Right now, one of the biggest studies for extending life, is to lengthen telomeres system-wide. If this could be done in a person's whole body at the same time, life could be extended indefinitely. Later on, new findings could be applied to make things work even better.

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

It might be happening slowly, but people are starting to wake up and use their rights. The Brunson lawsuit is showing them how.



EDIT: Let me mention. A lawsuit is one lawsuit. If you have 388 people named in your lawsuit, and it is found that only one of them was not guilty but the rest of them were guilty, the whole suit can be thrown out based on its failure regarding that one innocent person. The suit is one.

In other words, this suit should be brought by many people against one of the 388 at a time.

Again, the point you bring up is only a surface point. It is certainly a notable point, but it isn't the most important point. The important point has to do with which traditional belief, and if it ultimately gives eternal life. If it doesn't provide eternal life, it isn't the best.

In Axum, in Ethiopia (Africa), there is a 'church' that houses what they believe to be the sacred Ark of the Covenant from Ancient Israel. If this is the traditional religion you are speaking about, you are in the right direction, sort of.


Other traditions say that this was only a copy, made by Solomon, to keep the real one from falling into the hands of kingdoms that were fighting against Israel.

Whatever traditional religions are in Africa, Judaism (which became Christianity for some people) has been African religion for over 3,000 years (Formal Judaism started with Moses in Egypt.), and is the oldest religion of any significant size in Africa... considering that the Christian religion bases itself on Judaism.

Good point. However, the machinery of the universe works for both, the good and the bad.

The American white tail deer lives 10 years to 20 (20 in captivity sometimes). The point is that people can use wisdom and science to extend their lives on average.

Probably there are some plants in the jungles of South America that, if they were consumed, would extend life by many years. Grocery stores, and farmers' fields only have a limited variety of plants. And many of them are not used to their full capacity for extending life.

But what can one expect when the leading members of the medical - the people with the money - are always looking for ways to keep us sick so they can make money off us?

If some phytonutrients of some plants could keep me bouncy and fresh as a 26-y-o, I would probably want to keep on living. Maybe some billionaires are working on this right now.

Looks like SCOTUS shot down the Brunson lawsuit - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf - by formally agreeing to not litigate it. It's not over, and there is a good side to what SCOTUS did.

First, take a look at the Brunson's personal announcement of what happened and what they are going to do - http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html.

Next, look at the gift that SCOTUS gave to the people. Now the people can download the Brunson lawsuit (https://7discoveries.com/), and design their own lawsuit in the same way, thanks to the gift of SCOTUS. See below...


U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously You May Sue Government Agents for Damages When They Violate Your Individual Rights

---

https://ij.org/press-release/u-s-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-you-may-sue-government-agents-for-damages-when-they-violate-your-individual-rights/
In a unanimous opinion issued today by the U.S. Supreme Court, and authored by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court ruled in Tanzin v. Tanvir that individuals may seek damages as a remedy when federal officers violate their rights. The opinion closely tracks an amicus brief submitted by the Institute for Justice.

The case involved FBI agents who retaliated against Muslim-Americans and green-card holders who followed the dictates of their faith and refused to cooperate with the FBI by spying on their own communities. As a result of their refusal to cooperate, these individuals were placed on the No Fly List, which caused significant hardship, such as the inability to travel to visit family or for work. Luckily, Congress provided a statutory authorization to sue for violations of religious rights, allowing a plaintiff to receive "appropriate relief against the government."

Not surprisingly, in the lawsuit against the FBI agents, the government argued that the words "appropriate relief" do not include damages. According to the government, damages might be an appropriate remedy against private actors, but damages should not be allowed if the person who violated your rights happens to work for the government.

The Institute for Justice filed an amicus brief arguing against this radical notion. IJ's brief outlined how suits for damages against government officials are the historical cornerstone of government accountability, how damages are often the only way to vindicate constitutional rights, and how none of the government's policy justifications against damages have a basis in reality. IJ further explained that matters of policy should be left to Congress, not courts.
...

Of course, if he is smart, he will find a way to stay alive for hundreds of years. He won't tell anyone, but will simply fade out of public life, making it look like he died somewhere along the line.

Okay, I'll say it a different way. If everybody had guns in the public, how long would a mass shooter last? Not long. And there wouldn't be many mass shooters, because to be a successful mass shooter, one needs to find a place where he will last long enough to do his mass shooting. Most will chicken out before attempting the job... if they know that they will be shot down almost immediately. Whatever principle in their life dictates to them that they have to go on a killing spree, would also show them that they wouldn't be successful. But they want success, in this thing if nothing else.

So, what would they do? Some of them would still try, if they had a personal death wish along with it. Others would just commit suicide. And it's a shame that there are people who have mental problems like that. But they would be gone, and society would be better without them.

Without guns, there wouldn't be freedom. Why? Because government still has guns. And government would figure out ways and reasons to take freedom away from the people. How do we know? Look what the Taliban has done to their country. And in the US, look at the many laws the politicians make, designed to take away gun freedom, even though foundational US law is that we can have guns (2nd Amendment). They want to enslave us.

In the US, look at how far it has gone already with government. People think that their President is a dictator - almost a king. If he says they should get a Covid vaxx that will destroy their lives, they do it just to obey him... rather than checking the data to see if it is correct. It's a good thing that a bunch of people recognize the benefits of keeping guns.

When you get into the definitions of 'religion', you will find that 'religion' also means 'personal religion'... the things a person believes that are different than those of anyone else. So, your religion of atheism is acceptable as a religion, even if its doctrines aren't expressed clearly and concisely anywhere. But if they are, it is even a stronger religion.

One of the strongest points for recognizing that there might be truth to eternal life is, recognizing that all people are religious beings, and have a religion going for themselves no matter what they believe.

Some of the luckiest Africans are those who were brought up from childhood in the true religion that really does give eternal life in Heaven for following it. Why are they lucky? Because it's easy to teach a child, indoctrinating him into whatever religion. Since the religion meant here is the true religion that truly gives eternal life, that's why they are lucky.

Of course this doesn't mean that they CAN'T be tempted to some other religion, one that is only beneficial for this life. But at least they have a head start with childhood training in the eternal-life religion. Why? They last forever with that religion, even if they have to die here for a while.

Just because the religion of someone else says that such eternal-life religion is false, that doesn't necessarily make it false. After all, when the things of a particular religion are proven to be real, the religion starts to come out of the designation of religion, and into the laws of nature and physics, or simple living.

Much of what you say is based on your own wishes rather than scientific experimentation. That being said, since it's very difficult to scrutinize the unscrutable, there isn't very much factual info, yet... except for the very fact of personal identity.

And it will probably work for Russia, as well... especially now that Congress won't be voting any more money for Ukraine, and maybe will repeal the latest money they voted for her.

Well, actually, it's the other way completely. There shouldn't be any secret documents. Everything should be visible to any and all of the people who want to know. If it worked this way, governments couldn't do things like Covid warfare against the people, and whatever else they were doing conquer and disrupt freedom.

Once the people found the details out, they would legislate the conquering minds out of government.

However, the people can be pretty stupid. In America, people pay off their bank loans twice. And when they are shown this by all the banking pamphlets, and all the money websites, they still don't believe it, but keep on paying off their loans twice.

Won't work. Requirements for everlasting life are too complex. After all, science has barely begun to accept the idea that there is a soul and spirit. Even if the physical body has been kept alive forever, will the connection between it and the soul/spirit always remain, as well? We are far from understanding things like this, and they may not even be something we can understand.

Besides, when the connections are weakened, there are evil spirits that want to get in and take over both body and soul, right?

^^^ Note that all setbacks or advancements in Africa are personal as well as being societal.

Everybody dies, both the religious and the non-religious.

Without religion, personal setbacks are great. Why? because there is no hope of eternal life in Heaven. Without religion, there can only be eternal life in Hell... though many people without religion don't realize this.

With the right religion there will be life in Heaven after death (after the Resurrection). So, there is at least advancement rather than setback for some.

Advancement for Africans in this life, with no religion at all, means setback for eternal life for all Africans. Keep the religions, because some will be saved that way.

Heard of guerrilla warfare? Consider the IRA or the Taliban (who seem to have won, btw.). Guns in the hands of the people. If ALL the people had carried guns, the IRA would have won, and the Taliban wouldn't have.

Gun freedom in one major country of the world is something that sets the whole world in a certain mindset. Whatever country you are from, there will be a lot of people who understand the idea of gun self-protection. And it is this freedom ideal that government leaders realize exists among their people, and so they act with restraint. That is the second major reason why countries with no gun freedom have real freedom.
The major reason, of course, is that government people can't get rich off their people if the people are always living in fear. Fearful people don't work with enthusiasm. So, government plays the game of making them think they are free, while enslaving them as much as they can for the wealth they will produce that can be taxed.

Gun freedom in one major country produces the world mindset of freedom. It's why the US is the major country in the world, and Britain is second. Not that Britain has gun freedom now. But that when they did, they became powerful, even though their strength is wearing off.

America's gun problem doesn't come from people having guns. It comes from cowardly Americans not exercising their gun rights.



Think of it the other way. If everybody were required to carry at least a .38 in public (except the kids, of course), all the people would respect each other, because nobody wants a gun battle. Everybody would know that if he started a gun battle - or a shooting spree - he would be dead. Gun problems would evaporate because problem makers would be dead. People would be awake.

 

Two Biden batches found so far.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11619777/Biden-dodges-questions-classified-files-second-day-row.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/second-batch-of-classified-biden-documents-discovered-during-extensive-search/ar-AA16exx5?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=fdc02e86f4f84340b7588cfb56effd06

Time to start searching for more Trump batches and for Obama batches. I bet the Obama shredders are running red hot at over 115% capacity.

Question: Who gives them their power?     

Russia is big. The only thing they are short on is people. They could make anything happen if they had more people. They don't need other countries to supply them with anything. Siberia (part of Russia) has enough resources to support a far larger Russian population, and to make war materials or anything else for Russia.

The thing that converts raw materials into products are people with knowledge of how to do it. This is the only thing stopping Russia... not enough people to do it.

The American people need to wake up and change their banking system and government... before their government does the same things to them as it did to Ukraine.

But how do you defend against the military and the police without a gun? And especially when you meet a rogue or vicious cop?

Musk is using twitter to show us much of the bad, hidden stuff that government has been doing over the last two years. If gun freedom in the US were gone, government would run right over us all, and convert the whole world into outright slavery.

More gun freedom is what keeps us free. In addition, you can find all kinds of times when a good gunner shoots a bad shooter who is on a killing spree, because he illegally obtained a gun.


Is this the answer?
Make robots that can do everything for us that we need done.
Then put all the people of the world into strait jackets.
The robots can feed us, bathe us, wipe our butts, and do everything we need for us.
But we can't hurt anybody or anything... total green earth without our interference.



EDIT: Btw, does the guy who controls the robots have special guns to shoot rogue robots?