unless you use windows -> https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Release%20Notes

I - probably same as you - have a hard time to think about a reason. Maybe you charge for something that could potentially be paid in bitcoin, e.g. credits for printing or other campus services. That however could easily be done with bitpay or something like that without the need to run a full node. It would also be difficult to get such a project rolling, because of the potential changes required to existing systems.

I still think it would be better to approach student/professor projects that can run servers, be that for research or other reasons. The economics department might also be someone to contact, now that every second bank is talking about "blockchain tech".

Edit:

...or maybe you can rent/buy rack space/a VPS in the university datacenter. Depending on the price you might need to group buy it among interested colleagues. If you need to get hardware, a used server should easily handle running a full node.

changed, thanks -> http://pastebin.com/rBjJdDn8

I was asked to state my opinion on this, the below is just that.

I agree with getpay that there was no rule change. In the OP its state that escrow is accepted, not who pays the fees for it. IMHO its thus up for negotiation, which should happen before the bid or not invalidate the bid. If its so important for Dorrittulx they could have asked for a clearification or made their position clear with the bid. I rather suspect they never had the intent to buy or got cold feed and waste everyones time here. Typical escrow fees would be 1%, if thats your margin on your first bid, dont bid at all.

I also think threaten to leave negative feedback is uncalled for. Yes, retracting a bid on these grouds smells fishy, but I personally would rather exclude someone from the thread than keep wasting my time with them. Its obvious that Dorrittulx does not want to deal with getpay. To leave a negative rating is perfectly fine IMHO, because they didnt honor their bid.

Whether or not the license allows reselling it with a finished product I cant tell. The little text available under above link clearly states "Use, by you or one client," the buyer here can easily be seen as the client which would make it a valid license. I would suggest you (as in those who care and have an interest to buy) contact the person that issued the license when in doubt instead of fighting about it here. Preferably in a verifiable way.

The one was in security (for investors) while the other one was in gambling (for the gamers) before the move to the alt section.

#Full nodes matter, because they decide which transaction reach the miners and which not, they are also the interfaces to the network for light wallets. You cant have only 10 full nodes for the miners and call it bitcoin.

I this case I think you should be prepared to answer the question "why?".

Having a referal link as part of your signature is allowed, creating a post just to refer to the signature is considered ref spam.

The thread is removed with the confirmation, thus the post is as well and as such its not a valid method to gain activity / posts. Assuming there is a confirmation (obviously).

Write thesis/paper about the blockchain that requires you to get blockchain data, get a prof. to sign that you need a server for this, install core.

AFAIK paying for referals is fine. At least it was in early 2014, might be a bit more strict now.

They asked where the signature comes from a few posts ago on the previous page. As there are only pictures one might get the conclusion that you have to copy the signature from somewhere instead of generating it with a click.

For electrum the signature will show up as soon as hit the OK button on the password entering window. Its marked as blue in the picture[1] in the OP.

Similarly for multibit classic the signature shows up after you hit "sign message" and is marked as blue here[2].

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0#post_electrum198
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0#post_multibit0518

which wallet software/service do you use?

84+365*2 = 814, so it might take even longer.


A high rank does not make you honorable, but it gives you a fancy 5. coin.

You might want to provide some kind of signed message or other information that make this more than a mere claim. None of the accounts have a negative rating though, so even if you dont, it might not matter to you.

Your faith is beyond me. Maybe its the only way to understand this, ponzi schemes are a religious movement.

-> http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/CCREAD/etscc/kant.html

Waaay offtopic now. Robertt use(s/d) the new beta (or alpha?) wallet from blockchain.info which is apparently broken (who would have guessed that bc.i does something broken?). The way I understand the issue they are completely locked out of their wallet now.

Correct, signing and verification happen locally and no blockchain data is needed.

How did you create the wallet? As "watch only" says, you can only watch, not spend. That does not just happen, you have to explicitly create a watch only address with either address(es) or a master public key. Both addresses and master public keys however have a private part they are generated from. If you can remember where you got the public part from you might remember where the private part is gone to.