Fakery can not be confirmed or explained as truth, no matter how hard you try or desire in your mind. Now go and search Nasa live earth footage, and then compare their ridiculous cgi footage to real balloon one. Search on YouTube:flat earth balloon footage. Come here and tell me if you see a ball, satellites, rotating, spinning and wobbling ball...crap. Nasa have been exposed with fake moon landings, bubbles in space, transparent fraud astro-nots and many more fakes. Their fairy-tale of "universe" is to destroy the reality of a Creator and make humans feel like random accidentally, small and unimportant specks of dust. You can't fly with no air. And air is diluted water. Earth was formed out of water. You are living in created environment called plane earth under the dome with water below and above. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUFvtVdYkqI The water canopy that formerly covered the earth, was destroyed in the Great Flood of Noah's day. This was the starting time of the formation of C-14 in the atmosphere, because there was no water canopy protecting the earth from cosmic radiation anymore. The radiation from outer space gradually filled the earth, corrupting the DNA of people, so that people gradually had more and more genetic anomalies in their bodies. This reduce their age from hundreds of years per person to that which we see today. The earth is not flat and never was. The stars are great monsters off in distant space, similar to what cosmologists suggest. Yet again you are completely misguided. The firmament is solid and can't be destroyed by any natural force. This verse is after the flood, can you read, can you cope? Psa 148:3,4 Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light. Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. Stupid nasa was thinking that they will be able to destroy the firmament in operation fishbowl, firing nuclear missiles up to 480miles high. It is all documented you can learn for yourself. If nasa would read the Creator's manual, they could learn that the dome can not be destroyed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkujMTSFr9oThe people of the earth before the telescope didn't really understand outer space. Where do the heavens start? Don't they start at the ground and spread upwards? Because of this, the heavens can be interpreted in the minds of the ancient peoples to fit everything above the ground. Just because they didn't know that the heavens extends beyond the air, doesn't mean that it doesn't. The waters above the air heavens is what they were thinking about, not the waters above the outer space heavens. However, spectroscopy of the heavens shows us that there is water at the far distant reaches of outer space.
|
|
|
How old do you think Earth is? Why?
I think nobody can answer this question correctly. Scientists use Radiometric dating and they believe they are pretty accurate in their calculations, but what if the speed of the radioactive decay was different say 5 thousand years ago than it is now? There are a great many ways to estimate age of planetary bodies, not just radioactive decay. The speed of light is something to consider. If, say the earth was 6000 years old, the universe would have no stars farther away than 6000 light years. And new ones beyond that would be popping into existence all the time, as the sphere expanded. That's not what's happening. The light from some stars has traveled a billion years to get to us. Even Big Bang Theory suggests holes in the light distance thing listed above. Nobody knows what happened scientifically in the creation 6,200 years ago or so. If you see a wall of solid concrete, but never saw a cement truck, or saw one dump concrete, you might have all kinds of suggestions and theories about how that wall got there.
|
|
|
They didnt used the c-14 method.
To find out the age of earth they determined the amount of PB which was created due the radio active decay of Uranium in meteorites that felt down on earth.
Meteorites that didnt change since 4.5 billion years except for the radio active decay of the chemical elements.
The meteorites were meteors before they changed. Then they changed and became meteorites as they fell to earth. Nobody knows what they were while they were still meteors. Why not? Because nobody was up there to analyze them enough to know. It's all ASSUMPTION. If there is any real meteor science, there is extremely little of it. The thing to do would be to go out there in a space plane, grab a meteor, analyze it as best possible, attach super-heat-resistant monitors to it, and dump it onto the earth at speeds and vectors that it would have had if it had hit earth on its own. Then we might have some scientific knowledge about meteors... at least one of them. And that is just the beginning. The popular scientific age of the earth is all assumptions. And the wild guess of goat herders from the iron age with no education what so ever is so much better.. Don't know what goat herders have to say, but Moses' info about what to write, directly from God, is the best we have.
|
|
|
<>
Nobody can take your fun memories of enjoying your life instead of working hard to buy then protect your stuff.
Alzheimer's.
|
|
|
Embryonic gene Nanog reverses aging in adult stem cellsThe fountain of youth may reside in an embryonic stem cell gene named Nanog.
In a series of experiments at the University at Buffalo, the gene kicked into action dormant cellular processes that are key to preventing weak bones, clogged arteries and other telltale signs of growing old.
The findings, published June 29 in the journal Stem Cells, also show promise in counteracting premature aging disorders such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome.
"Our research into Nanog is helping us to better understand the process of aging and ultimately how to reverse it," says Stelios T. Andreadis, PhD, professor and chair of the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the UB School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and the study's lead author.
Additional authors come from UB's Department of Biomedical Engineering, a joint program between UB's engineering school and the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at UB, and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo. Read more at https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160725151241.htm.
|
|
|
Democrats Nominate Clinton Crime Family for a 2nd Co-PresidencyDemocrats Nominate Clinton Crime Family for a 2nd Co-Presidency
by Stephen Lendman
Bill Clinton once bragged about electing him president meant getting "two for the price of one."
Here we go again. Exposed electoral rigging along with unelected party insider super-delegates handed the Clinton crime family another chance for the nation's highest office.
Will November electoral rigging assure it, letting both legally challenged Clintons lead America - perhaps into the abyss if occurs?
Sanders capped his sellout to everything he campaigned against, urging Hillary be nominated by acclamation. In disgust, over 500 of his delegates walked out.
He transformed himself into Hillary's puppet, a caricature of what he claims to be, a Judas goat leading followers astray, urging them to betray their principles and honor like he did - a despicable scoundrel selling out to wealth and power like all the rest.
Tuesday was a night of infamy, a time for national mourning - fascism on steroids emerging triumphant. All-out activism against a corrupted system is crucial.
The alternative is a nation more unsafe and unfit to live in than ever, Wall Street and war-profiteers more greatly empowered, neoserfdom for ordinary people, and the unthinkable risk of WW III with nuclear weapons able to end life on earth.
That's what "two for the price of one" emerging triumphant in November means. Defeating the Clinton crime family is vital.
Late in my life, I fear for young people, unable to have the advantages I had growing up. It was a different time.
An inner city kid with nothing going for me had opportunities unavailable today. Permanent wars, neoliberal harshness and police state terror turned America into humanity's scourge.
A neocon-run nation bent on global conquest and domination at any cost risks dystopian harshness for everyone but America's privileged class if we survive their onslaught.
The unacceptable danger of a 2nd Clinton crime family presidency is explained by Hillary once saying "(w)hat do we have NATO for if not to defend our way of life" - code language for endless wars of aggression, benefitting privileged Americans exclusively, no matter the cost to humanity.
Straightaway post-9/11, she urged waging war on terror - a pretext for forcefully transforming all sovereign independent nations into US vassal states.
She threatened Iran with total "obliterat(ion) (if they) consider(ed) launching an attack on Israel…"
As me-first lady, she supported genocidal sanctions on Iraq, killing 5,000 children aged five or under monthly. She praised George Bush's Islamophobia, fully supporting his agenda.
She favors nuclear weapons use, calling them peacekeeping deterrents. As secretary of state, she orchestrated war on Libya and Syria, raping and destroying both countries.
US foreign policy under her leadership ousted democratically elected Honduran and Paraguayan leaders. Following Haiti's devastating 2010 earthquake, she was involved in raping the country for profit along with rigging its election, installing a US puppet to run things.
The Clinton Foundation is a money-laundering self-enrichment racket masquerading as a charitable NGO - selling influence to special interests in return for millions of dollars in contributions.
It's hard imagining a more despicable choice for president than Killary - partnered with husband Bill for a second time around to run the country into the ground - likely taking planet earth with it this time if elected in November.
Top priority is preventing their return to the White House. Humanity's fate hangs in the balance. Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/201053-2016-07-27-democrats-nominate-clinton-crime-family-for-a-2nd-co-presidency.htm.
|
|
|
Gun Control Works! Knife Wielding Man Kills 19 in JapanThey say that if only we'd give up our right to own firearms, we'd be almost completely free from gun related crimes. The murder rate would drop, and more importantly, mass shootings would become a thing of the past.
To some extent they are correct. If you live in a developed country with strict gun laws, you won't see very many crimes committed with guns. Although it's important to remember that in contrast, developing countries with strict gun laws usually see the opposite effect. Countries like Mexico, where buying a gun legally is difficult, often have an abundance of gun related crimes (as well as ordinary crimes).
But in theory it should work right? If you live in a stable, wealthy nation with a functional police force, gun control should be effective (though whether or not it would prevent violent crimes that aren't gun related, is debatable). Read more at http://www.thedailysheeple.com/gun-control-works-knife-wielding-man-kills-19-in-japan_072016.
|
|
|
<>
Look at all of the hassle you have gone through just to own one thing.
It is the same with everything you own. You are constantly protecting it from being taken.
<> And worst of all, you are spending this stuff you want to protect, to buy the protection to protect it. What a vicious cycle!
|
|
|
The Flying ClintonsThey are headed for their own Watergate, and it would be a pity to see the drama aborted. I'm only moderately vindictive: I want them hounded out of office, not hounded after they've already left.
This is getting good. As I write, Bill's old pal Bruce Lindsey* has been named an unindicted co-conspirator in the latest federal trial of the Arkansas mob. The Republicans want the special prosecutor to investigate three Clinton associates who may have perjured themselves before the Senate Whitewater Committee.
Both Clintons are under fire for the abuse of FBI files, a new scandal that has turned over several interesting rocks and revealed unsuspected dimensions of skullduggery: the thuggish Craig Livingstone, who was in charge of the file operation against the Clintons' enemies, is a character right out of the 1972 Nixon reelection campaign. He also turns out to be close to Hillary, and even helped clean out Vince Foster's office after his death. The Clintons' original story of "an innocent bureaucratic mistake" with the files has been exposed as a lie covering up something far more sinister. Every week brings a damaging revelation. Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/07/joseph-sobran/flying-clintons/.
|
|
|
Trump Enrages the War PartyThis election season is so much fun because Donald Trump keeps enraging all the right people – and his timing is perfect. Just as the Republican convention was at its height, with his running mate up there on the podium perorating about the alleged threat of Vladimir Putin, along comes Donald with an interview in the New York Times that has the War Party yelling and screaming bloody murder. The head of NATO; the foreign policy pundits; even some alleged "non-interventionists" – they're all aghast that Trump is questioning the supposedly sacred tripwires that commit us to going to war if Lower Slobbovia invades Upper Slobbovia.
It started with this article, in which Trump's views on NATO, the Turkey coup, and other matters were summarized, but it caused such a commotion that the Times published the entire interview, and it is really a sight to see – good news for us anti-interventionists, and very bad news for the internationalists, i.e. the entire foreign policy Establishment.
It starts off with Times reporter David Sanger trying to bait him into attacking Paul Ryan, who, he says, "presented a much more traditional Republican, engaged internationalist view of the world." Sanger reminds him of his previous comments on NATO: that our shiftless "allies" need to start paying their fair share of the costs of the alliance. Sanger adds in Korea and Japan, and ask: what if they won't pay? What then?
Trump's answer is vintage Trump: "Then yes, I would be absolutely prepared to tell those countries, 'Congratulations, you will be defending yourself.'" Read more at http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/07/21/trump-enrages-war-party/.
|
|
|
Interesting.. got part way through it and it sounds like reasonable science to me. Not crazy conspiracy talk.. I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X. It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved" AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions) We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery. Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory. Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light) AKA: guessing. And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that. It's the floor science stands on.. level one ! So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say. This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade. We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years. Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center. Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE ! But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed ! And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole. Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown. So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other When BOTH used the same testing methodology ! So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC ! In case you all got lost why i just posted that.. I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology. That is what all this space science stuff boils down to. THAT is what you have to look at closely.. Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES ! But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong. Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty You have to tread lightly with Space discovery.. We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots. So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things. Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-systemTHAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea. jokes going to be on them if they laughed at it. there is almost certainly a planet out there from what iv read about it anyway. IMO people are skeptical because people keep calling it planet X and people relate "planet x" to doomsday prophecy's. call it planet 9 or something lol. True. Think of what it would be like if we lived on a flat earth in a black hole.
|
|
|
Scientists have calculated that Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.
still here is no conformation about this, the scientist are still confused about this. they are giving different ideas and figure about the age of the world. i think that is only Allah who know the real age of the earth and only he can know the ending date of the Earth. Appeal to ignorance and putting therefore it is god. Remove your head out of your ass to avoid thinking this poorly. If you think science confuse you then don't use the things that scientist made and discovered, go back in stone age life. Nobody has to talk about God to see that the scientists who calculate the age of the earth constantly use limiting words as disclaimers so that they can protect themselves from libel. This is the way they tell us, themselves, that they don't know that what they are telling us is factual. Scientist may not tell the absolute truth but they can tell part of it and it means to us. I believe in scientist because unlike religion claiming certaing things, they claim a certain fact by observing and gathering data. It means it was scrutinized before presented as fact. For example. Scientists can tell the truth of the half-life of C-14. Because of this, if the C-14 creation rate in the atmosphere was always the same as it is now, scientists could accurately date things. The point is, scientists don't know if the C-14 creation rate was always the same. In fact, they don't know if there was any C-14 created in the atmosphere at all beyond about 5,000 years ago. So, we don't need all the examples of carbon dating inaccuracies that abound right now. We can see that nobody knows the truth using scientific means. EDIT: If this was all, we could say that science simply made a mistake. But the fact that they don't tell you that they don't know, shows that they are deceptive, and shouldn't be believed without personal examination of EVERYTHING that they say. It could be a foundation to base things, even though they might be wrong then what's wrong with that? As long as they are changeable it will never be a big deal. If they see something that is a mistake they can easily remove that data and look for another, scientist are doing trial and error until they get things that may suit things right. The thing that is basically wrong with it doesn't have anything to do with scientific discovery and examination. The thing that is wrong is that we are being lied to (not necessarily by the scientists themselves). We are being told that this or that is the scientific truth, when much of the time the scientific truth is not known. Lying to people is wrong.
|
|
|
They didnt used the c-14 method.
To find out the age of earth they determined the amount of PB which was created due the radio active decay of Uranium in meteorites that felt down on earth.
Meteorites that didnt change since 4.5 billion years except for the radio active decay of the chemical elements.
The meteorites were meteors before they changed. Then they changed and became meteorites as they fell to earth. Nobody knows what they were while they were still meteors. Why not? Because nobody was up there to analyze them enough to know. It's all ASSUMPTION. If there is any real meteor science, there is extremely little of it. The thing to do would be to go out there in a space plane, grab a meteor, analyze it as best possible, attach super-heat-resistant monitors to it, and dump it onto the earth at speeds and vectors that it would have had if it had hit earth on its own. Then we might have some scientific knowledge about meteors... at least one of them. And that is just the beginning. The popular scientific age of the earth is all assumptions.
|
|
|
I voted the individual must solve it and many agreed on my vote,individuals made a lot of contribution to the global warming because of their actions that can harm the planet,if all individuals are mindful of the effects,each one will do action to save this planet..
That is good. Last time I checked the thread the people "No nothing can be done" were leading this poll. Looks like the world friendly people finally woke up. People can grunt until they are blue in the face. But if the planet decides to further pangea, or to reverse pangea, all the grunting in the world isn't going to change things. Besides, one good volcanic "burp" spews out way more stuff in favor of global warming - or against it - than all the pollution of mankind could think of doing over all time. I disagree with you. Vylkany not so often wake up, for that would have a global impact on the atmosphere of our planet. A man once came as a species until the last vremyani only and does harm "his house." And if this continues for many more vremyani. The planet may die. And with it, and all living beings. Including people. Since you talk about Vylkany and vremyani, which one are you? Or are you both or neither? You are correct, however, I think. If enough of mankind really wanted to destroy the earth, they might be able to build enough hydrogen bombs to actually do it. But since nobody really wants to destroy earth, and since people are simply trying to live and make money, they won't do it by accident.
|
|
|
Fakery can not be confirmed or explained as truth, no matter how hard you try or desire in your mind. Now go and search Nasa live earth footage, and then compare their ridiculous cgi footage to real balloon one. Search on YouTube:flat earth balloon footage. Come here and tell me if you see a ball, satellites, rotating, spinning and wobbling ball...crap. Nasa have been exposed with fake moon landings, bubbles in space, transparent fraud astro-nots and many more fakes. Their fairy-tale of "universe" is to destroy the reality of a Creator and make humans feel like random accidentally, small and unimportant specks of dust. You can't fly with no air. And air is diluted water. Earth was formed out of water. You are living in created environment called plane earth under the dome with water below and above. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUFvtVdYkqI The water canopy that formerly covered the earth, was destroyed in the Great Flood of Noah's day. This was the starting time of the formation of C-14 in the atmosphere, because there was no water canopy protecting the earth from cosmic radiation anymore. The radiation from outer space gradually filled the earth, corrupting the DNA of people, so that people gradually had more and more genetic anomalies in their bodies. This reduce their age from hundreds of years per person to that which we see today. The earth is not flat and never was. The stars are great monsters off in distant space, similar to what cosmologists suggest. There's no outer-space, stars aren't great balls of fire billions of miles away. You're a moron for believing the pictures and lies NASA feeds you. If you rearrange the letters it spells SATAN (using the forked tongue as the T) for God's sake. I admire your faith. At times you express your faith to be in the things of the Bible, at least somewhat. In this religion of yours, keep on believing in Jesus salvation. It will be fun chatting in Heaven.
|
|
|
Lightweight metal foam turns armor-piercing bullets into dustLast year we saw researchers adapt these lightweight materials to stop various forms of radiation in their tracks, and now the same team has ramped things up to offer protection from something with a bit more force: an armour-piercing bullet, which was turned to dust on impact.
In its most simple form, foam metal is made by bubbling gas through molten metal to form a frothy mixture which then sets as a lightweight matrix. This leaves a material that offers a lighter alternative to conventional metals, while still maintaining a comparable strength.
Afsaneh Rabiei, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at North Carolina State University, last year produced a foam metal shield that could block X-rays, various forms of gamma rays and neutron radiation, giving it potential as a lightweight alternative to the bulky radiation shielding currently available.
Read more at http://www.gizmag.com/metal-foam-bullets/42731/.
|
|
|
|