It definitely matters. My nephew (who introduced me to bitcoin) has an IQ of 148 and his life will never be normal.  It seems kinda like a burden. He's always getting pressure from people that want to take advantage of his intelligence. He's smart enough to recognize it though. But, it seems like it would get annoying.

you're using the words matter and mass interchangeably. they are not the same thing.

Matter is any substance made of particles with mass. Mass is a property of matter equal to the ratio of the external force applied to the matter to the acceleration imparted by that force. Mass also is proportional to the total energy content of the matter at rest. Mass and energy are both (related) properties, while matter is a substance. The distinction between properties (like mass, energy, color, momentum) and substances (particles, puppies, blue berry jam) is the subject of much confusion, it seems.

So, even though your logic would be faulty anyways:  energy != matter.

E=MC^2  does NOT mean "energy = matter times the speed of light squared." The M in the equation stands for MASS not MATTER (two completely different things).  I don't know why you brought that up and started talking about the definition of the universe.


This is an example of trying to change the definition of a word.  You lead by giving the correct definition (note it says "matter" and NOT "mass") and then end by changing the definition to YOUR OPINION.

there you go trying to redefine words (universe) again to support your faulty logic.

Lets replace the word universe (noun) with the word toymaker (noun).
your statement becomes:

If the toymaker makes everything, then everything is made OF the toymaker.

NOT

If the toymaker makes everything, then everything is made BY the toymaker

the second sentence is logically sound no matter what noun you replace.

its also funny in your post how you lead with the definition of the word universe and then change the definition to your opinion at the end. 

I'm not going to explain anything to you. I just wanted to see if you were arrogant enough to not admit your faulty logic.

Here's your question with different words:

If everything in this painting is made up of paint, how does a second paint make up this painting?

basically the flaw in your logic comes down to this: the same as != made up of.

If trees are the same as trees, then all trees are made up of the same trees.

You see how stupid that sounds?

idk why you are trying to debate string theory with someone like dank.
anyways, im just curious: is string theory still considered a "theory?"
or is it kinda like the "theory" of evolution? (which isn't really considered a theory anymore among the scientific community)

I'm asking because I honestly do not know and I'm willing to admit that I don't fully understand it.
If it's still just a "theory" then you guys are arguing over an opinion anyways.

rarity, its obvious he's not responding to you because he can't play mary had a little lamb. I have a friend that is like him. He "plays" the guitar by spamming notes and moving his fingers around and he has no clue what its going to sound like.  He can't play the same thing twice and doesn't know what a musical scale is. He doesn't even know the difference between a whole step and a half step. Basically, he has no clue how a guitar even works.

I've heard danks "music." It sounds almost exactly like my friend's.  He obviously has that spam style where you press random things on the guitar not knowing what it's going to sound like.  

This is probably a coincidence, but hes also a lot like dank. He's completely retarded but he thinks he's a genius. He's terrible at everything so he sticks to subjective stuff that can't be measured like art, music, and philosophy.

what? am i seriously the only person that has received his jalapeno?

Please don't give dank more than one question to answer. He will just cherry pick what you said and try to figure out what he can answer. For people like him you have to keep it simple.

Dank, do you see the problem with this logic??  If so, please tell me why. If not, well, you're retarded.  The only way to save face here is to admit that is faulty logic.

Do you really not see a problem with this logic?

you're using spirituality as an excuse for your ignorance.

i really hope you don't represent all kids your age.

you remind me of my peers when I was 15.

You are an example of devolution.

lol

I have learned to listen to my gut and then do the exact opposite of what it said.

YUSS!

i agree. although i think it will be higher than $19 and then there will be a disappointment crash.  then back up again

grr i had a bid placed at 12.6 and it didn't get filled for some reason FUUU GOX  ):

i think this is the bottom of the crash.

well, if they're not cheating they are just very good players. I've had a lot of suspicious hands though. I win on every other poker site, but on SWC i'm down 400btc .    be careful, there are a lot of sharks on SWC.

im not playing there again till Micon gives me my coins back. (kidding. although i HAVE lost 400btc on SWC. there should be some kind of reward for being the biggest loser on the site.)

also, is there some way that you can prove there is no way for you to cheat the system?  like giving you cards you ask for or being able to see everyone's cards and stuff like that?

the bubble will start tonight at $13 and end in January at $35. it will crash all the way to $20 and then start going up slowly again in February. it will be back to $35 by September. after that, there will be a thick bubble of steel.