Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. LOL... Christians don't actually read their bible... if they read it, they would become Atheists LOL! That's why there are Bible classes in churches all around the world Exactly my point... Christians need cherry picked verses read to them... They do not read it themselves, cover to cover... or they would become atheists When in doubt... ask google: https://www.google.com/#q=the+fastest+way+to+become+an+atheistAgree. I didn't really care when I was younger. A friend of mine went to a few hallelujah meetings and was "born again" He asked me to read the bible and I did. The book is really disgusting. I have been an atheist ever since. I talked to my friend and told him to read the book. He is also an atheist after he did it. The things he was told about the bible in church turned out to be lies You are especially blessed to have me here to tell you how important the Bible is for your salvation. Your friends, obviously, didn't have the proper urging. But you can be saved, because I am helping you if you will only accept it. Like your friends, if you reject, you will not be saved. Usually when someone claims that you need "saving" from something that cannot be proven, they are trying to sell you something. Psychiatry is a great example of this. Religion is another. I should report you for scamming (Just kidding). Right. Death is not proven. It is only obvious.
|
|
|
image
Thanks again, nomad13666, for helping to solidify the fact that the earth is round in the minds of all who look at your posts.
|
|
|
Marijuana lowers baby boomer death rates, while alcohol causes massive increaseThe baby boomer generation is literally drinking itself to death at a time when medical marijuana should be and could be saving their lives.
As reported by the UK's Daily Mail, boomers born in the post-World War II period between 1946 and 1964 are distinct from previous generations because of their far great indulgence in hedonistic, aesthetic lifestyles, and this is particularly evident in their drinking habits.
Some believe that boomers drink at greater volumes than previous generations because during their formative years advertising for alcohol and tobacco was much more widespread. It could also be due to the fact that boomers have it much better than their parents, for the most part.
Now aged between 51 and 70, boomers' drinking habits are leading many to a premature grave. Between 1992 and 2006, average weekly alcohol consumption for boomers aged 4564 increased by a staggering 85 percent. That compares with a 50 percent increase in drinking for those aged 65 and older, and a 45 percent increase in the 1624 age group.
Follow-up studies have revealed similar findings, the Daily Mail reported. Between 2005 and 2013, for instance, the percentage of males consuming eight or more alcohol units which is equal to four pints of normal strength beer on any given day over the previous week changed by just 5 percent, and that was in the over-65 age group.
Loneliness and alcohol kill
By comparison, the drinking rate fell by 30 percent among 1624 year-olds, 19 percent in the 2244 year-old age group, and 12 percent for those between 45 and 64 years of age.
Additional data contains identical drinking patterns among baby boomers, the paper said. Between 2001 and 2014, alcohol-related deaths in England skyrocketed by more than 150 percent, while alcohol-related admissions to the hospital rose faster among the boomer generation than any other.
Admissions for behavioral and mental disorders attributed to alcohol abuse are now higher than those for alcoholic liver disease in those over the age of 60. Read more at http://www.naturalnews.com/055139_alcohol_abuse_baby_boomers_cannabis.html.
|
|
|
The Election Has Been Hacked: The Dismal Reality of Having No Real Electoral Choices"Free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves." Herbert Marcuse
The FBI is worried: foreign hackers have broken into two state election databases.
The Department of Homeland Security is worried: the nation's voting system needs greater protection against cyberattacks.
I, on the other hand, am not overly worried: after all, the voting booths have already been hacked by a political elite comprised of Republicans and Democrats who are determined to retain power at all costs.
The outcome is a foregone conclusion: the police state will win and "we the people" will lose.
The damage has already been done.
The DHS, which has offered to help "secure" the nation's elections, has already helped to lock down the nation.
Remember, the DHS is the agency that ushered in the domestic use of surveillance drones, expanded the reach of fusion centers, stockpiled an alarming amount of ammunition, urged Americans to become snitches through a "see something, say something" campaign, oversaw the fumbling antics of TSA agents everywhere, militarized the nation's police, spied on activists and veterans, distributed license plate readers and cell phone trackers to law enforcement agencies, contracted to build detention camps, carried out military drills and lockdowns in American cities, conducted virtual strip searches of airline passengers, established Constitution-free border zones, funded city-wide surveillance cameras, and generally turned our republic into a police state.
So, no, I'm not falling for the government's scare tactics about Russian hackers.
I'm not losing a night's sleep over the thought that this election might by any more rigged than it already is.
And I'm not holding my breath in the hopes that the winner of this year's particular popularity contest will save us from government surveillance, weaponized drones, militarized police, endless wars, SWAT team raids, red light cameras, asset forfeiture schemes, overcriminalization, profit-driven private prisons, graft and corruption, or any of the other evils that masquerade as official government business these days.
What I've come to realize is that Americans want to engage in the reassurance ritual of voting.
They want to believe that politics matter.
They want to be persuaded that there's a difference between the Republicans and Democrats (there's not).
They will swear that Barack Obama has been an improvement on George W. Bush (he has not).
They are convinced that Hillary Clinton's values are different from Donald Trump's (with both of them, money talks).
Most of all, they want to buy into the fantasy that when we elect a president, we're getting someone who truly represents "we the people" rather than the corporate state (in fact, in the oligarchy that is the American police state, an elite group of wealthy donors is calling the shots).
The sad truth is that it doesn't matter who wins the White House, because they all work for the same boss: Corporate America. Understanding this, many corporations hedge their bets on who will win the White House by splitting their donations between Democratic and Republican candidates.
Politics is a game, a joke, a hustle, a con, a distraction, a spectacle, a sport, and for many devout Americans, a religion. It is a political illusion aimed at persuading the citizenry that we are free, that our vote counts, and that we actually have some control over the government when in fact, we are prisoners of a police state.
In other words, it's a sophisticated ruse aimed at keeping us divided and fighting over two parties whose priorities are exactly the same so that we don't join forces and do what the Declaration of Independence suggests, which is to throw the whole lot out and start over.
It's no secret that both parties support endless war, engage in out-of-control spending, ignore the citizenry's basic rights, have no respect for the rule of law, are bought and paid for by Big Business, care most about their own power, and have a long record of expanding government and shrinking liberty. Most of all, both parties enjoy an intimate, incestuous history with each other and with the moneyed elite that rule this country.
Despite the jabs the candidates volley at each other for the benefit of the cameras, they're a relatively chummy bunch away from the spotlight. Moreover, despite Congress' so-called political gridlock, our elected officials seem to have no trouble finding common ground when it's time to collectively kowtow to the megacorporations, lobbyists, defense contractors and other special interest groups to whom they have pledged their true allegiance.
So don't be fooled by the smear campaigns and name-calling or drawn into their politics of hate. They're just useful tactics that have been proven to engage voters and increase voter turnout while keeping the citizenry at each other's throats.
We're in trouble, folks.
We are living in a fantasy world carefully crafted to resemble a representative democracy.
It used to be that the cogs, wheels and gear shifts in our government machinery worked to keep our republic running smoothly. However, without our fully realizing it, the mechanism has changed. Its purpose is no longer to keep our republic running smoothly. To the contrary, this particular contraption's purpose is to keep the corporate police state in power. Its various parts are already a corrupt part of the whole.
Read more at https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_election_has_been_hacked_the_dismal_reality_of_having_no_real_elec.
|
|
|
Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. LOL... Christians don't actually read their bible... if they read it, they would become Atheists LOL! That's why there are Bible classes in churches all around the world Exactly my point... Christians need cherry picked verses read to them... They do not read it themselves, cover to cover... or they would become atheists When in doubt... ask google: https://www.google.com/#q=the+fastest+way+to+become+an+atheistAgree. I didn't really care when I was younger. A friend of mine went to a few hallelujah meetings and was "born again" He asked me to read the bible and I did. The book is really disgusting. I have been an atheist ever since. I talked to my friend and told him to read the book. He is also an atheist after he did it. The things he was told about the bible in church turned out to be lies You are especially blessed to have me here to tell you how important the Bible is for your salvation. Your friends, obviously, didn't have the proper urging. But you can be saved, because I am helping you if you will only accept it. Like your friends, if you reject, you will not be saved.
|
|
|
Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. LOL... Christians don't actually read their bible... if they read it, they would become Atheists LOL! That's why there are Bible classes in churches all around the world Exactly my point... Christians need cherry picked verses read to them... They do not read it themselves, cover to cover... or they would become atheists When in doubt... ask google: https://www.google.com/#q=the+fastest+way+to+become+an+atheistAgree. I didn't really care when I was younger. A friend of mine went to a few hallelujah meetings and was "born again" He asked me to read the bible and I did. The book is really disgusting. I have been an atheist ever since. I talked to my friend and told him to read the book. He is also an atheist after he did it. The things he was told about the bible in church turned out to be lies They also tend to skip over the gruesome, blood thirsty, vengeful, violent, pornographic, misogynistic, homophobic verses when reading verses out loud. If Christians read their Bible, they would know that God is not pro-life, so it makes no sense to oppose abortion. There is a verse in Hosea where he commands the blood thirsty warriors of God to rip pregnant women open with swords, dashing their unborn into pieces. Anyone who rejects God, and especially Jesus salvation, will go to Hell. Hell will be a lot worse than "gruesome, blood thirsty, vengeful, violent, pornographic, misogynistic, homophobic verses." It will be way worse than righteous warriors of God ripping open "pregnant women open with swords" and killing their unborn children. The whole Bible, including Hosea, is a warning to all of us. God doesn't want it to happen, but by our sin and unbelief, we are twisting God into doing... Hell. Turn, while you have time.
|
|
|
Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. LOL... Christians don't actually read their bible... if they read it, they would become Atheists LOL! That's why there are Bible classes in churches all around the world Exactly my point... Christians need cherry picked verses read to them... They do not read it themselves, cover to cover... or they would become atheists When in doubt... ask google: https://www.google.com/#q=the+fastest+way+to+become+an+atheistFew people can sit down and in one reading read the whole Bible. That's why it is done in multiple sittings. In addition, the topics are so diverse that reading it straight would bring about confusion. In addition, most Christians today are not Jewish or of ancient Israel or even the Middle East. Because of this, people don't understand some of the simple ideas that the Bible is conveying, because the words of a culture not their own don't make any sense to them. Bible classes are in part a way to show Middle East thinking to people so they can get the Bible in the right context. However, the Bible understanding about the love of God, God's desire for perfection in people, Gods anger against imperfection, the salvation that God supplies for people who are destroying themselves by fighting God, and a lot more things, are understandable. People who trash basic Bible understanding do it willingly. They shut themselves out of Heaven.
|
|
|
And what do you think about the poor man's gold > silver?
|
|
|
You can't solve the problem by banning religion. What we need is proper education and a fair wealth distribution. Without those, ban anything as much as you can, we will still get fucked.Take a look at the streets, one dude drives a ferrari while the other begs for food on the streets.
Rather, the problems would all be solved if people all became Bible believing Christians.
|
|
|
Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. LOL... Christians don't actually read their bible... if they read it, they would become Atheists LOL! That's why there are Bible classes in churches all around the world, and why Pentecostals, especially, joyfully stand up and praise God for His great goodness to all people... goodness shown by the sending of Jesus so that all who want eternal life can have it. Praise the Lord!
|
|
|
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it. Guns themselves can't do anything it is the person with the gun that decides where the bullet goes. Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesnt need a gun to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people will not make them less violent. It might make them more violent. Violent people can use anything to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people is no more than just taking one out of a thousand more ways to hurt, rob, or kill you. Actually, you are more correct than you think. Government has in its legal definitions of guns, that they are weapons. Common folk use common language and call guns all kinds of things: property, guns, weapons, tools, etc. When government says "weapon," if their meaning of the word is the same as the meaning of a common man or woman, it is only by accident. If a restaurant has a legal citation on their door referring to no weapons allowed, they are not talking about guns that are property of patrons. The problem is that few people know how to fight it in court, and, if there is a weapon ban, there should be a lock box for you to place your gun in, if it is a public place.
|
|
|
I think it is time to ban religion on Earth.
Religion brings war, division, ignorance, hate and it holding the progress of our civilization.
I think it's time to ban breathing. It causes carbon emissions and boosts global warming. Ban religion by letting people who sit so close together in church wear Ban deodorant.
|
|
|
Train everybody to be a cop, and there will be no crooks around anymore, and we will have an army ready to go all the time.
That's already been done before. I believe it was known as the Third Reich. But you already knew that. It's easy to advocate for tight policing when you're not a victim to their profiling. If the Third Reich thing were true as you stated, there wouldn't have been any concentration camps. Sounds like you are part of the group who wants to subject some people to enslavement. I'm confused by the way you worded your statement. Are you implying that there wasn't a Third Reich? Or are you claiming that there weren't any concentration camps? Either way, it sounds very Alex Jonesy to me. The reason you are confused about the things I say is, you are simply confused. The Third Reich didn't arm the nation. They did just the opposite, except for their formal military. Were the concentration camp people armed? You attempt to confuse the issue because you are confused. Alex Jones is doing a reasonable job of informing the people of the truth. Since it is confused you who suggests that I sound very Alex Jonesy, it means nothing at all. But I should like to be in his camp, so to speak. Yeah. Why do I answer you since you are confused enough that you won't understand anyway?
|
|
|
We need to abolish religion, not ban it. There's a difference there. Countries that claim to have banned religion have merely replaced it with the worship of the state. North Korea is a great example of this.
There are groups out there trying to do this. They are trying to abolish religion in the only way that you can. See to it that all people everywhere die. When you look at the definition of religion, all people are included whether or not they have a formal religion. Is that what you really want? The destruction of all people? Actually, the most secular countries in the world are the ones that fare the best on both an economical and human rights standpoint. I can't imagine a country that uses the Bible as the source of its morals/values, we have already had that, Christianity gave us the Dark Ages where the Church banned reading for over a thousand years. That's 'cause secular governments like to rip the property away from their citizens, and then lie about what they have don to other countries. Christianity of the Dark Ages was in name only, not in reality. It took Martin Luther and other reformers to bring some semblance of truth to the Church. The best moral laws are found in the last 4 books of the Pentateuch, also known as the Torah. Churches steal more from citizens than any corrupt government. There's a reason Joel Osteen is so rich! Of course you bring up the argument: "The Dark Ages weren't really dark! They invented lots of things, like waterboarding!". Classical right winged religious nut argument Generally, churches don't steal anything. People give to God through the church. In what way does Joel Osteen steal? People know about his wealth, and still donate to God through him. Why do you think that the Dark Ages weren't dark? It's in the name. And that is why you think that the Church back then was Christian. You believe what they tell you.
|
|
|
Wow! What a load of junk that twists real science all out of whack.
|
|
|
We need to abolish religion, not ban it. There's a difference there. Countries that claim to have banned religion have merely replaced it with the worship of the state. North Korea is a great example of this.
There are groups out there trying to do this. They are trying to abolish religion in the only way that you can. See to it that all people everywhere die. When you look at the definition of religion, all people are included whether or not they have a formal religion. Is that what you really want? The destruction of all people? Actually, the most secular countries in the world are the ones that fare the best on both an economical and human rights standpoint. I can't imagine a country that uses the Bible as the source of its morals/values, we have already had that, Christianity gave us the Dark Ages where the Church banned reading for over a thousand years. That's 'cause secular governments like to rip the property away from their citizens, and then lie about what they have don to other countries. Christianity of the Dark Ages was in name only, not in reality. It took Martin Luther and other reformers to bring some semblance of truth to the Church. The best moral laws are found in the last 4 books of the Pentateuch, also known as the Torah.
|
|
|
Christianity is so contradictory
+1 Christians are simply unwilling to take the time to think about what they are reading in the bible, if at all. But when they do, they will become more like me.
|
|
|
Train everybody to be a cop, and there will be no crooks around anymore, and we will have an army ready to go all the time.
That's already been done before. I believe it was known as the Third Reich. But you already knew that. It's easy to advocate for tight policing when you're not a victim to their profiling. If the Third Reich thing were true as you stated, there wouldn't have been any concentration camps. Sounds like you are part of the group who wants to subject some people to enslavement.
|
|
|
A sovereign nation is a nation where all people are kings and queens, and the only government is to harm no one, nor damage the property of another. By the way, the people have to understand this.
|
|
|
|