The video shows a shut down and reboot button on the app?
I'm not sure what your question is - Windows already lets you reboot and shutdown, there's no magic to that. It's literally just their app sending the command - it's not something special about their PSU. If you could remote power ON the device, then that would be much more interesting, but also much more difficult. In the PDU model, you could configure the system to auto-start on power loss, and you can toggle the power on and off to the outlet (assuming it's a managed PDU). This is radically different than what they're offering - it's literally just an app to allow you to remote reboot or shutdown your machine. You could do that using TeamViewer or any number of other things... Now they've also added monitoring of the PSU state, like voltage levels, fan speed, temps - and those are interesting, but at least in my experience I've never had a fan fail, and if I'm pushing a PSU, I'm not going to use some consumer grade one... So these are of marginal value (at least to my mind). Well if you only have 120 volts it is good. Last year newegg sent me a smart plug. That let me power off and on. Nice item even let me use 240 volts. But it got hot to the touch so I rated it with three stars. My pdus allow off and power on from a pc remotely .
|
|
|
Lets face it we all know about bitmaintech and the warranty issues they have.
@ bitmaintech here is a suggestion offer no warranty option and if a buyer takes it give he a coupon to use on a future miner. If the buy wants the warranty don't give them a coupon.
This way the buyer will not take you up on the warranty problems you have. Since you don't honor them anyway.
I certainly would rather buy an s-9 with no warranty and you give me a 10% coupon on my next s-9. Then no one is in suspense about the warranty.
I would think you see that ETH and ETC are doing pretty well.
Mostly many people like buying from intel amd nvidia samsung western digital
to get mining gear with real warranties.
A very good eth rig costs less then your s-9 ,uses less power ,earns btc faster , runs quieter, has a real warranty.
|
|
|
my sapphire nitro arrived today 4gb 2 fan version it gives me 21.5 mh
I have a two card rig with a reference 8gb 480 and the 4gb sapphire nitro
combined hash rate is 47 mh power at my Kill-o-watt meter is 310 watt this is a hot meter it reads high.
my other meter reads 295 watts
So Phil you thinking about 110 watts ISH for the 470? How are the temps? I just ordered a 8gb 470 Nitro so I am hoping the power figures are comparable to the 370's. I ran it alone and did 152-159 watts on the hot meter entire system so 110 watts and 21-22 mh is a fair guess. I think it is better at mh per watt then the 480's by a little. this came in today and is what I am testing http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202229this comes tomorrow http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202230
|
|
|
I wanted to get into mining some altcoins about a year ago and I really wish I did start mining Etherium. It seems so risky now. After the fork, all the turmoil and everything that has happened...
Maybe mining ETC is still profitable but I feel like unless you can predict another alt-coin that will go up in value, you are probably going to be making just a few dollars a month for a large investment, and the ROI will be a while. (Depends on how much disposable income you have and how long you can wait to get it back I guess.)
Interested in Philipma1957 or someone with a similar setup on how long the ROI for your $1600 is.
well you need to know I earn 850 a month and spend 250 on power. so 600 a month . I have 3 rigs so 4800 . so 8 x 600 = 4800 but all my rigs have 1,2,3,5 year warranties on various parts. and all parts keep resale value far better then an basic does. my earnings are based on 18 cent power thats right and to mine a profit at 18 cent power is hard to do with an basic. My power drops to 9 cents on oct 1st so I go from 250 for power to 125 for power. The key is how long does it last?
|
|
|
my sapphire nitro arrived today 4gb 2 fan version it gives me 21.5 mh
I have a two card rig with a reference 8gb 480 and the 4gb sapphire nitro
combined hash rate is 47 mh power at my Kill-o-watt meter is 310 watt this is a hot meter it reads high.
my other meter reads 295 watts
|
|
|
we are dropping so most likely bitmaintech put in all their new s-9's and are now bundling up their old s-7s' https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1580285.0ant miner s-7's at 320 with a psu. so some low power cost guy will buy some the rest will sit and do nothing. my guess is we end up plus 5% and then go flat next pair of jumps
|
|
|
Caanan's got their new shop up and running...got a note from Jon a bit earlier using their new GUI for ordering, etc. Looks nice, seems to work well. New A6 on the way...hopefully more after that. All sorts of "new" today.
Mine on.
Any further information regarding new hardware that you were privy to that you can't share with us? Not asking for any specifics, just that there is something on the way. Thanks. I'm chomping at the bit to buy something that doesn't have bitmain's name on it! I'd take a guess at next month looking forward to adding something to the solar array.
|
|
|
If sufficient number of bitcoiners start running graphic cards in support of etc-eth (and they/we probably do this kind of thing already judging by some here), what may stop developers to release a "GPU only"-fork for bitcoin? This is basically a sword of Damocles that they have over Chinese miner farms and pools. People will switch their gear from etc-eth to btc if ASICs are ruled out, I think. It probably would be the best, anyway.
I don't think it is possible to prevent ASICs from ever being used to mine. LTC was suppose to be mined by not ASICs however after a while, companies invested in R&D necessary to manufacture ASICs because there would be enough demand because the value of LTC was high enough. I think the same would probably happen if the mining algo were to change for Bitcoin. it would set the asic builders backwards for a long time. If you added a dag file over 4gb it would force you to have 8gb gpus. That would mean costly development for asic builders. Better yet if you made it that 2x 8gb cards in crossfire would be the next change after 1x 8gb gpu card was the first change as soon as the the new asic came out switch to the 2 x 8gb algo so the entire time spent building an asic to mine the 'new' btc would have been wasted. I am pretty much ready for an attack against asic building companies. I have a lot invested in s-9's but frankly if they were rendered useless for btc I switch them over to another 256 coin. I got back a decent amount already from my s-9's BTC has a lot of real problems at this time. I don't like the asic lock on the coin. As I see it harming expansion of BTC. As interesting and appealing as this sounds, changing Bitcoin's proof of work algorithm seems pretty unlikely. That change is far more contentious than the other contemplated changes, like block size expansion. If the PoW were to change, ASIC companies and the miners that have invested in them would resist it. There would be two Bitcoins, like Eth/Etc today. The original SHA256 algorithm would be much more secure because they would have way more hash power. That would only change if an overwhelming number of people adopt the new algorithm. If the new PoW algorithm caught on, then the ASIC manufacturers would move to support it. I don't believe it's possible to create an algorithm that cannot be implemented more efficiently in hardware. If there's enough financial incentive, ASICs designers will find a way. Basically this would be a replay of SHA256 with the only effect of a reset for a few years. But in the end there would still be two Bitcoin chains, end-user confusion, merchant adoption would be hampered, and there would probably be less investment from VC's because the double chain mess would make Bitcoin investment even more risky. Bitcoin's first mover network effect advantage might even be lost to an alt.I don't see this happening at all. There's too much at stake for the current Bitcoin movers and shakers to allow this. Instead there will always be alts, like Eth/Etc, some of which will be profitable enough to draw miners away. I bolded what I believe will happen to BTC due to asic control in the hands of a few companies. If I was a big money guy I would prefer a gpu coin over an asic coin. Unless Amd, Nividia or Intel were selling the asic gear. Plain and simple the fail is not on BTC as much as it is on asic companies. I see a lot of green blood split over this. As in fiat cash. oh look here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1580285.0you think there is a link?
|
|
|
If sufficient number of bitcoiners start running graphic cards in support of etc-eth (and they/we probably do this kind of thing already judging by some here), what may stop developers to release a "GPU only"-fork for bitcoin? This is basically a sword of Damocles that they have over Chinese miner farms and pools. People will switch their gear from etc-eth to btc if ASICs are ruled out, I think. It probably would be the best, anyway.
I don't think it is possible to prevent ASICs from ever being used to mine. LTC was suppose to be mined by not ASICs however after a while, companies invested in R&D necessary to manufacture ASICs because there would be enough demand because the value of LTC was high enough. I think the same would probably happen if the mining algo were to change for Bitcoin. it would set the asic builders backwards for a long time. If you added a dag file over 4gb it would force you to have 8gb gpus. That would mean costly development for asic builders. Better yet if you made it that 2x 8gb cards in crossfire would be the next change after 1x 8gb gpu card was the first change as soon as the the new asic came out switch to the 2 x 8gb algo so the entire time spent building an asic to mine the 'new' btc would have been wasted. I am pretty much ready for an attack against asic building companies. I have a lot invested in s-9's but frankly if they were rendered useless for btc I switch them over to another 256 coin. I got back a decent amount already from my s-9's BTC has a lot of real problems at this time. I don't like the asic lock on the coin. As I see it harming expansion of BTC.
|
|
|
we already ALL GREEN now I "MAY" be color-blind, but the 100-block field is still black to me. Otherwise, various shades of green. Would like to see it ALL LIME GREEN! But to be diplomatic, it IS closer to a green-black than a red-black! we are close to all green. lime green across the board is very rare but we have done it
|
|
|
Don't go for 6 cards for your first farm. Too much trouble, really. With each card consuming in excess of 200W, you'll need a very expensive 1500W PSU adjusted for efficiency. Go for 3 or 4 cards and a high quality 1000W PSU. Those pro miners with 6-card rigs opt usually for two interconnected PSUs.
Some truth to this idea. A new miner should try two cards on that six card rig. Get used to it then a third and fourth. The big six card rigs can drive you crazy with stability rigs. I have five two card rigs and a four card rig. This week I will build a four card rig.
|
|
|
If sufficient number of bitcoiners start running graphic cards in support of etc-eth (and they/we probably do this kind of thing already judging by some here), what may stop developers to release a "GPU only"-fork for bitcoin? This is basically a sword of Damocles that they have over Chinese miner farms and pools. People will switch their gear from etc-eth to btc if ASICs are ruled out, I think. It probably would be the best, anyway.
I have become anti-asic. This idea is pretty good. BTC-GPU Here is my thought plain and simple. Intel AMD Nvidia as my suppliers of gear. Vs Bitmaintech and Avalon 1, 2, 3 year real warranties vs 90 day fuck you warranties. Actual real world use of the gear for shit other then mining. Lastly since the pc is mining how about a bonus if you run a node. Say 0.5% extra for running a node. China needs a good dose of reality about BTC. The current setup is not good for the game. I like the way you think. I have four s-9s. But frankly my pc gpu rigs mining eth and or etc are making more money . They cost lest to build they use less power and they have long warranties
|
|
|
If sufficient number of bitcoiners start running graphic cards in support of etc-eth (and they/we probably do this kind of thing already judging by some here), what may stop developers to release a "GPU only"-fork for bitcoin? This is basically a sword of Damocles that they have over Chinese miner farms and pools. People will switch their gear from etc-eth to btc if ASICs are ruled out, I think. It probably would be the best, anyway.
I have become anti-asic. This idea is pretty good. BTC-GPU Here is my thought plain and simple. Intel AMD Nvidia as my suppliers of gear. Vs Bitmaintech and Avalon 1, 2, 3 year real warranties vs 90 day fuck you warranties. Actual real world use of the gear for shit other then mining. Lastly since the pc is mining how about a bonus if you run a node. Say 0.5% extra for running a node. China needs a good dose of reality about BTC. The current setup is not good for the game.
|
|
|
I wonder if the spike in estimated difficulty has anything to do with the recent meeting between the Blockstream core devs and the chinese mining pools. At first glance (and if memory serves me correctly), it looks like the Chinese pools are possibly loosing market share compared to what they had very recently.
I believe that there were reports that the blockstream core devs were threatening to quit if the Chinese pools were to start supporting a HF that involves increasing the maximum block size -- or something along those lines (I am unsure as to the reliability of these reports though).
I wonder if the blockstream core devs are possibly running some of their mining equipment (possibly at a loss) on non-chinese pools (and solo mining) in an effort to show the Chinese pools "who is boss". If this is true, then I wonder how long this can, or will last.
Not sure but I don't think this jump makes economic sense. I have been complaining about btc transaction limit . We do an average of 300,000 a day with a max of just under 700,000 possible with perfect numbers. So to have liquid btc we use exchanges. And we just had Bitfinex 'lose' 60 million in btc . Btc with a no fork rule won't lock those coins via fork. So they stay lost. Btc won't make more room via fork for more transactions so we need to use exchanges . Exchanges get hacked and btc does not protect against the theft. Eth-eth had a hack or exploit boom crushed it via fork. Btc is sucking its own cock feels good but leads to nothing. I see a big move to etc-eth I buy all real company gear with real warranties . Sold by real sellers like Amazon or newegg. And if there is an exploit the developers make moves to save the day. So if you have solid money to invest seven figures eth-etc looks viable. Now if btc makes a block size adjustment that allows a lot more transactions per day then maybe it does okay. If not we are good to see a snap crackle pop happen
|
|
|
My bitfinex account was reduced in ETC and in ETH What does it mean? So far I don't know but if I ever get into it instead of looking at it I will pull the ETH.
Leave the ETC and the BFX
This is why I hold everything on a Trezor. I only use exchanges as briefly as possible to buy and sell coin. can you easily pay from that Trezor thingie? The description is kind of open to interpretation and/or opaque. I also looked at Ledger Nano S. Anybody uses that one? I have 4 hdds clones with the same bt core wallet all off line set to boot any of my mac minis. just hook up one on any of the minis boot wait for synch and you are set. so keeping larger coin amounts safe is not a problem. but I always float 1-3 coins on line between four or five spots.
|
|
|
mine just runs
mmpool.org
Rank Id DGM Estimate PPS Shares Rate (MHash/s) 1 0dfd19ac 5.30968299 0.47333532 48,188,418,755 0 2 c03a6b93 2.99337209 0.31473990 33,354,961,214 0 3 540f7f8c 2.98924310 0.19911573 26,170,348,147 0
4 c932f3ed 1.68813834 0.14595275 16,179,046,452 2,064,639 this is mine
5 dad84f7a 0.77519573 0.08385544 8,971,649,617 3,473,198
|
|
|
My bitfinex account was reduced in ETC and in ETH What does it mean? So far I don't know but if I ever get into it instead of looking at it I will pull the ETH.
Leave the ETC and the BFX
I don't have any direct experience because I didn't use Bitfinex. But according to posts on Reddit it sounds like they're giving everyone a haircut in order to avoid bankruptcy. I think I read that they're taking 36% of all user accounts, even those that were completely unaffected. It's really quite a mess. Their customers are paying the price for poor security choices, but that's better than forcing them into bankruptcy and waiting 5 years to get even less back. This is why I hold everything on a Trezor. I only use exchanges as briefly as possible to buy and sell coin. I don't usually have more then .5 coin say 300 usd on any exchange but I was over limit and got burned. Have to see what the burn is. all is 700 ⅓ is about 233 . I think they have me at 239 usd loss. If I only lose 239 I can start prizes back next jump at 25 usd and by christmas my loss will be made up. If I loss it all (700) I will stop prizes for a few more jumps Say 6 in all that is 300 bucks then go to 25 a jump for 16 and by late spring the loss will be made up.
|
|
|
i need 6 of these, how many you have for sale?
sold them.
|
|
|
My bitfinex account was reduced in ETC and in ETH What does it mean? So far I don't know but if I ever get into it instead of looking at it I will pull the ETH. Leave the ETC and the BFX
|
|
|
|