Since you are so deluded with your own vain words, you will trip yourself up in ways that won't be fun for you. God's protection is leaving you. You are pushing Him away. Change, before there is no turning back for you.

Use the intelligence that God gave you. Dumb nature doesn't make any of the complexity we see in nature. There is no evidence whatsoever that it does. The best that we can do so far is to say that we don't know nature deeply enough to say that nature does or doesn't do any creating.

The complexity in nature makes it evident that there is a God. Why? Like as the machines that people make don't exist without some intelligent person making them, even so the machinery of nature needs a Maker. Because of the great complexity of nature - far beyond anything we can do - the Maker fits the definitions of our word "God."

Sure, stop the slaughter. But don't do it by any kind of force whatever. Such is taking away the freedom of people to use their property as they want. Rather, do it in the court of public opinion. Embarrass the slaughterers. But don't take their freedom away until they start to do it to people.

Having and listening to the moral law, and then going out and disobeying it...

... is worse than not having it and disobeying it.

It is a difficult thing to judge which nation will be destroyed when. But Nebuchadnezzar's dream in Daniel (Bible Old Testament) shows us that all the nations will eventually be destroyed... all nations except one, that is.

According to Daniel's interpretation of the dream, the one great nation of God will become a mountain that will fill the earth. This nation is made up of all who believe in the salvation of Jesus, and maintain their faith by obeying the theme of the law... love. These people will come from and be found in every nation on earth.

Select a hand, or an arm, or an eye, or a brain. Now, make one of these. What? You can't?

Oh, but dumb nature makes them by the millions and billions.

Are you smarter than dumb nature? That stupid rock over there. It can't do anything. It can't even move itself. And it certainly can't think. But it is part of dumb nature that can make all this complex machinery of multitudes of forms of life. And you can't make even one of them. Why, you can't even make a dumb rock!

How dumb are you that you can't even figure out how nature does it? What? You focus on the word "evolution?" Evolution that science can't even show did anything to make life?

You and your stupidity are less that a lump on the side of a log, less than a wart on a toad's nose, that you don't have a clue where all these marvels of machinery in nature came from, but delude yourself into thinking that you are so marvelous.

The real question is not, "Who created the god."

The question is, "Why do people turn their backs on God, Who they know exists and loves them?"

ISIS is a production of some people in the USA government... including Hillary Clinton. They are exactly like what cops would be if they were sent to the Middle East. The only reason cops in America don't act like ISIS is that such action would disrupt the status quo of the money system.

Ask yourself this. If cops were ordered by government to quadruple their violence, would they obey? Or would they risk loss of job and pension and the enjoyment of proving how macho they are?

Come on down to reality, and get yourself a gun.

Yabut, popcorn1 is worse. Look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1592479.msg15998645#msg15998645.

Stop trying to take away the freedom of people to do with their own property what they want. If you don't, you will find that your freedom will be taken away, as well.

As long as Americans go publicly unarmed, they will remain subject to any joker who wants to shoot at them.

Make it a legal requirement that every adult in America must be armed open carry when he is off his residence property and the crime will stop, and all but the daring will stay home at night where they belong.

Neither does real science, nor even the Bible.

Russia and Spain don't even fit in the same category so that you can compare them. Somebody simply read about "Russia's pain in the behind..." somewhere, and moved the "s"  away from Russia and in front of "pain," and then thought they would try to compare the two countries.

In a lunar eclipse, both sun and moon are never in the sky over our heads. Rather, they might be visible at opposite horizons. Often, the moon appears red, because of the way the light penetrates the atmosphere of the earth as it goes on its way towards the moon. This is the same kind of red that gives us our red dawns.

I used to think like, Why don't these flat earth people wake up? But I am beginning to like you guys where you are. Easier to identify that way.

Check out all the silly things cops make people do. Even in the old days... walk that line in the parking lot.

Now days cops often make you submit to fondling of your genitals for no reason at all, even though they act like they have an excuse.

Google "police brutality" to see all the stuff cops make you do. And some of those cops murder people for nothing.

Now, if this was wrong, but it was the standard, then they wouldn't be worse than ISIS. But it isn't supposed to be thee standard in a land where you are innocent (until proven guilty). So cops are way worse than ISIS.

We could get into the various areas of logic about this. The thing to understand is that the topic title is talking about semantics.

Legal language (legalese) is a separate language... in America, anyway. It is the language of government and the courts. It looks like English, and it is similar to English, and within itself it might even be called English, but if you are not a judge or attorney in court, you don't speak or write legalese, even if you write all kinds of court cases and codes and statutes.

The language you are writing and speaking is common language. Some of it is almost exactly the same as legalese, but if you are not an attorney, judge, or other member of the BAR Association, it isn't legal language.

In common language, there are no illegal immigrants. Neither are there any undocumented ones. There is common talk that says there are both. But the talk is only talk, because common law has no authority to make anyone legal or undocumented except that it goes through the legal process.

There is only one way to remain in common law while you use the legal process. That is through the federal (often United States) district courts, which are found in every state. When you present your claim in any of these courts, in the format of "In Jon Doe's (you being Jon) court at such and such federal district court," only then can you operate with any strength at (not in) any of their courts. But you still have to stay in your court, and not give yourself over to their jurisdiction.

You stay in common law by using a jury made up of common people. You never let the judge do any legal prescribing, and certainly not judging. The jury is the judge. The jury is the tribunal. The judge is only a magistrate... a referee.

A guy named Edward Johnston said it like this on facebook, but he probably wasn't saying it legally:
In other words, if you don't give them the authority, you are in common law court, not civil legal court. But they are shrewd. They will pull you into their jurisdiction if they can get away with it.

In case you haven't noticed, over the years the two parties have swapped positions several times. And both have adopted platform points of the other multitudes of times.

The only two differences between the parties are:
1. The names, Democrat, Republican;
2. Some of the points that they have swapped this time around.

The whole thing is about big business and the one-worlders keeping the people so occupied with non-essentials that the people don't see how these behind-the-scenes wealthy are shaping the world.

Are you talking to me? Look at the article I presented about Vancouver. Vancouver is in Canada, right? You boast your Canadianship, right? Now you can afford housing in Vancouver, right?


Poor, little Spoetnik. We all need to be told that we are good. It makes us feel important, maybe even helps us grow, right? But when we continually have to pat ourselves on the back just to feel good about ourselves... because nobody else will do it... there is something wrong there, right? Are you sure you are living in reality? Or is it only your own virtual reality?


I know, I know. The bitterness in your soul has to come out. If it doesn't come out of your mouth (keyboard), you'll simply explode, right?

You pick on Trump because, why? Are you afraid he will eliminate welfare, and that the example he sets will penetrate all the way to Canada, and you will lose you place to live?



Do you have a column somewhere?

Did you have a story about this? If so I didn't read it. Do you have a link? Or are you talking about BTC-e out of Bulgaria?

(Sorry, but with all your emotional rambling between the lines of important stuff, I find it hard to pick out many of your posts that I have patience for, enough to read. I don't mean to insult you with this. It is simply your style and mine don't match.)

Besides, the in-between-company was one of many ideas. How about the following, which has been done, as well: a company that is to Bitcoin as UPMA is to silver and gold - a VISA or Mastercard based on Bitcoin. UPMA isn't working out so well. But Bitcoin people could use a company like this to push Bitcoin, even though they might be interested in fiat for living.