paper with Token implementation. Atoms will be the first token to be implemented on the ION Blockchain. Atoms are getting a portion of the air drop from Dark Matter. Atoms will earn passive income from transactions of Dark Matter. The production of Electrons is going to be suspended." More info at discussion thread on ION Community: https://ion.community/topic/1990/new-life-for-ionomy-atoms-with-ion-improvement-proposal-white-paper |
|
|
|
ION Improvement Plan - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility The design of this proposal will be documented in the ION wallet Program Design Specification (PDS) document maintained by the ION Core Team. Implementation of this ION wallet upgrade correctly will require commitment and a significant number of Man-hours from Ionomy LTD DEVs, the ION Core Team and ionomy community. To support the ION Core Team rapid development schedule, "Ionomy lTD Assets Contracts" design can be implemented as first smart contract on the ION blockchain proving the test of concept and document the real bandwidth usage. The funding of this new functionality could be obtained from crowd sale of ionomy new deflationary asset Dark Matter. Utilizing the code created and tested by the ION Core Team effort. Phase 1 should have system designer Adam Matlack to implement it (refer to IIP 0002). Phase 2 of this design will bring forth "PWR-GRID Assets" and other Smart Contracts to the ionomy. This IIP should use a life-cycle development process that encourages sound system principles and a healthy ION network as ionomy ecosystem grows in the future. ION Improvement White Paper revised 1 July 2018 * ION Core Team IIPs ReferencedI IP_0001 - IIP Purpose and GuidelinesIIP_0002 - Secondary tokens IIP_0003 - Revised block reward scheduleIIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving IIP Accountability Draft ionomy IIP Name: IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility Type: Informational Status: Draft - in process of getting ACCEPT/REJECT or ACTIVECreated: July 4 2018 More details of ION Improvement Proposal https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibilityionomy Ecosystem White Paper in BITCOINTALK ION Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.8920 https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf" If the IIP editor approves, he will assign the IIP a number, label it as Standards Track, Informational, or Process, give it status "Draft", and add it to git. The IIP editor will not unreasonably deny an IIP. Reasons for denying IIP status include duplication of effort, disregard for formatting rules, being too unfocused or too broad, being technically unsound, not providing proper motivation or addressing backwards compatibility, or not in keeping with the ION philosophy. For an IIP to be accepted it must meet certain minimum criteria. It must be a clear and complete description of the proposed implementation, if applicable, must be solid and must not complicate the protocol unduly."
|
|
|
|
It was brought to my attention that Ionomy Studios LTD (setup in UK) has been dissolved but still listed on the App Store as releasing through that company , did Krumblez quit the shitshow? No, this is question for ionomy cult member to verify... somebody at the management level |
|
|
|
It was brought to my attention that Ionomy Studios LTD (setup in UK) has been dissolved but still listed on the App Store as releasing through that company |
|
|
|
... Fast forward to today, the last update from a few days ago wildshark missed a key element... This is a powerful suite of tools for a developer ... ... 2019 is gonna be a good year  ... When does an ION investor care about setting up a game tournament for users to bloat ION blockchain with "worthless game tokens" (I don't include Atom & OffroadHeat tokens in this category) I've been trying my best to push out information about ionomy's 2019 business plan but it very hard to advertise the information without the help from korvas and the ionomy cult. All the information is hidden from public in the ionomy chat channels. It would be nice if answers to the questions generated from the Wild's Depot team were answered: Some members of Wild's Depot research and development team did a post community live update presentation hot wash up. I was able to create a list of discussion comments and questions from the discussion:
What did you think of the update?
I watched it. Load of fluff in my opinion (you may think differently).
P1) I don’t understand who these hangouts are pitched at. Is it investors only? Is it casual gamers who might be using ionomy products? It doesn’t seem to fully suit either audience. For real investors, there’s not much meat there. There’s a lot of vague ‘user numbers have grown’ but there’s no evidence to back that up. How many did they grow by? What are the game usage stats like? What is the revenue like?
P2) There’s a lot of buzzword bingo, and speculation. South Korea. Whatever. You haven’t captured a user base in the west, and yet you’re already stretching yourself too thin.
What do you think? They also seem to be aiming to get a lot out in this quarter - they’re not the best at hitting development targets, so forgive my cynicism.
P3) Dark Matter is being implemented on ION block chain before Atoms. It was promised that Atoms are Next to be implimented. Since the implementation of the ionomy V3 platform, The Atoms do nothing in the ion ecosystem,
P4) There is going to be an ION FORK sometime in Feburary 2019. The Fork is still not scheduled. The wallet being released was not identified nor was a release date of wallet released.
P5) ionomy isn't very sucessful in advertising their own prodect and now want to use twich to to advertise other game tournaments. Thnk big and set up ionomy internet radio station and pay the station manager in IONs to pump out ionomy advertisement and events to the internet community.
P6) ionomy now requiring IONs for payment of ionomy platform services. Change in TOS is coming. This is good first step in putting more value into the ION coin.
P7) Which ION Core team IIPs are in this wallet release? What type of fork will this be for the ION wallet owners?
To point 5: an internet radio station would probably be a dumb idea, the costs of acquiring licenses for music/rights and staff, infrastructure and other costs would be be far beyond even the car sponsorships. In the current music streaming era it would also be extremely hard to gain any traction at all with a simple internet radio channel in terms of listener numbers. But I understand that you’re not a marketer, so that’s fine, and I agree that they do need to do something - anything - differently. They mentioned that they’ve hired a full time marketer, but didn’t talk about his/her experience/why they hired them. And I think I know who it is anyway from watching their twitter posts. If I’m right, it’s not a person who has the type of experience a project like this would need.
To point 6: not sure it’ll add more value unless the platform gets more users. The problem isn’t that there’s not mechanisms in place to prop up the price, the problem is lack of scale. There simply isn’t the user numbers to have an effect right now, and without good marketing/much better product, that isn’t going to turn around anytime soon.
It’s also interesting that Matlack said, bluntly, that he doesn’t care about the price, he cares about the network. This backs up my previous thoughts that they view ions and the ion network as a means to an end and not an investment. The team don’t care if it’s $0.20 or $20 now - it’s done it’s bit and it’s primary utility isn’t as an investment vehicle now, it’s as an infrastructural foundation for the platform.
If I were in a whales position now, I’d be extremely concerned about the direction Matlack is taking this in. I don’t know if they share revenue numbers with the whales/bigger investors, but your primary focus should be getting some idea of how much funding they have left, what their burn rate through that is, how much revenue they’re generating, and when they expect to be profitable. You could then consider negotiating some sort of equity deal as a large Ion holder, or selling out if their revenue figures aren’t strong enough. This project is nearly three years in, and there should be more transparency around their figures by now. In a regulated environment they’d have been required to have posted accounts already. At the moment, you stand a significant risk of being sold down the river if the company ends up being profitable down the line (I don’t think it’s likely to, but that’s just my opinion), because it sounds like they’re not interested in Ion token value at all. If that’s the case you’ve essentially handed over wads of cash for them to use to shore themselves up financially with no tangible way of seeing a return on that unless ions get pumped in a wildly speculative market again.(edited)
XDM won’t do anything to help. The era of crazy "worthless token" sales is long gone, and the public at large don’t care about hyper deflationary currency anyway - the concept is so far removed from what most people engage with that to assume it’ll gain traction outside of a tiny niche is absurd. It’ll be traded amongst the existing ion community and no further, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
posting being removed by owner and need to delete this post
|
|
|
|
Some members of Wild's Depot research and development team
Shark, please stop this copypasta nonsense and attribute the text to the correct people o r give us a link to where these anonymous geniuses hang out so that we could read the original. and and chat with the research and development team to get the original scoop.It would be an honor if you stopped in and express your constructive criticism of the ionomy plan. Did you even watch the ionomy live presentation? |
|
|
|
Korvas I see here again you make no reply for question. Ion is for 3 years so what? Perhaps you cannot think to say or have only feelings with no showings of it? So I ask again what is making better ion? Games no good. Platform no good people do not use. Share of nodes does not bring so many people. Stickers on cars for racing does not make people come. What then? Pleas tell we wait for you.
I do agree with one thing though.... I am a genius
XDM won’t do anything to help. The era of crazy "worthless token" sales is long gone, and the public at large don’t care about hyper deflationary currency anyway - the concept is so far removed from what most people engage with that to assume it’ll gain traction outside of a tiny niche is absurd. It’ll be traded amongst the existing ion community and no further, in my opinion.
Korvas, Please tell us how the decaying ionomy plan works when the ion community does not want to switch to the "worthless token" wallet in February to get Dark Matter for free |
|
|
|
|
Some members of Wild's Depot research and development team did a post community live update presentation hot wash up. I was able to create a list of discussion comments and questions from the discussion:
What did you think of the update?
I watched it. Load of fluff in my opinion (you may think differently).
P1) I don’t understand who these hangouts are pitched at. Is it investors only? Is it casual gamers who might be using ionomy products? It doesn’t seem to fully suit either audience. For real investors, there’s not much meat there. There’s a lot of vague ‘user numbers have grown’ but there’s no evidence to back that up. How many did they grow by? What are the game usage stats like? What is the revenue like?
P2) There’s a lot of buzzword bingo, and speculation. South Korea. Whatever. You haven’t captured a user base in the west, and yet you’re already stretching yourself too thin.
What do you think? They also seem to be aiming to get a lot out in this quarter - they’re not the best at hitting development targets, so forgive my cynicism.
P3) Dark Matter is being implemented on ION block chain before Atoms. It was promised that Atoms are Next to be implimented. Since the implementation of the ionomy V3 platform, The Atoms do nothing in the ion ecosystem,
P4) There is going to be an ION FORK sometime in Feburary 2019. The Fork is still not scheduled. The wallet being released was not identified nor was a release date of wallet released.
P5) ionomy isn't very sucessful in advertising their own prodect and now want to use twich to to advertise other game tournaments. Thnk big and set up ionomy internet radio station and pay the station manager in IONs to pump out ionomy advertisement and events to the internet community.
P6) ionomy now requiring IONs for payment of ionomy platform services. Change in TOS is coming. This is good first step in putting more value into the ION coin.
P7) Which ION Core team IIPs are in this wallet release? What type of fork will this be for the ION wallet owners?
To point 5: an internet radio station would probably be a dumb idea, the costs of acquiring licenses for music/rights and staff, infrastructure and other costs would be be far beyond even the car sponsorships. In the current music streaming era it would also be extremely hard to gain any traction at all with a simple internet radio channel in terms of listener numbers. But I understand that you’re not a marketer, so that’s fine, and I agree that they do need to do something - anything - differently. They mentioned that they’ve hired a full time marketer, but didn’t talk about his/her experience/why they hired them. And I think I know who it is anyway from watching their twitter posts. If I’m right, it’s not a person who has the type of experience a project like this would need.
To point 6: not sure it’ll add more value unless the platform gets more users. The problem isn’t that there’s not mechanisms in place to prop up the price, the problem is lack of scale. There simply isn’t the user numbers to have an effect right now, and without good marketing/much better product, that isn’t going to turn around anytime soon.
It’s also interesting that Matlack said, bluntly, that he doesn’t care about the price, he cares about the network. This backs up my previous thoughts that they view ions and the ion network as a means to an end and not an investment. The team don’t care if it’s $0.20 or $20 now - it’s done it’s bit and it’s primary utility isn’t as an investment vehicle now, it’s as an infrastructural foundation for the platform.
If I were in a whales position now, I’d be extremely concerned about the direction Matlack is taking this in. I don’t know if they share revenue numbers with the whales/bigger investors, but your primary focus should be getting some idea of how much funding they have left, what their burn rate through that is, how much revenue they’re generating, and when they expect to be profitable. You could then consider negotiating some sort of equity deal as a large Ion holder, or selling out if their revenue figures aren’t strong enough. This project is nearly three years in, and there should be more transparency around their figures by now. In a regulated environment they’d have been required to have posted accounts already. At the moment, you stand a significant risk of being sold down the river if the company ends up being profitable down the line (I don’t think it’s likely to, but that’s just my opinion), because it sounds like they’re not interested in Ion token value at all. If that’s the case you’ve essentially handed over wads of cash for them to use to shore themselves up financially with no tangible way of seeing a return on that unless ions get pumped in a wildly speculative market again.(edited)
XDM won’t do anything to help. The era of crazy "worthless token" sales is long gone, and the public at large don’t care about hyper deflationary currency anyway - the concept is so far removed from what most people engage with that to assume it’ll gain traction outside of a tiny niche is absurd. It’ll be traded amongst the existing ion community and no further, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
You missed the joke of this situation, It has been over a year that Mr. Matlack promised air drop of "Free" Dark Matter to the community. There is no ionomy schedule/milestone for roll-out of this innovative product In usual ionomy way, the ionomy product is again behind a year in implementing on the ION blockchain and into the crypto market Raining down Dark Matter to the public will show the ION and Atom investors the start of ionomy's successful 2019 business plan  ionomy is hosting a YouTube Live community update Friday, January 4th 9pm GMT (3pm Central)Tune in on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ionomy/live ionomy is hosting a YouTube Live session to talk about what's in store for 2019 Join the ionomy today! https://ionomy.com/en/markets/btc-ion
|
|
|
|
Doxxing a desperate tactic by a desperate troll  , who doxed whom where? Your new alto ego missed the joke of Dark Matter innovation Buddies we shall abort our mission now, genius Korvas has found out all. I cannot write well so this one was our my downfall. It is lost and I am so sad how my money will not come from bosses of big mobile gaming who are so scared of effects of ion on them. Now they must find more ways to defeat explosion of innovate of ionomy’s.
Shark I can ask, how will grow ionomy if dark matter drops to just all holders? Which ones outside are wanting this now or will get it
You missed the joke of this situation, It has been over a year that Mr. Matlack promised air drop of "Free" Dark Matter to the community. There is no ionomy schedule/milestone for roll-out of this innovative product In usual ionomy way, the ionomy product is again behind a year in implementing on the ION blockchain and into the crypto marketRaining down Dark Matter to the public will show the ION and Atom investors the start of ionomy's successful 2019 business plan ionomy is hosting a YouTube Live session to talk about what's in store for 2019 on Friday, January 4th. Our previous email misstated the time in the GMT time zone. The correct time is 3pm Central or 9pm GMT. ionomy is hosting a YouTube Live community update Friday, January 4th 9pm GMT (3pm Central)Tune in on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ionomy/live Join the ionomy today! https://ionomy.com/en/markets/btc-ionYou also missed the change ION block reward plan:Well done though for buying lots of BTC at $300.... how much did you spend was it $10,000 maybe ?
For the sake of discussion imagine buying $10,000 worth of ion at ICO (April 2016) for 25 cents you would have owned 40,000 ion. In Jan 2018 you could have sold your ION for $5 (ION peaked at $7), this would have given you a minimum of $200,000, $250,000 if you also allow for staking..... Not quite garbage is it ?
Except selling BTC in Jan would have given ~2-3 times more... selling that BTC now would still be a 12x gain whereas ION is below the ICO price. It's utter garbage and it always was. Even at its peak it underperformed most of the market. The funny thing is that most of you morons probably held it all the way down from $5 to $0.20 just like you did with Paycoin hoping for $20. When "the team" converts it to some other shitcoin at $0.02 you'll be praising them again. masternode hosting on other coins too isnt an evolution its just a way to make cash. they offer other coin hosting ie cloud mining only because they take fees with no risk. ionomy was meant to be this ground breaking gaming revolution. its gotten itself 1 third party dev in what 3 years? instead of sponsoring some shit car paint job that doge did 3 years ago they should of funded indie devs. korvas will mever admit ionomy is way behind on their goal he’ll just spout some shit about it taking time. most game studios complete their project in 3 years. the only reason ionomy continues is matlack and others dont need to get real jobs just continue this. they are honestly terrible at what they do. in any real company they’d be fired now for under performing. ps korvas doesnt understand market depth. ion is like 5btc a day max market. thats $25k. no way in hell you could liquidate large sums and get full value. however you could sell 500btc and get full value easy I'm sorry to burst your investment promotion but anybody can do a "what if" plan and make a profit off it. Face the fact that all crypto coins are down 90% or more this year. The difference between ION and Bitcoin is only one of them is an inflationary POS 3 coin. As a initial ION investor, the first year block rewards were very high compared to current year. ionomy has method in place to change the block reward schedule to increase the block reward and ION coin supply (refer to IIP 0001 & IIP 0003). This gives the Team the ability to control the number of IONs the ION block chain poops out over the life of the coin. For more information on IIP in draft ionomy ecosystem white paper: https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibilityand ION Improvement Proposals at https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf |
|
|
|
Buddies we shall abort our mission now, genius Korvas has found out all. I cannot write well so this one was our my downfall. It is lost and I am so sad how my money will not come from bosses of big mobile gaming who are so scared of effects of ion on them. Now they must find more ways to defeat explosion of innovate of ionomy’s.
Shark I can ask, how will grow ionomy if dark matter drops to just all holders? Which ones outside are wanting this now or will get it
You missed the joke of this situation, It has been over a year that Mr. Matlack promised air drop of "Free" Dark Matter to the community. There is no ionomy schedule/milestone for roll-out of this innovative product In usual ionomy way, the ionomy product is again behind a year in implementing on the ION blockchain and into the crypto marketRaining down Dark Matter to the public will show the ION and Atom investors the start of ionomy's successful 2019 business plan Join the ionomy today! https://ionomy.com/en/markets/btc-ion |
|
|
|
Shark tells us some growth so maybe he can show this some way with figure? Come shark show us this growth that is so good!
I got 2 words for the innovative growth of ionomy... DARK MATTERThis will be real good growth in ionomy when the air drops begin to ION and Atom owners  Has anyone in the ionomy cult or ION community received Dark Matter |
|
|
|
they are honestly terrible at what they do.
What they do is fleece bagholders and they're pretty good at that. 3 years with no results and people are still giving them money The joke is on you for your "no results" comment... ionomy has grown a lot during 2018 but it still the best kept secret in the crypto community  |
|
|
|
Well done though for buying lots of BTC at $300.... how much did you spend was it $10,000 maybe ?
For the sake of discussion imagine buying $10,000 worth of ion at ICO (April 2016) for 25 cents you would have owned 40,000 ion. In Jan 2018 you could have sold your ION for $5 (ION peaked at $7), this would have given you a minimum of $200,000, $250,000 if you also allow for staking..... Not quite garbage is it ?
Except selling BTC in Jan would have given ~2-3 times more... selling that BTC now would still be a 12x gain whereas ION is below the ICO price. It's utter garbage and it always was. Even at its peak it underperformed most of the market. The funny thing is that most of you morons probably held it all the way down from $5 to $0.20 just like you did with Paycoin hoping for $20. When "the team" converts it to some other shitcoin at $0.02 you'll be praising them again. masternode hosting on other coins too isnt an evolution its just a way to make cash. they offer other coin hosting ie cloud mining only because they take fees with no risk. ionomy was meant to be this ground breaking gaming revolution. its gotten itself 1 third party dev in what 3 years? instead of sponsoring some shit car paint job that doge did 3 years ago they should of funded indie devs. korvas will mever admit ionomy is way behind on their goal he’ll just spout some shit about it taking time. most game studios complete their project in 3 years. the only reason ionomy continues is matlack and others dont need to get real jobs just continue this. they are honestly terrible at what they do. in any real company they’d be fired now for under performing. ps korvas doesnt understand market depth. ion is like 5btc a day max market. thats $25k. no way in hell you could liquidate large sums and get full value. however you could sell 500btc and get full value easy I'm sorry to burst your investment promotion but anybody can do a "what if" plan and make a profit off it. Face the fact that all crypto coins are down 90% or more this year. The difference between ION and Bitcoin is only one of them is an inflationary POS 3 coin. As a initial ION investor, the first year block rewards were very high compared to current year. ionomy has method in place to change the block reward schedule to increase the block reward and ION coin supply. This gives the Team the ability to control the number of IONs the ION block chain poops out over the life of the coin. For more information on IIP in draft ionomy ecosystem white paper: https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility |
|
|
|
now that bitcoins down is ion still being measured in usd or is it back in satoshi now? either way its a loss on ico although im sure korvas will say but pos gains.
games dont have players and so they’ve branched to masternode hosting.... just what is the aim of this coin again i thought it was games?
To get you back up to speed on the current ionomy vision, ionomy has grown in size with release of the V3 platform. The value of ION is still being expressed as USD on the platform homepage and Bittrex; Bitcoin used in the ionomy and other crypto coin markets. so its gone down a lot in usd then? Yes, I think it's going to be a 90% loss of value for 2018... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
