NO it isn't downloading anything. Turn off your router. Unplug your ethernet. Switch off your cellphone. It will carry on importing from the bootstrap.dat. The 401000 blocks were already downloaded. The rest will need importing from the bootstrap.dat file until it gets to the end (it goes up to block 592000 which was staked on Mon Aug 10 03:44:48 UTC 2015). Then and only then will it attempt to download anything. You'll have 1000 or so blocks left to download by the time it is done. I am Noob at technically of Bitcoin .......
So why are you telling me I'm wrong about the number of blocks in a bootstrap file I created myself? |
|
|
|
earlier today i asked if anyone can tell me where scrypt.cc's khs actually is. so far nobody answered or even saw it i think, i think you are all blinded by greed and wondering your butts off getting your withdraws. I'm gonna give it an other stab: I can't seen to locate the khs or even ghs amount of this website. I read about 850 GH/s somewhere but those are nowhere to be found, so again; what are you guys trading? thin air? who here talking in defense of scrypt.cc has the balls to explain this to me like i'm 5. just show me where its at. If i look at https://www.litecoinpool.org/pools i see there is 13GH/s unknown. so how about it, who's brave enough to explain this? I'll see if I can explain it. The KHS exist only in the hearts and minds of the investors. That's why they don't show up on any list of mining pools, unknown hashrates, etc. |
|
|
|
I made an updated bootstrap.dat file for people having trouble syncing their client.
It goes up to block 592000 which was staked on Mon Aug 10 03:44:48 UTC 2015.
NO it goes up to block 401000 almost 18 weeks ago ..... How big is the file you downloaded? It's meant to be 615,042,865 bytes. I'm not going to download the whole thing to check, but it looks good when I start: I guess it's possible your ISP is caching an old version. Maybe try adding "?no-I-really-mean-it" to the end of the URL: https://s3.amazonaws.com/dooglus/bootstrap.dat?no-I-really-mean-it |
|
|
|
How to import thousands of privkey from blockchain.info to CLAMs wallet-qt ?
No idea for a easy approaching to do that ? I can do that single by single but they are really a lot . it takes a lot time Put them in a file, then: $ cat file | while read key; do clamd importprivkey $key "" false; done |
|
|
|
Can you share some details about the node-install on ubuntu chilly2k? thanks
I built the CLAM client on a new debian machine yesterday. I didn't build the QT client, only clamd, but it was pretty straightforward. I didn't keep a log of everything I did, but it was very close to the following: sudo apt-get install git build-essential libtool autotools-dev autoconf pkg-config libssl-dev libboost-test-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libdb5.3++-dev
git clone https://github.com/nochowderforyou/clams.git
cd clams
git checkout v1.4.16
./autogen.sh
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
cd src
make -j 4 clamd The --with-incompatible-bdb bit is because my wallets were made using a too-new version of BDB. The older recommended version isn't available in the debian repositories as far as I can tell. Edit: doc/build-unix.md tells me that I can get the old 4.8 version if I wanted it: db4.8 packages are available [here](https://launchpad.net/~bitcoin/+archive/bitcoin).
You can add the repository using the following command:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
sudo apt-get update
Ubuntu 12.04 and later have packages for libdb5.1-dev and libdb5.1++-dev,
but using these will break binary wallet compatibility, and is not recommended.
for Debian 7 (Wheezy) and later:
The oldstable repository contains db4.8 packages.
Add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list,
replacing [mirror] with any official debian mirror.
deb http://[mirror]/debian/ oldstable main
To enable the change run
sudo apt-get update
for other Debian & Ubuntu (with ppa):
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev
Edit: extra steps to build the QT client: $ sudo apt-get install libprotobuf-dev libqt5gui5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools protobuf-compiler libqrencode-dev
$ ./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
$ cd src
$ make -j 4 qt/clam-qt |
|
|
|
Is there a tutorial how to setup a CLAM Node with a raspberry Pi ? I sure would like to run a CLAM node.
Not aware of a "guide"; but, there was a user just a few pages back in the forum here who did just that! Maybe, between the two of you, you could get a guide together for the community? can you give a link? I read the last 20 pages but did not find it...  Links: A Raspberry Pi 2 or Odroid C1 costs only $USD 35; either should be able to run clamd. I'm not sure whether the weaker CPUs will make staking more erratic, or it doesn't really matter. (If it does matter - the C1 CPU clocks 60% faster than the Pi2) I have an Odroid C1 right next to me, might try compiling and running clamd for a bit, just out of curiosity.  FWIW, I compiled clam for the Odroid C1 a few hours ago, and it's currently syncing. It did die with a segmentation fault (  ) after syncing a few thousand blocks, but has not skipped a beat since I restarted it. I'm doing a sync from scratch to give it a good workout. The seemingly random segfault bothers me a little. Once fully synced I'll move the db elsewhere temporarily then try another sync from scratch, to see if it dies at the same place. Hopefully it does. [edit: running from a virgin data dir didn't segfault.] I did the consistent experience in a slightly different way. The Odroid C1 only has a local address, with no gateway IP translation, so the only peer it can connect to is my local server. It didn't crash at all during the second sync attempt... hopefully this was an edge case, where a newer block offered by a peer when barely synced caused something obscure to trigger a crash, rather than it being a more "random" event. The client is fully synced now, and I can see it's trying to stake, too. With a relatively fresh deposit of only 108 CLAM it may take a while.  With a "typical" maximum power consumption of only 2.5W - a few dollars worth of electricity per year - this sort of setup could be very handy for someone who doesn't leave their main machine powered on 24/7. |
|
|
|
Any reason onto why?
There's a few reasons I limited the investment:
1) I don't want to hold on to 5k Bitcoin of other peoples money, as mentioned before.
2) I want PRC to bankroll 100% and have no investors but I think it's best to do it in smaller steps so as not to have drastic changes.
3) The biggest concern for potential buyers is "Will the site be as popular without investment", I can get data on that if I bankroll myself.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the answer. I already did that and they were funded at 2014-may-12. Although, there are 7 addresses in the wallet, 5 of them have clams. May that be issue?
That really shouldn't be a problem. We expect to find multiple funded addresses per wallet. You could try using the console in the CLAM client and importing the private keys one by one, although that isn't ideal since you'll potentially miss some funded "change" addresses: Run the LTC client, go to the console, run "dumpprivkey ADDR" for a funded address. Copy the result. Run the CLAM client, go to the console, run "importprivkey KEY import false" where KEY is the thing you copied in the previous step. Repeat for each address. On the last one, write "true" instead of "false" to let it rescan the blockchain. That will take 5 or 10 minutes and will probably make the wallet appear to hang while it runs, but you'll see your 4.6 CLAMs start appearing pretty quickly. |
|
|
|
Clam Client is 100% synced and on both OSX and Linux no luck importing a litecoin wallet.dat into the clamclient. Anyone ever succeeded doing this? Please help...
I never tried, because I know I didn't have any LTC on the date of the snapshot. I do know that people have been able to claim CLAMs from the initial distribution from LTC they held, but I don't know who or how. Could it be that none of the addresses in the wallet you are importing were funded on the date of the snapshot? If there's a specific address that you are sure was funded when LTC block 565693 was mined (2014-May-12 13:06:31) you can check it using the Chat tab on Just-Dice.com. Type "/dig ADDR" without the quotes. Replace ADDR with your LTC address. It will tell you whether the address was actually funded on the date of the snapshot. |
|
|
|
hey everyone, ive been away for a bit, how does the reward system work nowadays?
Staking? It hasn't changed for quite a while now. The network adjusts the difficulty in an attempt to get 1 block staked per minute. That's 1440 per day. Each block awards the staker with 1 new CLAM, plus any transaction fees from the transactions they included in the block. There are something like 650k CLAMs chasing those 1440 blocks per day, meaning there's 450 CLAMs per block per day. So each 450 CLAMs in your wallet can expect to stake about one CLAM per day. With a lot of variance, and quite a wide margin of error. That's roughly 0.2% per day. My working: # blocks per day >>> 60 * 24 1440 # CLAMs per block per day >>> 650e3 / 1440 451.3888888888889 # percentage inflation >>> 100.0 / 450 0.2222222222222222 |
|
|
|
[...] it fell like the luck changed since the server seed change. None of the system that we had used before worked, all goes south quick. I mean look at the site profit, changed from 80-90k to 140+k since the seed change. I don't mean this in any bad way, not critical to the site or your trust. I still like the site and you! But it is like I said before, it's gambling, sooner or later the luck runs out, and it may or may not come back  Hope you got what I was going for OK, thanks for explaining. The server seeds were reset on July 13th, and you're right - that is when the profit bounced off the 1% line and headed moonwards:  It's entirely coincidental, I can assure you. But now at least I know what you were referring to. |
|
|
|
People can now use CLAMspeech to put messages on my website, https://mathgate.info. I'm scanning blocks as they come in to look for transactions sending clams to xMGxkY1RLX69eDrEJCPTEhhSxChraZYjrV. The CLAMspeech part of those transactions are displayed on the pages of the website. More details are here: https://mathgate.info/clamspeech.phpI'd consider it experimental at the moment. When I feel more confident in its stability, I'll make a different thread about it. In the meantime, comments are appreciated. Well, if your comment is that my website looks like it's from 1999, then I've already been told that. I'm more interested in comments about this potential use of CLAMspeech. Even better would be if some of you would try to use it! I initialized the 8 message slots yesterday using a small amount of clams. That's an interesting application for CLAMspeech. It's a transparent way of selling advertising, since the payment and the request are both burned into the blockchain for all to see and verify. Nice work! I was confused at first why some URLs have a grey background and some don't. It turns out your style for visited links is to use a white background so they don't look different than regular text any more - ie. links only look like links until you click them - then they look like regular text. |
|
|
|
It might be greed, but I think me and a lot of other people can vouch that "the luck" have changed drastically since the server seed change ;P But like every gamble site, the luck have to change sometime.  Hi Psy. Can you be more specific about what you mean by saying the luck has changed? The server seed in combination with your client seed pre-determines all your rolls going forwards. Whether you win or lose depends on the change you pick and whether you go hi or lo. The server seed change will have totally changed all of your future rolls, from one infinite unknown list to a different infinite unknown list. Your chances of winning or losing any particular bet weren't changed when the seeds changed. Is that consistent with your view of things? If not, how isn't it? |
|
|
|
I've started to use this [uco ref link] as alternative of Scrypt, any one knows about if is real mining or other Ponzi game?
Well, the front page says "1.8% to 4.2% daily profit" and your post was deleted. So what do you think? |
|
|
|
I still don't think it's provably fair. Machines can calculate these possibilities faster than milliseconds. It's still rigged. There is no luck in gambling world. Any gambling site is provably fair, otherwise they wouldn't make money.
Before attempting to reply to this, are you serious or are you only trying to increase your post count by posting nonsense? Nothing you wrote makes sense but I think it would be a waste of time to try to engage you. Care to prove me wrong? |
|
|
|
The difference between stunna and ryan/doog is that doog and ryan is here all the time , they talk they become friendly they chat , they are like one of us .
Get off my lawn! |
|
|
|
Is there any inverse process to getting server seed from server hash?
I think how it worked was that there was a way to get the same server seed on two accounts. Then you could ask the site to reveal the seed on one account, but not on the other. The revealed seed would be useless on the first account, since the server seed would have been changed, but it would still be active on the 2nd account, and so you could use it to predict all your future rolls. Note that if you don't care about complexity, you can simply hash every possible server seed until you find one that gives the same hash as the site gave you. But there are more possible server seeds than server seed hashes, and so there are many server seeds which hash to the hash you have been given. Once you found a seed that hashes correct (which would take forever), you would then need to verify that it gave you the correct rolls (it almost certainly wouldn't) and so you would have to spend another bunch of lifetimes searching for another candidate. Which also wouldn't work. But in theory it works. |
|
|
|
Updated week-by-week profit stats, for a 1x investor and a 99x investor: 1x
--
Dec 12 2014 0.00% 100.00%
Dec 15 2014 3.64% 103.64%
Dec 22 2014 5.02% 108.85%
Dec 29 2014 2.09% 111.13%
Jan 5 2015 8.16% 120.20%
Jan 12 2015 5.28% 126.55%
Jan 19 2015 3.55% 131.04%
Jan 26 2015 2.10% 133.79%
Feb 2 2015 2.10% 136.60%
Feb 9 2015 1.94% 139.24%
Feb 16 2015 1.93% 141.93% 99x
Feb 23 2015 1.95% 144.70% ---
Mar 2 2015 1.81% 147.32% Mar 7 2015 0.00% 100.00%
Mar 9 2015 1.77% 149.93% Mar 9 2015 0.64% 100.64%
Mar 16 2015 1.73% 152.53% Mar 16 2015 2.53% 103.18%
Mar 23 2015 1.74% 155.18% Mar 23 2015 4.01% 107.32%
Mar 30 2015 1.67% 157.78% Mar 30 2015 2.06% 109.53%
Apr 6 2015 1.65% 160.38% Apr 6 2015 2.51% 112.27%
Apr 13 2015 1.63% 162.99% Apr 13 2015 2.48% 115.05%
Apr 20 2015 1.58% 165.57% Apr 20 2015 1.42% 116.69%
Apr 27 2015 1.64% 168.28% Apr 27 2015 3.43% 120.69%
May 4 2015 1.60% 170.98% May 4 2015 0.52% 121.32%
May 11 2015 1.56% 173.65% May 11 2015 0.94% 122.46%
May 18 2015 1.48% 176.22% May 18 2015 0.37% 122.91%
May 25 2015 1.59% 179.03% May 25 2015 5.65% 129.86%
Jun 1 2015 1.55% 181.81% Jun 1 2015 4.59% 135.83%
Jun 8 2015 1.49% 184.52% Jun 8 2015 4.12% 141.42%
Jun 15 2015 1.41% 187.13% Jun 15 2015 2.00% 144.25%
Jun 22 2015 1.42% 189.78% Jun 22 2015 3.48% 149.28%
Jun 29 2015 1.30% 192.24% Jun 29 2015 -3.45% 144.13%
Jul 6 2015 1.38% 194.90% Jul 6 2015 1.81% 146.73%
Jul 13 2015 1.33% 197.49% Jul 13 2015 0.72% 147.79%
Jul 20 2015 1.42% 200.31% Jul 20 2015 10.40% 163.16%
Jul 27 2015 1.30% 202.90% Jul 27 2015 3.62% 169.07%
Aug 3 2015 1.26% 205.45% Aug 3 2015 2.59% 173.44%
Aug 8 2015 1.03% 207.57% Aug 8 2015 2.17% 177.21% The 2nd column is the weekly profit, and the 3rd column is the cumulative return. |
|
|
|
Person A on DefaultTrust (level 1 or level 2) leaves a -ve feedback on person B. Person B points out that the reason he is entitled with -ve trust is also owned up by others. Person A flat out denies to leave -ve trust to anyone else.
Is it justified for these people to sit on DefaultTrust if they hand out different judgement for same activity ?
There's no requirement for anyone to "judge" everybody. If I leave negative feedback for you but don't leave any feedback for someone doing the exact same thing as you, is that wrong somehow? Maybe I just didn't happen upon the someone else yet. I can't be expected to label everyone - there are just too many of them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
