My point was to answer your question: In my opinion, 719.000/31days ~ 23.000 visits a day means that 1xbit is a quite big casino.
Not really, compared to other casinos. In my opinion, 11 million visits a month is a big casino, 3 million a month is a big casino, and even 2 million ... but not 719K visits. Furthermore, as noorman0 replied to you a few months ago, half of this number of visits are just ad displays, not actual visitors. Compare that to other casinos. Since I was curious, I checked on the statistics site. You're a little bit right about the number, but that doesn't mean it's completely customers, just ads displays. Previously, read about what "Display" traffic mean here.  source: https://www.similarweb.com/website/1xbit.com/#overview<...> So as you can see from the above, your argument is wrong. Do you have any other metrics that we can analyze in more detail?
<...>
Trust summary for Naficopa:| | DarkStar_ | | 2020-03-19 | | Reference | | Account likely used to shill for Malubit. Take any posts at Malubit's defense with a grain of salt. | | | suchmoon | | 2019-12-24 | | | | Promotes Yobit's "10% daily" scam. |
And now you have found a new scam to promote? Good for you. Who gives a damn whether 1xbit is scamming their users; what matters is that you get your dollar every week, right? |
|
|
|
Such an accusation against such a large casino like 1xbit is pointless! These amounts do not cover even part of the costs of a signature campaign.. Come on!
How do you define a large casino? There is no concrete evidence to suggest that they have a large number of active players. You can check the number of visits on 1xbit.com in publicly available sources and compare it to other top casinos. I just did, according to a similarweb.com, 1xbit had 719K visits in December. Let's compare that with some of the top respectable casinos here: stake.com - 11.4 million roobet.com - 3.3 million sportsbet.io - 2.9 million rollbit.com - 1.2 million duelbits.com - 1.8 million So what exactly was your point? Besides, if you check the statistics for yourself, you will notice that the number of visits on 1xbit is decreasing from month to month, which confirms my claim that all their efforts here are futile. No one on this forum is crazy enough to risk being scammed.  But it doesn't matter. What matters is that despite their efforts, there won't be any results from this forum. You keep asking for a scam accusation with a deposit of more than $1000, but can you show us at least one positive review with a withdrawal of more than $1000?
Could you please tell me what evidence would be credible and satisfactory enough for you? (I am asking this because I am afraid that whatever I present, you will try to undermine it anyway, and I would like to avoid misunderstandings.) Deposit - Play - Withdraw winnings - Show proof. It couldn't be simpler than that. If you're so confident in the casino you're promoting, then you have nothing to fear. |
|
|
|
Such an accusation against such a large casino like 1xbit is pointless! These amounts do not cover even part of the costs of a signature campaign.. Come on!
How do you define a large casino? There is no concrete evidence to suggest that they have a large number of active players. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that despite their efforts, there won't be any results from this forum. You keep asking for a scam accusation with a deposit of more than $1000, but can you show us at least one positive review with a withdrawal of more than $1000? |
|
|
|
<...> Although it probably won't change anything anyway, because you will say that 1xbit paid me for that and I'm lying .. so what's the difference?
Why the presumption? Did I ever tell you that you're lying? As I have said before: Don't assume anything. If you have this type of evidence, you should publish it. It will give your claims more credibility, whether people believe it or not. As you can see, having evidence from one side only is not good. 1xBIT doesn't provide any. This is why I am more inclined to believe accusers who attach screenshots and account IDs.
We had this discussion some months ago. You still haven't provided any evidence for your claims. |
|
|
|
They are using blockchain to protect our information, <...>
Could you please elaborate on that? How exactly do they use Blockchain to protect our information? |
|
|
|
I've been a member of 1xbit's signature campaign for a long time, and they've always paid me every week with no issues. They also spend a lot of money on that. Complaints about sites come and go, that's how it is with every site. 1xbit has a very big budget, if they pay a lot to a campaign why wouldn't they pay players? After all, satisfied customers always come back.
What does this have to do with the fact that they are scamming their players? Just because they have a signature campaign here doesn't necessarily mean they are honest casino. If you're so confident in their credibility, why don't you deposit your money there and see what happens? |
|
|
|
Being a good user is the goal of every member who joins this forum. Not only here, everywhere there will always be certain rules that must be respected.
Sadly, no. Many members come to this forum to scam, cheat, or do something else even more nefarious. Not only here, but in other forums and social networks on the Internet as well. That's why it's important to always use caution and have as much information on a person as possible before trusting or dealing with them. I do not understand your accusation, above I have clearly explained, this topic I took with the approval of the original owner.
It wasn't an accusation against you. You got it wrong. |
|
|
|
I miss the free WoF spin deposit bonus,Freebitco.in used to have such bonuses quite a lot but now I have not seen it running anymore.They used in the beginning to accept any deposit even just 1 satoshi and to give 10 WoF spin for such deposit and later on they made this as a minimum to depoist 3000 or 30000 Satoshi,I don't remember correctly.
Are there any plans we will see it again in the near future?
No. It was very heavily abused by people just depositing and withdrawing the same coin over and over again and breaking deposits up into lots of small ones so it will not be coming back. Why not set a minimum deposit and only give the bonus once per promotion? The introduction of a minimum deposit may not be good for all existing users who are already used to depositing any amount. Besides, what will happen to deposits that are less than the minimum amount? However, setting a minimum deposit amount that would qualify for promotion could be a good policy to enforce. |
|
|
|
This is the opportunity that a lot of people are waiting for. Remember, when btc hit 60k, a lot were thinking that they should have bought btc when it was still in the 30Ks, 40Ks. or 50Ks. So why not buy now when btc is still down or regret again once btc starts going up. Or people are holding off because they are thinking that it may go down further? But no one can tell us what will happen next. So maybe, if you can afford to invest, what you can do, is invest in this price range, and invest again, once it goes down again. That is my strategy. But all up to the user what he will do with his funds though.
This is exactly what I have been telling my colleagues all along. Buy when there is blood on the streets. Let's see what happens, you know, things go in waves and I think this is the beginning of a wave right now. My advice is to buy and be patient. Btc price could go up and go down but that is the market. If you want in, I think now is a good time. If you want out, my advice is stay. |
|
|
|
<...>
Has anyone participating in the signature campaign tried to create an account and play on this site to test?
I'd bet neither one of them. I checked some of the addresses from 1xbet campaign participants, and some of them are holding coins, while others (most of them) send coins to the coins.ph exchange, but none of them have made any deposit on 1xbet wallets. Ever. So much for having confidence in the casino they promote. |
|
|
|
Hhampuz has accepted 1 hero member (igehhh) for the opened position of the signature campaign of "FreeBitco.in Signature Campaign | Sr./Hero/Legendary |". So now the project is once again closed for new participant. So, it should be now CFNP instead of OFNP.
igehhh previously participated in the Roobet signature campaign. Now that he has been accepted into the new campaign, I imagine he will vacate one position in the Roobet campaign. Judging by the spreadsheed, I think it will be a Full Member position, but we will learn more about it from the manager soon. |
|
|
|
So, I have a question here, if you are earning like $2000 a month, how much are you willing to gamble that you think you can afford to lose?
Please use the amount as a basis for your answer.
The amount of money I spend on gambling will largely depend on how much I need to cover my living expenses each month. Generally speaking, I never spend more than 10% of my total income on gambling each month. I know that doesn't seem like a lot. And, believe me, I'm not saying that 10% is a safe amount. The important thing is to consider the total cost of your gambling habit before you make a decision. The reason I don't want to risk more money on gambling is that, in case I lose, I'd have to cut back on some lifestyle expenses. And that is definitely not something I want to do. |
|
|
|
agreed! will be starting with Hhampuz soon  Signature campaigns definitely spread awareness about the gambling platform, especially if they are managed by a well-known and respected campaign managers, and Hhampuz is probably the most popular one that I have come across. In case you are unable to reach an agreement, this topic by pugman provides a list of the most reputable campaign managers on the forum: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers. |
|
|
|
This is true. I pity crytpo gamblers who still are not aware of this place, they are missing so much. The Gambling section of this forum has evolved to such a degree that today it's the best place on the Web to find the info on which crypto gambling platforms to play, what games to play and how to deal with various issues. And, like in the OP's case, they'd rather pay you fast than get bad reputation here. Sometimes I wish this forum was promoted on the national TV or something. It would make life of millions of crypto gamblers easier.
Yeah. Gambling platforms are constantly growing and we will see new ones every day. Therefore, we should always be aware of what we can expect before placing any online bets and try to do our homework before we begin our gambling journey. There are numerous websites online where we can read casino reviews, but this forum is the best place on the Internet for this type of discussion because it is open to the public, and as such, everyone will be aware of any issues or questions that may be present before beginning to play on any of these platforms. There are thousands of users on this forum, and even the largest crypto casinos do not want to risk their reputation by associating with a name that has a bad reputation. |
|
|
|
Always the abusers doing the same thing over and over again while impacting us the honest users.You can implement the minimum deposit 100.000 Satoshi again and you can implement the condition of not being able to withdraw this money for at least 3 months.This way you would reduce the abuse.Just a suggestion as that was the most successful bonus ever in Freebitco.in
I also can clearly understand that by not making it come back you feel safer and the website is first and foremost,then the users.
I don't think that would be a good idea. It may be okay to introduce minimum deposit amounts (and, of course, minimum withdrawal amounts), but I'm not sure if it would be wise to limit withdrawals to any time frame. There are many users who would not feel comfortable having their funds locked up on any platform and not being able to withdraw them as they see fit. |
|
|
|
I'm one of those people who avoid KYC, except for Roobet because it doesn't require any documents but i make sure i will never make deposit more than $500
the reason is I'm worried that one day they might ask for documents, the whales could have done the same thing so they went to another site, usually the people who avoid KYC are the whales for some reason.
Yeah, similar story here. Since I'm a privacy-conscious person, one of the main reasons I chose to play at crypto casinos was for the anonymity. I really don't want my personal information to be available on every single website I visit. It only takes one rogue employee to leak all of this information to the dark web. We've already seen cases like this in the past. It's a good thing the KYC requirements on Roobet have several levels, so I completed only Level 1, which requires only basic personal information (it's still unnerving to have to provide my full name and address, but I guess we have to accept that). |
|
|
|
|
I still don't understand what the "Big Question" is? Does Hhampuz own a casino or not? Unless there is a scam accusation against the casino or something dishonest took place, this is not something that should concern anyone.
By the way, OP, why use such offensive language?
|
|
|
|
The good news is a lot of the users that are being reported have already been zapped by other staff. So, its just a matter of cleaning up the threads. I'll take a look more in depth on the particularly suspect ones, and see if I can find if they're offering an incentive to post. Though, I do suspect the vast majority are done via the sock puppet method.
Yes, I noticed some of the accounts I reported were nuked. That's good. I'm sure they'll try again with new accounts, but I believe we can make a difference if we join forces. It's great to have you with us, Welsh. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
