|
Mixers business is very easy to scam others and for that reason you need to deal with established mixers. I don't know how you guys get those random mixers but I will never trust a random mixer even a mixer that does not have at least over half a decade of experience to be in the business.
Sorry for your loss OP. I wish people would do more research before using a mixer.
|
|
|
|
I think this is the most asked question in the entire planet.
Are you considering the forum is your entire planet? LOL These points have no use for anything except in this forum. poorman1, it seems you had a good start. 2 posts, 2 activities and 2 merits. Not bad. The most important for you right now is to get to know the community instead of asking one line questions if you are really into bitcoin community. |
|
|
|
because the campaign followed by both accounts is 1xBit. I guess there's no need to bother reporting to the bounty manager. there is a high chance that the campaign participants from the scam site are also doing the same behavior with the two accounts.
if you report to the bounty manager I guess you will only get a thank you from the manager. because if you look at the rules in the 1xBit campaign thread, spam, offtopic, and bounty posts are not counted. don't know if burst posting will be counted or not. the most important thing for such a project campaign is quantity, not quality.
When a campaign has 100 posts per week requirement to reach the highest quota of the payment then how would you expect a participant will do their regular posting. The forum became a cash cow for some spammer. Earlier I was calculating one user who may have 5 Hero and above accounts. Each accounts makes them $60 on average will make them $300 per week which is like $1,200 a month LOL |
|
|
|
I can't access directly to this page, I got a warning from my browser.
I can access the page and it looks fresh and clean. The root folder does not have any content but the subdomain. I wonder how much it costs to make such websites and how they start getting traffic in their page within this short time. Surely they invest some money upfront with the time too. If they could use it for good cause then everyone could benefit from it. |
|
|
|
It is, especially creating threads dedicated to a single one unless it's important (like with cryptohunter a few years ago).
Oh my days! Where are those guys right now? See it's the usual thing for the trolls. They will continue trolling and once everyone will stop responding their trolling they will disappear. This BitcoinMoses/digitalmonk and his other accounts are the same. I assume they had an account which considered as their main account. For some reasons DT tagged it and they became angry. These accounts are just the reflection of their anger and they are targeting those users who painted them red for whatever reasons. |
|
|
|
Manchester City going down unexpectedly and fighting back from a goal down to win 2-1.
Few weeks ago I was saying no matter what, City are over 2 goals down against any team then I will bet on City to win or draw. When they were 1 down I was wishing them to to concede another goal so that I can prepare myself to start gambling again LOL. Considering this pattern City are making the bookies broke. In the recent days there were so many matches where City won matches after conceding even two goals. I missed another opportunity to reopen my gambling accounts 😉 Also this might be the year Paris finally gets their champions league title. They invested a lot and still hasnt paid off for them.
PSG always are the rich kid but I do not see they have a record of winning the title yet. |
|
|
|
The problem with secret questions is that the answers aren't very secret. Many passwords (like "123456") have the same problem. If anyone have 123456 as their secret question answer or password then they deserved to be hacked. If you ask them to enter a 12 word phrase then they will go like, 1234 5678 9101 1121 3141 5161 7181 9202 1222 3242 5262 7282 LOL. Let them not owning any online account 😂 but I bet then some people would use their Electrum seed phrase on different websites. As long as the address does not have any balance then it's fine. If the data is encrypted when saving in the database then it should be safer though; even if they have balance. But anyone who will do it they are simply stupid of course. Isn't it annoying every website has their own password requirements? Some have a minimum length, some a maximum. Some require certain characters, others refuse them because their system can't handle it. I always have to adjust the parameters of my randomly generated strong password for each site. I don't know if our password has such requirements but with an over 10 years old SMF software what more you could expect too. 😉 |
|
|
|
[...]
Four Hero, one Legendary five accounts! If the investigation is true then there will be more two to three accounts. Safe to say all together five accounts. $60/w from each account $300/w. On average 25 posts per week. That's 125 posts. It seems better than a full time job. I am not saying it a bad idea but how it's possible? 😂 The forum is a cash cow LOL |
|
|
|
Of course, you could fabricate all this, you could buy followers, buy engagement, and have people face your activity but for 2-3 eth? No, it simply isn't lucrative enough when you can buy low-level hacked accounts for 500-1000 on darkweb. I won't say it's not happening but on a large scale like how those scammers operate it makes little sense.
I am not a social media user. I know they exists and basic functions. I have no idea how it works to get this verified badge things. Sounds like for 2 to 3 ETH it's too much to do. May be these are indeed hacked account. We are hearing this type of things more often since the recent Twitter hack few months ago or last year I think. however, it's still strange to me how everything became so viral because accounts with very little influence were used.
Isn't it how social network works? 2 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 16 and quickly it spreads out all over the internet? |
|
|
|
What is going on? Boring when there are not many goal. In the first half from 14 teams we had only 4 goals. Interestingly none of them are ahead by the half time. There are many people who bets on half time win and if they were like me to go with a wining for an side then he lost all bets LOL I am watching City match. They seems very ineffective against Dortmund on the other hand Dortmund are keeping their mind cool and in fact they are playing better football. Not all bookmakers offer the market option I prefer to use; for example, yesterday's game, I bet on AJAX to make Over 2.5 shots on goal in 90 minutes, but they only managed one shot on goal when I expected at least three. I made the same wager on Bayern and it was a Hit
It's better to have accounts in many platforms so you can take chance of any good opportunity to bet. |
|
|
|
|
OP could have create another account and could make it a legendary account by this time frame without getting noticed by anyone. In an anonymous forum it should not be too hard to stay invisible.
Somewhere I saw few accounts were connected to GreatOrchid. I did not check the credibility but hoping it's not.
Given that this is the only account you have, waiting three and half years to get lifted for a ban and then coming back asking for forgiveness is very rare. It shows the love and passion you have for the account (I am not sure if the passion is same for the community but given the time you waited and coming back it cool).
I think if you should be given a chance.
|
|
|
|
also, reported.
It is interesting that these are verified accounts, at least judging by the badge next to the nickname
It's also interesting that these accounts later claims that they were hacked. Could this be a new way of scamming. Everyone likes easy money and twitter users seems to use it as their greatest tools especially some of these verified accounts where the blue badge surely gives a high peace of mind to the people who are not aware of crypto scamming. |
|
|
|
I don't think this is an alternative DigitalMonk account. But this person has a significant inattention to the rules of the forum, and the text selection is quite annoying. And in addition, I found two of his plagiarisms, which he simply copied without adding a source, and did not contribute a single thought of his own to his copies. I really hope that the moderators will draw the right conclusions.  I don't see any posts from him and he received 5 merits from three users in deleted posts. I am assuming he is already banned from the forum? |
|
|
|
BitcoinMoses (aka DigitalMonk) is just an immature attention-seeking troll or, as someone suggested, a mentally ill person, and nothing more. I was about to link the connection but it seems you already mentioned it. I am thinking that is a public key because it is hexadecimal, I checked for the addresses, the addresses are:
14ceuJoU4CcBo1cM64kPnsrewntqfgYhfu
1dz5xLuKMQFYdCiZ16Pqq1GT7bc3qepnr, compressed.
I know anyone that wants to claim to be Satoshi has to sign a message with his private key, but I just want to ask if this addresses have any link with Satoshi Nakamoto?
Isn't it funny when a random person create an address and tells he is satoshi then everyone starts looking for if he really is satoshi? There are no transaction on that address so far. Satoshi never posted such address anywhere too. If you ask me, this guy is a troll. I don't think he actually wants to get people to believe he is satoshi. I think he is looking for attention. I suggest that you not give him any attention.
He is enjoying the attention from last few weeks. |
|
|
|
|
We are already in problem with Secret Question feature now you are giving us another problem for this security problem 🤣
The recent idea that worked was developed by the person who proposed the change. I am not sure if this can be done in your case. If you can then Theymos will just add the code may be LOL
Anyway, I think staking bitcoin address already mentioned by user TheBeardedBaby is working fine. It used to take long time to recover an account but since the recovery team introduced in the forum it's fairly quicker. At least I can vouch it from my own experience.
|
|
|
|
With their late goal today, Liverpool was fortunate once more. However, my issue is not with Liverpool; rather, it is with Ajax for failing to provide me with at least 3 shots on goal throughout the entire 90 minutes. As a result, I lost 10mbtc tonight. It was a Tuesday for underdogs; let's hope tomorrow is better..
Sorry to hear your loss. What was your bet if okay to know. I had a fairly lucky day yesterday on the pool. Somehow I was favoring Bayern over Barca, it was against my will but it paid off. Looking forward to a good round today. |
|
|
|
I think the game might all just end this way probably goalless too.
Goalless? It ended up with a 2 - 0 both were after 90 minutes LOL This Arthur Gomes was fantastic. He scored the 2nd goal all by his own! Unbelievable speed and technique. |
|
|
|
I would love to see Inter finish at 0 - 2 LOL Tottemham please score. I had 0 - 1 for them but then decided to change it to 1 - 2 win for them. It was not a good decision as of now. Liverpool is terrible, but they will never downgrade the Europa League after a few poor performances.
Yeah terrible but let's hope we come back strong today. I am saving my energy for the match. |
|
|
|
The Pharmacist is an important figure in the forum. I trust him for always standing by his judgement no matter who is involved. He also help good forum users (both newbies and higher ranks) to rank up.
Though you might not like some of his judgements and opinions, but one thing is correct about him, he is very objective. I trust him. Traded my 0.067ish BTC (Value $537.48) for his 2.1 ETH.
Very quick and smooth.
Thank you. Very distinct. The first trust is based on charisma and personality and the second is based on trade or business. Everyone could easily differentiate. The first one is a statement and the 2nd one is a trade feedback. The first one does not need to be a positive feedback but a neutral feedback is more than fine. The 2nd one should be a positive feedback since the experience of the trade was positive. The real question you should ask is: which one of those feedbacks is easier to get?
The first one may take years to achieve. But there are holes. Using the holes a user can gain trust easily. Haven't we seen these trust farmers and trust spammers? The second one also can be earned faster. Someone trading $1 deal with a user can send a positive feedback. The Pharmacist was able to raise a good idea which was discussed here, I think we can reduce these spams if somehow the idea can be implemented. |
|
|
|
It's obvious that the volume they show on system are manipulated. Another theory could be like they have addresses that are not known publicly, so it's hard to find the actual volume from blockchain. Either way, I always have doubt that the exchanges really have the volume that they show on their system. For obvious reason they always show higher numbers in the charts. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
