In this case, each side has its own ideas about security. PayPal's view of security may not coincide with your view, as well as your opinion about good reasons The news is certainly good for the exchange rate, but it turns out to be a little funny situation when bitcoin, which was created for, among other things, to fight against such centralized payment systems, becomes one of the cogs in the mechanism. By the way, it is also funny that PayPal also did not seem to be burning with tender feelings for bitcoin, but the insidious reality forced them to change their beliefs. About safe haven. PayPal is a huge organization with a lot of customers and responsibilities to government regulators, and sudden doubts about your funds can lead to unpleasant consequences for your wallet. But the final decision is still always yours

As I recall, the results of scientific studies revealed that just easy symptoms of occurrence of this disease does not allow the body to build strong immunity and it is therefore likely recurrent disease. Well, if a normal stable immunity was not developed the previous time,then in theory, and a strong gain to the body again should not be. Therefore, I believe that in this case, in the coming weather seasons, we should make a big bet on mass vaccination, and then rely on mutations of the coronavirus, which will make it not so dangerous for humans.

By the way, I do not see anything reprehensible that pharmaceutical companies claim to receive funds to fight the pandemic, because this is their bread and is the essence of professional activity in the production of medicines. As a commercial enterprise, they earn money and it is difficult to expect them to work for free. Of course, pharmaceutical companies may be related to the rise of the information wave about the pandemic, but to call this a conspiracy, you need to have a very non-trivial view of the essence and motives of things happening in the world.

It seems that even now payment transactions and payment acceptance are not the main source of income for modern banks, so I think the idea of a threat to the banking sector coming from cryptocurrencies looks a little far-fetched. There are payment services for such things, and that's where you can look for potential conflicts of interest. Banks, as financial organizations that accumulate financial resources and issue the necessary amount to their customers, remain afloat and, if allowed by regulatory state organizations, will also lend cryptocurrencies.

A lot depends on how we want investors to perceive bitcoin, if as a safe haven, as a protective asset and a means of hedging risks when the economy falls like gold, then this is one question. In this case, there is no certainty that when the economy recovers, bitcoin expects a rise in the exchange rate price, while on the contrary, the most likely scenario is expected to stagnate and even fall in price, due to the leakage of fixed capital to the stock market. If bitcoin is perceived by the market as an object for financial speculation, as well as stock assets,then there are prospects for further growth during the economic recovery.

Let's not forget that it is impossible to be competent and effective in all matters, so the task of any sane politician is to gather an intelligent team around him. And already this intelligent and competent team will be engaged in direct management and solution of pressing problems and issues. Trump's biggest problem is the style and methods of the decisions made. With seemingly correctly formulated goals and objectives, execution methods raise many questions.

Let us hope that the pandemic will not be prolonged to such an extent that the absolute majority of the population will be forced to engage in subsistence farming and natural exchange. Almost all the existing cases of hyperinflation and total depreciation of money occurred against the background of civil conflicts and the destruction of state structures, but now there is no such thing, and we hope that the state authorities will keep the situation under control and prevent long-term chaos and unrest.

Politicians do what the voters want, but they would like to do nothing themselves, because this is their profession. It seems that no one is very indignant when the employer does not think much for a long time and dismisses an employee who, instead of performing his direct professional duties, is engaged in performing actions that are pleasant only to himself. It is good when it coincides, but very often there is no coincidence. No matter how we speak, but still democracy is a little veiled power of the majority and some seem to be bad things seem good for others and Vice versa.

Indeed, it is still too early to talk about side effects from the vaccine, because no one yet knows what consequences may occur after a few years, and not a few months during the trial. Its nuances will appear when the vaccine is used on tens and hundreds of millions of people. But I am not sure that for such reasons it is not necessary to carry out mass vaccination and calmly observe the death of people from the coronavirus, because any medicine, in addition to the benefits, has some harm.

Undoubtedly, after some time, the coronavirus will be on a par with seasonal acute respiratory infections and flu and can be easily carried by the majority of people. But this is a question of the future, and now the incidence of coronavirus is growing, so it is not surprising that countries are again beginning to tighten quarantine measures. I also don't like excessive quarantine measures that kill the economy, but the coronavirus infection is killing people and I'm not so sure that enough of the human population in countries has been infected with the coronavirus to develop collective immunity. Therefore, the government's measures and motives for the actions taken are also clear.

There will be some continuity, of course, because the main work is provided by the state apparatus that is constantly working regardless of the elections The current elections have shown that American society is more divided than the pre-election polls showed, and Biden's victory does not look so unconditional. Therefore, Biden will have to take into account the opinion of citizens who voted for Trump, despite his extravagant behavior and manner of governing the country. But the extent to which the electorate of Trump is the top priority for the new administration we will see in the next year.

These trillions of dollars of course have not disappeared and in addition to supporting the real sector of the economy, they have also splashed out on the stock market, supporting its current capitalization. Also, some of this money is clearly present in the market, raising the price of the main cryptocurrency to the current level. And while there is no reason why this money supply will flow back into the real economy, raising inflation strongly, and then we hope that the financial authorities will keep the situation under control.

In the case of a sale, the market reaction will be for sure, even remembering the past closed auctions organized by the American state and this did not spill out to the free market. By the way, it looks quite surprising that the market did not react strongly to this news. About the amount itself. I remember one story when the appointed external Japanese Manager of a bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange in Japan brought the market to its knees by selling off small parts of the remaining capital of the exchange.

I would not be in a hurry with such loud statements, and there was a short-term reaction in the form of a drop in the price. Let's wait a little longer, because this market is quite specific and the reaction of major players may occur with some delay. And as for the rise of traditional markets, there is a strong feeling that the market was waiting for good news and therefore there was such a reaction. It is also worth considering that mass vaccination is still a few months away, and the pandemic is raging right now.

The global shift to crypto in the near future is possible only if sovereign States disappear from the map of the world together with governments, respectively, because the government manages its state and economy, thanks to the presence of its own currency and the regulation of its issue and turnover. There is no control of money on its territory, there is no state. As for the withdrawal of all funds by depositors from the Bank at one time at once, no Bank can do this due to the principles of its existence.

Well, Fiat currencies in their digital form are already quite developed in the world's leading economic powers. As for printing money, I would like to say that the representatives of the state will name thousands of reasons why such a large amount of money was printed, despite the deplorable consequences that came from this Although of course, because of the pandemic, States print more money than in normal times.

Real estate has some relationship with the solvency of the population, economic activity in the state and may not always bring benefits to its owner in the end and also experience both an increase and a decrease in prices, but of course not on the same scale as it happens with bitcoin. As a result, it can be argued that bitcoin can bring much greater profitability in the end over time.

The problem is that government agencies are tempted to expand the very concept of illegal operations and it is unknown what wilds the rich imagination of lawmakers can lead to. Also, full control over money by the state leads to the second temptation, when you want to introduce new taxes and fees from the population, because there is constantly not enough money in the Treasury and this situation is chronic. Therefore, the proposed amenities may be followed by a fee after a while and there is no certainty that everyone will be very happy with this fee.

It depends on what is considered a long time. There are serious concerns that the second lockdown with different variations may last the entire current winter season, when constant partial easing of restrictions will alternate with subsequent tightening of restrictions, unless there is something breakthrough in the production of the vaccine and rapid total vaccination of the population.And some experience from the first wave may not always be a good helper, because now the time of the second wave will be longer.

I also believe that a mass ban is unlikely, because the major economic powers are engaged in printing a very large amount of money that the economy cannot digest. Therefore, bitcoin helps to sterilize an excessive amount of money supply. However, China is out of this General mass of countries with its market regulatory behavior and may act against the current trend and ban bitcoin on its territory, which may lead to a collapse in the exchange rate price for some time as a result of a mass sale by Chinese investors. But let's hope that this will not happen, because China is quite cautious in this area, not encouraging, but not completely prohibiting. About the second statement. Whales operate in the market as destructive and positively contributing to the growth of prices. I also believe that a mass ban is unlikely, because the major economic powers are engaged in printing a very large amount of money that the economy cannot digest. Therefore, bitcoin helps to sterilize an excessive amount of money supply. However, China is out of this General mass of countries with its market regulatory behavior and may act against the current trend and ban bitcoin on its territory, which may lead to a collapse in the exchange rate price for some time as a result of a mass sale by Chinese investors. But let's hope that this will not happen, because China is quite cautious in this area, not encouraging, but not completely prohibiting. About the second statement. Whales operate in the market as destructive and positively contributing to the growth of prices. It is impossible to fully insure against their actions, but it is probably not worth waiting for destructive actions from them in the near future,because they are also still accumulating.