There's no such technique in playing dice you know? Maybe sleight of hand for the dealer side if you were playing in real casinos, but for players? Both irl and online there's no technique involved whatsoever, it's a game purely reliant on luck. Why do you think it's one of the most staple "gambling games"? If you were looking for techniques your better off finding them at games like poker and blackjack maybe? Those games need you to think quite a bit after all, with a bit of deception on the poker side and memorization on both side.

Congrats OP! Had a pretty good starting point imo and hope that it lasts for at least till the end of the year (aka don't lose your money at the last end of the year). I do wonder how much you lost though for that certain month so that at the very least, other users could understand that whatever happened to you is pretty rare. Some might actually just assume that with equal investments such as yours, they'd be able to get the same amount of money that you actually got.

That's the problem with trying to learn a skill I guess? It's hard to determine whether it's because you want it, or you're in it for the money or both. Honestly, if you have both that would be for the best, and if it's because you want it then money would naturally follow, but if it was the latter? That's the hard part. Realizing you don't have enough "skill" to earn money with it would just lead you to giving up. To make a comparison, it's like an artist that keeps comparing themselves to others with years of experience, and ends up quitting since they have "talent" and he doesn't.

Developing skills takes time. A LOT of time imo. It isn't something that'd pop up just because you started doing it, so persevere since that's the only thing really that could push your skills to the level where it would turn iinto profit.

Does II guess it depends on how the market reacts with the recent panic sells/dump? I'm of the opinion that this month and probably a few more would be used to recover from the recent damages, the duration depends on how much the market is going to dump for this period of time imo. If the damage stops at this point a bullish attitude could still be viewed positively but if not, then I reckon the entire December would be used to recover and the next quarter would be a slow sideways movement. 

Well, most of the time people wouldn't really bother remembering slot provider company names and whatnot, I mean, it's slots, it's a rather basic and simple game that is spread all over the place. Not to mention the number of variations that it has, unlike other games that have unique titles and the like no? I myself have only remembered a few and that was due to me just playing around with what I have and then looking them up. Imagine the regular user that just plays and bets no?

It probably won't go for a cancellation, countries have had good reactions with regards to the new variants even in the past so I reckon they'd also do the same. It might take some time though for the match to actually continue due to it, but hey, at least it should still be possible to be continued.

On that note, I agree with GGG knocking out Murata here. Even with age mattering here, GGG just has that experience and the fists you know? Murata may never have been KO'ed yet, but there's a first for everything no? I want to vote for Murata here but GGG has that oomph still imo.

This is just my personal opinion but doesn't most transactions of casinos come from the majority of the users that aren't VIP level? Plus, even without the consideration of transaction fees, I reckon players would much like to use one that is much easier and faster in terms of transactions (and for the rich people, fees being low should be a kind of plus I suppose?). And having a wide range of cryptos available for that casino invites just that much more number of users, and together with their games, well they have their own solid player base there and then.

Well, that was a dumb reason to be stated as FUD, it's like whoever made it assumed that the person they were trying to scare was as dumb as them. Honestly, I won't deny that there's some part of FUD here with the dip (as always is) but your reason is definitely one of them. Honestly, this dump is just, as others have said, an opportunity to buy more. Bitcoin has so far not disappointed us in the growths that it has experienced over the past years. Just zoom out a bit and that should be proof enough.

Seems like the market is panic selling to me so no amount of supports could stop it imo. The entire market, not just crypto seems to have dropped quite heavily and as such we can probably assume that there's an external factor here at play that is influencing the market as a whole quite negatively. I reckon there's FUD spreading together with some real investors trying to pull out due to some circumstances or news themselves which caused the crashes here and there to actually happen.

Idk, market correction, the fear of new variant, government issue stuff, isn't it the usual? And most of the altcoins follow Bitcoin when it dips so it isn't anything new. If you were a long-time hodler as others have said, Bitcoin dipping by this small bit wouldn't really matter. Now if you're a new hodler, then I suggest just gritting your teeth and keep on hodling, it will turn better, just not now imo. If it were really about the new variant, then it should be temporary, just like what happpened when covid was first introduced into the world back then.

Not familiar with it (kahit na ang tagal ko na gumagamit ng meta) for some reason. Meron bang deposit function ang meta? Alam ko diretso send na lang sa address ng metamask mo kung saan siya originally manggagaling eh though in this case ang tamang gawin dapat is instead ay withdrawal at hindi deposit?

Tulad ng sabi ng iba, mataas talaga ang fees ng ETH so di talaga recommended, and di talaga maganda na pang transfer yung ETH sa tingin ko lalo na sa coins. May experience ako transfer from metamask to coins at binance to coins. Nung nagka binance ako XRP ko na lang pinapadala lagi para medyo mas mura fee kung ikukumpara mo sa ETH.

I hardly think so. Slots is a pretty basic game with it's simple mechanics and rules, and that's probably why it's one of the most staple games out there that most people play. It's simple, so everyone likes it, kind of like how plants vs zombies and other types of puzzle (or any type of game really) are enjoyed by the vast majority of people. Losing that would most likely branch out the game to a separate type, making it ultimately not a "slot" game anymore imo. Honestly even without change, It won't lose it's fan base, at least not any time sooner imo.

To probably not do it? Kidding aside, it has made me realize the value of money and the fact that trading kills you of your wallet quite fast. I've learned how to manage my losses and how to allocate my budget for my assets as well as how to manage them properly (I hope I am doing this properly). Pretty much learned all the hard facts about trading and about losing money. I've long left trading and just started hodling since, after almost a year of trading, I already realized it wasn't for me.

But tax evasion has been a thing prior to Bitcoin's existence though? It's not like it's a magical action that suddenly became possible due to Bitcoin being created. Tax evasion is an activity that's done by someone, not by something. So blaming Bitcoin is rather stupid really, not to mention that there's no central existence that governs over it. Besides, most countries are now making proper regulations with regards to crypto so I don't think tax evasion using it would be that rampart, especially since most exchanges require KYC now adays.

It's rather self-explanatory though? Free spins are well, free spins that are probably locked by the casino where the user has to spend x amount to actually claim it. Spend maybe $30-$40 before a user is able to claim it and the like. Wagering is pretty much the same, it lets the user play something for free without the risk of losing something on his side, or offering something to be able to play. Though i think wagering can be used for other types of games, not just spins.

Or, it may not actually be Free wagering but rather no wager requirements? Simply means that users could withdraw their winnings without any requirements whatsoever (the lock I said earlier about having to spend x amount is an example).

Hmm, no KYC is very much appreciated but I highly doubt it would last that long since you're gonna get your license either way. Good customer support is always necessary, just keep live support on most of the time and answers most questions and queries that users have and that'd be good to go. And Any games would do as long as they're provably fair imo. Honestly the hard part in making a new casino is spreading it's name and letting users know that it exists, so really, good luck with that since you have a lot of competition out there.

I don't think there's a trading knowledge that could take you to the next level? All trades are, in a sense, of the same level really. It's just a matter of how much you can actually expect the market to move towards which side. Maybe the next level you're talking about is that? That's just honestly collecting info about the market, analyzing them, and then creating an assumption based on that. An assumption, nothing more, nothing else. Honestly just keep doing what you're doing, losing money is always expected in trading, nothing unexpected.

You'd probably have to find a new one for those types of coins. Most coins that are of those types have been pretty much pumped already and it's rather scary to invest in it more since you never know when it could dump. Both are still good imo but it's just a matter of finding an actual coin that would let you profit. I'd suggest looking for some of the coins that dipped, (most of them did actually) and probably invest in a few of them? I hardly doubt you'd get a lot though since it'd be hard to go past their peak in a short amount of time.

I personally don't'. I've profited more than enough by taking advantage of the BItcoin's naturally increasing price over time, so I didn't think that I'd still need to stake my coin. Not to mention as others have said, the threat of your assets not being on your own care is enough to actually consider why you shouldn't actually stake your coins. If we were talking about solely staking, I'd go for something else instead of Bitcoin. Bitcoin price volatility is enough to profit, and that little profit you can get from staking it isn't enough imo.

Looks more like wishful thinking (like I did) than a proper analysis tbh. Honestly, it doesn't look like the market is just going to do anything, more sideways movement is what I'd expect as usual. Well not that it matters to me really, go up or down, I'm still gonna hodl for a couple more years. Side if we just zoomed out, you can always see Bitcoin going up. It's just a matter of "when" exactly. So really, I don't think it matters that much if you're in the hodl cult, if you're not, well good luck watching the market daily.