Surely there has to be a workaround. I mean the memory/swap doesn't even seem to be allocated let alone used, not even for a second.
Something like initializing the cards one after the other instead of all at the same time or something? Or giving the cards different jobs instead of working together on one big job? I have no idea but I'm sure there's a way.

This is both silly and borderline delusional.
The coin only have 31 BTC volume even now that it's getting pumped.
54% price increase at the time of writing. Why would anyone other than gamblers want to hold their savings in such a volatile form?

It doesn't even have a block explorer to take a look at the distribution.

ICO POS magic internet money with imaginary value.

Solitaire is serious business




Cloud computing services adapted a long time ago and they monitor everything. If you stress the CPU or GPU(s) or network bandwidth too much to their liking they will cut you off.
Unless of course that's exactly what you pay for but that is pretty much the equivalent of burning money unless you're name is David Andersen.

Entertaining the idea, I don't see your point. If we disregard the obviously super high hashrate per initial card price and the terribly inefficient looking cooling I'm sure there would be a sweet spot (guessing 3 cards per rig or 6 GPUs).
One of these imaginary rigs would do as much as 4 full 750 Ti rigs if we scale the numbers off the Titan X and the density would surely be welcomed by most miners so I don't see any logistics of space issue. On the contrary, less space, less fans and probably less noise, less components so in overall less points of failure.

Yeah, that's more of a joke from 3 months ago (April's fools).

You can't expect to print money without investing.

This was just my opinion and I didn't say they should be taken off at all. I'm just genuinely curious why these have this high trade volume. Foerster since gave a few reasons though.

Currently there are 10 BTC worth of coins are being mined every day. Compare that to the daily volume and it's safe to say the mined amount is nothing and the market can easily absorb it.



I agree, I just don't see why Doge has this much volume.

I see but I think that if BTC would flop for some reason then so would LTC/DOGE. I just don't think there's anything that LTC/DOGE does better than BTC.

I honestly think both LTC and DOGE are way overstaying their welcome as I really can't see any reason whatsoever that would warrant their current price. I'm curious though, why people think otherwise.

I honestly think both LTC and DOGE are way overstaying their welcome as I really can't see any reason whatsoever that would warrant their current price. I'm curious though, why people think otherwise.

Yobit is officialy dead to me. Just because they deny to serve one side of the market doesn't mean it's healthy, in fact as said above this is pretty much a braindead form of ponzi.

Oh gee, I wonder why comments are being deleted.

For scrypt based coins ccminer is set to only use 88% of the maximum video RAM in case of Windows and 98% in case of Linux by default:


It is there for safety so it won't crash for people who wish to mine on their main card.
One of the changes I always do before compiling is to change that value to 1 for Windows to allow it to use 99% of memory and if you don't have a monitor attached to your card and not running something that is using VRAM needlessly, it won't crash. Not even while autotuning.


I used that since cudaminer days so I have no idea about the hashrate difference anymore.


Now that we're entering the territory of cards with 3GB+ video memory it's worth noting that 32-bit ccminer can't utilize more than 3GB.
64-bit can utilize it all but 64-bit is also noticeably slower so for cards like the 970 it doesn't worth it but for the 980 Ti it might - for algos that scale with memory amount (not access) like Scrypt-Jane.
Afaik, 32-bit softwares can actually utilize more than 3GB video memory but only if the data is also stored in the system RAM which is generally not optimal for mining.

Edit: 200 pages! Congrats and keep up the good work sp_ (sent a few beers your way).

That's a non-Ti.

This is a Ti which have 6GB memory: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5472#ov

It can't cost that much to create fake volume with a pegged coin.

Do you want to get malware and get your wallets stolen? Because that's how you get malware and get your wallets stolen.

If you're not running wallets in a limited Sandboxie, a virtual amchine or on a throwaway OS then it's just a matter of time when you get your wallets (and maybe even your browser's saved login/passwords for exchanges) stolen.

I also dislike bittrex keeping delisted coins (the very least they should send them back to the address they were deposited from) but I also don't think this poll has any merit. Good luck though.