Some accounts with low amounts of MicroCash will get low amounts or no amounts of the total fees paid back, who is denying that or misleading anyone? Every day every account takes a half cent (0.005) to cover the operational costs, whether the account is rich or poor this fee is taken. These fees are then redistributed back to every account based on how much MicroCash they have.
Nothing is stopping anyone from becoming a MicroCash holder and earning significant amounts of interest, they just have to sell products people will buy, offer services or invest themselves. People who have tiny amounts of MicroCash will pay an account fee just like someone with a lot of MicroCash will. If they increase the amount of MicroCash they have they'll go from paying a tiny fee to actually earning MicroCash, it's a nice reward system where people can escape paying fees.
As to how much reward is given back, it all depends on the total fees collected, which varies day to day. The more people use the network the more fees are collected and the more people are paid. Now users get indirectly paid for spreading the word about MicroCash to their friends and family.
I have kind of a hard time believing that people in your inner circle like Ahimoth would get behind an economic scheme with such a design. |
|
|
|
|
Volume is good compared to any other alt chain, that's all that really matters.
|
|
|
|
No, no, ... it is all completely different! The 51% attack is only a 51%/2 = 25% attack (itīs int ya no) because half of the blocks are always safe! consider the code: Thus you can easily see it takes more than 100% to attack, which is of cause impossible. The same power blocks that formerly anyone could sign? Maybe someone on the inside found a fatal security flaw in sc2 and the team is trying to move on before it is too heavily exploited. That there is already a third sc is an admission to multiple failures, I don't know why anyone would hop on this bandwagon aside from the usual game of alt chain debut buy-sell chicken. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe someone out there needs this. Hosting company refused to install this, it's yours for 2BTC (bought it for $15USD).
|
|
|
|
|
The more I read about this, the more it sounds like paypal - only with more fees, slower transactions, and less security.
|
|
|
|
|
i'm phone posting too. :gay:
|
|
|
|
Any publicity is good publicity mostly only applies to entertainment, not banking or the financial industry. If this were true, Bernanke's son wouldn't have killed himself and the Enron CEOs would be partying it up in Malibu.
Oof! Thank you, I just woke up. Madoff's son you mean? |
|
|
|
|
Any publicity is good publicity mostly only applies to entertainment, not banking or the financial industry. If this were true, Bernanke's son wouldn't have killed himself and the Enron CEOs would be partying it up in Malibu.
|
|
|
|
|
I just hope we'll see more crazy rage posts from CoinHunter when people call him on arbitrarily attempting to inflate/deflate the currency, not explaining the coin well, or not releasing the source code. This place gets really quiet when he isn't around, and I think that hurts the value of the other alt chains.
|
|
|
|
Coin control? Client modified to return change to the same address? Are these all foreign concepts to the scamcoin community? Don't show your ignorance scamterry. Read the forum if you want to know more about it. SolidCoin v3 is built on a new protocol, it isn't bitcoin sourced anymore. what is this i dont even You don't get it, it's Bitcoin dragging them down, it must be. Or it would totally be a success by now! My guess is that coinhunter doesn't want to release the source code so that people wont uncover fun things like cpf fund transactions being able to be signed by anyone |
|
|
|
|
Bump and 1BTC reward just for making the site
I'll increase it as time goes on
|
|
|
|
|
those are similar but not really the same idea, save for maybe the first one. Should be an easy code, i'm surprised it's not up already. Probably a lot of money to be made here if advertised well.
|
|
|
|
|
I was wondering if anyone had pondered this before?
It would be an adult entertainment site with P2P connection of a client to a client; communications between clients are P2P, however the site itself can accept bitcoins from clients and then, once confirmed, transfer them instantly to one another through the server (the only non-private P2P communication). The incentive for the company is to take a percentage fee from each transaction. Hence, the servers acts as an escrow and a P2P webcam chat service.
The code should be easy, the same as omegle, you just need to code for bitcoin addresses to deposit to and then give the users randomly generated tokens with a long length to log in with (so as to keep the service anonymous).
|
|
|
|
|
what people call coil whine is usually cap/inductor whine, and almost all video cards produce it if you put your ear close to them.
|
|
|
|
Litecoin I think is down and has been down for at least 4 hrs, I had my miners running I was doing other things then went to the coinotron stats page around 3 pm westcoast time and looked at the stats for all the Litecoin miners ; I must have had my miners running for nothing for several hours  http://coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=statisticsTop miners LTC# Name Shares Speed
1 zhezhe 17424 0.00 KH
2 Schwede65 11733 0.00 KH
3 goblin1974 5580 0.00 KH
4 Squidnet 1947 0.00 KH
5 Josi 1860 0.00 KH
6 SuperTramp 1815 0.00 KH
7 fagtri 1623 0.00 KH
8 Ian_Moone 1296 0.00 KH
9 ue7ae 849 0.00 KH
10 RobRoy 345 0.00 KH
11 h4malui 318 0.00 KH
12 novacioni 264 0.00 KH
13 nipester 237 0.00 KH
14 XPMining 192 0.00 KH
15 chris3spice 186 0.00 KH
16 daki 111 0.00 KH
17 czarnicholas2k 72 0.00 KH
18 dim13 69 0.00 KH
19 skippy 69 0.00 KH
20 squeept 66 0.00 KH
. Looks like coinotron's pool is down http://pool-x.eu/net |
|
|
|
Yeah, as you guys said it just doesn't seem right in theory. Whether the CUDA miner or something else needs to be adjusted or re-written for the Kepler architecture is just my guess, it's too bad to not see it mine well.
FWIW, Folding @ Home (Stanford) has also said they have to recompile their program to work with the new architecture. Thus while normally Folding is a strong suit for Nvidia, it also is "broken" on the Kepler cards for the moment.
Might also just need a newer driver. Hopefully if that's the case, Nvidia won't take 3 months to release one. Normally it seems like they get new cards' drivers out very fast (updated ones I mean, rather than the stock). Here's hoping!
Folding @ Home is broken because nVidia broke it. The cards have way less DP/SP floating point performance than a 560 Ti. It's part of nVidia's new tactic of making their lower end architecture useful only for gaming. |
|
|
|
|
I hear it can do quarter miles in like 12 seconds when you put the fins up
|
|
|
|
Try RPCMiner-CUDA with the CUDA dev kit, something doesn't sound right. |
|
|
|
Trade history:
Date Type Price Amount (SC) Total (BTC)
25.03.12 21:13
Sell 0.006901 359.6 2.4815996
25.03.12 21:13
Sell 0.006905 19.0999 0.1318848
25.03.12 21:12
Sell 0.007 8.1 0.0567
25.03.12 21:12
Sell 0.007 143.602 1.005214
25.03.12 21:12
Sell 0.007001 84.1308 0.58899973
25.03.12 21:11
Sell 0.007003 27.9112 0.19546213
25.03.12 19:12
Sell 0.007003 12.9898 0.09096756
25.03.12 19:12
Sell 0.007004 31.4106 0.21999984
25.03.12 18:41
Sell 0.007002 40.1868 0.28138797
25.03.12 18:41
Sell 0.007003 40 0.28012
25.03.12 16:46
Sell 0.007 130.507 0.913549
25.03.12 16:46
Sell 0.007 600 4.2
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.007 225.891 1.581237
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.0075 1000 7.5
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.0075 1000 7.5
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.0075 1000 7.5
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.007514 3000 22.542
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.007518 798.828 6.0055889
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.0076 89.598 0.6809448
25.03.12 16:38
Sell 0.007601 160 1.21616 Solidcoin sees its first real volume in two weeks with a massive dump: http://marketscry.info/?s=scbtc&t=1000The month of March seems to be spelling the death of SC2, with a total volume of only ~45,000 SC2 on BTC-e, most of which were SLC->BTC sell orders. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
