I can do only criticism And can donate some coins ITS OK I DONT MIND. YOU ARE THE ONES I WANT TO MAKE HAPPY, SO I WILL WORK ON WHAT YOU THINK IS IMPORTANTare you gone already? If he's not back in a week, I'm taking this over. We were just talking about this in #Negativity on IRC earlier today, actually if im not mistaken he already did use your code That's why I'm willing to do this; I can work with it without needing to swap to a codebase I am comfortable with
|
|
|
I offered my solution to the council who voted to find someone to replace me, then didn't
Ask any of them, I offered to swap it to a secure chain prior to my departure and was turned down
Also, I don't care what you guys say in here, or what you think of me in general, we've already proven most of it bullshit, in this same thread but most of you are just trolls who ignore facts so what is the point of talking to the downies
I've been here before. In 6 months you will be gone and I'll still be here just like the last 10 waves of worthless trolls
|
|
|
Hmm already deleting posts that aren't even FUD. This thread is going places!
|
|
|
This thread is 99% provable lies, starting from the first post. If you believe any of it, you are an idiot
|
|
|
I can do only criticism And can donate some coins ITS OK I DONT MIND. YOU ARE THE ONES I WANT TO MAKE HAPPY, SO I WILL WORK ON WHAT YOU THINK IS IMPORTANTare you gone already? If he's not back in a week, I'm taking this over. We were just talking about this in #Negativity on IRC earlier today, actually
|
|
|
Please make sure you are on Version 5.2
We are now forked to Version 5.2
|
|
|
Under an hour now until the fork kicks in
Please make sure you are on Version 5.2
|
|
|
Told everyone it was coming down, shouldn't be much of a shock
|
|
|
Now less than 5000 blocks until 5.2 kicks in. Please update immediately
I've already done it but what happens at 5.2 and ppl dont and continue to do so ? They continue on a 5.0 fork with others who did not update I guess what I should ask will anything after 225 block essentially be invalidated on 5.0 and before even if they end up switching at say like 250 or w/e. If they stake on 5.0 until block 250,000, everything between 225k and 250k will be orphaned when updated
|
|
|
Now less than 5000 blocks until 5.2 kicks in. Please update immediately
I've already done it but what happens at 5.2 and ppl dont and continue to do so ? They continue on a 5.0 fork with others who did not update
|
|
|
Alright got it up now, thanks for the Mac wallet! Negativity is infectious Current Version: 5.2.x.x
I am aware the logo looks like shit in the Qt. This will be changed in the next non-mandatory update that will add a few RPC calls shortly. Rather than use a newer code base like BUCKS did, I'm going to start updating the one we have with most of the new stuff. Masternodes are definitely not on my list For all future updates, we will use the following format for version numbers: 5.x.y.z 5 will be major changes to coin specs (mandatory)x will be any hard forks that are required (mandatory)y will be used for any wallet quality-of-life features (optional)z will be used mostly for those running services or exchanges that require extra calls or features (optional)Therefore, as long as you are on version 5.2.0.0, you will be compatible all the way up to 5.2.9.9 Now less than 5000 blocks until 5.2 kicks in. Please update immediately
|
|
|
going to be interesting to see how rare they are to find
I imagine they will be quite rare. Hard to say with the blazingly fast blocks, though, since we will be checking a TON of numbers
|
|
|
Ignore the white knights on both sides. Objectively, nothing about XT, or the temper tantrum launch, is good. It's a display of pure ignorance
|
|
|
Negativity, due to speed of blocks. They will never get full
|
|
|
Alright got it up now, thanks for the Mac wallet! Negativity is infectious Current Version: 5.2.x.x
I am aware the logo looks like shit in the Qt. This will be changed in the next non-mandatory update that will add a few RPC calls shortly. Rather than use a newer code base like BUCKS did, I'm going to start updating the one we have with most of the new stuff. Masternodes are definitely not on my list For all future updates, we will use the following format for version numbers: 5.x.y.z 5 will be major changes to coin specs (mandatory)x will be any hard forks that are required (mandatory)y will be used for any wallet quality-of-life features (optional)z will be used mostly for those running services or exchanges that require extra calls or features (optional)Therefore, as long as you are on version 5.2.0.0, you will be compatible all the way up to 5.2.9.9 Just over 10,000 blocks until the reward drops and we get to the new Prime formula. You'll be able to track your attempts in debug.log
|
|
|
Alright got it up now, thanks for the Mac wallet! Negativity is infectious Current Version: 5.2.x.x
I am aware the logo looks like shit in the Qt. This will be changed in the next non-mandatory update that will add a few RPC calls shortly. Rather than use a newer code base like BUCKS did, I'm going to start updating the one we have with most of the new stuff. Masternodes are definitely not on my list For all future updates, we will use the following format for version numbers: 5.x.y.z 5 will be major changes to coin specs (mandatory)x will be any hard forks that are required (mandatory)y will be used for any wallet quality-of-life features (optional)z will be used mostly for those running services or exchanges that require extra calls or features (optional)Therefore, as long as you are on version 5.2.0.0, you will be compatible all the way up to 5.2.9.9
|
|
|
There is definitely no truce
|
|
|
This is really fucked up. Basically a 'feature' like this is the anti-ethos to what Bitcoin was created for, just like increasing the blocksize squeezes out the users it was made to help most
Just when I thought my respect for these two couldn't get any lower..
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but its on the way for core too... You have privacy issues but dont care about being vulnerable to DDos? set -listen=0 set -disableipprio=0 Problem solved. Now, nobody will know where you are relaying from. +void InitIPGroups(CScheduler *scheduler) { + // If scheduler is NULL then we're in unit tests. + if (scheduler) { + // Don't use in regtest mode to avoid excessive and useless HTTP requests, don't use if the user disabled. + if (GetBoolArg("-disableipprio", false) || Params().NetworkIDString() == "regtest" || !fListen) + return; + // If we have a proxy, then we are most likely not reachable from the internet, so don't use. + proxyType dummy; + if (GetProxy(NET_IPV4, dummy) || GetProxy(NET_IPV6, dummy) || GetProxy(NET_TOR, dummy)) + return; + } No, I personally do not care. My name and face are everywhere on Twitter and in altcoins The potential loss of privacy, while a fairly big one, is not the main issue
|
|
|
What happened to gorillabucks ? is it still alive??
Butthurt "vigilantes" used their hacking skills to kill it. Hopefully, these vigilantes won't use their knowledge to unleash their yoke on other coins with the same vulnerabilities. <sigh> The things done to BUCKS aren't even the worst that are possible on those chains. After reviewing the entire codebase to fix this issue, there were many other things found to be vulnerable. Anything cloned from the same base is going to get fucked, really hard, sooner or later when more people see the same thing so literally BUCKS would only be worth saving if it was swapped to another basecode/blockchain? lol would it be possible to cut out all coins created by the exploiting wallets ? or did they dump shit loads into the markets ? (were doing so would hurt people who paid btc for it) I did really like BUCKS staking, I'm not a fan of masternodes but the random staking returns were awesome... sometimes 1 and sometimes 10 lol and everything inbetween. on a codebase like NEG's that uses time in it's equation for weight (so even smaller wallets can eventually compete and find blocks) Thanks for the 5.2 update hehe and waiting till block 225k BUCKS actually copied its staking system from Variance, which used the same base as NEG, so that is very easy to bring back so far I like NEG Ha and will like it even more when I find my first prime You'll have your chance in about 25k blocks ;p
|
|
|
|