With cryptotalk I have no control over the sections counted or not counted, so I cannot implement this sort of rule. I would suggest that most users in the campaign only look to make 5 or so posts per day. Worrying about making the max everyday and getting paid will only hurt you in the long run. Not only do you have to worry about me banning you in the campaign, you have to worry about losing the account. Just because the rules say you CAN do 20 per day, doesn't mean you should.
Many people will not understand this. Those who follow the rules are considered as good and obedient citizens,so when they are posting within the limits of the rules (20 Posts), what's the problem ? I can explain this in a layman way. Well, the cryptotalk campaign rules are not made by any bitcointalk manager, they are solely the cryptotalk rules. You live in a country where gambling / drugs is allowed but when you to travel to another gambling prohibited country, and there you start gambling too, then you will have to face the consequences maybe court of law or deported. Another example, like you can smoke everywhere but cannot smoke in "smoking prohibited areas" , so when you post in bitcointalk, you have to abide by the common rules / best practices of bitcointalk and constantly positing 20 posts a day is certainly considered spam in this forum. |
|
|
|
John McAfee announced his new project decentralized exchange release in Monday, October 7th Are you going to use it and what do you think about it? No KYC. 0 makers fee 0.25% takers fee Free listing for erc20 tokens website: https://mcafeedex.com/Since it is a decentralized exchange , no one needs to make an account. Maybe just give it a try. We do not have any good decentralized exchange. Maybe it is better than the already decentralized exchanges we have like idex ? I don't know who is promoting McAfee but I am sure not promoting that old clown  I do like to explore and examine all new exchanges and projects, even if they are a scam. That is the only way to expose them. McAfee now asks 'just' $395 USD so we can all have our own clone exchanges  https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1181611941413957632 This will only promote a lot of Dex exchanges opened for the purpose to scam just like we had too many ICOs.  |
|
|
|
Guys ! I have been posted on bounty threads but one day I saw I was red trust form Bitcointalk forum , Who can explain for me how can i abandon red trust?
Because Many bounty campain don't like red trust account ! That is prevention me to making tokens on bounty .
I am not sure if you are that much innocent or just pretending to be ? Bounty only allow one account in one campaign but you were found guilty of using more than one in single campaigns. In this case your red tag will not be removed so do not waste time appealing for it. |
|
|
|
I see what you mean by it being distracting, we were trying out a slightly different style to the other sites with our horizontal comparison table - but I think you might be right in that it's too noisy and so we could look into switching to a more traditional list like the ones you posted.
The horizontal look is ok as it make your site stand out among the others but what i am talking about is the blue highlighted (spray), a lot of text which does not look nice. Maybe you can make a new page for this information so that the page does not look congested.  |
|
|
|
I have read story of bitcoin signature scamming their participants too (project not paying their participants for promoting them). No type of campaign is safe from scam therefore you just have to be conscious when joining a campaign. Be very vigilant when joining a campaign, note that there isn't any guarantee to get paid so don't invest all your mind and body into a project.
Hence why it's frequently suggested to only join signature campaigns that already gained a reputation here on Bitcointalk. And yes, everyone should be skeptical when joining campaigns, but with bounty campaigns though? It's almost next to guaranteed for bounty campaigns to be either a huge waste of time due to the coins/tokens being worth next to nothing, or the campaign being a scam. Back into those years where bounties are still profitable where its participants hitting up thousands of dollars value of tokens that they had obtain which is somewhat a thing that cant really be removed on someone's mind or an impression that they are hoping for even up to these days bounties without even realizing that those good old days were already gone.Outcomes on most projects now are totally trash together with your precious time,effort and resources. Year 2017 is fruitful year for bounty hunters and there are so many choices of campaigns to join with but now, it's so rare to find beautiful paying campaign since we cannot guarantee anything that's why we should be more creative to find new things so that we can still earn by staying here. And maybe the bounty campaigns are totally ends(hopefully not) so it's a must for us to get a skill to adopt on new trend. Do you know why 2017 was good year for bounty hunters ? The ICO concept was new at that time and most of the projects were not scams. Even though scam project did exists at that time too but not as much quantity as it is now a days. Since those ico coins listed in exchanges, the bounty hunters got good value for that. These days almost all the ICO projects are made to make money only, hence bounty hunters will only promote the coins and should not expect much returns from these bounties. |
|
|
|
This is how it will work:
1. Go to settings and click on the security tab. There will be an option to see "Emails from Instagram."
2. One tab labelled security will show you a list of emails the company sent you.
3. The "other" tab will display emails Instagram sent that aren't related to security issues.
4. According to Instagram, users shouldn't click on a link in an email that appears to be from the company, if they can't verify.
This method will allow users to check which emails were legitimate and which were not in the last 14 days but how will it prevent the damage ? The end user may already have clicked on the links through their emails ? Isn't ? Not everyone will come here first and check if this email is right or wrong. (As i understand this) |
|
|
|
Saw this image also in bakkt.com. And for me as a crypto trader, I don't know anything about this Bakkt but, with simple apprehension or grasp on the chart, I can say that BAKKT played a big role on September's dump. Bakkt is not responsible for this bitcoin dump. It is the whales which created the hype and then dump right before the start of the launch. This is the old tactics of whales to make the money and rest of the traders like us to lose the money and hope. I am not forecasting or anticipating any pump in November but i do hope that bitcoin make a strong support level at 10,000$ and remain stable above 10K for some time and the gradually move up. Sudden pumps are never long lasting !!! |
|
|
|
Hello i don't know i posted it in the right place or not?
I'm looking for a script to betting football
Also have Toto.
Send me a message if anyone has this script.
I wouldn't advise you to use scripts for betting. You may lose your money on these automated scripts. Also no one will give them free and they are costly. If you visit https://sportscaff.com/sportsbook-price/, you will find the minimum price for this is 700$ which is quite high. I suppose you are in Singapore as "Toto" is normally used as a lottery term in Singapore. You are also looking for lottery scripts ? You might find some here but i don't think there are any for Toto ? |
|
|
|
This is the problem right here. Crash and sports betting are completely different. If they opened up the beta to everyone, we could get a better idea as to how the sportsbook would function under heavy load(Cannot be assessed with a closed beta IMO).
If beta is opened for general public then it cannot be called a Beta Run. Normally in testing environment, you give access to only few people and those few people test the sites for everything including bug fixing or load testing. Also there are many other ways to artificially test the load and may not require the real users using the site. |
|
|
|
~ all users tagged by TP as spammers will likely be removed.
Then I think you can also check these users that have the similar neutral tags from The Pharmacist: trumpman, Apes, wildey. As i remember "The Pharmacist" was asked by theymos a long time back to remove the tagged users on the basis shit posting. Unfortunately all those spammers were moved to neutral tags. Seeing these post standards, I guess "The Pharmacist" was right on spot tagging them. I did change a lot of them already, but I've been taking more time doing it than I meant to. I'd apologize, except I'd gladly keep all those negs in place if Theymos didn't explicitly say that he doesn't want that.
I recently got a real computer and internet at home, so I'll start converting the negs I left for shitposting to neutrals tonight after work or tomorrow morning. Don't know how many I have left to do, but it shouldn't take all that long.
|
|
|
|
I am little bit confused about this topic, especially in gambling websites that accept Bitcoins or any cryptocurrencies.
So, we can see more activities on gambling that uses Bitcoin when we are in bull market (price increasing)? And decreases the activities or gambling volumes when also the price of Bitcoin keeps dumping (bear season) ?
I don't know if (we) some normal gamblers would have idea about this or maybe some gambling sites would exactly know this based on their website traffic/bet activities.
Apart from the effect of bitcoin price, the gamblers will continue to play in both the bull and the bear market. Gambling is a separate industry and they use crypto as a form of payment. It does not matter what is the price of the bitcoin other then when the price is higher people will gamble with lesser satoshi and when price is lower, people will bet with more satoshi. The reason for this is that we are still in the era where we calculate the reward and risk in dollar value. If some wants to gamble with 10$, he will convert 10$ in bitcoins and play with those converted satoshis. |
|
|
|
Except yahoo isn't managing the campaign.
People can come in this campaign with their own will but can remain in the campaign only on the will of the manager, Yahoo. Quality control is the most important part of managing the campaign. Everything else can be automated but maintaining the quality has to be done manually and they choose the best person for this. Regardless of the issues and concerns in that campaign, i would salute you to be sincere with your signature. I wished there were no issues. |
|
|
|
Or the one controlling all the PCs in the internet cafe. the server could snoop into what you're doing and record whatever it is that's on your screen and also your keystrokes. Usually I don't resort to public internet cafes to enter my personal bank accounts or any other sensitive data/passwords that I have. This is asking for trouble in plain sight, without any regard for the security of your private data and other sensitive stuff.
I'm pretty sure you have your mobile phone to open your wallets, no?
So why did they build the 2fa for ? If every important site of yours (Online wallets / Bank accounts and gmails) are 2fa enabled then these key loggers will no longer hack your account. They may get into first level of the security but they cannot bypass the 2fa. Anyways, its still not recommended, but if you had no other option (as OP mentioned) then 2fa can give you some security. |
|
|
|
I'm couldn't care less about spam on Cryptotalk - that forum is already destined to have zero useful content - but I'm getting fed up of seeing thread after thread on this forum devolve in to only users wearing the Cryptotalk signature repeating the same nonsense worded slightly different back and forth to each other to hit their post quota.
We have this thread in service discussion section to discuss all about crytotalk forums and posts and those who are interested can read and comments here but making posts all over the forum (even in meta) for cryptotalk discussion is not right but no one listens because most of them only care about the $$ it's simply because there you can make low-quality posts and spamming Another one who agrees that the service he is promoting is low quality trash. I never said that crytpotalk is doing everything 100% right and partially i agree that this is promoting low quality posts on both the forums. But i am hopeful that in due course of time more of these shitposters will be banned. |
|
|
|
Again crytotalk is using the Yobit panel and that's what written in the link you mentioned.
Maybe cryptotalk decided to use the yobit panel to automate the registration/payment method which Yobit has already developed.
Unless it is not declared clearly, we can assume it in both directions.
Any other "company" using that panel?  Not Yet. Maybe that Panel is expensive to use  In the eyes of others you will be look like a spammer thats what I intented to say. -snip- Better suggest me a doc if you know.  You said it already, its the eyes doctor |
|
|
|
Everyone who is Wearing / Promoting / Managing the cryptotalk signature is directly / indirectly supporting spam ? My Answer is No.
Let's wait for your answer.
Might not be everyone is spamming,but when you wear the signature which wore by 99% other campaign spammers then you also will be considered as spamming.Those who are wearing the signatures are not spamming. The ones who are spamming are being spotted and banned. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.msg52577567#msg52577567You need to consult a doctor. |
|
|
|
Estimates on how much bitcoin.com would fetch on the open market?
Bitcoin.com is a very attractive domain name and i do not it anyone would be willing to sale it. Still, there are many followers of Roger Ver and if he would sell it, the site may lose considerable traffic also. I'm not sure anyone would spend that much on it now who had money or the Roger Ver attitude.
It would instantly go for many, many times more than $1 million if it were ever put up for sale. Crypto.com supposedly went for $12 million last year and last year wasn't exactly a classic year for the whole market. There are always people / businessmen who will buy what they think will be in trending the future. If bitcoin become mainstream, these domain names will be worth a million. |
|
|
|
You mean they stop paying everyone to solve immediately? What about the few good posters there ? Good posters will want to post for the sake of posting, without the incentive of being paid a few cents for a post. If they stop paying and only a few good posters remain, the quality of posts will go through the roof (let's face it, the quality can hardly get any worse). If they stop paying and no one remains, then nothing of value will have been lost, and all the spammers will just return to bounty hunting for useless tokens. Unless it is not declared clearly, we can assume it in both directions. Whatever you want to tell yourself to justify promoting a shady exchange. You can go through this thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0) and see all the posts where people talk about the official YoBit account and YoBit management, including the user in charge of handing out bans. There is never any mention of Cryptotalk management. Or you can have a look on twitter, where people with issues with Cryptotalk are being advised to contact YoBit support, such as here: https://twitter.com/buihuye48749862/status/1181090503187554305. I am unable to convince you or maybe i am wrong in my assessments, but i have one question for you. Everyone who is Wearing / Promoting / Managing the cryptotalk signature is directly / indirectly supporting spam ? My Answer is No. Let's wait for your answer. |
|
|
|
So stop paying the spammers. Problem solved immediately. They won't do that though.
You mean they stop paying everyone to solve immediately? What about the few good posters there ? They have already started banning the accounts which are producing pure spam and they may further increase the mods too. (I hope things gets better) Again crytotalk is using the Yobit panel and that's what written in the link you mentioned. Maybe cryptotalk decided to use the yobit panel to automate the registration/payment method which Yobit has already developed. Unless it is not declared clearly, we can assume it in both directions. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
