Newbies/inexperienced traders are advised to start with small amount or with amount they can afford to lose until they become good at trading.  Can you afford to lose 50 UNI? If yes, then learn to trade with it... probably by first having a basic idea of how to trade crypto (you can find some interesting/ok cryptocurrency trading tutorials on youtube for example) and then try it out on a good exchange to see how well you can trade.

If you can't afford to lose that amount (50UNI), then I would advice that you convert part of the coins to stablecoin and only hold the amount of UNI you can afford to lose. You can then find time to learn ways to increase your UNI and experiment with the small amount of UNI you have to see if what you learned works and if the earning is sustainable. If it's profitable and sustainable, you could gradually start converting your stablecoin to UNI for more profits. 
I don't really know where you can earn that much you stated (2-5UNI perday of 50UNI investment)

Ofcourse. It's probably like doing fundamental and technical analysis in Crypto trading and betting on two coins based on the analysis. I assume football betting sites already have tools for bettors to analyze teams/matches fundamentals, team records, players past/present fitness, players skills, etc.   The information will certainly help people bet right.

Rigging will certainly affect the accuracy of bets. A good bettor who doesn't factor in rigging will likely be affected by rigged results.
 I don't know much about NBA(I'm used to football), but I think you could factor in the rigging before participating in the bets to see if it's true, then avoid betting on certain games/teams/referees that will likely be rigged or encourage rigging...and bet more on games with teams/referees that consistently look fair

You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.

I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?

Same in most businesses... you start with what you can afford to lose until you are grounded and start being consistently profitable in the business.
If you don't want to start small, you could learn the business first and practice it for free via apprenticeship, getting goods from people/friends for free to sell(& share the profit with them) etc and see how profitable you can be.

The token has to be very useful to users, not just deflationary. I think the usefulness and fundamentals are very important factors to consider while developing/participating in a crypto project, otherwise it's as good as sharing millions of useless shiny stones amongst the uninformed and controlling the supply to make it deflationary.

Agreed. The centralization of the exchanges most likely contributed alot to how people view Bitcoin and others. Probably one the reasons it doesn't make sense to them.  I imagine the exchange users wondering: "How can this people say it's decentralized, transparent, privacy-friendly/anonymity-friendly, immutable, censorship resistant, permissionless, secured, consensus-driven etc whereas it's not"

The worst is that people who should know recommend those centralized exchanges/platforms and don't seem to be bothered..

It doesn't have to be completely virtual currency. It should be both virtual  and physical currency. I sometimes find the idea of eliminating physical currency really strange. If you prefer virtual/digital, then go for it, rather than imposing it on people who prefer something different.
I think you could create a small Local "internet" Network in a community and bitcoins/cryptos could be used and printed in the community like you would use physical currencies. You'll need to build the applications and equipments for this though. And I believe it will be cheap to build.

I actually like both. They can serve different purposes at home or other places, and can be really friendly/loving pets.
I don't prefer any particular color, esp if it's not too colorful, completely too dark or white... so they don't attract too much attention from people. I don't mind having the colours though, if they won't be bothered

Ofcourse! I believe lots of information/knowledge is really require to achieve success in skill-based bettings. Without this, you are depending on luck as a bettor even though it isn't luck-based games/competitions.
If I want to bet on a match, I will learn alot about the two teams rather than just bet blindly, without knowing enough or anything atall about the teams

Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.

I guess serious bettors would learn from experience the longer they play. Bur the problem  would be how can they learn without taking big risk... Probably with small bets, free bets or by practicing for free on some sort of dedicated free betting platform(more like demo trading)

A humane and sensible ideology would be:  "freedom to do what is good/right/moral." Do everything in love for GOD and people. Don't move outside of the boundary of Love or you get punished.

GOD created everything... If you love HIM well enough, you wouldn't abuse HIS creations or displease HIM. You basically find what pleases HIM and do them always. You can only do what pleases HIM always if you have HIS Spirit in you. So, people with HIS Spirit in them can live without human laws/rules and still do things right/morally always.

You don't necessarily need to destroy/burn money in Crypto unless maybe it's crime, dirty or invalid money.   I think I would prefer cryptocoins to continue to be in circulation and taken out of circulation until the coins are no longer good to use.

Is that the image op posted?
I checked the link but saw nothing(probably from my browser), and the image didn't show on his/her post.

Anyway, I wonder how much in total Op started the bets with. If it's less the the total win, that means he/she did well or is profitable.
However, the Balance is 0...guess op has already withdrawn his/her win.

How old is the under 18 exactly?
If by "gambling" you mean "taking big risk on bets" then I can assure you that you are not supposed to gamble even as an adult. You can however bet little, and only what you can afford to lose. But betting as under 18, it really depends on the country you are from. Does your country allow kids to bet without supervision from guardians/parents? *Gambling* is out of the equation here because kids are not supposed to gamble at all.

Are you serious about this:

You really tried almost all gambling sites that exist?  Specifically what "gambling" sites are you referring to, crypto-based betting sites, non-crypto betting sites or sites that allow specifically gambling(which could be both crypto and non-crypto based)
Do you have to leave you computer on to autobet or is this just a short autobet?

I'd probably spend all of mine in a short time because of the many nice and interesting posts I often find. I honestly don't feel very comfortable giving 1 or 2 persons in a thread while leaving out the others.
 And It's bit difficult for me to give out merits without specific reasons. Wish it's possible to give out the merits with little comments/notes (or have list of reasons to choose from) why i did so... more like it's done with reputation. That would help me have something to comment or list of reasons to tick while giving out the merits, so others I didn't merit won't think I am partial or something. Maybe sending the merits anonymously would be preferable also

This can work well with advanced escrow system on a decentralized marketplace.
 If you have a contract with your seller and the goods turn out to be different from what the seller claims in the agreement, you lay complaints with proofs on the decentralized marketplace. Qualified arbiters go through the complaints, if you have a good case, you return the goods and automatically get a refund.

I wonder why you use the word mediocre for such people.  Is it mediocre on just the understanding of Bitcoin or mediocre in all other areas of life? I think people who don't understand Bitcoin would most likely be good in certain other areas of life. Lots of them probably don't see the need for Bitcoin yet,  it isn't explained well enough to them, it doesn't interest them,  they are just cautious etc..
I believe when people find Bitcoin unique, secure, very useful, easy-to-use, etc... and that they can use it with little to no problem,  they will likely attract others people.