I really suggest you to read Potato Chips's post. In all honesty, nobody will tag an account if you don't post a signed message from an address staked with that account. If people would just take your word for it, and tag this account, what's stopping you from creating dozens of new accounts and getting everybody you disagree tagged red by dt?

I realise this sounds unfair, and it's probably the last thing you want to hear when you've just lost your account, but posting signed messages is one of the only types of proof of account ownership accepted on this forum...

i see you translated your post, great
As for your problem: if the valhalla deposit addresses were either 1BdynZP1WgugRuicK3bQhpYpKQwCJkxE1H or 1Fq4FDxYKpNz1pVh4f5GhuAfmg5XoaUbjG, there should be no reason why they didn't credit your account.
The transaction was confirmed (like you said).

There are many things that could've gone wrong: either valhalla is a scam, or is experiencing technical difficulty's, or maybe you miscopied the deposit address, or your pc is infected with one of those virusses that change addresses in the clipboard? Is there a way you can find historic deposit addresses within the valhalla interface? (i don't know this service, so i don't know which features they offer).

Anyways, there is no way to cancel or reverse a transaction, especially if it has 2000+ confirmations... So if you sent BTC to the wrong address, you basically lost it... If you've sent to the correct address, only valhalla can credit your account or refund you, if they're unwilling to do this, you can try to put some legal pressure on them, or open up a scam report on this forum and hope they chose to refund you to avoid losing credibility on this forum.

Usually, electrum's default wallet is called "default_wallet", There are a couple things you can try:
1) find out wether it's an ascii file, or not (in linux, just type "file bitcoin.dat".
2) you can try to open a copy of the .dat-file using notepad++
3) you can install bitcoin core, rename bitcoin.dat to wallet.dat and place it in the default directory (~/.bitcoin on a linux box), then start core and look in the debug.log to check if the wallet was valid
4) you can rename a copy of the bitcoin.dat to default_wallet and see if you can open it with electrum (altough i doubt it'll work).
5) you can use db_dump to see if it's a berkelydb dbfile

34 characters starting with 14 doesn't sound like a standard private key generated with electrum, sorry...

IF you want your users to use a gui wallet, then yes, you should distribute bitcoin-qt. Both bitcoind and bitcoin-qt start from the same default datadir, and use the same default configuration file. If you start either, the synchronisation process will start. As a matter of fact, you could start bitcoind -daemon, let it run untill the synchronisation is half done, then stop it properly and use bitcoin-qt do do the other half of the synchronisation (i don't see a reason why you should do this, but it is possible).

Personally, i'm a bigger fan of running bitcoind in deamon mode, then using bitcoin-cli to communicate with the daemon. This way i don't need to open an annoying gui... I don't know the level of expertise of your users, but it *might* be a good idear to distribute both...

I see you have a real problem, that's why i didn't report your post... But basically, one of the few rules this forum has is that outside regional subforums, only english posts are allowed.
Either translate this post into english, or move it to your regional subforum. If you post an english translation, i'll see if i can help you out.

bitcoin.dat file => maybe, it could *potentially* be your wallet, a .dat extension could also mean it's a wallet that has been generated using bitcoin core.
tx info => useless in regards to recovering your wallet
qr code => probably useless, it's probably the qr of a deposit address (since you say it's read only)
password > only usefull *if* it's the pasword from your bitcoin.dat. IF it's a private key, it *could* be the private key of one of your addresses... It would be even better if it were a master private key. Electrum's master private key starts with xprv. Could you tell us what's the first letter and how many characters this password has?

Nope, bitcoin isn't a religion...  The OP posted his question in the BITCOIN Developement and technical discussion section... There is a subforum dedicated to all altcoins, all altcoin discussion is supposed to go in there... When i started out in this forum, posting altcoin stuff in the bitcoin subforum would be a sure way to get ridiculed by other members.
It seems, nowadays, people let this slide, but to be honest, when the OP asks a BITCOIN wallet question, and people start dragging in ALTCOINS, it gets pretty confusing for newbies. What happens if you're a newbie, and you have the same question as the OP? If you read somebody's post advising an altcoin wallet, i wouldn't be supprised if the newbie would end up with more questions than he initially had (why does my address start with 0x instead of 1, why can't i withdraw my BTC to DEX,...). This is exactly why the forum has dedicated bitcoin and altcoin subforums.

next to necro-posting, did you bother to read the other posts in this topic? There were only 10 of them, including mine... My answer was only 5 posts higher, and it clearly disproved the fact that you can confirm your own transactions using a laptop...
You're currently a member, this means you've passed the stage of newbie and junior member. People do expect a basic amount of knowledge from your posts...

In general, there are only a couple things you can do to get a lower rejected share %:
1) make sure you have up-to-date firmware/mining software
2) make sure your network connectivity is OK... Maybe switch to a pool with a lower ping latency?

Getting a rejected share once in a while is normal, usually it's a stale or a duplicate share... I wouldn't worry about the numbers you indicated in your OP, they seem well within bounds to me.

This isn't a bitcoin wallet... I wouldn't bring an altcoin wallet in a bitcoin wallet discussion...

If you clone bitcoin, your developer *should* be able to clone bitcore, changing the same parameters that were changed when cloning bitcoin...

More specific, the part "Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs)"... There are also other options, like running bitcore: https://bitcore.io/guides/wallet-service/
This being said: i never recommand anybody to start using a web wallet, starting a wallet service as a novice user without any trust is a bad idear (IMHO)

Fixed that for you... We're not in the altcoin subforum, so we're talking about BITCOIN mining. At current diff, mining BTC with your PC is a very, very, very bad idear.
Proof: https://www.mocacinno.com/nonspecialisedmininghardware.php

I wouldn't recommand an online wallet, not even for daily transactions.
If you want to do daily transactions and own a lot of BTC, i'd recommand a hardware wallet. If you don't own a lot of BTC, a desktop wallet on a clean PC will probably suffice.

The only reason for using an online wallet (imho) is when you're travelling, and you need access to a small amount of BTC from anywhere in the world... Even then, i'd probably use an encrypted mobile wallet instead.

The image shows you're creating SCRYPT hashes, bitcoin's POW algo is SHA256D, so whatever is happening, you're not mining bitcoin with your phone.

IF, for example you're mining Litcoin with that phone, this calculator tells me that at current diff, you should be mining around 21 litoshi's/day... That's ~600 litoshi's/month... Still far from the 5000 satoshi's you say you mine...
This leads me to belief that the software is either mining an even lower diff coin but mislabeling it as bitcoin, or it's doing something completely different (like showing you adds, or mining even another coin with a mobile friendlyer POW algo, if such a thing even exists), or you *might* be looking at your stats wrong... Several years ago, when the diff was many factors lower than it is today, 5000 sat/week was a possibility, maybe you're looking at historic stats?

What do i think about this service: It looks exactly like all the other ponzi scams out there... I wouldn't invest a single satoshi there, nor would i ever recommand anybody to invest their hard earned funds on a ponzi...
There is no 100% proof, but the modus operandi is exactly the same as all the other ponzi's, as are the other telltale signs like the hidden whois info, the new domain, the used template, the unrealistic profit expectation, the refferal program,...

yup, this one works 

Quoted, i'll verify in a minute and update this post

EDIT: couldn't verify your message using my website link
Nor could i verify it using electrum 3.0.5

Easyer? When talking about altcoin mining with a GPU and bitcoin mining with an ASIC? Defenately bitcoin mining with a recent ASIC...
- Basically, you start by looking for a good price for an S9 + PSU + S&H + import duties...
- Next you visit a mining calculator like https://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/bitcoin-mining-calculator
- you fill in all the questions on the mining calculator... An S9 hashes at around 13500 Gh/s and draws about 1400 Watt. A default pool fee is ~1%, the price is the price you found for the S9 + PSU + S&H + import duties, the electricity rate is your local electricity rate.
- Next you see if the ROI is reasonable. Do realise that if the diff jumps up, the ROI rises, if the BTC/USD price goes down, the ROI rises, if the blocks halve: the ROI rises

IF the ROI is reasonable given your power cost and the total price for the ASIC, you can just buy the S9, plug it in, surf to it's web gui, fill in the details you get from your favorite pool and start mining.


Altcoin mining, on the other hand, usually requires you to look into which altcoin you want to mine, you'll have to research about your GPU, then setup the mining software on your PC and run it, but constantly keep an eye on the shifting altcoin markets... I don't know a lot about altcoin mining tough, if you have more questions, you should ask them in the altcoin mining subforum.

One very important sidenote tough: eventough in my opinion, nothing beats the user experience of just buying an S9, plugging it in and surfing to the web gui, the maintenance and reparation of an S9 is something completely different. IF you burn your GPU, there's a fair chance it's still under guarantee (a lot of those GPU's have 3 years factory warrantee). You can buy a replacement GPU in your local computer shop, and if you're done mining you can get a fair amount of cash for your second hand GPU.
An S9 ASIC on the other hand, has only 3 months (very limited) guarantee. It breaks a lot easyer than a decent GPU, and if it does, you're usually in a lot of trouble: you'll have to send boards to china, wait, get your claim rejected,..... Also, when a new (more efficient) ASIC hits the market, the second hand prices for your ASIC will plummet.

Bitcoin mining = no, you can't make any profit whatsoever unless you invest in a latest gen asic and have a good plan and electricity rate.

Altcoin mining = maybe... If you have a decent GPU you can potentially mine some altcoins, however, if you want more info, you should ask your question in the altcoin mining subforum

Good luck