hahaha
da, desio se uspesan merge na Kiln testnet-u, i to je poslednji korak ka merge-u na mainnet-u (bas smo poslednji kripto bilten posvetili tom dogadjaju)
inace, skoro sigurno ce biti deflationary izmedju merge-a i aktivacije shard-inga, jer ce naknade za transakcije biti na slicnom nivou kao sada (mada su u poslednje vreme bas niske), a posle shard-inga najverovatnije nece
Još sam na jednom YouTube videu čuo da validatori neće odmah moći claimati nagrade za stejkanje nakon merge-a nego tek nakon nekoliko mjeseci. |
|
|
|
Nitko nije komentirao (valjda casperBGD spava zimski san  ) da je Ethereum uspješno napravio merge na Kiln testnetu prije par dana (16.3.2022.). Prema CoinDesk članku, to bi trebao biti posljednji testnet prije nego se merge napravi na javnim testnetovima, a pravi merge bi trebai biti negdje u 7. mjesecu ove godine. Nakon što se ETH1 i ETH2 spoje, Ethereum više neće biti PoW nego PoS blockchain, a prema nekim analizama ETH će postati deflationary (ne znam hrvatski izraz  ). |
|
|
|
Kako misliš otkud im toliko love? Pa od svih vas koji imate njihovu karticu i radite stake kod njih. Ugledali su se na banke pa su zaključili da je sve više od 10 posto uložene love previše. Pa neće valjda svi odjednom povući sredstva. Bankama prolazi godinama pa treba probati.
Ne znam. Ja stejkam samo 1000 CRO tokena što je davnih dana bila granica za dobiti Ruby karticu koja ima 2% cashbacka. Ali ne koristim ju. Tokeni stoje i neka stoje jer ako ću ikad htjeti koristiti karticu i cashback, morao bi zaključati puno više tokena. Više se niti ne sjećam koliko. |
|
|
|
Da, točno. Viđao sam njihove reklame još kojekuda po sportskim događanjima. Čovjek se zapita... Otkuda im toliko love za marketing? I što uopće hoće postići s time? Jer reklamiraju se samo na sportskim događanjima. Nisam vidio neku njihovu "nesportsku" reklamu. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think that this kind of things can be seen as bad for Bitcoin or crypto in general. You can't say that fire is bad if you use it in the wrong way (like when someone starts a forest fire). Just like that, no one can't say that crypto is bad because it can be used to avoid sanctions. Besides, "it takes two to tango". In another words, it takes someone who will accept Bitcoin from a sanctioned country and in my opinion that individual is doing the wrong thing.
|
|
|
|
/snip
You're wrong. Learn to admit and move on.
He will never do that. I can't understand why is he so obsessed to convince all of us that we are wrong and that we are giving away our fiat money for nothing. |
|
|
|
Yes they are nonsensical because they misrepresent my position. I literally never said that bitcoin doesn't exist because you can't touch it or feel it.
I said that bitcoin doesn't exist because I checked the Satoshi's system and proved by empirical observation that neither liabilities (to redeem) nor digital products exist there. But just numbers. You can't touch or feel liabilities and digital products but they still exist. It is just that they don't exist in Satoshi's system. So no coins or bit-coins. Coins are tangible items or intangible liabilities. None of that is in Satoshi's system. Just numbers. Numbers are concepts on quantity represented by symbols (0-9). They are neither coins, nor invented by Satoshi.
No, you said simply that Bitcoin doesn't exist and that's it. Bunch of gibberish about why it doesn't exist that doesn't make sense to any of us, only to you. You are constantly saying that Bitcoin must represent something in the real world. IT DOES NOT REPRESENT ANYTHING AND IT DOESN'T HAVE TO IN ORDER FOR IT TO HAVE VALUE! |
|
|
|
Ohh this is very interesting to hear! It felt like that the last halving happened just a few months ago. I remembered checking all of my BTCs and their value skyrocketed since I HODLed most of them. Fortunately and unfortunately, after the halving I cashed out majority of my BTCs and that taught me a valuable lesson to invest long-term and take advantage of its value.
The good thing about halving is that it takes a considerable amount of time for all of the supply of BTC to be circulated. Every halving means that the BTC in circulation would be cut down as its denominations would considerably decrease.
Cashing out in plus is not unfortunate. Sure, now you know that you could have made more money if you didn't cash out. But you couldn't have known that the price will go up. It could have went down and then you would be happy that you cashed out. The only unfortunate thing is if you need to cash out while you are losing. |
|
|
|
|
I saw the news today and it really is a great thing that they will be a sponsor of the FIFA World cup. However, as many of you wrote before me, Crypto.com is already heavy invested into sport. I know that FIFA World cup is probably one of the most watched competition in the world, but is it worth it? Probably every sport fan knows about crypto.com until now because of all other marketing campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Sure, if people repeatedly lie that coin called bitcoin exists then I must repeatedly address their lies. I don't care about their nonsensical analogies with DNS or evolution. The people here are lying and spreading misinformation. That's the point. Hiding behind stupid analogies won't make that lies go away.
A coin, a token, or money in the form of a record is basically a record of liability. Liability of the issuer of the record to redeem it. So, if that guy Satoshi claims that the numbers that his system is writing down are coins than he is actually claiming that someone has the liability to redeem them. Like banks redeem their records via loan repayments, like casinos redeem their records (tokens), like retailers redeem their gift cards, or corporations their bonds. But no entity exists that has the liability to redeem the record next to addresses in Satoshi's system. That's why the records that his system writes down are not coins. They're not bitcoins. They are fake numbers. Any idiot can print numbers, and then claim they are coins, without having any liability to redeem them. That's called a fraud and not a payment system.
No, you are wrong! Analogies with DNS or evolution are not nonsensical because you claim that Bitcoin doesn't exist because you can't touch it or feel it. You can't touch or feel DNS or evolution and yet they exist. How are those analogies nonsensical if they confirm that a thing can exist even if you can't touch it or feel it? |
|
|
|
|
One of the biggest problems when investing in a bear run is selecting which project to invest into because a lot of them won't survive a bear market. Investing in a bull market is pretty easy because in bull everything goes up. However, when the market is bearish, investing in the wrong project can make you lose all your investment.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a little suggestion... Please put links in your post so that users who want to try those services don't have to search for them. As we know, Google search results are filled with scam sites that will steal your crypto in seconds if you visit the wrong site and press the wrong Approve.
|
|
|
|
|
I read the whole discussion since yesterday and all I see that you repeat the same thing all the time - Bitcoin doesn't exist because no one can show it to you. And when someone asks you about other things that do exist (communication protocols or evolution), you ignore the question or just say that you now nothing about that. Just let it go man... All of us here are delusional idiots who believe Bitcoin is something valuable and you are the only one smart enough to see that it's worthless. Is your life mission to save us all from our delusion?
|
|
|
|
Hahah, istina. Al fino ti to zapakiraju - meni je mama bila slala 'vidi kako Modrić zarađuje na Bitcoinu'. Imaju njegove slike, izjave, naravno da mi znamo da je to sve muljaža ali naši starci teško povjeruju da netko tako lako to sve skupa izmisli.
Kad smo već kod toga - to se vrti na Indexu kao plaćene reklame - ona 'obitelj iz Bjelovara zarađuje 80 tisuća eura u 28 minuta' šema. Evo, stvarno ne znam kako je to uopće legalno.
Sve to već izgleda dosta ozbiljnije - recimo, meni jučer stiže mail od Coinbasea vezano za withdraw - stvarno je jako sličan pravome. Da nisam u kriptu par godina, i ja bih možda nasjeo na nešto od toga.
Ma te prevarantske sheme postaju sve sofisticiranije. Nije Index jedini koji tolerira takve reklame koje promoviraju prevare. Neki dan sam čitao da Australija planira ili je već tužila Facebook zbog prevarantskih reklama u kojima slavne ličnosti promoviraju prevare. Pretpostavljam da se radi o istoj vrsti reklama za kakve te pitala mama |
|
|
|
Dakle, Crypto.com jako puno novaca ulaže u marketing. Nakon što su kupili Staples centar u Los Angelesu, danas su objavili da će biti službeni sponzor svjetskog prvenstva u nogometu koje će se krajem ove godine održati u Kataru. Ne znam otkuda im lova za sve to ali svaka popularizacija crypta (pa makar i ovako kroz reklame) je dobrodošla. |
|
|
|
An italian podcaster spent more than one month in El Salvador spending only bitcoin: no usd, no credit cards, only bitcoin, both onchain and LN.
He said that the average people in El Salvador know very little about bitcoin, so I guess this astonishing level of popularity is due to other reasons than our mutual orange friend.
Some of the information on the internet and social media does not match the reality. If the people of El Salvador knew little about bitcoin, the adoption would not be complete. A few months ago when EL Salvador started adopting bitcoin there were a lot of pros and cons, there was a lot of controversy that led to a demo. However, Nayib stuck to the decision to use bitcoin and continued to develop it until he founded a bitcoin mining company using volcanic mountain energy and is currently going to develop Bitcoin City. The problem with people of El Salvador adopting Bitcoin is that for one to do it, he/she needs to be tech savvy. You can't use Bitcoin if you at least never used a mobile phone. I'm not saying that no one in El Salvador doesn't use a mobile phone and I'm sure that in big cities that number is pretty big. But people in rural areas have probably heard about Bitcoin but haven't used it. According to this report (I don't know how trust worthy it is), only half of El Salvador's population uses Internet. |
|
|
|
|
Is the exact number of people that use crypto even important? I think we all can agree with the fact that that number increased significantly in the last two years. I don't know if the pandemic is the reason but it doesn't matter in the end. What matters is that more and more people use crypto and that's what we all want in the end.
|
|
|
|
Kad smo kod scam upozorenja, Danijela Martinović je nedavno na svom instagrma profilu poslala poruku pratiteljima da ne nasjedaju na lažne stranice sa njenim imenom koje pozivaju na ''ulaganje'' u Bitcoin. Podnete su i službene prijave za prevare na internetu, ali sumnjam da policija može tako lako naći one koji odavno prave ovakve lažne profile. Još jedna (anti)reklama za Bitcoin /snip Jadan je onaj koga Danijela Martinović nagovori na ulaganje u Bitcoin. Taj bolje neka odmah pita kome i gdje da pošalje pare koje planira izgubiti pa da je miran. |
|
|
|
So, how much do you pay for using DNS protocols? And how much do you pay for attaching the number "10" to your crypto address in Satoshi's system? Do you now understand the true meaning of the phrase: "Your level of your ignorance is astounding."?
Oh, now it's not the matter of existence, is it? You told me that Bitcoin doesn't exist because you can't show it to someone. We told you that communication protocols like DNS also can't be shown to someone but that doesn't mean they don't exist. Using of DNS protocol is free. But guess what - using of Bitcoin is also free. You have to pay if you want to own Bitcoin, but you don't have to pay to use it. |
|
|
|
Internet is computers and communication protocols. Those exist. Bitcoin is not "used" given it doesn't exist. Numbers are attached to address by Satoshi's system. Attaching numbers is a proof that numbers are attached. Attaching letters is proof that letters are attached. Attaching a picture to a email message is proof that a picture is attached. No bitcoins magically emerge by attaching one thing to another. You believe in some sort of alchemy. Try to use your brains for a second instead of repeating the same nonsense over and over again.
Your level of your ignorance is astounding.
The Internet exists. Okay, I agree. But does the DNS protocol exist? It is also just a collection of numbers attached to addresses by your definition. Denying the use of Bitcoin is the same as denying the use of DNS. Could you please show me the DNS? No? You can't see it, hear it, or touch it, yet it exists and billions of people use it every day. I think he will never admit that he is wrong about the fact that Bitcoin does not exist. He says that Internet is computers and communication protocols. OK, you can see and touch computers. But can you see and touch a communication protocol (like DNS in this example)? If you can't touch it, I guess it doesn't exist so I don't really know how does my computer know what web site to display when I enter bitcointalk.org into the address bar. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
